BizExpress

Share subscription agreement explainer: every clause in plain English (2026)

A share subscription agreement (SSA) is the contract in which an investor agrees to buy new shares from a company at an agreed price and on agreed conditions: it is the document that moves the money. This page walks through a fully drafted Series A SSA for Saffron Labs Private Limited, 26 clauses in plain English, and the disclosure letter that shields the founders from the warranties, 12 clauses more. It then explains 56 terms, tracks 14 conditions precedent in a who-does-what table, and gives you two calculators: one for the filing deadlines that start the day the money lands, and one that shows what an indemnity claim is worth once the de minimis, the basket and the caps apply. Written by the BizExpress team, who handle these filings for founders, so the Section 42, PAS-3, stamp duty and tax layer that most explainers skip is here too.

Free, no sign-upWorks in your browserLaw as at 4 November 2026

In short

What it is

A share subscription agreement is the contract under which an investor buys new shares from a company. In Saffron's Series A, Marigold agrees to pay ₹20 crore and Saffron Labs agrees to issue 2,00,000 Series A CCPS at ₹1,000 each, with the conditions, warranties and indemnities that go with the price. The shareholders' agreement, signed at Closing, governs life afterwards. The SSA governs the purchase itself, and it is where most of the money-related risk sits.

When it binds

Fully binding from signature on 30 October 2026. From that day neither side can walk away unless the agreement gives a reason. The money moves only at Closing, 27 November 2026, once every condition precedent in Schedule 1 is satisfied or waived. If that has not happened by the long-stop date of 31 January 2027, either side may terminate; only confidentiality, costs, disputes and the boilerplate survive, plus any rights already accrued.

The three parts that matter most

First, the conditions precedent and the long-stop date, which decide whether and when the money arrives. Second, the warranties schedule read with the disclosure letter, which decide what the founders are promising and what they have already confessed. Third, the indemnity limits: de minimis ₹5 lakh, tipping basket ₹25 lakh, a cap equal to the money actually paid (₹20 crore once both tranches are in), and a founder cap of the lower of half that amount and the value of their shares.

What is normal at Series A

A long-stop of 60 to 120 days from signing. Fourteen to twenty-two warranty heads with a 24-month survival, 7 years for tax. A de minimis of 0.1 to 0.5 percent of the round, a basket of 1 to 2 percent, a cap of 50 to 100 percent of the money. Investor costs reimbursed up to ₹15 lakh to ₹30 lakh. Tranches are the exception rather than the rule, and where they exist a near-miss band of 10 to 20 percent below the milestone is common.

What to push back on

An open-ended condition that diligence be 'satisfactory to the Investor', which turns a binding agreement into an option. Set-off of unproven claims against the second tranche. Joint and several founder indemnity without an individual cap. Specific indemnities with no cap and no end date. A break fee, or full reimbursement of the Investor's costs if the deal fails for any reason at all.

What happens after signing

Three to five weeks of chasing conditions, then the money lands in a separate bank account, the board allots within 60 days (here on 27 November 2026), PAS-3 goes to the Registrar within 15 days, DIR-12 for the Investor Director within 30 days, demat credit within 2 months, and the ₹14 crore can be spent only once PAS-3 is filed. The second tranche of ₹6 crore follows the auditors' certificate that ARR has reached ₹6 crore.

Before the clauses

Four things that make the rest of the document easier to read.

The SSA is the purchase, the SHA is the rulebook

Think of two documents signed four weeks apart. The SSA, signed on 30 October 2026, is a sale contract for new shares: price, tranches, conditions, warranties, indemnity. The SHA, signed at Closing on 27 November 2026, is the constitution for the years after: board seats, reserved matters, transfer restrictions, exits. Investors sometimes ask for both in one combined document, an SSHA. Keeping them separate lets the SSA fall quiet once the claims period ends while the SHA lives on, and it keeps the warranties out of a document every future shareholder has to sign.

Signing and Closing are different days

In a sign-then-close deal you sign first, then spend three to six weeks satisfying conditions: resolutions, valuation report, insurance, employment agreements. Only then does the money move and the board allot the shares. Smaller rounds, especially angel rounds, often sign and close on the same day, which removes the conditions machinery but means everything must be ready before anyone signs. Saffron signs on 30 October 2026 and closes on 27 November 2026, with 31 January 2027 as the long-stop if something slips.

Warranties are the price of the money; the disclosure letter is how you pay less

Marigold is buying shares in a company it cannot fully see, so the Company and the founders make statements of fact it can rely on. If a statement is wrong, the indemnity pays. The disclosure letter lists everything that would otherwise be a breach: the short TDS deduction, the trademark objection, the two consultants who look like employees. A matter fairly disclosed cannot be claimed. The more awkward the item, the more it belongs in the letter, because the letter is the only place where saying it protects you.

The money cannot be spent until the allotment and PAS-3 are done

Section 42 of the Companies Act 2013 requires the ₹14 crore to sit in a separate bank account until the board allots the shares, within 60 days of receipt, and the return of allotment in Form PAS-3 is filed within 15 days of allotment. Spend the money before allotment and PAS-3 and the company, its promoters and its directors risk a penalty under Section 42(10) of up to the amount raised or ₹2 crore, whichever is lower, with a refund order; Registrars have used Section 42(10) for exactly this breach, and for a startup or small company Section 446B halves the penalty, with a maximum of ₹2 lakh for the company and ₹1 lakh for each officer in default. Plan payroll and vendor payments around the PAS-3 date, not the Closing date. BizExpress handles this for clients as a package: the PAS-4 offer letter, the PAS-5 record, the board papers, the PAS-3 filing and the demat credit.

SSA, SSHA, share purchase agreement, disclosure letter and deed of adherence, side by side

Five documents that get confused with each other. The SSA issues new shares for new money. A share purchase agreement moves existing shares between a seller and a buyer. The other three are companions: a combined SSHA, the disclosure letter that qualifies the warranties, and the deed of adherence a new shareholder signs to join the SHA.

SSASSHA (combined SSA and SHA)Share purchase agreement (secondary)Disclosure letterDeed of adherence
What it isA contract to issue new shares for new money, with the conditions, warranties and indemnity that go with the priceOne document that both issues the shares and sets the rules among shareholders afterwardsA contract to buy existing shares from a shareholder; no new money reaches the companyA letter from the company and the founders listing the exceptions to the warrantiesA short deed by which a new shareholder agrees to be bound by the existing SHA
Who signsCompany, Promoters and the InvestorCompany, Promoters, the Investor and every existing shareholderSeller and buyer, usually with the company as a confirming partyCompany and Promoters, addressed to the Investor, who countersigns to acknowledge receiptThe new shareholder and the company, with the other parties by counter-signature or deemed consent
When it bindsOn signature; the money moves at Closing once the conditions precedent are satisfiedOn signature; the shareholder terms usually take effect only from ClosingOn signature; the shares and the price move at completionWhen the SSA is signed; a supplementary letter updates it at ClosingOn signature, from the date the shares are acquired
What it coversPrice, tranches, conditions precedent, pre-closing conduct, warranties, indemnity, closing mechanicsEverything in an SSA plus board, reserved matters, information rights, transfers and exitsPrice adjustments, escrow or earn-out, seller warranties, non-compete on the sale of goodwillGeneral disclosures, specific disclosures by warranty number, the data room and the knowledge standardAccession only; no new commercial terms
Filed anywhereNo. Only the special resolutions (MGT-14), the return of allotment (PAS-3) and the Articles reach the RegistrarNo, but the Articles that mirror it are filed with Form MGT-14No. Form SH-4 and stamp duty at 0.015 percent on the transfer; Form FC-TRS if a non-resident is involvedNo. It stays between the partiesNo. The register of members is updated and, for a non-resident, FC-TRS or FC-GPR as applicable
Lasts untilThe claims period ends: 24 months for business warranties, 7 years for tax, longer for fundamental warrantiesThe SHA terminates: a qualified IPO, a sale of the company, or the investor exitingThe claims period, escrow release and earn-out period endAs long as the warranties it qualifies can be claimedAs long as the SHA binds the shareholder
Where it is explainedThis pageThis page, under the SSHA term, and the Shareholders' Agreement Explainer for the SHA halfThe Share Purchase Agreement ExplainerThis page, in the disclosure letter tabThe Shareholders' Agreement Explainer

The sample documents, clause by clause

Click a clause. The notes beside it tell you what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, and how to negotiate it. Dotted words open the glossary; terms defined on another explainer open there.

Example only

Share Subscription Agreement for Saffron Labs Private Limited (Series A)

The agreement below is the Series A SSA for Saffron Labs, signed on 30 October 2026, four weeks before Closing. It reads the way the Investor's counsel would send it, with the founders' wins already negotiated in: a closing memorandum instead of a 'satisfactory diligence' condition, no set-off against the second tranche, a founder cap, a share-settlement election and no break fee. Click a clause for what it says, what it means for you, what is normal in India in 2026 and how to negotiate it.

Company
Saffron Labs Private Limited, Bengaluru (CIN U72900KA2023PTC171234)
Promoters
Ananya Rao (CEO) and Vikram Menon (CTO)
Investor
Marigold Capital Partners Fund II, a SEBI-registered Category II AIF acting through Marigold Investment Advisors LLP
Round
₹20 crore for 2,00,000 Series A CCPS at ₹1,000 each (face value ₹10, premium ₹990); ₹80 crore pre-money, ₹100 crore post-money
Tranches
₹14 crore at Closing for 1,40,000 CCPS; ₹6 crore within 30 days of the Milestone (₹6 crore ARR certified by the auditors) for 60,000 CCPS
Signing and long-stop
Signed 30 October 2026; long-stop 31 January 2027
Closing
27 November 2026 (first tranche; the SHA is signed the same day)
Expenses
Investor's diligence and legal costs reimbursed up to ₹20 lakh plus GST
Framework

1. Parties and background

THIS SHARE SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT is made on 30 October 2026 at Bengaluru between: (1) Saffron Labs Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act 2013 with CIN U72900KA2023PTC171234 and having its registered office at Bengaluru, Karnataka (the "Company"); (2) Ananya Rao and Vikram Menon, each an individual resident in India (together the "Promoters"); and (3) Marigold Capital Partners Fund II, a SEBI-registered Category II alternative investment fund acting through its investment manager Marigold Investment Advisors LLP (the "Investor"). WHEREAS: (A) the Company is engaged in the development and licensing of workflow software for mid-market manufacturers in India; (B) the Promoters and the Existing Investors hold the entire issued share capital of the Company as set out in Part A of Schedule 5 (the cap table); (C) the Investor has agreed to subscribe for, and the Company has agreed to issue and allot, the Series A CCPS for the Investment Amount on the terms of this Agreement, following the term sheet accepted on 15 September 2026; and (D) the Promoters have agreed to give the Warranties and undertakings in this Agreement in consideration of the Investor's subscription. NOW THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES as follows.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The opening page names the three sides: the company issuing the shares, the two founders who stand behind the promises, and the fund that is paying. The recitals set the scene: what the business does, who owns it today (the cap table in Schedule 5), that the deal follows the term sheet accepted on 15 September 2026, and that the founders are giving the warranties as the price of the investment. Recitals are not operative promises, but an arbitrator reads them when a clause is ambiguous.

What it means for you

You sign twice: once for the company and once as a Promoter in your own name. That second signature is what makes you personally liable under the warranties and the indemnity, up to your cap in Clause 17. Check the Investor's exact legal name, its SEBI registration number and that the LLP signing is its investment manager; an SSA signed by the wrong entity is a common closing-day delay. The angels are not parties here; they sign the SHA at Closing.

What is normal

At Series A the founders are almost always parties in their personal capacity, and in most Indian deals they give the business warranties alongside the company. Existing angels join the SSA only when they are also investing in the round or giving warranties, which is rare. One recital usually confirms that the term sheet is superseded; see Clause 26. Two to five recitals is the norm; ten or more is a sign of over-lawyering.

How to negotiate it

Ask for three things. First, that the Promoters are parties only for the clauses that name them (warranties, indemnity, conduct of business), not for every covenant of the company. Second, that the Investor's own warranties in Clause 16 are given to the Promoters as well as to the company. Third, that the recital on the term sheet confirms the economic terms in it are reflected here, so nothing agreed in September is quietly dropped in October.

2. Definitions and interpretation

2.1 In this Agreement, unless the context requires otherwise: "Business Day" means a day other than a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday on which scheduled commercial banks are open for business in Bengaluru and Mumbai; "Closing" means completion of the subscription for the First Tranche Shares under Clause 9, and "Closing Date" means the date on which Closing occurs; "Conditions Precedent" means the conditions in Schedule 1; "Disclosure Letter" means the letter of the same date as this Agreement from the Company and the Promoters to the Investor, together with any Supplementary Disclosure Letter delivered under Clause 15; "Fundamental Warranties" means the Warranties in paragraphs 1 (title and capacity) and 2 (capitalisation) of Schedule 3; "Investment Amount" means ₹20,00,00,000, comprising the First Tranche Amount of ₹14,00,00,000 and the Second Tranche Amount of ₹6,00,00,000; "Long-stop Date" means 31 January 2027 or such later date as the Parties agree in writing under Clause 7; "Milestone" means annual recurring revenue of the Company of not less than ₹6,00,00,000 computed in accordance with Schedule 6 and certified by the Auditors; "Series A CCPS" means the 2,00,000 Series A compulsorily convertible preference shares of face value ₹10 each having the rights set out in the Articles and the Shareholders' Agreement; and "Warranties" means the statements in Schedule 3. 2.2 Headings are for convenience only; a reference to a statute includes any amendment or re-enactment; "including" means including without limitation; and a reference to a Clause or Schedule is to a clause of or schedule to this Agreement.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The dictionary of the agreement. Ten defined terms do most of the work: Business Day (bank working days in Bengaluru and Mumbai), Closing, Conditions Precedent, Disclosure Letter, Fundamental Warranties, Investment Amount, Long-stop Date, Milestone, Series A CCPS and Warranties. Every capitalised word in the later clauses means exactly what this clause says, and nothing else. The interpretation rules at the end stop arguments about headings, statutory amendments and the word 'including'.

What it means for you

Read this clause last, not first, and check each definition against the clause that uses it. 'Investment Amount' is the full ₹20 crore, so the indemnity cap in Clause 17 refers to the amount actually paid, which is ₹14 crore until the second tranche arrives. 'Milestone' points to Schedule 6, so the ARR definition there (what counts as recurring, how churn is treated) decides whether ₹6 crore of the money ever comes. 'Disclosure Letter' includes the supplementary letter, which is what lets you update it before Closing.

What is normal

Twenty to forty definitions is normal for a Series A SSA; more than sixty usually means a template built for a much larger deal. Business Day is almost always defined by reference to the company's city and Mumbai. Fundamental Warranties are limited to title, capacity and capitalisation in most deals; an investor-heavy draft adds tax and intellectual property to the list, which stretches the uncapped, unlimited-time treatment to warranties that should be capped.

How to negotiate it

Keep Fundamental Warranties to title, capacity and capitalisation. Make sure 'Investment Amount' for the purpose of the caps means the amount actually paid at the date of the claim, so your exposure is ₹14 crore and not ₹20 crore before the second tranche. Define 'Milestone' by reference to a schedule you have modelled with your auditors, with revenue recognition rules written down. Ask that the Long-stop Date definition carries the extension mechanism from Clause 7 rather than a fixed date alone.

3. Subscription

3.1 Subject to the terms of this Agreement, the Investor agrees to subscribe for, and the Company agrees to issue and allot to the Investor, 2,00,000 Series A CCPS at a subscription price of ₹1,000 per share, comprising a face value of ₹10 and a premium of ₹990, for the Investment Amount of ₹20,00,00,000. 3.2 The Series A CCPS shall be subscribed in two tranches: (a) 1,40,000 Series A CCPS (the "First Tranche Shares") for ₹14,00,00,000 (the "First Tranche Amount") at Closing; and (b) 60,000 Series A CCPS (the "Second Tranche Shares") for ₹6,00,00,000 (the "Second Tranche Amount") in accordance with Clause 11. 3.3 The Series A CCPS shall be issued fully paid and free from all Encumbrances by way of a private placement under Section 42 and a preferential issue under Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act 2013, and shall rank in accordance with the Articles and the Shareholders' Agreement, including a 1x non-participating liquidation preference ranking senior to the Seed CCPS. 3.4 Each Series A CCPS shall convert into one Equity Share at the Conversion Ratio set out in the Articles, subject to adjustment under the anti-dilution provisions of the Shareholders' Agreement, and in any event within 20 years of allotment. 3.5 The Promoters and the Existing Investors have waived any pre-emptive right in respect of the Series A CCPS under the Articles and the Seed Shareholders' Agreement dated 12 March 2024.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The deal in numbers. Marigold buys 2,00,000 Series A CCPS at ₹1,000 each: ₹10 of face value and ₹990 of premium per share. The money comes in two parts, ₹14 crore for 1,40,000 shares at Closing and ₹6 crore for 60,000 shares later. The shares are issued under the private placement and preferential issue routes of the Companies Act, rank ahead of the seed investors on a liquidation, convert one for one into equity, and the existing shareholders have given up their right of first offer on the new shares.

What it means for you

This clause fixes the price for both tranches at ₹1,000, so if the company is worth more in a year the second ₹6 crore still buys 60,000 shares, and if it is worth less you are still obliged to sell at ₹1,000. The ranking words matter: 'senior to the Seed CCPS' means Marigold is paid its ₹20 crore before Ritika and Arjun see anything on a sale below the preference stack. The pre-emption waiver is a condition you must actually collect from the angels in writing; a missing waiver is a title defect under the Warranties.

What is normal

A single tranche is the norm at Series A; two tranches appear in roughly a quarter of deals, usually where revenue is early. Face value of ₹10 with the balance as premium is standard; the premium goes to the securities premium account under Section 52. A 1x non-participating preference is the market standard; 1.5x or participating is rare in 2026 outside distressed rounds. Conversion one for one, adjusted for anti-dilution, and a 20-year outer limit under Section 55 is in every CCPS deal.

How to negotiate it

Three asks. First, if there must be a second tranche, fix the price now (as here) and do not let it float with a later valuation, because a floating price is a disguised down-round option. Second, resist any wording that lets the Investor subscribe for fewer than all the Second Tranche Shares once the Milestone is met. Third, confirm that the anti-dilution is broad-based weighted average and sits in the Articles too, because a conversion ratio that lives only in the SSA is hard to enforce against a future round.

4. Subscription monies and use of proceeds

4.1 The Investor shall pay the First Tranche Amount by electronic transfer to the separate bank account of the Company with a scheduled commercial bank opened solely for the purpose of receiving monies under Section 42 of the Companies Act 2013 (the "Subscription Account"), details of which are set out in Schedule 2. 4.2 The Company shall not utilise any part of the Subscription Monies until the Series A CCPS have been allotted and the return of allotment in Form PAS-3 has been filed with the Registrar, and shall not use the Subscription Monies to repay any loan from, or any other amount owed to, a Promoter or a Related Party. 4.3 Subject to Clause 4.2, the Company shall apply the Subscription Monies towards the use of proceeds set out in the Business Plan approved by the Board, namely product development, sales and marketing expansion and working capital, and for no other purpose without the consent of the Investor Majority. 4.4 If the Series A CCPS are not allotted within 60 days of receipt of the First Tranche Amount, the Company shall refund the First Tranche Amount within 15 days thereafter, failing which it shall pay interest at 12 percent per annum from the end of the sixtieth day until repayment in accordance with Section 42(6). 4.5 The Company shall keep the Subscription Monies in the Subscription Account, and may place them in a fixed deposit with the same bank, until they are applied under Clause 4.3.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The money goes into a dedicated bank account, not the operating account. It stays untouched until two things happen: the board allots the shares and the return of allotment in Form PAS-3 is filed with the Registrar of Companies. It can then be spent only on the uses in the board-approved business plan, and never to repay a founder loan. If the shares are not allotted within 60 days, the money goes back within 15 more days, with 12 percent interest if the company is late.

What it means for you

Open the separate account before you sign, not the week before Closing; banks take one to two weeks and ask for the board resolution and the PAS-4 draft. Plan cash so that payroll and vendor payments on the Closing week do not depend on the new money; you can spend it only after PAS-3, which here is filed by 12 December 2026 at the latest and in practice within two to three days of allotment. The founder-loan bar means any money you lent the company stays in until the Investor Majority agrees otherwise under the related party rules.

What is normal

Every Indian SSA carries the Section 42 mechanics because the law leaves no choice: separate account, allotment within 60 days, PAS-3 within 15 days, and no use before both. The use-of-proceeds list is usually three to five heads with a 10 to 20 percent flexibility band between them. A bar on repaying founder loans or paying founder bonuses from the proceeds appears in most deals. Interest on a delayed refund is 12 percent by statute, so there is nothing to negotiate on that number.

How to negotiate it

Ask for a reallocation band: the company may move up to 20 percent of the proceeds between the approved heads without consent. Ask that the Investor's cost reimbursement under Clause 23 counts as an approved use so you are not in breach the day you pay it. Carve out repayment of any founder loan that the Investor has already seen in the data room and approved, and permit fixed deposits so ₹14 crore does not sit idle in a current account for three weeks.

Conditions and closing

5. Conditions precedent

5.1 The obligation of the Investor to subscribe for the First Tranche Shares is conditional upon the satisfaction, or waiver by the Investor under Clause 6, of each of the Conditions Precedent set out in Schedule 1, namely: (a) completion of the Investor's legal, financial and tax due diligence and delivery of a closing memorandum by the Investor's advisers in the agreed form; (b) the Shareholders' Agreement and the Deed of Adherence being in agreed form; (c) the passing of the special resolutions under Sections 42 and 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act 2013 approving the issue of the Series A CCPS and the filing of Form MGT-14; (d) the adoption of the restated Articles in the agreed form; (e) the adoption of the Saffron Labs Employee Stock Option Plan 2026; (f) execution of the employment, intellectual property assignment and non-compete agreements by each Promoter in the agreed form; (g) delivery of accepted proposals for key person insurance of ₹5,00,00,000 on each Promoter and D&O insurance of ₹5,00,00,000; (h) delivery of a valuation report from a registered valuer under Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014 justifying the subscription price; (i) the Company's DPIIT recognition remaining valid; (j) issue of the private placement offer letter in Form PAS-4 and maintenance of the record in Form PAS-5; (k) opening of the Subscription Account; and (l) no Material Adverse Change having occurred, confirmed by an Officer's Certificate dated the Closing Date. 5.2 The Conditions Precedent are for the sole benefit of the Investor, save that Condition (b) is for the benefit of all Parties.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Twelve things must be true before Marigold has to pay. Diligence finished and written up in a closing memorandum, the SHA agreed, the shareholders' special resolutions passed and filed, the restated Articles and the ESOP adopted, the founders' employment and IP agreements signed, insurance proposals accepted, a registered valuer's report justifying ₹1,000 per share, DPIIT recognition still valid, the PAS-4 offer letter issued, the separate bank account open, and no material adverse change by Closing. Most are for the Investor's benefit alone, so only the Investor can waive them.

What it means for you

This list is your project plan for the four weeks after signing. Each item needs an owner and a date; the tracker on this page shows who does what. The dangerous version of item (a) reads 'completion of due diligence to the satisfaction of the Investor', which lets the Investor walk away for any reason. Saffron's version requires a closing memorandum in an agreed form, which means diligence is closed when the advisers say so in writing, not when the Investor feels like it. The MAC condition is the other exit door; its definition in Schedule 1 should exclude market-wide events.

What is normal

Eight to fourteen conditions is normal at Series A. Diligence completion, the special resolutions, the restated Articles, founder agreements, a valuation report and no MAC appear in almost every deal. Insurance appears in most deals above ₹10 crore. A 'satisfactory diligence' condition survives in about a third of first drafts and is removed or softened in most negotiated agreements. Conditions that depend on third parties (customer consents, lender waivers) should carry a fallback, because you cannot control them.

How to negotiate it

Ask for four changes. Replace 'satisfactory to the Investor' with 'completion of due diligence and delivery of a closing memorandum', with a deadline for the Investor's advisers to deliver it. Define MAC narrowly: a sustained event specific to the company, excluding industry, market, regulatory and force majeure events, and excluding anything disclosed. Move items you can only start after signing (insurance policies, the D&O cover) into conditions subsequent. Make the agreed-form documents conditions for all parties, so the Investor cannot reopen the SHA after you have signed the SSA.

6. Satisfaction and waiver of the Conditions Precedent

6.1 The Company and the Promoters shall use their best endeavours to procure the satisfaction of the Conditions Precedent (other than Condition (a), which is within the control of the Investor) as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event before the Long-stop Date. 6.2 The Company shall keep the Investor informed of progress towards satisfaction of each Condition Precedent and shall promptly notify the Investor in writing on becoming aware of any fact or circumstance that may prevent a Condition Precedent from being satisfied before the Long-stop Date. 6.3 Within 2 Business Days of the satisfaction of the last of the Conditions Precedent (other than Condition (l)), the Company shall deliver to the Investor a notice in the form set out in Part B of Schedule 1 (the "CP Satisfaction Notice") together with evidence of satisfaction of each Condition Precedent in the form specified in Schedule 1. 6.4 The Investor shall, within 5 Business Days of receipt of the CP Satisfaction Notice, confirm in writing that it is satisfied that the Conditions Precedent have been satisfied, or identify in writing the Conditions Precedent that in its reasonable opinion remain unsatisfied and the deficiency in each case. 6.5 The Investor may, in its sole discretion and only by notice in writing, waive any Condition Precedent in whole or in part, subject to such conditions as it may specify, and the Company shall satisfy any waived Condition Precedent that is capable of subsequent satisfaction within 30 days of Closing. 6.6 The Investor shall use reasonable endeavours to complete its due diligence and deliver the closing memorandum under Condition (a) within 10 Business Days of the date of this Agreement.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The process clause. The company and founders must do their best to satisfy the conditions before the long-stop date and keep the Investor updated, including about anything that could stop a condition being met. When the last one is done, the company sends a CP satisfaction notice with the evidence. The Investor has five business days to accept or to say in writing exactly what is still missing. Only the Investor can waive a condition, and only in writing; a waived condition that can still be done becomes a post-closing obligation.

What it means for you

'Best endeavours' is a heavy standard in Indian law: it means doing everything a prudent person determined to achieve the result would do, including spending money. Keep an evidence file from day one so the CP satisfaction notice is a cover letter, not a scramble. The five business day response window is your protection against silence: without it, the Investor could sit on the notice until the long-stop date. The waiver rule cuts both ways: a verbal 'do not worry about the insurance' from the Investor's partner is not a waiver, so get it in an email at the least.

What is normal

A CP satisfaction notice with a 3 to 7 business day response window is standard in negotiated deals, although many first drafts omit the response deadline. 'Best endeavours' for the company and 'reasonable endeavours' for the investor is the usual asymmetry. Waiver by the investor alone, in writing, is universal. A 30-day period to complete a waived condition after Closing is common; 60 days appears in deals with slow third parties.

How to negotiate it

Ask for 'reasonable endeavours' instead of 'best endeavours' for the conditions that depend on third parties, such as customer or lender consents, so you are not in breach because someone else is slow. Keep the Investor's response window at 5 Business Days and add a deemed-satisfaction rule: if the Investor neither confirms nor objects within that window, the conditions are deemed satisfied. Put a deadline on the Investor's own diligence condition, as Clause 6.6 does, and require the Investor to state its objections once, in full, so new points cannot be raised after each reply.

7. Long-stop Date and termination before Closing

7.1 If Closing has not occurred on or before the Long-stop Date of 31 January 2027, other than as a result of a breach of this Agreement by the Party seeking to terminate, either the Investor or the Company (acting with the consent of the Promoters) may terminate this Agreement by notice in writing to the other Parties, provided that the Parties shall first discuss in good faith for a period of 10 Business Days whether to extend the Long-stop Date and may extend it by agreement in writing. 7.2 The Investor may terminate this Agreement by notice in writing before Closing if: (a) a Material Adverse Change occurs; (b) there is a breach of a Fundamental Warranty, or a breach of any other Warranty or of Clause 8 which is material in the context of the transaction and which, if capable of remedy, is not remedied within 10 Business Days of notice; or (c) an insolvency event occurs in relation to the Company. 7.3 On termination under this Clause 7, this Agreement shall cease to have effect, save that Clause 1, this Clause 7, Clause 22 (Confidentiality), Clause 23 (Costs), Clause 25 (Governing law and dispute resolution) and Clause 26 (Miscellaneous) shall survive, and termination shall be without prejudice to any accrued rights or liabilities of any Party. 7.4 Any Subscription Monies received by the Company before termination shall be refunded to the Investor within 15 days of termination without interest, save as required by Section 42(6) of the Companies Act 2013.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The exit door before the money moves. If Closing has not happened by 31 January 2027, either side can end the agreement, unless its own breach caused the delay, and only after a ten business day conversation about extending. The Investor alone can also terminate for a material adverse change, a serious uncured warranty breach, a breach of the pre-closing conduct rules, or the company's insolvency. Confidentiality, costs and disputes survive termination, and any money already received goes back within 15 days.

What it means for you

Ninety-three days from signing to long-stop is comfortable for a deal with twelve conditions; the risk is a condition outside your control, such as a bank account that takes three weeks to open. The termination right is mutual, which protects you from an Investor who delays its own diligence and then walks away citing the long-stop. The founder consent requirement in Clause 7.1 means the company cannot terminate behind the founders' backs. The 10 Business Day cure period in Clause 7.2(b) is what turns a surprise into a conversation; without it, a minor breach found on Closing week could end the deal.

What is normal

Sixty to one hundred and twenty days from signing to long-stop is normal at Series A; 45 days is tight, 180 days is unusual outside regulated sectors. Termination for MAC, uncured material breach and insolvency appears in nearly every draft. A mutual termination right at the long-stop is standard; some investor drafts give the right to the investor alone, which is worth resisting. A 'no fault' refund within 15 days matches Section 42.

How to negotiate it

Ask for a mutual termination right (as here), an automatic extension of 30 days where the only unsatisfied conditions are regulatory or third-party items being pursued in good faith, and a cure period of at least 10 Business Days before any breach-based termination. Resist a right to terminate for any breach of warranty regardless of materiality, and resist any 'break fee' payable by the company if the deal fails. Make sure the surviving clauses include Clause 23 only in the limited form you negotiated there.

8. Conduct of business before Closing

8.1 From the date of this Agreement until Closing, the Company shall, and the Promoters shall procure that the Company shall, carry on its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice and in compliance with applicable law, preserve its assets, goodwill and relationships with customers, suppliers and employees, and maintain its insurances. 8.2 Without limiting Clause 8.1, the Company shall not, and the Promoters shall procure that the Company shall not, without the prior written consent of the Investor (not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed, and deemed given if the Investor does not respond within 5 Business Days of a written request): (a) declare or pay any dividend or make any other distribution; (b) incur any indebtedness in excess of ₹50,00,000 in aggregate, other than trade credit in the ordinary course; (c) employ or engage any person on total annual remuneration above ₹30,00,000, or increase the remuneration of any Promoter or key employee; (d) issue, allot, transfer, redeem or buy back any share or security or grant any option, other than under this Agreement and the ESOP 2026; (e) settle or compromise any claim or litigation above ₹10,00,000; (f) enter into, vary or terminate any related party transaction or any contract with a Promoter or an Affiliate of a Promoter; (g) acquire or dispose of any business, or any asset having a value above ₹25,00,000, other than in the ordinary course; (h) amend its Memorandum or Articles other than as contemplated by this Agreement; or (i) agree to do any of the foregoing. 8.3 Nothing in this Clause 8 shall restrict any action required by law or by a Governmental Authority, or any action expressly contemplated by this Agreement or the Business Plan, provided the Company notifies the Investor in writing.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Between signing and Closing the company must run as normal and must not do anything that changes what the Investor is buying. The named prohibitions without consent: no dividends, no new borrowing over ₹50 lakh, no hire above ₹30 lakh a year or founder pay rise, no change to the cap table except the deal itself and ESOP grants, no settling claims over ₹10 lakh, no related party deals, no asset sales over ₹25 lakh, no change to the constitution. Consent cannot be unreasonably withheld and is deemed given after five business days of silence.

What it means for you

For four weeks you are running the company with an extra approver. The thresholds decide how painful that is: a ₹30 lakh hiring cap means you can hire developers but not a VP of Sales without an email to Marigold. The deemed consent after 5 Business Days is the clause that keeps the business moving; without it, a slow fund blocks your hiring. These are the SSA's version of the SHA's reserved matters, so read them against the list in the Shareholders' Agreement Explainer: anything the SHA will allow you to do without consent should not be banned here. A breach here is a termination ground under Clause 7.

What is normal

A short list of eight to twelve pre-closing restrictions is normal. Debt thresholds of ₹25 lakh to ₹1 crore and hiring thresholds of ₹25 lakh to ₹50 lakh of annual remuneration are standard at a ₹100 crore post-money. Deemed consent after 3 to 7 business days appears in most negotiated deals but is missing from most first drafts. 'No dividends and no cap table changes' is universal; a bar on ordinary-course asset sales is investor-heavy and should be limited to assets outside the ordinary course.

How to negotiate it

Ask for deemed consent after 5 Business Days (as here) and a 'not unreasonably withheld' standard. Raise the hiring threshold to match your approved hiring plan for the quarter and carve out hires already in the Business Plan. Carve out ESOP grants to new joiners within the pool, and any action already disclosed in the Disclosure Letter. Keep the restrictions limited to the period before Closing; a draft that extends them until the second tranche is paid would run the company under SSA rules for a year alongside the SHA.

9. Closing

9.1 Closing shall take place at the registered office of the Company, or by exchange of electronic documents, on the date falling 5 Business Days after the Investor's confirmation under Clause 6.4, or on such other date as the Investor and the Company agree in writing (the "Closing Date"), which the Parties expect to be 27 November 2026. 9.2 At Closing the following shall occur in the following sequence, and each step shall be deemed to occur simultaneously with and conditional upon the others: (a) the Investor shall have transferred the First Tranche Amount to the Subscription Account not later than 2 Business Days before the Closing Date, and the Company shall produce the bank statement evidencing receipt; (b) the Board shall hold a meeting at which it shall record receipt of the First Tranche Amount, approve the allotment of the First Tranche Shares to the Investor, approve the entry of the Investor's name in the register of members, and instruct the depository participant to credit the First Tranche Shares to the Investor's demat account; (c) the Company shall enter the Investor in the register of members as the holder of 1,40,000 Series A CCPS; (d) the Company, the Promoters, the Existing Investors and the Investor shall execute the Shareholders' Agreement; (e) the Board shall appoint Rohan Kapoor as the Investor Director with effect from Closing; and (f) the Parties shall exchange the Closing Deliverables listed in Schedule 2. 9.3 If any Party fails to comply with any obligation in Clause 9.2, the Investor (in the case of a default by the Company or a Promoter) or the Company (in the case of a default by the Investor) may defer Closing to a date not more than 10 Business Days later, proceed to Closing so far as practicable, or, if the default is not remedied on the deferred date, terminate this Agreement under Clause 7.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The choreography of closing day. The money must already be in the separate account two business days before. Then the board meets, records receipt, allots 1,40,000 Series A CCPS to Marigold, writes Marigold into the register of members, instructs the depository participant to credit the shares in demat form and appoints Rohan Kapoor as Investor Director. Everyone signs the SHA, the Schedule 2 deliverables change hands, and every step is treated as happening at once so nobody is exposed halfway through. If a step fails, Closing can be deferred up to 10 business days or the deal terminated.

What it means for you

The sequence matters because the law creates a gap: once the money is in the account the company holds it in trust until allotment, and once the board allots, the Investor owns shares before the demat credit shows. The 'simultaneous and conditional' wording closes that gap contractually. Schedule the board meeting for the morning, with the bank statement, the valuation report and the PAS-5 record on the table. Your company secretary signs the board minutes and the DP instruction; the DIR-12 for Rohan Kapoor then falls due within 30 days, on 27 December 2026, as the deadlines calculator on this page shows.

What is normal

Closing within 3 to 10 Business Days of CP confirmation is standard. Money two business days before Closing is common; some investors insist on same-day transfer against a signed allotment resolution, which creates a timing argument on the day. Electronic closings with scanned signatures and a closing call have been the norm since 2020. A deferral right of 5 to 10 Business Days before a termination right is standard and protects both sides.

How to negotiate it

Ask for a fixed outside date for the money (as in Clause 9.2(a)) so the board meeting is not called on a promise. Ask that the Investor's failure to pay on time is itself a default allowing the company to defer or terminate, as Clause 9.3 does. Resist any requirement to hand over signed share certificates or a signed register before the money is confirmed in the account. Ask for a short closing memorandum signed on the day listing what was delivered, so there is no dispute later about a missing document.

10. Closing deliverables

10.1 At Closing the Company and the Promoters shall deliver to the Investor the documents listed in Part A of Schedule 2, namely: (a) certified copies of the resolutions of the Board and of the shareholders approving the issue and allotment of the Series A CCPS, the restated Articles and the ESOP 2026, with evidence of filing of Form MGT-14 for each special resolution; (b) a copy of the private placement offer letter in Form PAS-4 issued to the Investor and of the record of private placement offers in Form PAS-5; (c) the valuation report under Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014; (d) a certified copy of the restated Articles as adopted; (e) an Officer's Certificate signed by the Chief Executive Officer confirming that the Warranties are true and accurate at Closing, that no Material Adverse Change has occurred and that Clause 8 has been complied with; (f) the executed employment, intellectual property assignment and non-compete agreements of each Promoter; (g) written confirmations from the insurer or broker that the key person and D&O insurance proposals have been accepted; (h) a certified extract of the register of members showing the Investor as the holder of the First Tranche Shares; (i) a copy of the instruction to the depository participant for the demat credit; and (j) a legal opinion from the Company's counsel in the agreed form as to the due incorporation of the Company, its capacity, the due authorisation and enforceability of the Transaction Documents and the valid issue of the Series A CCPS. 10.2 At Closing the Investor shall deliver to the Company the documents listed in Part B of Schedule 2, namely evidence of its authority to enter into the Transaction Documents, its KYC documents, its demat account details and a copy of its SEBI registration certificate.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The list of papers that cross the table. From the company and founders: certified board and shareholder resolutions with proof of the MGT-14 filings, the PAS-4 offer letter and PAS-5 record, the valuation report, the adopted Articles, an officer's certificate that nothing has gone wrong since signing, the founders' signed employment and IP agreements, insurance confirmations, the register extract, the demat instruction and a legal opinion from the company's counsel. From the Investor: proof of its authority, KYC, its demat account details and its SEBI certificate.

What it means for you

This is a checklist you can start on the day you sign; seven of the ten items can be ready a week before Closing, while the officer's certificate, the register extract and the demat instruction can only be signed on the day. The officer's certificate is the item to read carefully, because it is a fresh warranty signed by the CEO on Closing Day and a false certificate is a personal problem, not a corporate one. The legal opinion is the item that costs money: your counsel will charge ₹1 lakh to ₹3 lakh for it and will want the same evidence file you built for the CP satisfaction notice. The Investor's KYC and demat details are needed for the PAS-3 and the DP instruction, so chase them early.

What is normal

Ten to fifteen company-side deliverables is normal. A legal opinion from the company's counsel appears in roughly half of Series A deals in India, more often with institutional funds. An officer's certificate at Closing is almost universal. Evidence of MGT-14 filing is asked for where the resolution date leaves time for the filing before Closing, as here. Investor-side deliverables are usually three to five items and are often forgotten in first drafts.

How to negotiate it

Ask that the legal opinion is limited to capacity, authority and valid issue, and excludes any opinion on the warranties or on compliance; broader opinions are expensive and unusual. Ask that the officer's certificate is given 'so far as the Promoters are aware' for the business warranties and absolutely only for title, capacity and capitalisation. Make the Investor's deliverables a condition of the company's obligation to allot, so a missing KYC document is the Investor's delay, not yours. Agree the forms of every deliverable as annexes before signing.

11. Second Tranche and the Milestone

11.1 Subject to Clause 11.4, the Investor shall subscribe for the Second Tranche Shares for the Second Tranche Amount of ₹6,00,00,000 within 30 days of receipt of the Auditors' certificate that the Milestone has been achieved (the "Milestone Certificate"), provided that the Milestone is achieved on or before the date falling 12 months after the Closing Date. 11.2 The Company shall deliver the Milestone Certificate within 30 days of the end of the month in which the Milestone is achieved, together with the management accounts and the ARR computation in accordance with Schedule 6, and the Investor may within 10 Business Days raise written queries which the Auditors shall address. 11.3 If annual recurring revenue of at least ₹5,40,00,000 but less than ₹6,00,00,000 is achieved within the period in Clause 11.1 (a "Near Miss"), the Investor shall consider in good faith a request from the Company to waive the shortfall, and may, but need not, waive the Milestone in whole or in part by notice in writing. 11.4 The obligation of the Investor under Clause 11.1 is conditional upon: (a) the Warranties in paragraphs 1, 2 and 13 (insolvency) of Schedule 3 being true at the date of the subscription; (b) where a fresh special resolution is required under paragraph (d), the Company having obtained a valuation report from a registered valuer under Rule 13 supporting a price of not more than ₹1,000 per share, failing which the Investor may elect to subscribe at the price the report supports or not to subscribe, and Clause 11.6 shall apply; (c) the Company having issued a fresh offer letter in Form PAS-4; (d) if the allotment will fall after 19 October 2027, a fresh special resolution having been passed for it; and (e) no insolvency event having occurred. 11.5 The Second Tranche Shares shall be allotted within 60 days of receipt of the Second Tranche Amount, the Company shall file Form PAS-3 within 15 days of allotment, and Clauses 4, 9 and 12 shall apply to the Second Tranche with the necessary changes. 11.6 If the Milestone is not achieved within the period in Clause 11.1 and the Investor does not waive it, the Investor shall have no obligation to subscribe for the Second Tranche Shares, the Company may offer them to other investors at a price not lower than ₹1,000 per share, subject to the Investor's pre-emptive rights under the Shareholders' Agreement, and the Investor's rights under the Shareholders' Agreement shall continue in respect of the First Tranche Shares.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The second ₹6 crore arrives within 30 days after the auditors certify that annual recurring revenue has reached ₹6 crore, provided that happens within 12 months of Closing. The company must deliver the certificate with the management accounts, and the Investor may ask questions. If ARR lands between ₹5.4 crore and ₹6 crore the Investor must consider a waiver in good faith but is not bound to give one. The price stays at ₹1,000 and a fresh PAS-4 is needed, plus a fresh special resolution and a fresh valuation report if the allotment falls after 19 October 2027; if that report supports a price above ₹1,000, the Investor may subscribe at that price or walk away. The second tranche follows the same Section 42 mechanics. If the milestone is missed, the Investor keeps its first-tranche rights and the company may raise the ₹6 crore elsewhere at no lower price.

What it means for you

Build the ARR definition in Schedule 6 with your auditors before signing; disputes about tranches are almost always disputes about what counts as recurring revenue. The 12-month window runs from 27 November 2026, so you need ₹6 crore ARR by 27 November 2027 and the certificate soon after. The near-miss band gives you a conversation, not a right, so do not plan cash on it. Clause 11.6 is your protection: a missed milestone does not give Marigold new rights, and you can fill the gap with another investor at the same price, subject to Marigold's pro-rata right. The second allotment needs a second PAS-3, and if it falls after 19 October 2027, Rule 13 also needs a fresh special resolution and a fresh valuation report, all at your cost, so book that EGM early.

What is normal

Where tranches exist, 12 to 18 months for the milestone and payment within 30 to 45 days of the certificate is normal. A near-miss band of 10 to 20 percent below the milestone with a good-faith waiver discussion appears in most negotiated deals; an automatic pro-rata reduction of the tranche is less common. Fixed pricing for the second tranche is the norm. Within 12 months of the special resolution the original Rule 13 report supports that price; a fresh report comes with a fresh resolution. Investor-heavy drafts make the second tranche conditional on all warranties being true and on 'no breach of the SHA', which founders should narrow.

How to negotiate it

Ask for four things. Limit the bring-down for the second tranche to the fundamental warranties and insolvency, as Clause 11.4 does, not every business warranty. Add a near-miss rule with a specific consequence, for example a pro-rata tranche of at least 80 percent if ARR is at least 90 percent of the target. Require the Investor to raise queries once, within 10 Business Days, and treat silence as acceptance of the certificate. Make sure a missed milestone carries no penalty beyond losing the tranche: no ratchet on the first-tranche price, no extra board seat and no change to the liquidation preference.

12. Conditions subsequent

12.1 The Company shall, and the Promoters shall procure that the Company shall, complete each of the following within the period stated (each a "Condition Subsequent"): (a) file the return of allotment in Form PAS-3 with the Registrar within 15 days of the allotment of the First Tranche Shares; (b) file Form MGT-14 within 30 days of each special resolution passed in connection with the Transaction Documents, to the extent not already filed; (c) procure the credit of the First Tranche Shares to the Investor's demat account within 2 months of allotment and deliver the depository statement evidencing the credit; (d) file Form DIR-12 for the appointment of the Investor Director within 30 days of the Closing Date; (e) update the register of members and the register of directors and key managerial personnel; (f) pay the stamp duty on the issue of the Series A CCPS through the depository at the rate prescribed under the Indian Stamp Act 1899; (g) bind the D&O insurance policy of ₹5,00,00,000 and the key person insurance policies within 30 days of the Closing Date; and (h) adopt the policies listed in Schedule 7 (including an anti-bribery policy, a related party transactions policy, a whistle-blower policy and a policy under the Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013) within 90 days of the Closing Date. 12.2 If the Company fails to complete a Condition Subsequent within the period stated, the Investor shall notify the Company and the Company shall have 15 Business Days from such notice to cure the failure; a failure not cured within that period shall be a breach of this Agreement entitling the Investor to claim under Clause 17, and a failure to complete Condition (a) or (c) shall also entitle the Investor to require the Company to refund the First Tranche Amount with interest at 12 percent per annum in accordance with Section 42(6) of the Companies Act 2013, to the extent permitted by law.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The homework after the money arrives, each with a deadline: PAS-3 within 15 days of allotment, MGT-14 within 30 days of each special resolution, the demat credit within 2 months, DIR-12 for the Investor Director within 30 days of Closing, the statutory registers updated, stamp duty paid through the depository, the D&O and key person policies bound within 30 days, and a set of governance policies adopted within 90 days. A missed item gets a notice and 15 business days to fix; after that it is a breach, and a failed PAS-3 or demat credit can trigger a refund claim with 12 percent interest.

What it means for you

Put the dates in your compliance calendar the day you sign: with allotment on 27 November 2026, PAS-3 is due by 12 December 2026, DIR-12 by 27 December 2026, the policies by 25 February 2027 and the demat credit by 27 January 2027. The PAS-3 deadline is also the day you can start spending the money, so file it on day two, not day fifteen. The 15 Business Day cure period is a founders' win; many drafts treat a missed filing as an immediate breach. The refund remedy for a failed PAS-3 mirrors Section 42 and is rarely used, but it is the Investor's lever if the company sits on the filing.

What is normal

Six to ten conditions subsequent is normal. The statutory ones (PAS-3, MGT-14, demat credit, DIR-12) are in every deal because the law fixes them. Insurance within 30 to 60 days and policies within 60 to 120 days are standard. A cure period of 10 to 20 Business Days appears in most negotiated deals. Filing fees for PAS-3 and MGT-14 are a few hundred rupees each for a company of this size; the stamp duty on the issue is ₹7,000 on ₹14 crore at 0.005 percent, collected by the depository.

How to negotiate it

Ask for a cure period (15 Business Days here) and for the remedy to be a claim for actual loss rather than a refund, except where the law itself requires the refund. Ask that any failure caused by a government portal outage or by the Investor's own delay in delivering KYC or demat details extends the period. Limit the policies in Schedule 7 to those the law requires or the Board approves, and give yourself 90 days rather than 60. Ask that the Investor confirms completion of the conditions subsequent in writing, so the file is closed.

Warranties and disclosure

13. Warranties

13.1 The Company and each Promoter jointly and severally warrant to the Investor that each of the Warranties set out in Schedule 3 is true, accurate and not misleading at the date of this Agreement and shall be true, accurate and not misleading at Closing by reference to the facts and circumstances then existing. 13.2 Schedule 3 contains Warranties as to: (1) title and capacity; (2) capitalisation and the cap table in Schedule 5; (3) the Accounts for FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26 and the management accounts to 30 September 2026; (4) tax; (5) employees and consultants; (6) intellectual property; (7) material contracts; (8) litigation; (9) compliance with law and licences; (10) data protection and information technology; (11) insurance; (12) real property and leases; (13) insolvency; and (14) related party arrangements. 13.3 Each Warranty is a separate and independent statement and, save as expressly provided, shall not be limited by reference to any other Warranty or any other provision of this Agreement. 13.4 The Warranties are given subject to the matters fairly disclosed in the Disclosure Letter and to the limitations in Clauses 17 to 20. 13.5 The Promoters undertake not to make any claim against the Company, or any director, officer or employee of the Company, in respect of any information or advice given to them in connection with the Warranties or the Disclosure Letter, save in the case of fraud. 13.6 Where a Warranty is qualified by the expression "so far as the Promoters are aware" or any similar expression, it shall be deemed to include an additional statement that it has been made after reasonable enquiry of the Company's Chief Financial Officer, company secretary, auditors and heads of department.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The founders and the company promise that fourteen groups of statements in Schedule 3 are true today and will still be true at Closing: who owns what, the accounts, tax, people, intellectual property, contracts, litigation, compliance, data protection, insurance, property, solvency and related party dealings. Each statement stands on its own. The promises are limited by what the disclosure letter fairly discloses and by the indemnity limits later in the agreement. Where a warranty is 'so far as the Promoters are aware', it means after asking the finance head, the company secretary, the auditors and the department heads.

What it means for you

Schedule 3 will run to 15 to 25 pages, and every sentence in it is a potential claim against you personally, up to your cap in Clause 17. Read it sentence by sentence with your finance team and ask of each one: is this true, and if not, is it in the disclosure letter? The repetition at Closing means a problem that arises in November must be disclosed before 27 November 2026, under Clause 15. 'Jointly and severally' in Clause 13.1 means Marigold may pursue either founder for the whole claim; the indemnity clause then applies the founder cap and the share-settlement election.

What is normal

Fourteen to twenty-two warranty heads is normal at Series A. Warranties given by the company and the founders together is the Indian norm; founders-only warranties are rare, company-only warranties appear mainly in later rounds with institutional co-investors. Knowledge qualifiers on litigation, compliance, IP infringement and third-party breaches are standard; qualifiers on tax, title and capitalisation are not accepted. A 'separate and independent' rule is universal, and a no-recourse undertaking by the founders against the company's employees appears in most drafts.

How to negotiate it

Ask for knowledge qualifiers on the forward-looking and third-party warranties: infringement of others' IP, compliance by counterparties, threatened litigation. Ask that the warranties on the accounts are limited to 'true and fair' under the accounting standards that apply to the company rather than 'accurate in every respect'. Ask that the disclosure letter and the data room index both qualify the warranties, within the standard in Clause 14. Ask for a materiality threshold inside the contracts and litigation warranties, for example contracts above ₹25 lakh a year and claims above ₹10 lakh, so you are not warranting every purchase order.

14. Disclosure Letter and knowledge

14.1 The Warranties are qualified by the matters fairly disclosed in the Disclosure Letter. A matter is "fairly disclosed" if it is disclosed in the Disclosure Letter with sufficient detail to enable a reasonable investor to identify the nature and scope of the matter disclosed and its likely effect on the Company. 14.2 The general disclosures in Part A of the Disclosure Letter shall qualify the Warranties only to the extent of: (a) the documents listed in the data room index dated 24 October 2026 annexed to the Disclosure Letter, to the extent the relevant matter is apparent from the face of the document; (b) matters appearing in the public records searched on 20 October 2026 and specified in the Disclosure Letter; and (c) the Accounts. 14.3 The specific disclosures in Part B of the Disclosure Letter are made against the Warranty paragraphs identified in Part B, but a disclosure against one Warranty shall be treated as a disclosure against every other Warranty to which it is reasonably apparent that it relates. 14.4 Save as provided in Clause 14.2, no other information of which the Investor or its advisers have knowledge (actual, constructive or imputed) shall prejudice or reduce any claim by the Investor under the Warranties or operate to reduce any amount recoverable, and the Investor shall not be deemed to have waived any claim by reason of any investigation made by or on its behalf. 14.5 The Investor acknowledges that it has not relied on any statement, representation or warranty other than those set out in this Agreement and the Disclosure Letter.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

This clause sets the rules for how the disclosure letter protects the founders. A matter is fairly disclosed only if it is described with enough detail for a reasonable investor to understand what it is, how big it is and what it means. General disclosures count only for the documents in the indexed data room (where the problem is visible on the face of the document), the public records searched and the accounts. Specific disclosures are made against numbered warranties but spill over to any other warranty they obviously relate to. What the Investor happened to know does not reduce a claim, and the Investor confirms it relied only on the written warranties.

What it means for you

The standard decides whether your disclosure letter is a shield or a decoration. 'Fairly disclosed' with the detail test is the fair middle: you cannot bury a ₹3.2 lakh TDS problem by uploading 400 documents and calling it disclosed, but you also do not have to predict every consequence. Clause 14.2(a) is the compromise on the data room: the index counts, but only where the matter is visible on the face of the document. Clause 14.4 is pro-sandbagging: if Marigold's lawyers spotted a problem you did not disclose, Marigold can still claim. The answer is to disclose it, not to hope they noticed.

What is normal

A 'fairly disclosed' standard with a sufficient-detail test is the Indian market norm; 'fully, fairly and specifically disclosed' is investor-heavy and 'disclosed' alone is founder-heavy. Data room disclosure is accepted in roughly half of Series A deals, almost always limited to an indexed room and often to matters apparent on the face of the document. Pro-sandbagging wording (the investor's knowledge does not reduce a claim) appears in most Indian institutional drafts; an anti-sandbagging clause is a founder win that is rare at Series A. A non-reliance acknowledgement by the investor is standard.

How to negotiate it

Ask for 'fairly disclosed' rather than 'fully and specifically disclosed'. Ask that the indexed data room qualifies the warranties (as Clause 14.2(a) does), and if the Investor resists, agree a list of named documents that are deemed disclosed. Ask that a specific disclosure against one warranty qualifies all related warranties, as Clause 14.3 does. On sandbagging, ask at least that matters the Investor's own diligence report identified in writing before signing are deemed disclosed; a full anti-sandbagging clause is unlikely but the written-report carve-out is often conceded.

15. Repetition at Closing and notification

15.1 The Warranties shall be deemed repeated at Closing by reference to the facts and circumstances then existing, and any reference in a Warranty to the date of this Agreement shall be construed as a reference to the Closing Date (the "Bring-down"). 15.2 The Company and the Promoters shall notify the Investor in writing promptly, and in any event within 3 Business Days, on becoming aware of any fact, matter or event arising after the date of this Agreement which constitutes, or would on the Bring-down constitute, a breach of any Warranty or of Clause 8, giving reasonable particulars. 15.3 The Company and the Promoters may, not later than 3 Business Days before the Closing Date, deliver a Supplementary Disclosure Letter disclosing matters arising after the date of this Agreement which would otherwise constitute a breach of the Warranties on the Bring-down. 15.4 A matter fairly disclosed in a Supplementary Disclosure Letter shall qualify the Warranties as repeated at Closing, but shall not qualify the Warranties as given at the date of this Agreement or prejudice any claim of the Investor in respect of a breach existing at that date. 15.5 If a matter disclosed in a Supplementary Disclosure Letter, alone or together with other matters so disclosed, constitutes a Material Adverse Change or a breach of a Fundamental Warranty, or would reasonably be expected to give rise to Losses exceeding ₹1,00,00,000, the Investor may, by notice in writing within 5 Business Days of receipt, terminate this Agreement under Clause 7.2, failing which the Investor shall proceed to Closing and shall have no claim in respect of the matters so disclosed.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The warranties are made twice: at signing and again at Closing, as if the agreement were being signed on 27 November 2026. If something goes wrong in between, the founders must tell the Investor within three business days. They can update the disclosure letter up to three business days before Closing. An update protects the founders against the Closing-day warranties but not against the signing-day ones. If the update reveals a material adverse change, a breach of a fundamental warranty or a likely loss over ₹1 crore, the Investor has five business days to walk away; if it closes anyway, it cannot claim for the matters disclosed.

What it means for you

The bring-down is why the four weeks between signing and Closing are not a holiday: a customer notice, a tax demand or a resigning developer becomes a warranty breach on 27 November 2026 unless you disclose it. Clause 15.3 is your tool; use it. Clause 15.4 means a supplementary letter does not rewrite history: if the problem existed at signing and you missed it, the Investor keeps its claim. Clause 15.5 is the founders' win: once the Investor sees a disclosed matter and still closes, it has accepted the risk. Without that sentence the Investor could close, take the shares and sue on the matter it already knew about.

What is normal

Repetition at Closing is universal in sign-then-close deals. A notification duty with a 2 to 5 business day window is standard. The right to deliver a supplementary disclosure letter appears in most negotiated deals; many investor first drafts omit it or state that supplementary disclosures do not qualify the warranties at all, which leaves the founders exposed for events outside their control. A 'close or terminate, but not both' election for the investor is the fair market position, with a materiality threshold of 0.5 to 1 percent of the round for the walk-away right.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the right to deliver a supplementary disclosure letter (as here). Ask that matters arising from events outside the company's control, such as a change in law or a market-wide event, qualify the warranties at Closing without giving the Investor a termination right. Ask for the 'close or terminate' election in Clause 15.5 so the Investor cannot close and then claim. Ask that the notification duty in Clause 15.2 is 'so far as the Promoters are aware' and that a late notification is not itself a separate breach unless it causes additional loss.

16. Investor warranties

16.1 The Investor warrants to the Company and the Promoters that at the date of this Agreement and at Closing: (a) it is a fund duly constituted as a trust under the Indian Trusts Act 1882 and registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India as a Category II alternative investment fund under the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations 2012, and Marigold Investment Advisors LLP is duly appointed as its investment manager with authority to bind it; (b) it has the power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement and the Shareholders' Agreement, and such documents constitute valid and binding obligations on it; (c) it has, and will at Closing and at the date of the Second Tranche have, sufficient committed and callable capital to pay the Investment Amount in full; (d) its execution of the Transaction Documents does not breach its constitutional documents, the terms of its placement memorandum or any law or order binding on it; (e) neither it nor its investment manager nor, so far as it is aware, any of its contributors is a person subject to sanctions administered by the Government of India, the United Nations Security Council or any other authority whose sanctions bind the Investor; (f) it is a person resident in India for the purposes of the Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999; each of its sponsor, manager and investment manager is owned and controlled by resident Indian citizens, or by non-resident Indians or overseas citizens of India on a non-repatriation basis, so that its investment is not indirect foreign investment under Rule 23 and Schedule VIII of the FEMA (Non-debt Instruments) Rules 2019; no beneficial owner of the Investor is situated in, or is a citizen of, a country that shares a land border with India; and the subscription requires no filing under those Rules and no approval under Press Note 3 of 2020; and (g) it is subscribing for the Series A CCPS for its own account and not as a nominee for any other person. 16.2 The Company and the Promoters shall be entitled to rely on the Investor Warranties and the Investor shall indemnify the Company and the Promoters against Losses arising from any breach of them, subject to a cap equal to the Investment Amount.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The Investor makes promises too. It is a properly constituted and SEBI-registered Category II AIF, the LLP signing for it has authority, it has the committed capital to pay both tranches, the deal does not breach its own fund documents, nobody behind it is a sanctioned person, it is resident in India, its sponsor and managers are Indian-owned and controlled and no beneficial owner is from a country sharing a land border with India, so FEMA filings and Press Note 3 approval do not apply, and it is buying for itself. The company and the founders may rely on these warranties and are indemnified, up to the ₹20 crore investment amount, if any is wrong.

What it means for you

Investor warranties are short but useful. The committed-capital warranty in Clause 16.1(c) is the one that matters for a tranched deal: a fund near the end of its investment period may not be able to call ₹6 crore in a year, and this warranty gives you a claim if it cannot. The residency and ownership warranty in Clause 16.1(f) is what keeps FEMA out of this deal: because Marigold is a domestic rupee fund whose sponsor and manager are Indian-owned and controlled, there is no FC-GPR, no FEMA pricing floor and no Press Note 3 question. If a foreign fund invests alongside, that investor would warrant its country of beneficial ownership and the Press Note 3 position instead.

What is normal

Four to seven investor warranties is normal; many first drafts contain two (authority and capacity) and founders add the rest. A committed-capital warranty appears in most tranched deals. A sanctions warranty is standard with institutional funds. Residency and Press Note 3 warranties are standard where any investor is or might be non-resident, and for a foreign investor the warranty usually extends to the beneficial owners of the fund. An indemnity from the investor capped at the investment amount is a fair and common position; many drafts give no investor indemnity at all.

How to negotiate it

Ask for a committed-capital warranty covering both tranches (as here) and, if the fund's investment period ends within the next 18 months, a confirmation that the second tranche has been reserved. Ask for a residency and Press Note 3 warranty from any investor whose ownership you cannot see, because a wrong answer makes the company responsible for a FEMA compounding application. Ask that the Investor Warranties are given to the Promoters as well as the Company. Ask for an investor indemnity with a cap, so the obligation is real rather than a bare warranty.

Indemnity and remedies

17. Indemnity

17.1 Subject to the limitations in this Clause 17 and in Clauses 18 to 20, the Company and the Promoters shall jointly and severally indemnify and hold harmless the Investor, its Affiliates and their respective directors, officers and employees (the "Investor Indemnified Persons") from and against all Losses suffered or incurred by any of them arising out of or in connection with any breach of the Warranties or of any covenant or undertaking of the Company or the Promoters in this Agreement. 17.2 The Company and the Promoters shall not be liable for a claim under Clause 17.1 unless: (a) the Losses in respect of that claim, or a series of claims arising from the same or substantially similar facts, exceed ₹5,00,000 (the "De Minimis"); and (b) the aggregate Losses in respect of all claims exceeding the De Minimis exceed ₹25,00,000 (the "Basket"), in which case the Investor may claim the whole of such aggregate Losses and not only the excess. 17.3 The aggregate liability of the Company and the Promoters under this Agreement shall not exceed the Investment Amount actually paid by the Investor at the date of the claim (the "Cap"), and the aggregate liability of each Promoter shall not exceed the lower of 50 percent of the Investment Amount actually paid and the fair market value of the Shares held by that Promoter on the date of the claim. 17.4 Nothing in Clauses 17.2 and 17.3 shall limit liability for fraud or wilful concealment by the person against whom the claim is made. 17.5 No Party shall be liable for any indirect or consequential loss, loss of profit or loss of goodwill, save to the extent that a diminution in the value of the Series A CCPS is treated as a direct loss. 17.6 A Promoter may, at his or her election by notice in writing within 20 Business Days of a claim being agreed or finally determined, satisfy all or part of the claim by transferring to the Investor Equity Shares having a fair market value (determined by the Auditors or an independent valuer appointed by the Board) equal to the amount so satisfied, subject to applicable law including Sections 50CA and 56(2)(x) of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026).

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

If a warranty or a promise turns out to be wrong, the company and the founders compensate the Investor for its losses. Small claims under ₹5 lakh do not count. Nothing is payable until eligible claims together exceed ₹25 lakh, and then the whole amount is payable, not just the excess. Total liability is capped at the money actually paid, and each founder's liability at the lower of half that amount and the value of their own shares. Fraud is uncapped. Indirect losses are excluded. A founder may pay a claim in shares instead of cash.

What it means for you

Run the numbers through the indemnity calculator on this page. With the defaults, four claims of ₹3 lakh, ₹7.5 lakh, ₹18 lakh and ₹4 lakh leave ₹25.5 lakh recoverable, because the two small claims drop out and the rest tip the basket. Your personal exposure as a founder is capped at the lower of ₹7 crore (half of ₹14 crore until the second tranche) and the value of your shares, and you can pay in shares, which keeps your house out of it. 'Jointly and severally' means Marigold may pursue you alone for the company's breach up to your cap; see Clause 21 for how a claim meets the second tranche.

What is normal

De minimis of 0.1 to 0.5 percent of the round (₹2 lakh to ₹10 lakh on ₹20 crore) and a basket of 1 to 2 percent (₹20 lakh to ₹40 lakh) are standard; a tipping basket is more common than a deductible one in India. A cap equal to 100 percent of the investment is the norm at Series A; 50 percent appears where founders have strong leverage, and caps above the investment are rare. A founder cap of 25 to 50 percent of the investment, or the value of their shares, appears in most negotiated deals, and the share-settlement election in perhaps a third. Exclusion of indirect loss is universal; the diminution-in-value carve-back is common.

How to negotiate it

Ask for several rather than joint and several liability for the founders, so each answers only for their own share of a claim; if the Investor insists on joint and several, keep the individual cap and the share-settlement election. Tie the Cap to the amount actually paid, not the full ₹20 crore, until the second tranche arrives. Ask for a tipping basket of at least 1 percent of the round and a de minimis of at least 0.25 percent. Ask that the fair market value for share settlement is determined by an independent valuer and that the Investor bears the Section 56(2)(x) tax consequence of receiving shares below Rule 11UA value, or that the mechanism is adjusted to avoid it.

18. Specific indemnities

18.1 Without prejudice to Clause 17 and notwithstanding any disclosure in the Disclosure Letter, the Company and the Promoters shall jointly and severally indemnify the Investor Indemnified Persons against all Losses arising from the matters set out in Schedule 4 (each a "Specific Indemnity"), namely: (a) any tax, interest, penalty or prosecution arising from the short deduction of tax at source on payments to contractors in FY 2024-25 under Section 194J of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026), in respect of which ₹3,20,000 has since been deposited together with interest under Section 201(1A), to the extent any further amount is demanded; (b) any Loss arising from the objection raised under Section 11 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 to the Company's application for registration of the mark "Saffron Flow" in Class 42, including the cost of rebranding if registration is finally refused; and (c) any Loss arising from any claim by the freelance developer named in Schedule 4 to ownership of, or compensation for, work performed for the Company in 2024 before the execution of the assignment deed dated 10 October 2026. 18.2 The De Minimis and the Basket shall not apply to a claim under a Specific Indemnity. 18.3 The aggregate liability under Clause 18.1(a) shall not exceed ₹25,00,000, under Clause 18.1(b) shall not exceed ₹50,00,000, and under Clause 18.1(c) shall not exceed ₹50,00,000, and such liability shall count towards the Cap. 18.4 A claim under Clause 18.1(a) may be made until the seventh anniversary of the end of FY 2024-25; a claim under Clause 18.1(b) or (c) may be made until the second anniversary of the Closing Date. 18.5 The Company shall use reasonable endeavours to resolve each matter in Schedule 4 and shall keep the Investor informed.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Three known problems found in diligence are carved out of the usual rules and indemnified separately: a short TDS deduction on contractor payments in FY 2024-25 (₹3.2 lakh since deposited with interest), the Trade Marks Registry objection to the 'Saffron Flow' application, and a freelance developer whose 2024 work was assigned only on 10 October 2026. Disclosure does not block these claims and the de minimis and basket do not apply, but each has its own cap, ₹25 lakh, ₹50 lakh and ₹50 lakh, which counts towards the overall cap, and its own time limit: 7 years for the tax matter, 2 years for the other two.

What it means for you

Specific indemnities are the price of a disclosed problem: the Investor accepts that you told it, but it wants you to carry the cost anyway. The danger version has no cap and no end date, which turns a ₹3.2 lakh TDS matter into an indefinite liability. Saffron's version caps each at a figure that reflects the realistic exposure. For the TDS matter the exposure is small because the tax and interest are paid; what remains is penalty risk under Section 271C and a possible dispute on whether the contractors supplied technical services (2 percent) or professional services (10 percent). The developer matter is the one to close fast: get the assignment deed registered in your IP file and obtain a receipt for any consideration paid.

What is normal

Two to five specific indemnities is normal where diligence has found something; many Series A deals have none. Specific indemnities usually sit outside the de minimis and basket but inside the overall cap, and each carries its own cap of 1.5 to 3 times the realistic exposure. Tax matters survive 7 years, outlasting the reassessment and TDS default time limits; other matters 2 to 3 years. A specific indemnity with no cap is investor-heavy and should be resisted except for fraud. Resolving the matter before Closing, where possible, is the cheapest outcome and often removes the indemnity entirely.

How to negotiate it

Ask for a cap on each specific indemnity (as here), sized to the realistic loss plus a margin, and for the caps to count towards the overall Cap. Ask for a time limit on each, 7 years for tax and 2 to 3 years for the rest. Ask for conduct of the underlying matter to stay with the company, since you know the facts, with an obligation to consult the Investor on settlements above a threshold. Ask that any specific indemnity falls away once the matter is resolved, for example on registration of the trademark or on a closure order for the TDS proceedings.

19. Claims procedure

19.1 The Investor shall give written notice of any claim under Clauses 17 or 18 to the Company and the Promoters within 60 days of becoming aware of the fact, matter or event giving rise to the claim, specifying in reasonable detail the nature of the claim, the Warranty or provision breached and, so far as practicable, the Investor's good faith estimate of the Losses. Failure to give notice within such period shall not relieve the Company or the Promoters of liability save to the extent that the Losses are increased by the delay. 19.2 Where a claim arises from a claim by a third party (a "Third Party Claim"), the Investor shall procure that the Company gives the Promoters reasonable access to the relevant records and personnel, shall not admit liability or settle the Third Party Claim without the written consent of the Promoters (not to be unreasonably withheld), and the Promoters may, at their cost and by notice within 15 Business Days, assume the conduct of the Third Party Claim in the name of the Company, provided that they keep the Investor informed, do not settle without the Investor's consent (not to be unreasonably withheld) where the settlement would involve an admission by the Company or restrictions on its business, and provide security for costs if reasonably requested. 19.3 The Investor shall take, and shall procure that the Company takes, all reasonable steps to mitigate any Loss. 19.4 The Investor shall not be entitled to recover more than once in respect of the same Loss, whether under this Agreement, the Shareholders' Agreement or otherwise, and any amount recovered by the Company from an insurer or a third party in respect of a matter giving rise to a claim shall be deducted from the Loss. 19.5 Where the Company holds insurance that may respond to a Loss, the Company shall first make and diligently pursue a claim under that insurance before a claim is made against the Promoters, and the period in Clause 20 shall be suspended while the insurance claim is pursued.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

How a claim is run. The Investor must notify a claim within 60 days of learning of it, with reasonable detail and an estimate; a late notice only matters if the delay increased the loss. For claims by outsiders, the founders can take over the defence at their cost and must be consulted on any settlement, and the Investor cannot settle without them. The Investor must mitigate, cannot recover twice for the same loss, must deduct insurance recoveries, and where the company has insurance that could pay, the insurer is claimed against before the founders are.

What it means for you

These procedural rules are worth more than they look. Conduct of claims lets you defend a tax demand or a customer dispute yourself, rather than watching the Investor's lawyers settle it with your money. The insurance-first rule in Clause 19.5 means a loss the company's own policies cover, such as a customer claim under a professional indemnity or cyber policy, goes to the insurer before it reaches your cap; the D&O and key person covers in Clause 12 rarely respond to warranty losses. No double recovery stops the Investor claiming the same ₹10 lakh under the SSA and again as a diminution in the value of its shares under the SHA. Keep a claims file from the day a notice arrives.

What is normal

A notice period of 30 to 90 days with a 'no prejudice unless the delay increases the loss' saving is standard. Conduct of third-party claims by the warrantors appears in most Indian SSAs; investor drafts often give conduct to the company under the Investor's direction, which is worth changing. Mitigation and no double recovery are universal. An insurance-first rule appears in about half of negotiated deals; investor-heavy drafts allow the Investor to claim against the founders first and leave the insurance recovery to be refunded later.

How to negotiate it

Ask for conduct of third-party claims by the Promoters (as here), with a consent right over settlements that restrict the business. Ask for the insurance-first rule and for the time limit to pause while the insurer is pursued. Ask that a claim notice must give reasonable detail and an estimate, so a one-line 'we reserve our rights' email does not stop the clock. Ask for a 'use it or lose it' rule: a notified claim that is not settled or brought to arbitration within 9 to 12 months of the notice lapses, as Clause 20 provides, accepting that Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 may limit how far it is enforced.

20. Time limits and treatment of payments

20.1 The Company and the Promoters shall not be liable for a claim under Clause 17 unless written notice of the claim is given in accordance with Clause 19.1: (a) in the case of the Fundamental Warranties, at any time; (b) in the case of the Warranties in paragraph 4 (tax) of Schedule 3, on or before the date falling 7 years after the end of the financial year in which Closing occurs; and (c) in the case of all other Warranties and covenants, on or before the date falling 24 months after the Closing Date (together, the "Survival Periods"). 20.2 A claim notified within the applicable Survival Period shall be deemed withdrawn, and the liability of the Company and the Promoters in respect of it shall cease, unless arbitral proceedings in respect of it have been commenced within 12 months of the date of the notice, save where the claim relates to a Third Party Claim that has not been finally determined, in which case the 12-month period shall run from the date of final determination. 20.3 Any payment made by the Company or a Promoter under Clauses 17 or 18 shall, to the extent permitted by applicable law, be treated as an adjustment to the subscription price paid by the Investor for the Series A CCPS, and the Parties shall file their tax returns consistently with such treatment, provided that no Party gives any warranty as to the tax treatment of such payment. 20.4 Where a payment under Clauses 17 or 18 is subject to deduction of tax at source or to tax in the hands of the Investor, the paying Party shall pay such additional amount as ensures that the Investor receives the net amount it would have received had no such deduction or tax applied, to the extent the Loss itself would not have been taxable.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

How long the promises last. Fundamental warranties (title, capacity, capitalisation) can be claimed at any time. Tax warranties can be claimed for 7 years after the end of the financial year of Closing, so until 31 March 2034. All other warranties and covenants expire 24 months after Closing, on 27 November 2028. A notified claim dies unless arbitration is started within 12 months of the notice. Payments are treated as a reduction of the price Marigold paid, to the extent the law allows, and are grossed up if tax is deducted from them.

What it means for you

The 24-month business survival period means your personal exposure for most warranties ends on 27 November 2028, just under two years after you get the money. Tax is longer because the Income-tax Department can reopen assessments for several years; the 7-year period is set to outlast the reassessment and TDS default time limits. The 12-month 'bring the arbitration or lose the claim' rule aims to close a notified claim, but Section 28(b) of the Indian Contract Act 1872 may make it void. The price-adjustment treatment in Clause 20.3 records how the parties will report a payment; it does not decide the tax. The Income-tax Act has no specific rule on indemnity receipts, so Marigold can argue that a payment compensating a fall in the value of its CCPS is a capital receipt that reduces its cost, but a tax officer may treat it as income. A payment by the company cannot actually cut the subscription price after allotment, because returning share capital or premium needs a reduction of capital under Section 66 of the Companies Act 2013, and a payment by a founder cannot be a price adjustment at all, since the founder never received the price. That is why the clause says 'to the extent permitted by applicable law' and gives no tax warranty.

What is normal

Survival of 18 to 36 months for business warranties is normal, 24 months being the most common; 7 years for tax; indefinite or 'the longest period permitted by law' for fundamental warranties. A 6 to 12 month period to commence proceedings after a claim notice is standard. The price-adjustment treatment appears in most institutional drafts, always with 'to the extent permitted by law'. Gross-up clauses are common but are usually limited so that the warrantor does not pay tax on a loss that would itself have been deductible.

How to negotiate it

Ask for 18 to 24 months for business warranties, with 24 months as the fallback. Ask that fundamental warranties survive for a fixed period, such as 7 to 10 years, rather than indefinitely. Keep the 12-month rule to bring arbitration after a notice (as here), but give nothing up for a shorter one, since Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 may make it unenforceable. Ask that the gross-up in Clause 20.4 applies only where the Investor is actually taxed on the payment, and not where the payment is treated as a price adjustment, so you do not pay for a tax that never arises.

21. Set-off

21.1 The Investor shall pay the Second Tranche Amount in full, without set-off, by transfer from its own bank account to the Subscription Account. Any amount agreed in writing by the Company and the Promoters, or finally determined by an arbitral award or a court of competent jurisdiction, to be payable to the Investor under Clauses 17 or 18 shall be paid by the Company or the Promoter concerned to the Investor by separate bank transfer on the same day. 21.2 Where a claim has been notified under Clause 19.1 but has not been agreed or finally determined at the date on which the Second Tranche Amount falls due, the Investor shall pay the Second Tranche Amount in full and shall not be entitled to withhold any part of it, save that the Investor may require that an amount equal to the lesser of the Investor's good faith estimate of the claim and ₹2,00,00,000 be placed in an escrow account with a scheduled commercial bank pending agreement or determination of the claim, with the escrow agent's costs borne equally by the Investor and the Company. 21.3 Save as provided in this Clause 21, all payments under this Agreement shall be made in full without set-off, counterclaim or deduction.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

If the company or a founder owes the Investor money under the indemnity and the amount has been agreed or finally decided, the Investor pays the second ₹6 crore in full from its own bank account and the company or founder pays the claim by a separate bank transfer the same day. If a claim is merely alleged when the second tranche is due, the Investor must still pay in full, but may ask that up to ₹2 crore of the tranche is parked in escrow until the claim is resolved. Otherwise, everybody pays in full without deductions.

What it means for you

Set-off is the clause founders fight hardest in a tranched deal, with reason: a draft that lets the Investor withhold the second tranche for any claim it 'reasonably believes' it has turns ₹6 crore of your runway into a bargaining chip, and an unproven claim becomes a reason not to pay. Saffron's version allows no set-off at all: an agreed or finally determined amount is paid back separately, which costs you nothing, since the money was owed anyway. The escrow compromise in Clause 21.2 protects the Investor against a founder who disappears while keeping the money moving. Indian law expects share money to arrive by bank transfer from the investor's own account, so Saffron's SSA settles an agreed claim as two payments on the same day rather than a deduction from the tranche; a deduction for a founder's debt would also leave the founder owing the company, which looks like a loan to a director.

What is normal

Set-off against a future tranche appears in most tranched Series A drafts. The negotiated norm is set-off only for agreed or finally determined claims; set-off for 'notified' or 'bona fide' claims survives in investor-heavy deals. An escrow of the disputed amount, capped at 10 to 30 percent of the tranche, is a common middle ground. A general 'no set-off' rule for all other payments is universal. Where no second tranche exists, the set-off clause usually disappears or is limited to dividends and other amounts payable to the Investor.

How to negotiate it

Ask that the tranche is paid in full and that agreed or finally determined claims are paid back by separate bank transfer on the same day, not set off (as here). If the Investor insists on protection for pending claims, offer escrow of the disputed amount capped at a figure (₹2 crore here, one third of the tranche) rather than withholding. Ask that a pending claim cannot delay payment of the undisputed balance of the tranche by a single day.

Other

22. Confidentiality and announcements

22.1 Each Party shall keep confidential the terms of the Transaction Documents, the Disclosure Letter, the contents of the data room and all information received from another Party in connection with the transaction, and shall not disclose them to any person except: (a) to its Affiliates, directors, officers, employees, professional advisers, auditors, financiers and, in the case of the Investor, its contributors and prospective contributors, in each case who need to know and are bound by equivalent obligations; (b) as required by law, a court, a Governmental Authority or the rules of a stock exchange, after consulting the other Parties where lawful; (c) with the prior written consent of the other Parties; or (d) to the extent the information is already in the public domain other than through a breach of this Clause. 22.2 No Party shall make any public announcement or press release concerning the transaction without the prior written consent of the Company and the Investor, save that following Closing the Investor may announce the fact of its investment, the name of the Company and the round size, and may include the Company's name and logo in its portfolio materials, and the Company may announce the round with the Investor's prior approval of the text. 22.3 This Clause 22 shall survive termination of this Agreement for 3 years and, following Closing, shall be superseded by the confidentiality provisions of the Shareholders' Agreement to the extent of any inconsistency.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Everyone keeps the deal terms, the disclosure letter and the data room confidential, with the usual exceptions for advisers, financiers, the fund's own investors, legal compulsion and public information. Nobody announces the deal without the company's and the Investor's consent, except that after Closing Marigold may announce that it has invested, name the company and the round size, and use the logo in its portfolio materials, and Saffron may announce the round once Marigold approves the wording. The clause lasts three years after termination and hands over to the SHA's confidentiality clause once the deal closes.

What it means for you

This is a short clause because the SHA takes over at Closing; the point of having it in the SSA is to cover the period before Closing and a deal that falls through. The data room and the disclosure letter are the sensitive items: the letter lists every problem the company has. The Investor's right to disclose to 'prospective contributors' means your financials can appear in a fund's next fundraising deck; ask that it is on an anonymised basis until Closing. The announcement rule protects your customers from learning of the round from a press release before you have told them.

What is normal

A two to four paragraph confidentiality clause with a 2 to 3 year survival is standard in an SSA; the detailed regime lives in the SHA. Investors always keep the right to announce the fact of the investment and to use the logo. A mutual approval right over announcements is normal; a company-only right is rare. Disclosure to limited partners and prospective limited partners is standard for AIFs and is rarely negotiable beyond an anonymisation request before Closing.

How to negotiate it

Ask that the Investor's disclosure to prospective contributors before Closing is anonymised. Ask for a mutual approval right over the first announcement and an agreed form press release as a closing deliverable, so the wording is settled before anyone is tempted to tweet. Ask that the round size may be described as 'Series A' without the valuation unless both sides agree to publish it. Confirm that the clause is superseded by the SHA at Closing, so you do not run two inconsistent confidentiality regimes for three years.

23. Costs and expenses

23.1 The Company shall reimburse the Investor within 10 Business Days after the return of allotment in Form PAS-3 for the First Tranche Shares has been filed, out of the First Tranche Amount and against invoices, for the reasonable and documented fees and expenses of the Investor's legal, financial and tax advisers incurred in connection with the due diligence, negotiation and execution of the Transaction Documents, up to an aggregate of ₹20,00,000 plus applicable goods and services tax (the "Expenses Cap"). 23.2 Save as provided in Clause 23.1, each Party shall bear its own costs and expenses in connection with the Transaction Documents. 23.3 If this Agreement is terminated before Closing under Clause 7 as a result of a breach of this Agreement by the Company or a Promoter, or as a result of the Company or the Promoters withdrawing from the transaction otherwise than in accordance with this Agreement, the Company shall reimburse the Investor's reasonable and documented fees and expenses incurred under Clause 23.1 up to ₹10,00,000, and such reimbursement shall be the Investor's sole remedy in respect of costs. 23.4 If this Agreement is terminated before Closing for any other reason, including the non-satisfaction of a Condition Precedent that is not attributable to a breach by the Company or a Promoter, or a decision of the Investor not to proceed, no Party shall have any liability to any other Party for costs. 23.5 No break fee, termination fee or other payment shall be payable by any Party by reason of the failure of the transaction to complete, save as expressly provided in Clause 23.3. 23.6 Stamp duty on this Agreement, the Shareholders' Agreement and the issue of the Series A CCPS shall be borne by the Company, and the Company shall bear the fees of the Registrar and the depository in connection with the issue.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The company pays the Investor's lawyers and accountants up to ₹20 lakh plus GST out of the money, within 10 business days after PAS-3 is filed. Otherwise everyone pays their own costs. If the deal fails because the company or the founders broke the agreement or walked away, the company reimburses the Investor's costs up to ₹10 lakh, and that is the Investor's only remedy for costs. If the deal fails for any other reason, including a condition that could not be met through nobody's fault or the Investor changing its mind, nobody pays anybody. There is no break fee. The company pays the stamp duty and the filing fees.

What it means for you

The ₹20 lakh comes off the ₹14 crore, so your usable first tranche is ₹13.8 crore, and GST on legal fees is 18 percent, so budget ₹23.6 lakh if the cap is fully used. The payment waits for PAS-3 because Section 42 bars any use of the money before then. The failed-deal clause is the one to read: Saffron's version limits reimbursement to a breach or a walk-away by the company, capped at ₹10 lakh. The investor-heavy version makes the company pay the full costs whenever the deal fails 'for reasons attributable to the Company', which a creative lawyer can stretch to a slow valuer. Clause 23.5 kills any break fee, which is right: the Investor is not paying one either.

What is normal

Investor expense caps of ₹15 lakh to ₹30 lakh are normal for a ₹20 crore Series A, with GST on top. Payment from the proceeds is standard, timed after the PAS-3 filing because the money cannot be used before it. Reimbursement on a failed deal appears in about half of first drafts and is usually narrowed to a breach or withdrawal by the company, capped at 25 to 50 percent of the expenses cap. Break fees are rare in Indian venture deals; they appear in competitive late-stage processes, not at Series A. The company bearing stamp duty and filing fees is universal because the law imposes them on the issuer.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the cap to be inclusive of GST, or at least to be stated with GST so there is no surprise. Ask for reimbursement on a failed deal only where the company breached or walked away, capped at half the expenses cap (as here), and never where a condition failed without fault or the Investor declined to proceed. Delete any break fee. Ask that the Investor's costs are invoiced to the company so the GST input credit is available to the company, since it is the one paying.

24. Assignment

24.1 No Party shall assign, transfer, charge or otherwise deal with any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement, or grant any trust over or sub-contract any of them, without the prior written consent of the other Parties, and any purported assignment in breach of this Clause shall be void. 24.2 Notwithstanding Clause 24.1, the Investor may, without the consent of any other Party, assign the benefit of this Agreement, in whole or in part, to: (a) an Affiliate of the Investor, including any fund managed or advised by Marigold Investment Advisors LLP or its Affiliates; or (b) a person to whom it transfers Series A CCPS in accordance with the Shareholders' Agreement, provided in each case that the assignee enters into a deed of adherence to this Agreement, the assignor gives the Company written notice of the assignment within 10 Business Days, and the aggregate liability of the Company and the Promoters to the Investor and all assignees shall not exceed the liability that would have applied had no assignment occurred. 24.3 An assignee under Clause 24.2 that is not a person resident in India shall, before the assignment takes effect, confirm to the Company that the assignment complies with the FEMA (Non-debt Instruments) Rules 2019 and that any required pricing, reporting and approval requirements, including under Press Note 3 of 2020, have been or will be satisfied at the assignee's cost. 24.4 This Agreement shall be binding on and enure for the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Nobody can hand their rights or obligations under the agreement to someone else without consent, except the Investor, which may pass the benefit to an affiliated fund or to anyone it sells its shares to under the SHA. An assignee must sign up to the agreement, the company must be told within ten business days, and the total liability of the company and the founders cannot grow because the rights are now spread across several holders. A non-resident assignee must confirm the FEMA position, including Press Note 3, before the assignment works.

What it means for you

The Investor's assignment right is what lets Marigold move the shares to a successor fund or sell to a secondary buyer and hand over the warranty claims with them. The founders' protection is the no-increase-in-liability rule: three assignees cannot each claim the cap. The FEMA confirmation in Clause 24.3 matters because today's deal is a domestic one; if Marigold later sells to a foreign fund, the FC-TRS filing, the pricing floor and the Press Note 3 question arrive with the buyer, and this clause makes the buyer carry them. The company and the founders cannot assign at all, which is normal.

What is normal

A no-assignment rule with a carve-out for the investor's affiliates and transferees is in nearly every Indian SSA. A deed of adherence requirement and a no-increase-in-liability proviso appear in most negotiated drafts. A FEMA confirmation from a non-resident assignee appears in about half of domestic deals and is worth adding in all of them. Assignment rights for the company are rare and unnecessary; the company's obligations cannot sensibly be performed by anyone else.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the no-increase-in-liability proviso (as here) and for notice of any assignment within 10 Business Days. Ask that an assignee that is a competitor of the company, as defined in the SHA, needs the Board's consent even if it is otherwise a permitted transferee. Ask for the FEMA confirmation from non-resident assignees at their cost. Ask that the warranties cannot be assigned separately from the shares, so a claim always sits with a shareholder you can see on the register.

25. Governing law and dispute resolution

25.1 This Agreement and any non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection with it shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of India. 25.2 Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, including any question regarding its existence, validity, interpretation, performance, breach or termination (a "Dispute"), shall first be referred by written notice to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a partner of Marigold Investment Advisors LLP, who shall attempt in good faith to resolve the Dispute within 30 days of the notice. 25.3 Any Dispute not resolved within such 30-day period shall be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 before a sole arbitrator appointed by agreement of the Parties within 15 days of a request, failing which by the Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration in accordance with its rules. 25.4 The seat and venue of the arbitration shall be Bengaluru, the language shall be English, and the award shall be final and binding on the Parties. 25.5 Nothing in this Clause 25 shall prevent any Party from seeking urgent interim or conservatory relief from a court of competent jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 or from the arbitral tribunal under Section 17 of that Act, and the courts at Bengaluru shall have exclusive jurisdiction for that purpose and for any application in relation to the arbitration. 25.6 Disputes under this Agreement and the Shareholders' Agreement arising from the same facts may be consolidated into a single arbitration at the request of any Party.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Indian law governs. A dispute goes first to a 30-day conversation between Saffron's CEO and a Marigold partner. If that fails, a sole arbitrator decides, chosen by agreement within 15 days or, failing that, appointed by the Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration under its rules. The arbitration sits in Bengaluru, in English, and the award is final. Either side can still go to the Bengaluru courts for urgent protective orders under Section 9, or to the tribunal under Section 17. Disputes under the SSA and the SHA about the same facts can be heard together.

What it means for you

Arbitration in Bengaluru with a sole arbitrator keeps a dispute private and relatively quick, 12 to 18 months rather than the years a court case can take. The 30-day negotiation step is cheap and settles most warranty disputes, so use it. The seat being Bengaluru means the courts there supervise the arbitration: a challenge to the award goes to the Commercial Court in Bengaluru, with an appeal to the Karnataka High Court, which is convenient for a Bengaluru company. Section 9 relief is what the Investor would use to stop you spending the money or issuing shares in breach, so expect it to be preserved; it works for you too if the Investor withholds a tranche. Consolidation stops you fighting the same facts twice.

What is normal

Indian law, a 30-day negotiation period, a sole arbitrator and an institutional fallback (MCIA or the Delhi International Arbitration Centre) with the seat in the company's city is the market standard for domestic deals. Three arbitrators appear in deals above ₹100 crore or with foreign investors, where Singapore is the common seat. Preservation of Section 9 relief is universal. Consolidation clauses appear in most negotiated multi-document deals.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the seat in your company's city (as here) and a sole arbitrator; three arbitrators triple the cost. Ask for an institutional appointment fallback with a named institution so a dispute cannot stall on choosing the arbitrator. Ask for the consolidation clause so the SSA, the SHA and any founder agreement are decided together. Ask that costs follow the event, so a party that brings a weak warranty claim pays the other side's costs, which deters tactical claims.

26. Miscellaneous

26.1 This Agreement, the Disclosure Letter, the Shareholders' Agreement and the Articles constitute the entire agreement between the Parties in relation to the subscription and supersede the term sheet accepted on 15 September 2026 and all prior discussions, provided that nothing in this Clause limits liability for fraud. 26.2 No amendment of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by or on behalf of each Party, and no waiver shall be effective unless in writing; no failure or delay in exercising a right shall operate as a waiver of it. 26.3 Notices shall be in writing in English and delivered by hand, registered post or email to the addresses in Schedule 8, and shall be deemed received on delivery if by hand, on the third Business Day after posting if by registered post, and on the Business Day after transmission if by email without a notice of failed delivery. 26.4 This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which is an original, and may be executed by electronic signature, including a digital signature certificate issued under the Information Technology Act 2000 or an Aadhaar-based e-sign, and the Parties agree that such execution shall be as valid as execution by hand. 26.5 The Company shall pay the stamp duty on this Agreement in accordance with the Karnataka Stamp Act 1957 and shall bear the stamp duty on any counterpart. 26.6 If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and the Parties shall negotiate in good faith a valid provision having the closest possible effect. 26.7 Each Party shall, at its own cost, execute such documents and do such things as another Party may reasonably require to give full effect to this Agreement, including the filing of forms with the Registrar and the depository. 26.8 In the event of any inconsistency between this Agreement and the Articles, the Parties shall exercise their rights so as to give effect to this Agreement and shall procure that the Articles are amended accordingly.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The boilerplate, each paragraph with a job. The SSA, the disclosure letter, the SHA and the Articles together are the whole deal, and the term sheet is dead. Changes and waivers must be in writing and signed. Notices go by hand, registered post or email, with deemed receipt rules. The agreement can be signed in counterparts and electronically, by DSC or Aadhaar e-sign. The company pays the Karnataka stamp duty. A bad clause is cut out without killing the rest. Everyone must do the paperwork needed to give effect to the deal, and if the Articles conflict with the agreement, the Articles get amended.

What it means for you

Three paragraphs deserve a founder's attention. The entire agreement clause means any promise made in a September email about, say, a board seat for a future round is gone unless it is in these four documents, so check them against the term sheet before signing. Electronic signature is valid under Section 5 of the Information Technology Act 2000, and most Series A closings now use DSCs or an e-sign platform; but stamp duty is still payable, in Karnataka at a nominal rate for an agreement of this kind, and an unstamped agreement cannot be relied on in arbitration until the duty and penalty are paid. The further assurance clause is what the Investor uses to make you file the PAS-3 if you drag your feet.

What is normal

Entire agreement, written amendments, notices, counterparts, severability and further assurance appear in every SSA. An electronic signature paragraph has been standard since 2020. The company bearing stamp duty on the agreement is universal; the amount is nominal in Karnataka for an agreement not otherwise specifically charged, typically a few hundred rupees under Article 5(j) of the Karnataka Stamp Act 1957, but in Maharashtra Article 5(h)(A)(iv) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act 1958 charges 0.2 percent of the amount agreed on agreements creating rights worth more than ₹10 lakh, which a stamp officer could apply to an SSA, and some other States also charge ad valorem on agreements that create rights in shares, so check locally. An inconsistency clause pointing to the Articles is standard and mirrors the SHA.

How to negotiate it

Ask that the entire agreement clause carries the fraud carve-out (as here), because without it a fraudulent statement in diligence could be excluded from the deal. Ask that the e-signature paragraph names the method, so a closing is not delayed by an argument about whether a particular platform counts. Ask that the notices clause lists email for both sides and treats a read-receipt or a reply as delivery, so a missed registered letter does not start a termination clock. Ask that the further assurance clause is 'at the requesting Party's cost' for anything beyond the statutory filings.

Example only

Disclosure Letter from Saffron Labs Private Limited and the Promoters to Marigold Capital Partners Fund II

A disclosure letter is the founders' answer to the warranties. Saffron Labs and its two founders deliver this one to Marigold on 30 October 2026, the day the share subscription agreement is signed, and every warranty in Schedule 3 of that agreement is read subject to it: a matter fairly disclosed here cannot found a warranty claim. Part A makes general disclosures: the indexed data room, the public records searched on 20 October 2026 and the accounts. Part B makes specific disclosures against numbered warranty paragraphs: an advisor promised equity by email, a TDS shortfall, two consultants who work like employees, a trademark objection, a change-of-control clause and a late annual return. Three of these matters are also specific indemnities under Clause 18 of the agreement, which disclosure does not switch off. Click any paragraph for what it says, what is normal and how to negotiate it.

From
Saffron Labs Private Limited and the Promoters, Ananya Rao and Vikram Menon
To
Marigold Capital Partners Fund II, a SEBI-registered Category II AIF acting through Marigold Investment Advisors LLP
Dated
30 October 2026, delivered at the signing of the Share Subscription Agreement
Against
The Warranties in Schedule 3 of the Share Subscription Agreement (14 warranty heads, given at signing and repeated at Closing)
Standard
Fairly disclosed: enough detail to identify the nature and scope of each matter and its likely effect (Clause 14.1 of the SSA)
Data room
Index dated 24 October 2026, 412 documents, annexed as Annexure 1; frozen copy delivered to Marigold
Supplementary letter
To be delivered at least 3 Business Days before Closing (27 November 2026) if anything changes
Specific indemnities
Clause 18 of the SSA still applies to the TDS shortfall, the Saffron Flow trademark and the freelance assignment, despite disclosure
Framework

1. Purpose and effect

To: Marigold Capital Partners Fund II, acting through Marigold Investment Advisors LLP (the "Investor"). From: Saffron Labs Private Limited (the "Company"), Ananya Rao and Vikram Menon (the "Promoters"). Date: 30 October 2026. 1.1 This letter is the Disclosure Letter referred to in Clause 14 of the share subscription agreement of even date between the Company, the Promoters and the Investor (the "Agreement"). 1.2 The Company and the Promoters make the disclosures in this letter against the Warranties in Schedule 3 of the Agreement. Each Warranty shall be qualified by the matters fairly disclosed in this letter, and no claim shall lie against the Company or either Promoter for breach of a Warranty in respect of any matter so disclosed. 1.3 The disclosures are made only to qualify the Warranties. They shall not imply any representation, warranty or undertaking not expressly given in the Agreement, shall not extend any Warranty, and shall not be taken as an admission that any matter is material or a breach of any obligation. 1.4 Nothing in this letter shall limit a claim under the Specific Indemnities in Clause 18 of the Agreement, which apply notwithstanding any disclosure.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The opening paragraph says what the letter is and what it does. It is the disclosure letter that Clause 14 of the share subscription agreement refers to, delivered the same day, 30 October 2026. Every warranty in Schedule 3 is read subject to what the letter fairly discloses, and Marigold cannot claim for breach of warranty on a matter disclosed here. The letter does nothing else: it gives no new promises, does not widen any warranty and is not an admission that anything disclosed is material or a breach. It also leaves the three specific indemnities in Clause 18 untouched; they apply even to disclosed matters.

What it means for you

This paragraph turns your disclosures into protection. Without it, telling Marigold about the ₹3.2 lakh TDS shortfall in paragraph 7 would be a confession; with it, the shortfall is carved out of the tax warranty and cannot found a warranty claim. Paragraph 1.3 stops anyone arguing later that by disclosing a matter you admitted it was material or a breach. Paragraph 1.4 is the limit you already accepted in the agreement: for the TDS matter, the trademark objection and the freelance assignment, disclosure does not help, because Clause 18 makes you indemnify them anyway, up to ₹25 lakh, ₹50 lakh and ₹50 lakh.

What is normal

A framework paragraph of 3 to 6 sub-paragraphs opens almost every Indian disclosure letter. The 'no claim for a matter fairly disclosed' rule and the 'no admission, no new warranty' rule are standard, and investors rarely resist them. Investors usually insist that specific indemnities sit outside the letter, as here, and some ask that general disclosures do not qualify the fundamental warranties on title, capacity and capitalisation, while accepting specific disclosures against them. The letter is delivered at signing, with a supplementary letter 2 to 5 business days before Closing.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the 'no admission' sentence in paragraph 1.3; without it, a disclosure can be quoted against you as proof that a matter was material. Ask that the letter binds the Investor's affiliates and any later holder of its shares, so a buyer of Marigold's stake cannot claim for matters you disclosed to Marigold. Ask the Investor to countersign the letter on the day of signing rather than acknowledge it by email. Accept specific indemnities on top of disclosure only for matters found in diligence, each with its own cap, as Clause 18 does.

2. Interpretation

2.1 Words and expressions defined in the Agreement shall have the same meanings in this letter, and the rules of interpretation in Clause 2 of the Agreement shall apply to it. 2.2 As provided in Clause 14.1 of the Agreement, a matter is fairly disclosed if it is disclosed with sufficient detail to enable a reasonable investor to identify the nature and scope of the matter and its likely effect on the Company. 2.3 Part A contains the general disclosures and Part B the specific disclosures. Each specific disclosure is made against the Warranty paragraph identified by its number and shall also qualify every other Warranty to which it is reasonably apparent that it relates. 2.4 A reference to a document is to the copy in the data room bearing the index number given, and a summary of a document in this letter shall not limit the disclosure of that document to the extent its contents are apparent on its face. 2.5 The quotation of a Warranty paragraph in Part B is for reference only and shall not amend the Warranty. 2.6 Where an amount is stated in respect of a matter, the matter is disclosed to the extent of that amount together with any interest or penalty that is reasonably apparent from the facts disclosed.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

This paragraph sets the reading rules. Terms mean what they mean in the agreement, and 'fairly disclosed' carries the agreement's test: enough detail for a reasonable investor to see what the matter is, how big it is and how it affects the company. Part A holds the general disclosures, Part B the specific ones; each specific disclosure is made against a numbered warranty but also covers any other warranty it obviously relates to. A summary does not shrink the document behind it, quoting a warranty does not change it, and a stated amount discloses the matter up to that amount plus the interest and penalty that obviously follow.

What it means for you

Two sentences here decide most disputes. The spill-over rule in paragraph 2.3 means a disclosure made against the tax warranty also protects you against the accounts warranty, without repeating it. The amount rule in paragraph 2.6 is the one to watch: if you disclose a GST credit reversal of ₹1,10,000 and the officer later disallows ₹2 lakh on the same vendor, the extra is not disclosed unless its basis was apparent. So describe the basis, not just the figure: 'all credit taken on this vendor's invoices', not '₹1,10,000'. If the agreement has a materiality scrape, precise wording matters even more.

What is normal

Interpretation paragraphs of 4 to 8 sub-paragraphs are standard. The test of enough detail to identify nature and scope is the Indian norm and must match the agreement word for word; where the two differ, the agreement usually prevails. Spill-over between related warranties is accepted in most negotiated letters, limited to what is 'reasonably apparent'. Investor first drafts often limit every disclosure to the amount stated; a compromise that also covers the interest and penalty following from the stated facts, as in paragraph 2.6, is common.

How to negotiate it

Ask for spill-over to related warranties, as in paragraph 2.3; without it, you must repeat each disclosure against every warranty it touches, and one missed cross-reference becomes a claim. Ask that summaries do not limit the documents behind them. Resist a rule that every disclosure is capped at the amount stated, and offer the interest-and-penalty compromise in paragraph 2.6 instead. Check that the letter adopts the agreement's definition of 'fairly disclosed' word for word, so there is no gap between the two documents for a later claim to use.

General disclosures

3. The data room

Part A: General disclosures. 3.1 The documents listed in the index of the virtual data room dated 24 October 2026, comprising 412 documents and annexed to this letter as Annexure 1, are disclosed as a whole. A copy of the data room as at that date, on an encrypted storage device, has been delivered to the Investor, and the Company shall retain an identical copy until the later of 7 years from Closing and the final resolution of any claim under the Agreement. 3.2 As provided in Clause 14.2(a) of the Agreement, a document so listed shall qualify the Warranties only to the extent the relevant matter is fairly disclosed on the face of that document. 3.3 Without limiting paragraph 3.1, the following documents are deemed specifically disclosed against the Warranty paragraphs noted: (a) document 2.14, the Seed Shareholders' Agreement dated 12 March 2024 (paragraph 2 of Schedule 3); (b) documents 4.07 to 4.09, the TDS statements and challans for FY 2024-25 (paragraph 4); and (c) document 7.03, the agreement with Tungabhadra Forge Industries Limited (paragraph 7). 3.4 A document added to the data room after 24 October 2026 shall not be disclosed unless it is listed in a Supplementary Disclosure Letter.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The whole indexed data room, 412 documents as at 24 October 2026, is disclosed in one sentence. Marigold receives a frozen copy on an encrypted drive, and the company keeps an identical copy for seven years or until any claim ends. Under the agreement's compromise, a document disclosed this way protects the founders only for what is visible on its face. Three documents are also treated as specifically disclosed against named warranty paragraphs: the seed shareholders' agreement, the FY 2024-25 TDS statements and challans, and the Tungabhadra Forge agreement. Anything uploaded after 24 October counts only if a supplementary letter lists it.

What it means for you

Disclosing the data room 'as a whole' is the founders' widest general disclosure, and investors resist it because nobody reads 412 documents with the warranties beside them. The agreement's answer is the face-of-the-document test: a lease that shows a rent escalation is disclosed; a problem you could only find by reconciling three spreadsheets is not. The frozen copy matters more than it looks. In a claim two years later the argument is about what the data room held on 24 October 2026, and without an agreed copy neither side can prove it. Documents uploaded after the index date protect you only if you list them.

What is normal

Data room disclosure is accepted in roughly half of Indian Series A deals, almost always limited to an indexed data room at a fixed date and often to matters apparent on the face of a document. A frozen copy, on a drive or with the data room provider, is standard. Investors who refuse general data room disclosure usually accept a compromise list of 10 to 30 named documents deemed disclosed against named warranties, as paragraph 3.3 does for three. The index is normally frozen 3 to 7 days before signing.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the indexed data room to be disclosed as a whole, limited to matters apparent on the face of each document; that is the market compromise and the agreement already gives it. If Marigold refuses, list 10 to 30 key documents that are deemed disclosed against named warranties, as paragraph 3.3 does. Insist on a frozen copy for both sides on the index date, with a file list both can check. Ask that your written answers to the Investor's diligence questionnaire go into the index, since that is where most problems are explained.

4. Public records

4.1 The following are disclosed to the extent the relevant information appeared on 20 October 2026, the date of the searches, in: (a) the records of the Company maintained by the Registrar of Companies on the MCA21 portal, including the index of charges and the filings of the Company since incorporation; (b) the records of the Trade Marks Registry relating to applications made by the Company; (c) the case status records of the courts at Bengaluru, the High Court of Karnataka and the Bengaluru Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal, searched against the names of the Company and each Promoter; and (d) the returns filed by the Company for FY 2023-24 to FY 2025-26, as downloaded on that date from the GST portal, the income-tax portal and the TRACES portal. 4.2 The search reports are at data room documents 1.01 to 1.09 and are the public records specified for the purposes of Clause 14.2(b) of the Agreement. 4.3 No other public register, and no entry made in any register after 20 October 2026, shall be treated as disclosed by this paragraph.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Four sets of records are disclosed, but only as they stood on 20 October 2026, the day the searches were run: the company's filings and charges on the MCA21 portal; the Trade Marks Registry records for the company's applications; court records in Bengaluru, the Karnataka High Court and the NCLT bench, searched against the company and both founders; and the company's GST, income-tax and TDS returns for three years, downloaded from the portals that day. The search reports sit in the data room. No other register counts, and nothing that appeared on any register after 20 October counts.

What it means for you

Investors push back on 'everything on a public register is disclosed' because it would make them responsible for knowing every entry on the MCA portal, every court database and every tax filing. Limiting the disclosure to named searches on a stated date, with the reports in the data room, is the fair middle, and it is what Clause 14.2(b) of the agreement asks for. It also helps you: the trademark objection and the late annual return both appear in these searches, so they are disclosed twice. Run the searches yourself before signing; a forgotten cheque-bounce case against a founder is better found by you than by Marigold's counsel.

What is normal

Public records disclosure is accepted in most Indian deals when it is limited to named searches run 7 to 14 days before signing, with the reports in the data room. Typical searches cover the MCA21 records and the index of charges, the trademark and patent registries, court and tribunal records in the company's city and the founders' cities, and the tax portals. A blanket 'all public records' disclosure is founder-heavy and rarely survives. Searches more than 30 days old are usually refreshed before Closing.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the named searches to count as disclosed, with the reports in the data room, as here. Offer to refresh the searches 2 or 3 business days before Closing and to put any new entries in the supplementary letter; that answers the investor's worry about stale records. Agree the list of courts and registries in advance, and if Marigold wants searches in the founders' home cities, run them. Refuse a carve-out that says public records never qualify the litigation or compliance warranties, since those are where public records matter most.

5. The accounts

5.1 The Accounts, being the audited financial statements of the Company for FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26, comprising in each case the balance sheet, the statement of profit and loss, the cash flow statement and the notes, together with the reports of Rao & Hegde, Chartered Accountants (data room documents 3.01 and 3.02), are disclosed for the purposes of Clause 14.2(c) of the Agreement. 5.2 A matter is disclosed by the Accounts only to the extent it is fairly disclosed on their face, including the notes, the auditors' reports and the related party disclosures. 5.3 The unaudited management accounts for the six months ended 30 September 2026 (data room document 3.03) are disclosed under paragraph 3. They have not been audited or reviewed and exclude the year-end provisions for gratuity on an actuarial basis and for deferred tax. 5.4 The general disclosure of the Accounts and the management accounts shall not qualify the Warranties in paragraph 3 of Schedule 3 as to those accounts themselves, but shall qualify every other Warranty.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The two years of audited accounts, FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26, with Rao & Hegde's audit reports, are disclosed as the agreement's third general disclosure. Only what is fairly visible on their face counts, including the notes and the related party note. The half-year management accounts to 30 September 2026 are disclosed as a data room document and flagged as unaudited and missing the year-end entries for gratuity and deferred tax. Neither set of accounts qualifies the warranty that the accounts themselves are right, but both qualify every other warranty.

What it means for you

Paragraph 5.4 is the fair answer to a circular argument. If the accounts qualified the accounts warranty, the warranty would say nothing: 'the accounts are true and fair, except as shown in the accounts'. Investors never accept that, and you should not ask. What you do get is that anything clearly shown in the accounts, such as a contingent liability or a balance owed by a founder in the related party note, is disclosed against the tax, contracts and other warranties. Read the notes with that in mind: if an item is described vaguely there, describe it properly in Part B as well. Paragraph 5.3 protects you on half-year numbers, which always move at audit.

What is normal

Disclosure of the last 2 or 3 years of audited accounts is accepted in almost every Indian deal, and the carve-out for the accounts warranty itself is universal. Management accounts are disclosed with an 'unaudited, prepared with due care' caveat, and the warranty on them is softer than on audited accounts. Investors accept that an item described in the notes is disclosed, but not one that can be found only by working through the ledgers. Management accounts more than 3 months old at signing are usually brought up to date.

How to negotiate it

Ask that the accounts qualify every warranty except the accounts warranty itself, as paragraph 5.4 does. Ask that the warranty on the management accounts says only that they were prepared with reasonable care on a basis consistent with the audited accounts, and write the caveats in paragraph 5.3 into the letter. Ask your auditors to check that every contingent liability note states an amount; a note reading 'claims not acknowledged as debts: nil' when a demand exists is a disclosure problem and an accounts problem at once.

Specific disclosures

6. Capitalisation

Part B: Specific disclosures. 6.1 Disclosure against paragraph 2.4 of Schedule 3, which provides: "Save for the Series A CCPS and options under the ESOP 2026, no person has any right, actual or contingent, to call for the issue, allotment or transfer of any share or other security of the Company, and no such right has been promised to any person." 6.2 In an email sent in July 2024, Ananya Rao, on behalf of the Company, offered the person named in Annexure 2 (the "Advisor"), who was then advising the Company on sales to manufacturers, 0.5 percent of the equity share capital of the Company for those services. No shares were issued and no agreement was signed. 6.3 The Advisor has been a permanent, full-time employee of the Company since 1 September 2026 and was confirmed in employment before the grant date, with no probation outstanding. By a deed of release dated 16 October 2026 (data room document 2.21), the Advisor irrevocably released the Company and the Promoters from any claim arising from the email, in consideration of the Company's undertaking that it shall grant to the Advisor 2,500 options under the ESOP 2026 on 1 December 2026 at an exercise price of ₹100 per option. 6.4 Save as set out in this paragraph 6, no promise of equity has been made to any person.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The capitalisation warranty says nobody has a right, or a promise, to shares other than Marigold's Series A shares and the ESOP. That is not quite true, so the letter discloses the exception. In July 2024 Ananya emailed an advisor offering 0.5 percent of the company for sales advice; nothing was issued or signed. The advisor joined as a permanent, full-time employee on 1 September 2026, has been confirmed in employment with no probation outstanding and, by a deed dated 16 October 2026, released all claims under the email in exchange for 2,500 options under the ESOP 2026 at ₹100 each, to be granted on 1 December 2026. No one else has been promised equity.

What it means for you

An email promising equity is a cap table liability even without a signed agreement: an advisor who did the work can argue that the offer was accepted by performance under Section 8 of the Indian Contract Act 1872. Left alone, it is a claim for 0.5 percent that surfaces when you sell the company. The fix is the one here: a written release in exchange for something defined, inside the existing pool. The advisor had to become a permanent employee first, because Rule 12 lets options go only to permanent employees and to directors other than independent directors, not to outside advisors. If the employment letter carries a probation period, confirm the advisor before the 1 December 2026 grant, or use a cash-settled award instead. The 2,500 options are 0.25 percent fully diluted, below the 0.5 percent grant size that needs the Investor Director's consent.

What is normal

Equity promised to an advisor by email or on a call is one of the commonest capitalisation findings in Indian Series A diligence. The usual clean-up is a written release in exchange for a defined award of 0.1 to 0.5 percent fully diluted: ESOP options if the advisor is or becomes a permanent employee, or a cash fee or a cash-settled phantom award if not. Investors expect the release to be signed before signing or, at the latest, delivered at Closing; an unreleased promise often becomes a condition precedent.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the release to be disclosed as a completed fact, with the deed in the data room, so the capitalisation warranty is clean at signing. Ask Marigold to confirm that the replacement grant sits inside the existing pool and needs no separate consent, which at 0.25 percent it does not. If a release cannot be signed before signing, offer it as a condition precedent rather than accept an uncapped specific indemnity. Before signing, search the founders' email for 'equity', 'percent', 'shares' and 'ESOP'; anything you find belongs in this paragraph.

7. Tax

7.1 Disclosure against paragraph 4.3 of Schedule 3, which provides: "The Company has deducted and deposited all tax required to be deducted at source within the time prescribed and has filed all related statements." In FY 2024-25 the Company deducted tax at 2 percent under Section 194J of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026) on three invoices of independent contractors for implementation services aggregating ₹40,00,000, treating them as fees for technical services. The Company has since accepted that the rate of 10 percent for professional services applied. The shortfall of ₹3,20,000 was deposited on 14 August 2026 with interest under Section 201(1A), and corrected statements were filed (data room documents 4.07 to 4.09). No notice, demand or penalty proceeding under Section 271C has been received. 7.2 Disclosure against paragraph 4.6 of Schedule 3 (input tax credit): credit of ₹1,10,000 availed in FY 2025-26 on invoices of a vendor whose GST registration was later cancelled with retrospective effect was reversed in the Company's return in Form GSTR-3B for September 2026, with interest under Section 50(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 for any period in which the credit was utilised, computed under Rule 88B(3) of the CGST Rules 2017. 7.3 This paragraph shall not limit the Specific Indemnity in Clause 18.1(a) of the Agreement.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Two tax matters are disclosed against two tax warranties. First, TDS: in FY 2024-25 the company deducted 2 percent on three contractor invoices totalling ₹40 lakh, treating the work as technical services, when 10 percent for professional services applied. The ₹3.2 lakh shortfall was paid on 14 August 2026 with interest, the TDS statements were corrected, and no notice or penalty proceeding has arrived. Second, GST: ₹1.1 lakh of input tax credit claimed on a vendor whose registration was later cancelled was reversed in the September 2026 return, with interest only for any period in which the credit was actually used. The TDS matter stays covered by the specific indemnity in Clause 18.

What it means for you

This is what a fair disclosure looks like: the section, the rate applied, the rate that should have applied, the base, the shortfall, the date paid and the status. What remains is a possible penalty under Section 271C of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026) of up to the tax not deducted, ₹3.2 lakh, which can be avoided by showing reasonable cause under Section 273B. That residual risk is why Marigold took a specific indemnity capped at ₹25 lakh: disclosure protects you on the warranty, the indemnity means you still pay if a penalty comes. On GST, check whether the same vendor appears in other months.

What is normal

Rate disputes under Section 194J are among the commonest tax findings in Indian startup diligence, because the line between technical services at 2 percent and professional services at 10 percent is unclear for software and implementation work. Paying the shortfall with interest at 1 percent a month before signing, and disclosing it, is the normal fix. Investors typically add a capped specific indemnity for the residual penalty risk, surviving 7 years. Small GST credit reversals that have already been reversed, with any interest due, are usually accepted on disclosure alone.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the disclosure to state the base, both rates, the shortfall, the payment date and the status, so the whole matter is fairly disclosed and not just the ₹3.2 lakh. Ask that the specific indemnity in Clause 18.1(a) falls away once the time limit for a penalty order passes or the proceedings close. Ask to keep conduct of any penalty proceeding, consulting Marigold before any settlement. For GST, ask Marigold to accept the reversal as closing the matter, with no separate indemnity.

8. Employment

8.1 Disclosure against paragraph 5.3 of Schedule 3, which provides: "Every individual who works for the Company on a full-time basis is engaged under a written contract of employment, and no consultant of the Company is, or may claim to be, an employee." Two software developers have been engaged since 2024 under consultancy agreements on fixed monthly retainers (data room documents 5.14 and 5.15) and work full-time from the Company's office under the direction of the Chief Technology Officer. These engagements may be treated as employment for the purposes of the Code on Social Security 2020 and the Income-tax Act 1961. Each agreement contains a present assignment to the Company of all intellectual property created under it. The Company has offered each developer employment from 1 December 2026, with service counted from the start of the engagement, and the Company shall bear any amount found payable for the period of the engagement. 8.2 Disclosure against paragraph 5.7 of Schedule 3 (compliance with the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013): the Company has had 10 or more workers since 2024, but its Internal Committee under Section 4 of that Act was constituted only on 2 September 2026. No complaint has been received at any time.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Two employment matters are disclosed. First, two developers have worked full-time in the office since 2024 under consultancy agreements on monthly retainers, managed by the CTO, so they may be treated as employees. Their agreements assign their work to the company, so the code is owned. The company has offered both employment from 1 December 2026 with service counted from the start, and will bear any back-dated cost. Second, the company has had 10 or more workers since 2024 but set up its Internal Committee under the POSH Act only on 2 September 2026. No complaint has ever been made.

What it means for you

A consultant who works fixed hours, at your desk, under your CTO, for one client, is an employee in all but name; this is contractor misclassification, and the label in the agreement will not decide it. The risks are back-dated social security, a tax argument and, if nothing was assigned, a claim to the code. Provident fund under the Code on Social Security 2020 applies only to establishments with 20 or more employees and does not cover employees whose pay exceeded ₹15,000 a month when they joined unless they were already members, and ESI stops at ₹21,000 a month, so for well-paid developers these are often nil. Gratuity counts service from the start of the engagement but becomes payable only after five years of continuous service, leave may be owed under the company's policy and the State shops and establishments law, and the tax argument is that the fees were salary on which tax should have been deducted under Section 192 of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026). Here the code is safe; the fix for the rest is conversion with continuity of service, here from 1 December 2026, just after Closing. On POSH, the late committee was a breach punishable with a fine of up to ₹50,000 under Section 26; the 10-worker count includes consultants and contract workers, whom the Act treats as employees. Constituting the committee ends the breach, not the history.

What is normal

Long-term full-time consultants turn up in many Indian startup diligence exercises, usually engineers hired before the company could run payroll. The normal fix is conversion to employment at or soon after Closing, with continuity of service, or a small capped indemnity for back-dated benefits. A late Internal Committee is common in companies that crossed 10 workers quickly; investors accept disclosure plus proof of constitution, a published policy and the annual report under Section 21 of the POSH Act. Left unremedied, either matter often becomes a condition precedent.

How to negotiate it

Ask Marigold to accept conversion with continuity of service as the cure, with no specific indemnity, since the code is already assigned. If it insists on an indemnity, ask for a cap tied to the realistic exposure, a few lakh rupees for two developers, and a 2-year limit. Offer the committee's constitution order, the policy and the first annual report as closing deliverables. Ask that the warranty on contractor status is given 'so far as the Promoters are aware', since classification is a judgement a court makes, not a fact you control.

9. Intellectual property

9.1 Disclosure against paragraph 6.2 of Schedule 3, which provides: "Each application for registration of Intellectual Property made by the Company is subsisting and, so far as the Promoters are aware, is not subject to any objection or opposition." The Company's application to register the word mark "Saffron Flow" in Class 42 (data room document 6.02) was objected to in the examination report under Section 11 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 on the basis of an earlier similar mark. The Company filed its reply within the time allowed (data room document 6.03), and the application awaits the Registrar's decision. 9.2 Disclosure against paragraph 6.4 of Schedule 3 (ownership of Intellectual Property): the freelance developer named in Schedule 4 of the Agreement developed a reporting module of the Company's software in 2024 under purchase orders that contained no assignment. By a deed dated 10 October 2026 under Section 19 of the Copyright Act 1957 (data room document 6.11), the developer assigned to the Company all rights in that work, worldwide and for the full term of copyright, for a consideration that has been paid. 9.3 This paragraph shall not limit the Specific Indemnities in Clauses 18.1(b) and 18.1(c) of the Agreement.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Two IP matters are disclosed. The 'Saffron Flow' trademark application in Class 42 drew an objection under Section 11 of the Trade Marks Act because an earlier similar mark exists; the company replied in time and is waiting for the Registrar's decision. Separately, a freelance developer built a reporting module in 2024 under purchase orders with no assignment of rights, so the developer owned that code until signing a deed of assignment on 10 October 2026, covering the whole world and the full copyright term, for a fee already paid. Both matters remain specific indemnities under Clause 18.

What it means for you

The freelance matter is the one that could have hurt. Under Section 17 of the Copyright Act 1957 an employer owns work an employee creates in the course of employment, but a freelancer owns what they write unless they assign it in writing. Until 10 October 2026, part of your product belonged to someone else. The deed fixes that, and its wording matters: an assignment that states no period is deemed to last 5 years, and one silent on territory covers India only (Section 19). The trademark objection is routine, but if registration is finally refused you may have to rebrand, which is why Clause 18 caps that risk at ₹50 lakh.

What is normal

Objections under Section 11 are common at examination for software marks in Class 42, and many are overcome by a written reply or at a hearing; investors usually accept disclosure plus a capped indemnity or a rebranding plan. Missing assignments from early freelancers turn up in many Indian diligence exercises. A confirmatory deed before signing, worldwide and for the full term, with the consideration paid, is the normal fix, and investors often make it a condition precedent. IP specific indemnities typically survive 2 to 3 years.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the signed deed to be a closing deliverable, and once it is in the data room, ask that the specific indemnity in Clause 18.1(c) is limited to a claim by the developer for further payment. On the trademark, ask that the indemnity covers rebranding costs only if registration is finally refused and the owner of the earlier mark objects to your use, not on a refusal alone. Ask for a 2-year limit on both, and consider filing a variant mark now as a fallback.

10. Contracts

10.1 Disclosure against paragraph 7.3 of Schedule 3, which provides: "No Material Contract may be terminated or varied by the counterparty on a change in the control of the Company, and each Material Contract may be terminated by the Company on not more than 90 days' notice without compensation." 10.2 The software subscription and services agreement with Tungabhadra Forge Industries Limited for the Company's deployment at its plant at Hosur, Tamil Nadu (data room document 7.03), permits the customer to terminate on 60 days' notice if any person acquires control of the Company. The Company's view, which the customer has confirmed by email (data room document 7.04), is that the subscription under the Agreement is not a change of control. 10.3 The following contracts, whether or not Material Contracts, renew automatically for successive periods of 12 months unless notice is given at least 60 days before the renewal date, and the fees for the balance of a term shall be payable on early termination: (a) the cloud hosting agreement (data room document 7.11; committed fees of ₹38,40,000 a year); and (b) the sales software subscription (data room document 7.12; fees of ₹6,00,000 a year). 10.4 Save as set out in this paragraph 10, no Material Contract contains such a provision.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Two contract points are disclosed. The Tungabhadra Forge agreement for the Hosur plant lets the customer terminate on 60 days' notice if anyone acquires control of the company; the company's view, which the customer has confirmed by email, is that Marigold's minority investment does not do that. Separately, the cloud hosting agreement (₹38.4 lakh a year) and a sales software subscription (₹6 lakh a year) renew automatically every 12 months unless cancelled at least 60 days before renewal, and cost the rest of the year's fees if ended early. Nothing else in the material contracts has these features.

What it means for you

Tungabhadra Forge is the Hosur customer that signed the mutual NDA for the paid pilot in January 2026; the pilot became this contract. Its change-of-control clause does not bite on a 20 percent investment, but the warranty asks whether such clauses exist, not whether this round triggers them, so it must be disclosed. Keep the list: on a sale of the company each of these clauses becomes a consent to collect before completion. The auto-renewals are small but real: miss the 60-day window and you have committed to another ₹38.4 lakh of hosting.

What is normal

Change-of-control termination rights appear in many enterprise customer contracts in India, usually triggered by a transfer of more than 50 percent of the votes or control of the board; minority rounds of 15 to 30 percent rarely trigger them. Investors expect them listed and, where the wording is loose, a written comfort from the customer. Automatic renewal with a 30 to 90 day cancellation window is standard for software and cloud services, and is disclosed mainly so that no one later argues the company can exit at will.

How to negotiate it

Ask that disclosure of a change-of-control clause is enough, without a condition precedent requiring the customer's consent, where the round does not trigger it. If Marigold wants comfort, offer the customer's email or a short letter rather than a formal waiver, which can reopen commercial terms. Ask that the contracts warranty applies only above a value threshold, such as ₹25 lakh a year, so routine subscriptions need no disclosure. Diary every renewal date and add the list to the monthly MIS.

11. Compliance and litigation

11.1 Disclosure against paragraph 9.2 of Schedule 3, which provides: "The Company has filed every return, form and document required to be filed with the Registrar of Companies within the time prescribed." The annual return of the Company under Section 92 of the Companies Act 2013 for FY 2023-24 was filed 41 days after the due date, with additional fees of ₹4,100 under Section 403 (data room document 9.04). No notice of adjudication of a penalty has been received, and the Company shall notify the Investor of any such notice received before Closing. 11.2 Disclosure against paragraph 8.1 of Schedule 3 (litigation and notices): in 2026 the landlord of the registered office issued a notice in respect of an instalment of rent paid 19 days late owing to a change in the Company's bank mandate. The instalment and the interest due under the lease were paid, and the landlord has confirmed in writing that the matter is closed (data room document 12.03). 11.3 Save as disclosed in this paragraph 11, no litigation, arbitration, prosecution or administrative proceeding is pending or, so far as the Promoters are aware having made reasonable enquiry, threatened by or against the Company or either Promoter.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Two matters are disclosed and the rest is confirmed clean. The company's annual return for FY 2023-24 reached the Registrar 41 days late, with additional fees of ₹4,100 (₹100 a day); no penalty notice has followed. In 2026 the registered office landlord sent a notice over a rent instalment paid 19 days late after a change in the company's bank mandate; the rent and interest were paid and the landlord has confirmed in writing that the matter is closed. Otherwise there is no litigation, arbitration, prosecution or proceeding, pending or, so far as the founders know after reasonable enquiry, threatened.

What it means for you

Paying the additional fee gets the late filing accepted, but it does not end the exposure: the Registrar can still adjudicate a penalty under Section 92(5) of ₹10,000 plus ₹100 a day of delay, which Section 446B halves for a recognised startup. On a 41-day delay that is unlikely, so disclosure, not an indemnity, is the right answer. The landlord matter is disclosed because the warranty covers notices that could lead to proceedings, not just cases filed. Paragraph 11.3 is the 'nil' statement for everything else; it is knowledge-qualified, so check with your company secretary and the searches in paragraph 4 before you sign.

What is normal

Late ROC filings are the commonest compliance finding in Indian startup diligence. Delays of under 90 days, regularised by paying the additional fee (₹100 a day for annual filings), are usually accepted on disclosure alone. Longer delays, a pattern across several years or an unfiled return usually become a condition precedent to regularise, sometimes with an adjudication or compounding application. Settled landlord, vendor and customer notices are disclosed with the settlement letter. A 'nil litigation' statement qualified by the founders' knowledge after reasonable enquiry is standard.

How to negotiate it

Ask that the compliance warranty excludes filings 'made late with additional fees and disclosed', which covers this and any similar delay you find. Ask Marigold to accept disclosure without a specific indemnity for matters closed by payment, such as the rent notice. Ask that threatened claims are covered only 'so far as the Promoters are aware', as paragraph 11.3 does, and that the knowledge test names the people you must ask. Before signing, pull the MCA filing history and list every late form with its date and fee.

Updates and acknowledgement

12. Supplementary disclosure and acknowledgement

12.1 If, between the date of this letter and Closing, any fact, matter or event arises which would make any Warranty untrue or misleading when repeated at Closing, the Company and the Promoters shall notify the Investor within 3 Business Days of becoming aware of it and may, not later than 3 Business Days before the Closing Date, deliver a Supplementary Disclosure Letter in the form of this letter, in accordance with Clause 15 of the Agreement. 12.2 A Supplementary Disclosure Letter shall qualify the Warranties only as repeated at Closing under the Bring-down, with the effect stated in Clauses 15.4 and 15.5 of the Agreement. 12.3 The Investor acknowledges receipt of this letter, its annexures and the copy of the data room on 30 October 2026. The acknowledgement shall not constitute acceptance that any matter is fairly disclosed, which shall be determined under Clause 14 of the Agreement, and the Investor reserves its rights under Clause 18 of the Agreement and in respect of any matter not fairly disclosed. 12.4 Signed by Ananya Rao, Director, for and on behalf of Saffron Labs Private Limited; by Ananya Rao and Vikram Menon as Promoters; and, by way of acknowledgement only, by the authorised signatory of Marigold Investment Advisors LLP for Marigold Capital Partners Fund II.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

If anything happens between 30 October and Closing that would make a warranty untrue on 27 November 2026, the founders must tell Marigold within three business days, and may deliver a supplementary letter up to three business days before Closing. That letter protects them only against the warranties as repeated at Closing, under the agreement's close-or-terminate rule. Marigold signs to acknowledge receipt of the letter, the annexures and the data room copy, but does not accept that any disclosure is fair, and keeps the specific indemnities and its rights for anything not fairly disclosed. Ananya signs for the company, and both founders sign personally.

What it means for you

The supplementary letter is your tool for the four weeks before Closing. It cannot repair this letter: a problem that existed on 30 October and was missed stays a claim. Under Clause 15.5 of the agreement, if a supplementary disclosure shows a material adverse change, a fundamental warranty breach or a likely loss above ₹1 crore, Marigold can walk away within 5 business days; if it closes anyway, it cannot claim for that matter. Marigold's acknowledgement is deliberately thin. It proves receipt of the letter and the data room copy, which ends any 'we never saw it' argument, but fairness is decided only if a claim is made. Both founders sign because both give the warranties.

What is normal

A right to deliver a supplementary disclosure letter, with a cut-off 2 to 5 business days before Closing, is standard in negotiated Indian deals, though investor first drafts often omit it. Supplementary disclosures usually qualify only the Closing-date warranties, with a walk-away right for the investor above a stated loss threshold or for a material adverse change. Investors almost always countersign 'by way of acknowledgement only'; a countersignature accepting the disclosures as fair is a rare founder win.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the right to deliver a supplementary letter, as here, and for matters outside your control, such as a change in law or a market-wide event, to qualify the Closing warranties without giving Marigold a walk-away right. Ask that Marigold countersigns on the day of signing, so receipt of the data room copy is beyond argument. Keep a running list from signing to Closing of anything that changes, so the supplementary letter takes a day, not a week. Have both founders read the final letter before they sign it personally.

Conditions precedent tracker: who does what, and what counts as done

Every condition in Schedule 1 of the SSA needs an owner, a date and a piece of paper that proves it is done. This is the tracker Saffron's company secretary ran between 30 October and 27 November 2026. The times are typical for a Series A in Bengaluru; the evidence column is what the Investor's counsel will ask to see before it countersigns the CP satisfaction notice.

Condition precedentWho does itTypical timeWhat satisfies it
Legal, financial and tax diligence completedThe Investor's counsel, accountants and tax advisers, with the Company answering requests through the data room3 to 6 weeks, mostly before signingA diligence sign-off or closing memorandum from the Investor's advisers listing open points, not an open-ended 'satisfactory to the Investor' standard
Definitive agreements in agreed formBoth counselsSettled before signing; the SHA is signed at ClosingThe SHA, the restated Articles and the disclosure letter initialled as agreed-form drafts; the SHA executed on the Closing Date
Valuation report under Rule 13A registered valuer appointed by the Company1 weekA report justifying ₹1,000 per Series A CCPS, addressed to the Board and in hand before the EGM notice went out, because the explanatory statement for the special resolution must include it
Special resolutions under Sections 42 and 62(1)(c)Shareholders at an EGM called by the Board21 clear days' notice, or shorter notice with the consent of a majority in number of the members, holding at least 95 percent of the voting share capitalCertified copies of the resolutions passed on 20 October 2026 with the explanatory statement naming Marigold as allottee; Form MGT-14 filed within 30 days
Restated Articles in agreed formThe Company's counsel drafts; shareholders adopt by special resolutionAdopted at the 20 October 2026 EGM, effective from ClosingCertified copy of the special resolution and the restated Articles; MGT-14 by 19 November 2026
ESOP 2026 adoptedBoard on 9 October 2026; shareholders by special resolution on 20 October 20262 weeksCertified resolutions and the plan document; MGT-14 within 30 days; the pool of 1,00,000 options reflected in the fully diluted cap table
Founders' employment, IP assignment and non-compete agreementsEach Promoter and the Company1 to 2 weeksSigned agreements in the agreed form delivered before Closing, with the ₹60 lakh remuneration and the non-compete tied to shareholding
DPIIT recognitionThe Company; recognition held since May 2023Already satisfiedA copy of the Startup India recognition certificate and a confirmation that it remains valid
Key person and D&O insurance proposalsThe Company with its insurance broker2 to 4 weeks for quotes; policies bound after ClosingAccepted proposals for ₹5 crore key person cover on each founder and ₹5 crore D&O cover; the policies themselves are conditions subsequent due within 30 days of Closing
No material adverse changeThe Promoters and the CompanyConfirmed on the Closing DateAn officer's certificate signed by the Chief Executive Officer confirming no MAC and no breach of warranty since signing
PAS-4 offer letter issued and PAS-5 record keptThe company secretary1 to 2 days after Form MGT-14 for the special resolution is filed; Rule 14(8) bars an earlier offerA serially numbered PAS-4 addressed to Marigold with the Investor's signed application form; the PAS-5 record maintained at the registered office
Separate bank account openedThe Company with its scheduled bank1 to 2 weeksA bank letter confirming a separate account designated for Section 42 application money
Board approval of the offer and the allotmentThe BoardOffer approved before PAS-4 is issued; allotment at the Closing board meetingCertified board resolutions; the allotment resolution dated 27 November 2026 allotting 1,40,000 Series A CCPS
Lender, landlord or customer consentsThe Company1 to 3 weeksWritten consents, or a confirmation from the Company's counsel that no contract requires one for an issue of new shares

Calculators

Change any figure and the result updates. Every formula is shown.

Closing deadlines calculator

Enter the date the money reached the separate bank account, the allotment date, the date of the special resolution, whether the investor is resident, and whether the shares are issued in demat form. The calculator lists every filing deadline that follows under Section 42, Rule 13, Section 56(4) and, for a non-resident, the FEMA reporting rules.

Worked example. Saffron's defaults: money received 20 November 2026, allotment 27 November 2026, special resolution 20 October 2026, resident investor, demat. The outputs: allotment deadline 19 January 2027 (60 days from receipt of the money); PAS-3 by 12 December 2026 (15 days from allotment); MGT-14 for the special resolution by 19 November 2026 (30 days), with a warning because that date falls before the allotment, so the filing is due before Closing; demat credit by 27 January 2027 (2 months from allotment); stamp duty on the issue at 0.005 percent, collected through the depository on allotment; DIR-12 for the Investor Director by 27 December 2026 (30 days from Closing); and MGT-14 for the restated Articles, if adopted at Closing, by 27 December 2026. Switch the investor to non-resident and two more lines appear: Form FC-GPR within 30 days of allotment and the FLA return by 15 July.
The engine counts calendar days and does not shift a deadline that falls on a Sunday or a holiday, so file a day early when the date lands on a weekend. Saffron adopted its restated Articles at the EGM on 20 October 2026, so its MGT-14 for the Articles was due on 19 November 2026 along with the Series A resolution; the 27 December 2026 line applies only if you adopt the Articles at Closing. The 60-day allotment clock runs from the day the money is credited, not the day it is sent.

Indemnity claim calculator

Enter the individual claims, the de minimis, the basket and whether it tips or deducts, the overall cap, the founder cap and the number of founders, and whether their liability is joint and several. The calculator shows which claims count, how much is recoverable and who can be pursued for it.

Worked example. Defaults: four claims of ₹3,00,000, ₹7,50,000, ₹18,00,000 and ₹4,00,000; de minimis ₹5,00,000; tipping basket ₹25,00,000; overall cap ₹20 crore; founder cap 50 percent; two founders; joint and several. Output: the ₹3,00,000 and ₹4,00,000 claims fall below the de minimis and are ignored. The eligible claims are ₹7,50,000 and ₹18,00,000, aggregate ₹25,50,000. The aggregate crosses the ₹25,00,000 basket, so under a tipping basket the whole ₹25,50,000 is claimable; under a deductible basket only ₹50,000 would be. ₹25,50,000 is within the ₹20 crore cap and within each founder's ₹10 crore cap. Under joint and several liability each founder can be pursued for the whole ₹25,50,000; if liability were several, ₹12,75,000 each.
The engine applies the de minimis claim by claim, so split a single matter into several small claims and the investor will aggregate them back under the 'series of related claims' wording that most SSAs carry. The founder cap is applied to the Investment Amount you enter, so use ₹14 crore until the second tranche is paid if your agreement caps liability at the amount actually invested. The engine does not model share settlement or insurance recovery; both reduce what a founder pays in cash.

Every term, in plain English

56 terms in 6 groups. Each one has the plain meaning, a worked example where numbers help, what is normal, what to watch for, and the India-specific rule.

Start here

What the SSA is, its combined form, and how signing and Closing fit together

SubscriptionBuying newly created shares directly from the company, so the money goes into the company and every existing holder is diluted.
Also called: Primary investment, Fresh issue, Subscription for shares

In plain English

A subscription is a purchase of newly created shares from the company itself. The company receives the money and issues the shares, so its capital grows and every existing holder owns a smaller slice of a larger company. A secondary sale is the opposite: an existing holder sells shares it already owns and keeps the money. The SSA documents a subscription: how many shares, at what price, when the money arrives and what must be true first. Because new shares come into existence, the Companies Act machinery applies: special resolution, offer letter, separate bank account, allotment and return of allotment.

Worked example

Marigold subscribes for 2,00,000 Series A CCPS at ₹1,000 each, ₹20 crore in all: 1,40,000 for ₹14 crore at Closing on 27 November 2026 and 60,000 for ₹6 crore after the Milestone. Every rupee goes to Saffron. Compare Vikram Menon's sale of 20,000 equity shares to Marigold on 15 December 2027: ₹2 crore changes hands, but it goes to Vikram, and Saffron's share count does not change.

What is normal

Series A rounds in India are almost always primary subscriptions, sometimes with a founder secondary of 1 to 5 percent alongside. The instrument is usually CCPS with a face value of ₹10 or less and the rest as premium, here ₹990 of each ₹1,000. Tranches tied to milestones over 6 to 18 months appear regularly in rounds of ₹10 crore to ₹50 crore.

Watch out for

Check that the number of shares, the price, the tranche split and the conversion terms match the term sheet and the restated Articles exactly. Watch for a right of the investor to nominate an affiliate to subscribe: it changes who sits on your cap table and, if the affiliate is non-resident, brings FEMA pricing and Form FC-GPR into a deal priced as domestic.

In India

A subscription by an identified investor is a private placement under Section 42 and a preferential issue under Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act 2013, priced on a registered valuer's report under Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014. Stamp duty of 0.005 percent applies to the issue, collected by the depository for demat shares. Angel tax no longer applies to shares issued from 1 April 2024.

Share subscription and shareholders' agreement (SSHA)One document that combines the share subscription agreement and the shareholders' agreement, common in smaller and angel rounds.
Also called: SSHA, Combined SSA and SHA, Subscription and shareholders' agreement

In plain English

An SSHA puts the purchase and the rulebook in one document. The subscription half covers price, conditions, Closing, warranties and indemnity; the shareholders' half covers the board, reserved matters, transfers and exits. It saves drafting and suits small rounds where signing and Closing happen together. The cost shows later: every future investor adheres to a document that still carries your old warranties and indemnity, the subscription terms cannot be cleanly retired after the claims period, and the next round usually forces a full restatement. At Series A most investors keep the two documents apart.

Worked example

Saffron's Series A uses two documents: the SSA signed on 30 October 2026, which falls quiet after Closing except for the warranty and indemnity periods, and the SHA signed at Closing on 27 November 2026. As an SSHA both would sit in one document, and a Series B investor signing a deed of adherence would be signing up to a document that still contains Saffron's Series A warranties.

What is normal

Common in angel and seed rounds below about ₹5 crore, often with signing and Closing on the same day. Uncommon from Series A onwards, where a separate SSA and SHA are the norm and only the SHA is restated at each later round.

Watch out for

If you sign an SSHA, make sure the subscription provisions (warranties, indemnity, conditions, Closing) end or are carved out when the next round restates the shareholders' part, and that the deed of adherence for new holders covers only the shareholders' part. Otherwise a later investor could argue it has the benefit of warranties given to an earlier one.

In India

The subscription half is an ordinary contract under the Indian Contract Act 1872. The shareholders' half is written into the restated Articles so that it binds the company and future holders, the practice that followed the Rangaraj decision. Either way the issue itself runs through Sections 42 and 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act 2013, and stamp duty on the document is State-specific: nominal in Karnataka, but in Maharashtra a stamp officer could charge 0.2 percent of the amount agreed.

Sign-then-closeA deal structure in which the SSA is signed first and the money moves at a later Closing, once the conditions precedent are met.
Also called: Deferred closing, Split signing and closing, Two-stage closing

In plain English

In a sign-then-close deal both sides are bound from signature, but the money moves only after the conditions precedent are met. The gap exists because some steps cannot be done, or should not be paid for, until the investor is committed: the valuation report, the offer letter, insurance, employment agreements. The gap brings three sets of rules with it: covenants on how you run the business meanwhile, a bring-down of the warranties at Closing, and a long-stop date after which either side can walk away. Most Series A rounds in India are done this way.

Worked example

Saffron signs on 30 October 2026, the day the 45-day exclusivity from the term sheet of 15 September 2026 ends. The conditions take four weeks and Closing is 27 November 2026; had it slipped past the long-stop of 31 January 2027, either side could have terminated. Between the two dates Saffron could not borrow above ₹50 lakh, hire anyone above ₹30 lakh a year or pay a dividend without Marigold's consent.

What is normal

Three to eight weeks between signing and Closing is normal for a Series A; Saffron's gap is four. The long-stop is usually 60 to 120 days after signing (here 93 days). Where every condition is ready before signing, the gap shrinks to days or disappears.

Watch out for

The longer the gap, the more can go wrong at your risk: a customer loss, a key hire leaving, a tax notice. Each becomes a bring-down problem or a ground to walk away. Keep the gap short, make every condition objective, and finish the slow corporate steps, such as the special resolution, before signing.

In India

The gap is shaped by the Companies Act: the special resolution under Sections 42 and 62(1)(c) and the Form PAS-4 offer must come before any money is received, and once money arrives the 60-day allotment clock under Section 42(6) starts. That is why the investor pays at Closing, not at signing.

Simultaneous sign-and-closeSigning the agreement and closing the deal on the same day, so there is no gap, no long-stop and no bring-down.
Also called: Sign and close, Same-day closing, Simultaneous signing and closing

In plain English

When everything the investor needs is ready before anyone signs, the parties sign and close in one sitting: the money arrives, the board allots, the register is updated and the documents are exchanged together. There are no conditions to chase, no interim covenants and no long-stop, and the warranties speak only once. The cost is that the company carries the work and expense of the corporate steps before the investor is bound, and the investor can still walk away the day before. It suits angel, seed and bridge rounds and small follow-on investments.

Worked example

Had Saffron's Series A been done this way, the special resolution, the valuation report, the PAS-4 offer and the separate bank account would all have been ready before a single signing day, with Marigold wiring ₹14 crore that morning and the board allotting 1,40,000 Series A CCPS that afternoon. Saffron would have carried the legal and valuation costs with no signed commitment from Marigold.

What is normal

Common for angel and seed rounds of up to about ₹5 crore, bridge rounds and small follow-ons. Uncommon at Series A, where diligence, insurance and employment agreements usually need 3 to 8 weeks after the terms are agreed.

Watch out for

Do not spend on the special resolution, valuation report and restated Articles before the investor has signed a term sheet with exclusivity and an agreed split of costs. Check that the special resolution, the PAS-4 offer and the PAS-5 record are dated before the money arrives: a same-day closing compresses steps that Section 42 requires in sequence.

In India

Section 42 still sets the order: the special resolution, filed in Form MGT-14 before the Form PAS-4 offer goes out, then money from the investor's own bank account into the separate account, then the board's allotment, with Form PAS-3 due within 15 days. Stamp duty of 0.005 percent on the issue is paid through the depository when the shares are credited.

Business DayA weekday on which banks are open in the named cities; the SSA's own deadlines count these days, while statutory deadlines count calendar days.
Also called: Working day, Banking day

In plain English

Saffron's SSA defines a Business Day as any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday on which scheduled commercial banks are open in both Bengaluru and Mumbai. Naming two cities matters: a holiday in either one is not a Business Day, so a bank holiday in Mumbai stops the clock even though Saffron's office is open. Every contractual window in the SSA uses it: the CP Satisfaction Notice, the investor's confirmation, Closing, deemed consent and cure periods. Statutory deadlines do not: the Companies Act counts calendar days.

Worked example

The CP Satisfaction Notice is due within 2 Business Days of the last condition, Marigold must answer within 5, and Closing follows 5 after that: 12 Business Days, about two and a half calendar weeks if no holiday intervenes. The return of allotment works differently: for the allotment on Friday 27 November 2026, Form PAS-3 is due by 12 December 2026, a Saturday, because the 15 days under Section 42 are calendar days.

What is normal

Indian SSAs define Business Days by the company's city and usually Mumbai, where the fund's bank or custodian sits. Contractual windows run from 2 to 20 Business Days: 2 to 5 for notices, 5 to 10 for responses and Closing, 10 to 20 for cure periods.

Watch out for

A definition that also requires banks to be open in a foreign city, which adds that country's holidays; a mix of 'days' and 'Business Days' in the same clause; and any belief that a statutory deadline moves for a holiday. PAS-3, MGT-14, DIR-12 and the 60-day allotment limit count calendar days, so plan to file before the deadline, not on it.

In India

No statute defines a Business Day; it is purely contractual. Bank holidays are notified under the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 and differ by State, so Karnataka's and Maharashtra's lists can differ in the same week. Statutory periods under the Companies Act 2013 run in calendar days, counted under Section 9 of the General Clauses Act 1897 by excluding the first day.

Electronic signature (e-sign)Signing the SSA electronically, by Aadhaar e-sign or a digital signature certificate, which Indian law treats as equal to signing by hand.
Also called: e-sign, Digital signature, DSC

In plain English

Most SSAs are now signed electronically, each party signing on a platform or on its own counterpart. Indian law recognises two methods by name: a digital signature certificate (DSC) and an Aadhaar-based e-sign under the Second Schedule to the Information Technology Act 2000. Platform signatures and scanned signature pages also form a contract, but they are easier to challenge in a dispute about who signed. Whatever the method, stamp duty is still payable on the agreement, so buy the e-stamp certificate on or before the signing date and attach it to the signed document.

Worked example

Clause 26.4 of Saffron's SSA of 30 October 2026 lets each party sign by DSC or Aadhaar e-sign and treats that as signing by hand, and Clause 26.5 puts the stamp duty under the Karnataka Stamp Act 1957 on the Company. A workable sequence: Saffron buys the e-stamp certificate on the signing date, the founders e-sign with Aadhaar, Marigold's signatory signs with a DSC, and the certificate is attached to the final PDF.

What is normal

Electronic signing has been the norm for Indian venture documents since 2020, usually through a platform offering Aadhaar e-sign for individuals and DSC for entities. Wet ink survives mainly for documents the IT Act excludes, such as a power of attorney under which someone signs for a founder.

Watch out for

Check that the person signing for the fund has authority under the fund's documents and an investment committee approval, that every signatory signed the same final version, and that the agreement is stamped on or before signing. An understamped agreement cannot be relied on in evidence until the deficit and a penalty are paid.

In India

Section 5 of the Information Technology Act 2000 gives electronic signatures the same effect as handwritten ones, and Section 10A makes contracts formed electronically enforceable. Aadhaar e-sign is listed in the Second Schedule; DSCs work under Section 3. The First Schedule excludes powers of attorney, wills, trusts and contracts for the sale of immovable property, but not an SSA.

The purchase

The price, the money, the allotment and the second tranche tied to the Milestone

Securities premiumThe part of the subscription price above face value, credited to a securities premium account that the company may use only in limited ways.
Also called: Share premium, Securities premium account, Premium

In plain English

Every Series A CCPS has a face value of ₹10 and a price of ₹1,000, so ₹990 of every share is premium. Face value goes to share capital; the premium goes to the securities premium account under Section 52 of the Companies Act 2013. The cash itself can be spent on the business like any other money once it is usable, but the account is treated like share capital: it cannot be paid out as a dividend, and returning it to shareholders needs a capital reduction. Its permitted uses are narrow: bonus shares, buy-backs, writing off issue expenses and premium on redemption.

Worked example

Saffron's ₹20 crore splits into ₹20 lakh of share capital (2,00,000 × ₹10) and ₹19.80 crore of securities premium (2,00,000 × ₹990). At Closing the ₹14 crore first tranche adds ₹14 lakh to share capital and ₹13.86 crore to the premium account. The ₹19.80 crore can fund salaries and sales, but none of it can be declared as a dividend.

What is normal

At Series A the premium is usually 95 percent or more of the price, because face value is ₹1 or ₹10 while prices run into hundreds or thousands of rupees. Here it is 99 percent: ₹990 of ₹1,000.

Watch out for

Writing off issue expenses, such as the investor's capped costs and the stamp duty, against the premium account is permitted, but agree the accounting with your auditors. Any clause under which the company refunds part of the price to the investor, for example an indemnity treated as a price adjustment, touches the premium account and may need a capital reduction.

In India

Section 52 of the Companies Act 2013 governs the account and treats it as paid-up capital for a reduction under Section 66. The premium has not been taxable since angel tax under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026) was withdrawn for shares issued from 1 April 2024. The Rule 13 valuation still has to support the price.

Subscription MoniesThe money the investor pays for its shares, held in the separate account and unusable until allotment and Form PAS-3 are complete.
Also called: Share application money, Application money, Subscription money

In plain English

Subscription Monies is the SSA's name for the cash the investor sends for its shares. Until the board allots the shares and the return of allotment is filed, the money is not yet the company's to spend: it sits in the separate bank account and may be used only to allot shares or to refund the investor. After PAS-3 it becomes ordinary company money, but the SSA still controls its use, through the business plan and a bar on repaying founder loans. Build your spending plan from the PAS-3 date, not the Closing date.

Worked example

Marigold's ₹14 crore reaches Saffron's Subscription Account on 20 November 2026. The board allots on 27 November 2026, and PAS-3 can be filed within days; the latest date is 12 December 2026. Until then the ₹14 crore cannot pay a salary. Afterwards Clause 4.3 directs it to product, sales and working capital, and Clause 4.2 bars using any of it to repay money owed to Ananya or Vikram.

What is normal

Investors pay 1 to 5 Business Days before Closing or on the Closing day itself; Saffron's SSA requires at least 2 Business Days before. Use-of-proceeds clauses list 3 to 6 broad heads, require investor consent for anything else and bar repaying founder or related party loans.

Watch out for

Do not let the money touch the operating account before PAS-3, even for a day; a sweep instruction can do it without anyone noticing. If the investor pays from an account not in its own name, or in amounts the PAS-4 does not describe, the allotment can be questioned. Keep the bank's credit advice: it is evidence the investor will ask for.

In India

Section 42 of the Companies Act 2013 bars any use of private placement money until allotment and the filing of the return of allotment, and Section 42(6) requires it to be kept in a separate account and used only for allotment or refund. Spend the money before allotment and PAS-3 and the company, its promoters and its directors risk a penalty under Section 42(10) of up to the amount raised or ₹2 crore, whichever is lower, with a refund order; Registrars have used Section 42(10) for exactly this breach, and for a startup or small company Section 446B halves the penalty, with a maximum of ₹2 lakh for the company and ₹1 lakh for each officer in default.

Separate bank account (Section 42)A bank account opened only to receive private placement money, from which funds may go only to allotment or to a refund.
Also called: Subscription Account, Share application account, Private placement account

In plain English

Section 42 requires money received on a private placement to be kept in a separate bank account with a scheduled bank; Saffron's SSA calls it the Subscription Account. Nothing else should be paid into it, and money leaves it in only two ways: by adjustment against allotted shares, after which it can move to your operating account once PAS-3 is filed, or by refund to the investor. Open it early: the bank needs a board resolution and KYC of the signatories, which can take two weeks. Opening it is a condition precedent in Saffron's SSA.

Worked example

Opening the Subscription Account is Condition (k) of Saffron's SSA, and its details go in Schedule 2. Marigold transfers ₹14 crore into it on 20 November 2026, the board allots on 27 November 2026, and once Form PAS-3 is filed Saffron moves the money to its operating account. Until then Clause 4.5 allows only a fixed deposit with the same bank.

What is normal

Most companies open one dedicated account per round and freeze or close it once the money has moved. Opening takes 1 to 3 weeks, and the money typically sits in it for 1 to 4 weeks in all, from receipt to PAS-3.

Watch out for

Using the main current account 'just this once' is the commonest Section 42 mistake and a contravention in itself. Check that the account is in the company's name, that no other receipts land in it, and that any fixed deposit stays with the same bank and is linked to the account. Interest earned is the company's taxable income.

In India

The requirement is in the proviso to Section 42(6) of the Companies Act 2013: a separate account in a scheduled bank, used only for adjustment against allotment or for repayment where the company cannot allot. Rule 14 of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014 also requires the money to come from the subscriber's own bank account and the company to keep a record of it.

AllotmentThe board's act of creating the new shares and assigning them to the investor, the moment its money turns into actual shares.
Also called: Issue and allotment, Allotment of shares

In plain English

Allotment is the board resolution that turns an application and money into shares. Before it, the investor has paid money and holds a contract; after it, the shares exist, the investor's name goes into the register of members and the company's capital rises. Under Section 42 allotment must happen within 60 days of receiving the money, and the return of allotment in Form PAS-3 follows within 15 days. In Saffron's SSA allotment happens at the Closing board meeting, in a fixed sequence with the register entry, the SHA signature and the Investor Director's appointment.

Worked example

Marigold's ₹14 crore arrives on 20 November 2026, which starts the 60-day clock to 19 January 2027. Saffron's board meets on 27 November 2026, records receipt and allots 1,40,000 Series A CCPS: share capital rises by ₹14 lakh and securities premium by ₹13.86 crore. The register of members is updated, the depository participant is instructed, and Form PAS-3 is due by 12 December 2026.

What is normal

Allotment within 1 to 10 days of receiving the money is usual; the 60 days in Section 42 is an outer limit, not a target. At Series A the allotment, the register entry, the SHA signature and the director appointment happen at one Closing board meeting, in person or by video conference.

Watch out for

An allotment made before the money has cleared into the separate account, to a name that differs from the PAS-4 offer, or of more shares than the special resolution approved is defective and hard to cure. Check that the authorised capital covers the new class; an increase needs a shareholders' resolution before allotment, filed in Form SH-7 within 30 days.

In India

Section 42(6) of the Companies Act 2013 requires allotment within 60 days of receiving the money, and Section 179(3)(c) requires the board to issue securities by resolution at a meeting, not by circulation. Form PAS-3 follows within 15 days under Section 42(8), and for demat shares the proviso to Section 56(4) requires the depository to be told of the allotment immediately.

Interest on delayed refund (Section 42(6))If shares are not allotted within 60 days of receiving the money, it must be refunded within 15 days, failing which 12 percent interest runs.
Also called: Section 42(6) interest, Refund of application money

In plain English

Section 42 gives the company 60 days from receiving the money to allot the shares. If it cannot, it must refund the money within the next 15 days. If it misses that too, it owes interest at 12 percent a year from the end of the sixtieth day until repayment, and the money is treated as a deposit under the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 2014, a status no startup wants. Saffron's SSA repeats the rule in Clause 4.4 and applies it to a refund after termination and to a failed PAS-3 or demat credit.

Worked example

Marigold's ₹14 crore arrives on 20 November 2026, so allotment is due by 19 January 2027 and any refund by 3 February 2027. Miss both and interest at 12 percent runs from the end of the sixtieth day: ₹1.68 crore a year, about ₹46,000 for every day the ₹14 crore stays unrefunded.

What is normal

In practice the clock is rarely close: Series A allotments happen within 1 to 10 days of receipt. The risk arises when money arrives early, before a condition such as a lender consent is ready, or when a Closing collapses after funding.

Watch out for

Do not let the investor wire money until the conditions are all but done. If a deal fails after funding, refund within the 15 days after the sixtieth day at the latest; the SSA's own refund clause (15 days from termination, Clause 7.4) can be faster than the statute. A late refund also brings the deposit rules into play.

In India

Section 42(6) of the Companies Act 2013 sets the 60 days, the 15-day refund window and interest at 12 percent from the expiry of the sixtieth day. Money neither allotted nor refunded in time is treated as a deposit under the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 2014. Section 42(10) adds a penalty and a refund within 30 days of the order where money was taken in contravention.

Milestone CertificateThe auditors' certificate that the company has hit the agreed milestone, which triggers the investor's duty to pay the next tranche.
Also called: Auditor's milestone certificate, ARR certificate, Tranche certificate

In plain English

When a round is paid in tranches, the second payment usually depends on a measurable event, and someone has to confirm it objectively. In Saffron's SSA that is the auditors: the Milestone Certificate confirms annual recurring revenue of ₹6 crore computed under Schedule 6, and it starts the clock for the investor's payment. The drafting that matters is the definition of the metric, who certifies it, how long the investor has to query it, and what happens if the investor stays silent.

Worked example

If Saffron's monthly recurring revenue reaches ₹50 lakh in August 2027, its ARR is ₹6 crore. Rao & Hegde deliver the certificate with the management accounts and the Schedule 6 computation by 30 September 2027; Marigold may raise queries within 10 Business Days and must subscribe ₹6 crore for 60,000 CCPS within 30 days of receiving it. The Milestone has to be met by 27 November 2027, and if the allotment falls after 19 October 2027 a fresh special resolution must come first.

What is normal

ARR or revenue milestones over 9 to 18 months are the most common, certified by the statutory auditors or a named audit firm, with 5 to 15 Business Days for investor queries. Treating silence after that window as acceptance is a founder ask worth making.

Watch out for

ARR has no accounting definition, so Schedule 6 must say what counts: signed recurring contracts only, monthly figures annualised or a trailing twelve months, GST excluded, one-time implementation fees out, discounts netted. A vague metric turns the second tranche into a negotiation at the moment the investor has least reason to pay.

In India

The certificate is a Chartered Accountant's certificate for a special purpose, issued under the ICAI Guidance Note on Reports or Certificates for Special Purposes and carrying a UDIN that anyone can verify. The accounting standards the company follows do not define ARR, so the contract has to supply the definition.

Near MissA result just below the milestone, which the SSA treats specially so that a narrow shortfall need not cancel the next tranche.
Also called: Milestone shortfall, Near-miss clause

In plain English

A milestone is binary: hit it and the money comes, miss it by a rupee and it does not. A near-miss clause softens that edge. Saffron's version is weak for founders: if ARR is at least 90 percent of the target, the investor must consider a waiver in good faith but need not grant one. Stronger versions give a proportionate tranche, a short extension, or a mandatory waiver within a band. Because the investor decides, a clause like Saffron's is only as good as your relationship with the fund at that moment.

Worked example

Saffron reaches ARR of ₹5.6 crore by 27 November 2027, 93 percent of the ₹6 crore target. That is a Near Miss (₹5.4 crore up to just under ₹6 crore). Marigold may waive and pay ₹6 crore, waive in part, or decline. Under the proportionate clause founders ask for, ₹5.6 crore of ARR would have earned ₹5.6 crore of the tranche, for 56,000 CCPS at ₹1,000.

What is normal

Near-miss bands of 85 to 95 percent of the target are common. Founder-friendly versions give a proportionate tranche (often at least 80 percent of the amount when 90 percent of the target is reached) or a 3-month extension; investor-friendly versions, like Saffron's, leave the outcome to the investor.

Watch out for

A duty to 'consider in good faith' is hard to enforce, so ask for a mechanical outcome instead. Check that the price stays at ₹1,000 if a partial tranche is paid, and that a missed milestone triggers no ratchet on the first tranche price and no new investor rights.

In India

A partial or late second tranche is still a fresh issue: it needs a fresh Form PAS-4, allotment within 60 days of the money and Form PAS-3 within 15 days, and it can rest on the original Rule 13 valuation report. If the allotment falls more than 12 months after the special resolution of 20 October 2026, Rule 13 requires a fresh special resolution and a fresh valuation report.

Second valuation reportA fresh registered valuer's report for a second tranche allotted under a fresh special resolution, showing that the fixed price is still justified when those shares are allotted.
Also called: Second tranche valuation, Fresh Rule 13 valuation

In plain English

The first tranche is priced on a valuation report under Rule 13. The second tranche is a separate allotment months later. Within 12 months of the special resolution it can rest on the same report at the fixed ₹1,000; a fresh special resolution after that needs a fresh report. The awkward part is the direction of travel: the price is fixed at ₹1,000, but a company that has grown into its Milestone may now be worth more. Rule 13 expects the price to be determined on the valuer's report, so a fresh report has to support ₹1,000 at the new date. If it values the shares above ₹1,000, the company cannot issue at ₹1,000, and the SSA must say what happens then.

Worked example

Saffron allots the first tranche on 27 November 2026 on a report justifying ₹1,000. If the Milestone Certificate arrives on 30 September 2027 and Marigold pays in late October 2027, the allotment falls after 19 October 2027, more than 12 months after the special resolution of 20 October 2026, so Clause 11.4(d) requires a fresh special resolution and Clause 11.4(b) a new report supporting a price of not more than ₹1,000. An allotment by 19 October 2027 could rest on the original report.

What is normal

Rule 13 sets no shelf life for a valuation report and no fixed 60-day rule. Within 12 months of the special resolution the original report supports the fixed price. A fresh report comes with a fresh special resolution, where possible from the same registered valuer, which keeps the method consistent. Deals whose tranches run beyond 12 months from the resolution plan a fresh special resolution from the start.

Watch out for

If the company outperforms, a fresh report may value the shares above ₹1,000, and the company then cannot issue at ₹1,000, so agree in the SSA what happens then and which method the second report will use.

In India

Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014 requires the price of each preferential issue to be determined on a registered valuer's report and the allotment to be completed within 12 months of the special resolution. If the investor were non-resident, the FEMA (Non-debt Instruments) Rules 2019 would also bar issuing below fair value at the second allotment.

Conditions and closing

What must happen before the money moves, what you cannot do meanwhile, and the cure

CP Satisfaction NoticeThe company's formal notice, with evidence, that every condition precedent has been met, which starts the countdown to Closing.
Also called: Conditions satisfaction notice, CP notice, Satisfaction certificate

In plain English

Conditions precedent are satisfied in pieces over weeks, and someone has to say when they are all done. The CP Satisfaction Notice does that: the company delivers it with evidence for each condition, in the form Schedule 1 prescribes. The investor then confirms within a fixed window or lists in writing what it says is still missing, and its confirmation starts the Closing clock. The notice turns 'when the investor is happy' into a dated, documented step, and the deadlines around it decide how long the investor can sit on its hands.

Worked example

Suppose the last condition to land is the insurers' acceptance of the key person and D&O proposals. Saffron then has 2 Business Days to send the notice with its evidence pack: certified resolutions and the MGT-14 filing, the PAS-4 and PAS-5, insurance acceptances, signed employment and IP agreements and the bank's account letter. Marigold has 5 Business Days to confirm or list deficiencies, and Closing follows 5 Business Days after confirmation, on 27 November 2026.

What is normal

A notice within 1 to 3 Business Days of the last condition and an investor response window of 3 to 7 Business Days are standard. A deemed-satisfaction rule, under which silence after the window counts as confirmation, is a founder ask worth making; investors resist it most for the diligence and no-MAC conditions.

Watch out for

Saffron's SSA has no deemed-satisfaction rule, so Marigold's silence after 5 Business Days does not move Closing; ask for one. Make sure the no-MAC condition is excluded from the notice (the Officer's Certificate confirms it at Closing), and that the evidence for each condition is listed precisely in Schedule 1, so the investor cannot ask for more on the day.

In India

No form or filing is involved; it is a contractual notice. The evidence pack, though, is made of statutory documents: the Form MGT-14 filing for the special resolution, the PAS-4 offer and PAS-5 record under Rule 14 of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014, and the registered valuer's report under Rule 13.

Waiver of a condition precedentThe investor's written decision to close although a condition precedent is not met, often turning it into a post-Closing obligation.
Also called: CP waiver, Waive a condition, Conditional waiver

In plain English

Conditions precedent exist for someone's benefit, and only that party can waive them. In Saffron's SSA almost every condition is for the investor alone, so only Marigold can waive, only in writing, and it may attach conditions. A waived condition does not disappear: if it can still be done after Closing, the company must do it within 30 days. That is useful when one item, such as an insurance policy or a landlord consent, is late and everything else is ready. Some conditions cannot really be waived at all, because the law itself requires them.

Worked example

Suppose the key person insurer is still underwriting Vikram's ₹5 crore policy when every other condition is met. Marigold can waive Condition (g) in writing, on terms that the accepted proposal arrives within 30 days of Closing. The deal closes on 27 November 2026 as planned, and the waived condition becomes a deadline of 27 December 2026.

What is normal

Waivers by the investor alone, in writing, are standard; mutual conditions, such as the SHA being in agreed form, need both sides. Waived items typically become conditions subsequent with 15 to 60 days to complete.

Watch out for

No one can waive a legal requirement: the special resolution, the valuation report, the PAS-4 offer and the separate bank account appear as conditions in the SSA, but skipping them breaks the Companies Act whatever the investor writes. Watch also for a waiver that reserves a claim for the missing item, which reopens the issue after Closing.

In India

Section 63 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 lets a promisee dispense with or remit performance owed to it, or extend the time for it, which is the legal basis of a waiver. No waiver can validate a statutory step: Sections 42 and 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act 2013 and Rule 13 apply whatever the SSA says.

Pre-closing covenantsPromises about how the company will run between signing and Closing: ordinary course, and a list of steps needing the investor's consent.
Also called: Conduct of business covenants, Interim covenants, Ordinary course covenants

In plain English

Between signing and Closing the investor has agreed a price for a company it does not yet own a share of. Pre-closing covenants protect that price: you promise to run the business in the ordinary course, keep assets and relationships intact, and not take a list of significant steps without consent. They are the SSA's short-term version of the SHA's reserved matters. The thresholds decide how much they bite, and a deemed-consent rule decides whether a slow fund can freeze your hiring.

Worked example

From 30 October to 27 November 2026, Saffron needs Marigold's consent to borrow more than ₹50 lakh, hire anyone above ₹30 lakh a year, settle a claim above ₹10 lakh, sell an asset worth over ₹25 lakh, pay a dividend or enter into a related party transaction. A written request that Marigold ignores for 5 Business Days is deemed approved.

What is normal

Ordinary course plus 8 to 12 negative covenants is normal at Series A, with thresholds of ₹25 lakh to ₹1 crore for debt and assets, hiring caps aligned with the approved plan, and deemed consent after 5 to 10 Business Days.

Watch out for

Covenants that copy every SHA reserved matter into a four-week window; consent in the investor's 'sole discretion' rather than 'not to be unreasonably withheld'; no deemed consent; and no carve-out for actions in the approved business plan or required by law. Each breach is also a problem at the bring-down.

In India

No statute governs these covenants. A minority Series A below the Competition Act 2002 small-target thresholds needs no CCI filing, so they raise no gun-jumping concern; in a notifiable deal, consent rights before approval must stop short of giving the acquirer control of the business.

Leakage (between signing and Closing)Value leaving the company after signing and before the investor's money arrives, such as dividends, founder payments or unapproved spending.
Also called: Value leakage, Pre-closing leakage

In plain English

Leakage is value that walks out of the company after the price is fixed and before the investor is in. In a share purchase it is usually handled by a locked-box price and recovered rupee for rupee (leakage in a share purchase). An SSA has no price adjustment: the investor relies on the conduct covenants to stop leakage and on the bring-down and indemnity to recover it. Typical leakage is a dividend, a bonus to a founder, a payment to a related party, a waiver of money owed to the company, or new debt that funds any of these.

Worked example

If Saffron paid each founder a ₹15 lakh bonus on 20 November 2026 without consent, ₹30 lakh would leave a company Marigold had priced at ₹80 crore pre-money, in breach of Clause 8.2(c). Marigold could require repayment before Closing or claim under the indemnity: a ₹30 lakh claim clears the ₹5 lakh de minimis and, on its own, the ₹25 lakh tipping basket, so all of it is claimable.

What is normal

Series A SSAs control leakage through 8 to 12 conduct covenants rather than a price mechanism, with thresholds of ₹10 lakh to ₹1 crore depending on the item. Locked-box pricing with rupee-for-rupee recovery belongs to share purchases, not subscriptions.

Watch out for

Permitted payments that are not listed: salaries in the approved budget, ESOP grants under the adopted plan and ordinary course payments to related parties at arm's length should be carved out expressly. Without that list, routine payments can be argued to be breaches.

In India

Payments to founders, their relatives or their companies are often related party transactions under Section 188 of the Companies Act 2013, needing board approval and, above the thresholds, shareholder approval. A dividend paid in the gap would be taxed in the founders' hands at slab rates and would breach Clause 8.2(a).

Break feeA fixed payment by one side if the deal fails for reasons on its side; Saffron's SSA has none, only capped reimbursement of costs.
Also called: Termination fee, Reverse break fee, Walk-away fee

In plain English

A break fee compensates one side for the time and money it spent if the other side causes the deal to fail. Investors sometimes ask the company for one, in case the founders walk away for a better offer; founders occasionally ask an investor that fails to fund for a reverse break fee. Saffron's SSA has neither: Clause 23.5 says no break fee is payable, and Clause 23.3 gives Marigold only its documented costs, capped at ₹10 lakh, if the deal fails because of a breach or withdrawal by the company or the founders.

Worked example

Marigold's costs are capped at ₹20 lakh plus GST if the deal closes. If Saffron walked away on 20 November 2026 to take a rival term sheet, Marigold would recover its documented costs up to ₹10 lakh and nothing more. A break fee of 1 percent of the round would have added ₹20 lakh on top.

What is normal

Break fees are rare in Indian venture rounds. Capped reimbursement of documented costs, typically ₹5 lakh to ₹25 lakh, on a failure caused by the company is the usual substitute; reverse break fees from investors are rarer still.

Watch out for

A break fee dressed as 'liquidated damages', or a costs reimbursement with no cap that is payable even when the deal fails because a condition outside your control was not met. Reimbursement should apply only to a failure caused by the company's breach or withdrawal, never to a missed condition or the investor's own decision not to proceed.

In India

Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 lets a court award only reasonable compensation up to a stated sum, and where loss can be proved Indian courts expect it to be proved, so a break fee well above real costs may be cut down. A capped reimbursement of documented costs avoids that argument.

Closing deliverablesThe documents each side must hand over at Closing, listed in a schedule, so that Closing becomes a checklist rather than a negotiation.
Also called: Closing documents, Completion deliverables, Closing checklist

In plain English

The Closing Deliverables schedule lists what each party must produce at Closing. For the company: certified board and shareholder resolutions, the PAS-4 offer and PAS-5 record, the valuation report, the restated Articles as adopted, the Officer's Certificate, signed employment and IP agreements, insurance confirmations, a register of members extract, the depository instruction and the legal opinion. For the investor: evidence of its authority, its KYC and demat details, and the money. If an item is missing, Closing can be deferred and in the end terminated. A precise list protects you, because nobody can add items on the day.

Worked example

Saffron's Schedule 2 lists ten company items, from (a) certified resolutions with evidence of the MGT-14 filings to (j) the legal opinion. Items (h) and (i), the register extract showing Marigold as holder of 1,40,000 Series A CCPS and the instruction to the depository participant, exist only once the board allots on 27 November 2026, which is why the board meeting sits inside the Closing sequence.

What is normal

Eight to fifteen company deliverables is normal at Series A. Electronic Closings, with e-signed or scanned documents exchanged on a call, have been standard since 2020; originals follow within 5 to 10 Business Days where needed.

Watch out for

Items that depend on third parties you do not control, such as a lender's no-objection or a landlord's consent, should be conditions with a waiver route, not deliverables on the day. Check that each 'certified copy' names who certifies (a director or the company secretary) and that every 'agreed form' document is initialled before signing.

In India

Several deliverables are statutory documents: the special resolution with its Form MGT-14, the Form PAS-4 offer and PAS-5 record under Rule 14 of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014, and the Rule 13 valuation report. The register of members is the statutory register kept under Section 88 of the Companies Act 2013.

Officer's CertificateA certificate signed by a director or officer at Closing confirming facts the investor relies on, such as no material adverse change.
Also called: Closing certificate, Bring-down certificate, Compliance certificate

In plain English

An Officer's Certificate is the company's signed confirmation, dated the Closing Date, of facts that documents alone cannot prove: no material adverse change has occurred, the warranties are true as repeated at Closing, and the covenants have been complied with. It is usually signed by the chief executive on the company's behalf. It turns the bring-down into a dated written statement, so if it is wrong the investor has a clear claim. Sign it as an officer of the company, and only after checking each statement with the people who know.

Worked example

On 27 November 2026 Ananya Rao, as Chief Executive Officer, signs Saffron's Officer's Certificate confirming that no Material Adverse Change has occurred, which satisfies Condition (l), that the Warranties are true at Closing subject to any Supplementary Disclosure Letter, and that Clause 8 has been complied with. Had a ₹1.2 crore customer loss been known and left out, the certificate would be the first exhibit in Marigold's claim.

What is normal

One certificate signed by the chief executive or a whole-time director is normal; some investors ask for both founders. It covers no-MAC, the bring-down of the warranties and compliance with covenants, and runs to a page or two.

Watch out for

Wording that makes the signatory personally liable, or that certifies facts absolutely where the warranties themselves are knowledge-qualified. Ask for an express statement that the officer signs only on behalf of the company. A knowingly false certificate is fraud, which Clause 17.4 leaves outside every limit.

In India

It is a contractual document, not a statutory form, and nothing is filed. An untrue statement in it is a breach of the SSA; a knowingly untrue one is fraud within Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, which Saffron's SSA leaves outside the de minimis, basket and cap.

Cure period for conditions subsequentA grace period after notice in which the company can complete a missed post-Closing obligation before the failure becomes a breach.
Also called: Cure period, Remedy period, Grace period

In plain English

Conditions subsequent are the filings and tasks due after Closing: PAS-3, MGT-14, the demat credit, DIR-12, insurance and policies. Things slip: a form comes back for resubmission, an insurer is slow. A cure period means a missed deadline is not immediately a breach. In Saffron's SSA the investor must first give notice, and the company then has 15 Business Days to fix the failure. Only an uncured failure becomes a breach that can be claimed under the indemnity, and for PAS-3 or the demat credit it can also trigger a refund with interest.

Worked example

Saffron's Schedule 7 policies are due by 25 February 2027, 90 days after Closing. If the whistle-blower policy is not adopted by then, Marigold sends a notice and Saffron has 15 Business Days from it to adopt the policy. Had Saffron missed the PAS-3 date of 12 December 2026 and failed to cure within 15 Business Days of notice, Marigold could also ask for the ₹14 crore back with 12 percent interest.

What is normal

Cure periods of 10 to 20 Business Days are standard for conditions subsequent. The statutory filings themselves have no cure in law, only additional fees and penalties. A refund remedy is usually limited to failures that undermine the issue itself, such as PAS-3 or the demat credit.

Watch out for

Cure periods that run from the deadline rather than from notice, which can expire before you know of the problem; remedies that make every missed policy a ground for refund; and no carve-out for delays caused by the Registrar, the depository or the investor's own late documents.

In India

The cure period is contractual and does not stop the statutory clock: a late Form PAS-3 still attracts additional fees and the Section 42(9) penalty of ₹1,000 a day, up to ₹25 lakh, on the company, its promoters and directors, and the money still cannot be used until it is filed.

Warranties and disclosure

The promises you make, how the disclosure letter limits them, and the awkward items

Fairly disclosedThe standard a disclosure must meet to protect you: enough detail for a reasonable investor to understand the matter and its likely effect.
Also called: Fair disclosure, Disclosure standard, Fairly disclosed standard

In plain English

A warranty is qualified only by matters fairly disclosed against it. Saffron's SSA defines that as disclosed with enough detail for a reasonable investor to identify the nature and scope of the matter and its likely effect on the company. A vague line ('there may be tax issues') fails; naming the provision, the invoices, the amount, the date of payment and the interest paid passes. The more awkward the item, the more precisely it should be described: a disclosure that meets the standard removes the claim entirely, and one that misses it protects you from nothing.

Worked example

Saffron's disclosure against the tax warranty says that TDS was short-deducted under Section 194J of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026) on three contractor invoices of ₹40 lakh in FY 2024-25, a shortfall of ₹3.2 lakh deposited with interest on 14 August 2026. That is fair disclosure; 'certain historical TDS gaps exist' is not. Here the SSA adds a specific indemnity for the item anyway.

What is normal

The 'reasonable investor could identify the nature and scope' test is standard in Indian SSAs, borrowed from English practice; some drafts add 'and its likely effect', as Saffron's does. Specific disclosures by warranty number, with a general cross-application, are normal.

Watch out for

Investor drafts that require disclosure 'fully and fairly' or 'with full particulars', which raises the bar; disclosures that point at a document without saying what in it matters; and specific indemnities that override disclosure without being listed. Disclose against the warranty, state the facts, give amounts and dates.

In India

Indian law has no statutory test of fair disclosure and little case law on it, so the SSA's own definition governs as a contract term under the Indian Contract Act 1872. That is why the wording of Clause 14.1 deserves as much negotiation as the warranties themselves.

General disclosuresDisclosures made against all warranties at once, such as the data room, public records and the accounts, which investors try to narrow.
Also called: Part A disclosures, Blanket disclosures, General disclosure

In plain English

General disclosures sit in Part A of the disclosure letter and qualify every warranty at once. Founders want them wide (everything in the data room, everything on public record); investors want them narrow, because a wide general disclosure lets you escape a claim for something buried in a 400-document data room. Saffron's SSA strikes the usual compromise: indexed data room documents count only where the matter is apparent on the face of the document, public records only where searched on a stated date and specified, and the accounts.

Worked example

Part A of Saffron's disclosure letter covers three things: the data room index dated 24 October 2026 (412 documents), the public records searched on 20 October 2026, and the Accounts for FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26 with management accounts to 30 September 2026. A change-of-control clause visible on page one of a customer contract in the room is disclosed; a liability buried in an email thread is not.

What is normal

General disclosure of an indexed data room is accepted in roughly half of Series A deals, usually limited to matters apparent on the face of the document. Public records disclosure is normally limited to searches made on a stated date, 1 to 3 weeks before signing.

Watch out for

A general disclosure of 'all matters known to the investor' is the strongest founder position and is rarely conceded. The risk for you runs the other way: if a matter sits in the data room but is not apparent on the face of the document, you are unprotected. Put anything important in Part B.

In India

There is no Indian rule on general disclosure; it is purely contractual. The public records relied on are usually the MCA company master data and filings, the index of charges, the Trade Marks Registry, court and tribunal records and the GST portal's public taxpayer search, each searched on a dated basis.

Specific disclosuresDisclosures made against a named warranty paragraph, describing a particular matter in detail, which is where your real protection comes from.
Also called: Part B disclosures, Specific disclosure

In plain English

Specific disclosures sit in Part B of the disclosure letter, one paragraph per warranty area, each identifying the warranty and describing the exception: what happened, when, how much, and what was done about it. They are your strongest protection because they meet the fair-disclosure test directly. Saffron's SSA adds a useful rule: a disclosure against one warranty counts against every other warranty to which it is reasonably apparent that it relates, so placing an item under 'tax' does not leave you exposed when the investor claims under 'compliance'.

Worked example

Saffron's Part B discloses, against the IP warranty, the objection under Section 11 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 to the 'Saffron Flow' application in Class 42, the reply filed, and the assignment deed of 10 October 2026 for a freelance developer's 2024 work; and against capitalisation, an advisor's 2024 email promise of 0.5 percent and its replacement by 2,500 options with a written release.

What is normal

Ten to fifteen warranty areas, each with 0 to 5 specific items, is typical for a three-year-old company. Cross-application to related warranties 'where reasonably apparent' is the common compromise; investor drafts sometimes limit each disclosure to the paragraph it is made against.

Watch out for

Disclosing a document instead of the matter ('see data room folder 4.3'); disclosing the problem but not its consequence; and leaving out items because they have been fixed, such as a late Internal Committee under the POSH Act. A fixed problem can still produce a loss for the period before the fix.

In India

Disclosure only allocates risk between you and the investor; it does not cure the default. A late ROC filing still carries its additional fee and any penalty, a POSH Internal Committee constituted late still leaves the earlier period exposed under the 2013 Act, and no regulator is bound by the letter.

Data roomThe organised online folder of company documents the investor reviews in diligence; its index can count as disclosure if the SSA allows.
Also called: Virtual data room, VDR, Diligence data room

In plain English

The data room is where you put the documents the investor's lawyers and accountants review: constitutional documents, cap table and share records, contracts, accounts and tax returns, employment and IP documents, licences and litigation. A dated index lists every document. It matters legally in two ways. The SSA may treat indexed documents as disclosed against the warranties, usually only where the matter is apparent on the face of the document. And it is the record of what the investor was shown, so freeze and archive it at signing so that both sides can prove later what was in it.

Worked example

Saffron's data room index is dated 24 October 2026 and lists 412 documents. Under Clause 14.2(a) an indexed document qualifies the warranties only where the matter is apparent from its face: a change-of-control clause in a customer agreement counts, a liability you find only by reading three documents together does not. An encrypted copy of the room handed over at signing on 30 October 2026 settles any later argument.

What is normal

A Series A data room typically holds 200 to 600 documents, indexed by warranty area and open for 3 to 6 weeks. Disclosure of the whole room is accepted in about half of deals, usually limited to matters apparent on the face; investors refuse it for unindexed rooms.

Watch out for

Uploads after the index date that the letter does not cover, documents added the night before signing, and a provider that deletes the room 30 days after the deal. Archive it. Keep the personal data of employees and customers out or redacted, because sharing it is processing under the data protection law.

In India

Uploading employee or customer personal data is processing under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, whose Rules were notified on 13 November 2025 with phased obligations, so redact or pseudonymise. Confidentiality of the room rests on the term sheet and the SSA; access before a term sheet usually rests on an NDA.

Public records searchesDated searches of official registers, such as MCA filings, trademark and court records, whose results the disclosure letter treats as disclosed.
Also called: Public searches, Statutory searches, Registry searches

In plain English

Before signing, someone searches the public registers that hold information about the company: MCA filings and the index of charges, the Trade Marks Registry, court and tribunal records, and the tax portals for returns filed. The disclosure letter states what was searched and when, and treats matters revealed by those searches as disclosed. Investors accept this only for searches actually made on a stated date and listed in the letter, never for 'anything on any public record'. The searches are cheap, and running them yourself shows you what the investor will see.

Worked example

Saffron's searches were run on 20 October 2026: the MCA portal for filings and charges, the Trade Marks Registry for the 'Saffron Flow' application, court and tribunal records, and the GST and income-tax portals. They show the FY 2023-24 annual return filed 41 days late with additional fees; because it appears in the listed searches and the letter specifies it, Marigold cannot claim for it under the warranties.

What is normal

Searches dated 1 to 3 weeks before signing, repeated just before Closing for charges and litigation, are normal; the investor's counsel usually runs its own in parallel. Disclosure is limited to the registers listed and to matters apparent from the results.

Watch out for

Records that are public but not reliably searchable, such as district court cases filed under a misspelt company name, and tax data visible only through the company's own login. A 'public' disclosure of data the investor could not see is weak; list those matters specifically in Part B.

In India

The main registers are the MCA portal (company master data, filings and the index of charges the Registrar keeps under Section 81 of the Companies Act 2013), the Trade Marks Registry, the e-Courts and tribunal databases, and the GST portal's public taxpayer search, which shows return filing status. Income-tax returns are visible only through the company's own login.

Knowledge qualifierWords such as 'so far as the Promoters are aware' that limit a warranty to what you knew, or would have known after reasonable enquiry.
Also called: Awareness qualifier, So far as aware, Best of knowledge

In plain English

Some warranties are about things you cannot fully control: threatened claims, third parties infringing your IP, a customer's intentions. A knowledge qualifier limits those warranties to what you knew. Investors accept qualifiers only for such matters, and then define knowledge to include what you would have learned by asking the right people. That deemed enquiry is the real negotiation: whom you must ask, and whether you are treated as knowing what they knew. Title, capitalisation, accounts and tax are almost never knowledge-qualified.

Worked example

Saffron's Clause 13.6 deems 'so far as the Promoters are aware' to include reasonable enquiry of the CFO, the company secretary, Rao & Hegde and the heads of department. If the head of sales knew on 25 October 2026 that a large customer planned to cancel and Ananya and Vikram never asked, the qualifier does not protect them: they are treated as if they had asked.

What is normal

Knowledge qualifiers on 3 to 6 warranty areas (threatened litigation, third-party infringement, vendor data breaches, the tax positions of counterparties) are normal at Series A, with deemed enquiry of 3 to 6 people named by role. Actual knowledge only, with no enquiry, is a strong founder position.

Watch out for

A definition that imputes the knowledge of every employee, or 'constructive knowledge' of anything in the company's records; and qualifiers that apply to the company's warranties but not to the founders', or the reverse. Keep the list of people to be asked short and named by role.

In India

Under Section 229 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, information an agent obtains in the course of the principal's business can be imputed to the principal, so an employee's knowledge may bind the company. Nothing similar binds founders personally, which is why investors add deemed-enquiry wording and founders try to limit it.

Materiality scrapeA clause that ignores words like 'material' in the warranties when deciding breach or measuring loss, so small issues still count.
Also called: Materiality read-out, Double materiality scrape, Scrape clause

In plain English

Warranties often contain their own thresholds: 'no material litigation', 'all material contracts'. A materiality scrape says the warranties are read as if those words were not there, either to decide whether there is a breach, to calculate the loss, or both (a double scrape). Investors argue that the de minimis and basket already filter small claims, so materiality inside the warranties is double protection. Founders reply that a scrape turns every trivial item into a breach to be disclosed. Saffron's SSA has no scrape; its warranties keep their own thresholds.

Worked example

Suppose a warranty says Saffron has 'no material litigation' and a vendor sues for ₹12 lakh. Without a scrape, Marigold must first show that a ₹12 lakh suit is material for a company valued at ₹100 crore post-money, which is hard. With a double scrape, the suit is a breach and the ₹12 lakh counts in full towards the ₹25 lakh basket.

What is normal

Scrapes are standard in M&A share purchases and appear less often in Series A SSAs. Where one is accepted, the usual compromise is a single scrape for measuring loss only, traded for a higher de minimis, for example ₹5 lakh to ₹10 lakh on a ₹20 crore round.

Watch out for

A scrape that also overrides materiality wording in the disclosure letter, or that reaches into the definition of Material Adverse Change. Accept at most a single scrape for measuring loss, and only with a de minimis and basket in place.

In India

Indian law has no default rule; the SSA decides. Courts read commercial contracts as written under the Indian Contract Act 1872, so an express scrape will be applied, while an ambiguous one may be read against the party that drafted it, usually the investor.

SandbaggingClaiming for a warranty breach the investor knew about before signing; a pro-sandbagging clause permits it, an anti-sandbagging clause bars it.
Also called: Pro-sandbagging, Anti-sandbagging, Knowledge saving clause

In plain English

Suppose the investor's lawyers learn of a problem in diligence and say nothing. Can the investor sign, close and then claim for it? A pro-sandbagging clause says yes: the investor's knowledge does not reduce its claim, except for matters fairly disclosed. An anti-sandbagging clause says no: what the investor knew, it cannot claim. Silence leaves the question to the courts. Saffron's Clause 14.4 is pro-sandbagging, which is normal for institutional investors in India. Your protection is to disclose, not to hope the investor noticed.

Worked example

During diligence Marigold's partner hears on a customer reference call that the customer disputes ₹8 lakh of Saffron's invoices. Nothing in the disclosure letter or the data room shows it. Under Clause 14.4 Marigold can still claim if the dispute becomes a loss, and at ₹8 lakh it clears the ₹5 lakh de minimis and counts towards the ₹25 lakh basket.

What is normal

Pro-sandbagging wording appears in most Indian institutional drafts; full anti-sandbagging is rare at Series A. The common compromise: matters identified in the investor's written diligence report before signing are deemed disclosed.

Watch out for

Clauses that make the investor's knowledge irrelevant even for matters in its own written diligence report; ask for that report, or its list of red flags, to count as disclosure. And never rely on the investor having noticed something in the data room unless the SSA says the data room is disclosed.

In India

Indian law on sandbagging is unsettled where the SSA is silent. The exception in Section 19 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, which denies rescission to a party that could have discovered the truth with ordinary diligence, is sometimes argued against investors, so both sides prefer an express clause.

Bring-downThe repetition of the warranties at Closing, so they must be true on the Closing Date as well as at signing.
Also called: Repetition of warranties, Bring-down of warranties, Closing repetition

In plain English

In a sign-then-close deal the warranties are given at signing and repeated at Closing by reference to the facts then existing. Anything that goes wrong in between becomes a breach on the bring-down, even if it is nobody's fault. The SSA manages that risk in three ways: a duty to tell the investor promptly about anything that would make a warranty untrue, a supplementary disclosure letter for new matters, and a right for the investor to walk away if a new matter is serious. The Officer's Certificate confirms the bring-down in writing at Closing.

Worked example

Saffron gives its warranties on 30 October 2026 and repeats them on 27 November 2026. If a key developer resigns on 10 November 2026, Saffron must tell Marigold within 3 Business Days and may include it in a Supplementary Disclosure Letter delivered at least 3 Business Days before Closing. Unless it is a MAC or the likely loss exceeds ₹1 crore, Marigold must close and has no claim for it.

What is normal

Bring-down of all warranties at Closing is standard in Indian SSAs. A walk-away threshold of 0.5 to 1 percent of the round for new matters (here ₹1 crore, 0.5 percent of ₹20 crore) and a notification duty of 2 to 5 Business Days are common.

Watch out for

A bring-down with no supplementary disclosure right leaves you liable for events you could not prevent. Watch also for a full bring-down at every later tranche: Saffron's second tranche repeats only title and capacity, capitalisation and insolvency (paragraphs 1, 2 and 13 of Schedule 3), which is the right answer.

In India

It is purely contractual and is proved by the Officer's Certificate. Its timing matters for the Companies Act indirectly: a bring-down failure that delays Closing after the money has arrived runs into the 60-day allotment limit and the refund rule in Section 42(6), which is why investors pay only after confirming the conditions.

Supplementary disclosure letterA second disclosure letter delivered before Closing for matters arising after signing, which qualifies the warranties only as repeated at Closing.
Also called: Supplementary Disclosure Letter, Updated disclosure letter, Bring-down disclosure

In plain English

Things happen after signing. A supplementary disclosure letter lets you disclose new matters before Closing so that the repeated warranties are not breached by them. Investors limit its effect: in Saffron's SSA it qualifies the warranties only as repeated at Closing, never as given at signing, so it cannot cure something already untrue on 30 October 2026. If a newly disclosed matter is big (a MAC, a fundamental warranty breach, or likely losses above ₹1 crore), the investor may walk away within 5 Business Days; if it closes anyway, it cannot claim for that matter.

Worked example

On 16 November 2026 a customer worth ₹40 lakh of ARR gives notice to terminate. Saffron notifies Marigold within 3 Business Days and delivers a Supplementary Disclosure Letter at least 3 Business Days before Closing. The likely loss is under ₹1 crore and it is not a MAC, so Marigold must close on 27 November 2026 and has no claim for that cancellation.

What is normal

Investor drafts often allow a supplementary letter for information only, with no qualifying effect. Saffron's version, which qualifies the Closing repetition and gives the investor a close-or-walk election above a threshold of 0.5 to 1 percent of the round, is the balanced market position.

Watch out for

A letter that is accepted but does not stop a claim, so you disclose and still pay; a walk-away right with no threshold; and a delivery deadline so early that late events cannot be disclosed. Check that the investor's election is 'close or terminate, but not both'.

In India

No statute governs it; the effect comes entirely from the SSA's wording, here Clauses 15.3 to 15.5. An investor's agreement to close without a claim for a disclosed matter works like a remission of performance under Section 63 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, so it binds once Closing happens.

Advisor equity promiseAn informal promise of shares to an advisor, often by email, which can surface in diligence as a claim on your cap table.
Also called: Advisor shares, Promised equity, Informal equity commitment

In plain English

Early-stage founders often promise an advisor 'half a percent' in an email or a chat, with no vesting, no price and no board approval. That promise may be an enforceable contract, and it makes the capitalisation warranty untrue, because someone has a claim to shares the cap table does not show. The fix before a round is to document it: replace the promise with a proper instrument, sized and vested, and get a written release of the original promise. Then disclose both documents against the capitalisation warranty.

Worked example

An advisor to Saffron was promised 0.5 percent in a 2024 email. At the Series A that is 5,000 shares on a 10,00,000 fully diluted base, worth ₹50 lakh at ₹1,000. Once the advisor joined as a permanent, full-time employee on 1 September 2026 and was confirmed in employment, Saffron settled it with 2,500 options under the ESOP 2026 and the advisor's written release, and disclosed both against the capitalisation warranty in the disclosure letter of 30 October 2026.

What is normal

Advisor equity of 0.1 to 1 percent, vesting over 1 to 2 years, is common in Indian startups; well-run companies document it within weeks of the promise. In diligence, investors expect every promise to be either honoured through a documented instrument or released in writing before Closing.

Watch out for

An ESOP grant works only if the advisor is eligible: under Rule 12 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014 options go to permanent employees and directors (other than independent directors), not to outside consultants. A pure advisor may need a direct allotment at fair value, a cash-settled phantom award, or a role that makes them eligible.

In India

A written promise given for advice can be an enforceable contract under the Indian Contract Act 1872. An order compelling an allotment is unlikely, because allotment needs board and shareholder approvals under the Companies Act 2013, so the usual risk is a damages claim. If the advisor is non-resident, any shares or options issued also need FEMA compliance.

Contractor misclassificationTreating people as independent consultants when they work like employees, which creates back liabilities for social security, tax deduction and IP.
Also called: Disguised employment, Consultant versus employee risk, Sham contracting

In plain English

Whether someone is an employee depends on how they work, not on what the contract calls them. A consultant who works full-time, from your office, on fixed hours, under your direction, with your laptop and no other clients, looks like an employee. If they are one, the company may owe social security contributions for the past, gratuity may be accruing, and tax should have been deducted as salary. There is an IP angle too: a true contractor owns the copyright in their work unless it is assigned in writing. Fix it before the round, or disclose it precisely.

Worked example

Two developers have invoiced Saffron as consultants since 2024 while working full-time from the Bengaluru office. Saffron disclosed this against the employment warranty. Their consultancy agreements already assign their code to Saffron, so the fix is employment from 1 December 2026 with service counted from 2024, and a calculation of any back contributions, so the exposure has a number rather than an open-ended indemnity.

What is normal

Such arrangements are common in Indian startups before Series A. Investors usually accept disclosure plus conversion to employment within 30 to 90 days of Closing, sometimes with a specific indemnity capped at the computed exposure.

Watch out for

Converting the contracts does not erase the past: the period since 2024 stays exposed, so quantify it. Check the GST charged on the consultants' invoices too: services by an employee to an employer are not a supply, so input credit taken on them can be questioned. And make sure the IP assignment covers past work, not just future work.

In India

The four Labour Codes in force since 21 November 2025 use a broad definition of employee, and the Code on Social Security 2020 governs provident fund and gratuity. Tax on an employee's pay is deducted under Section 192 of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026), not Section 194J. Under the Copyright Act 1957 a contractor's work stays the contractor's unless assigned in writing.

Investor warrantiesThe investor's own promises to the company: that it exists, may invest, has the money, is not sanctioned and has the residency it claims.
Also called: Subscriber warranties, Investor representations

In plain English

Warranties run both ways, though the investor's are short. The company needs to know the investor is who it says it is, has authority to sign, has the money committed for both tranches, is not under sanctions, and is resident or non-resident as stated, because residency, and for a fund the ownership and control of its sponsor and managers, decides whether FEMA pricing and reporting apply, and its beneficial owners decide whether Press Note 3 approval is needed. If any of that is wrong, the company may have issued shares in breach of law. Saffron's SSA lets the company and the founders rely on these warranties, with an indemnity capped at the Investment Amount.

Worked example

Marigold warrants that it is a trust registered with SEBI as a Category II AIF, that Marigold Investment Advisors LLP is its investment manager with authority to bind it, that it has callable capital for the full ₹20 crore including the ₹6 crore second tranche, that it is resident in India for FEMA purposes, that its sponsor, manager and investment manager are owned and controlled by resident Indian citizens, so its investment is not foreign, and that no Press Note 3 approval is needed. It subscribes for its own account, not as a nominee.

What is normal

Five to eight investor warranties are normal: status, authority, no conflict, funds, sanctions, residency and own account. A committed-capital warranty repeated at each later tranche is a founder ask that funds usually accept.

Watch out for

A fund that signs through a manager or trustee: check that the signatory's authority comes from the fund's own documents, not just the manager's. Watch for a fund near the end of its investment period, which may struggle to call capital for a second tranche, and make sure the committed-capital warranty covers the second tranche date, as Saffron's does.

In India

Category II AIFs are governed by the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations 2012 and may put no more than 25 percent of investable funds into one company. Under Schedule VIII of the FEMA (Non-debt Instruments) Rules 2019, an AIF's investment counts as foreign if its sponsor, manager or investment manager is not owned and controlled by resident Indian citizens, or is owned or controlled by persons resident outside India, so foreign contributors alone do not make its investment foreign. Since 16 August 2024, Rule 23(7) also treats entities owned and controlled by NRIs or OCIs investing on a non-repatriation basis as domestic.

Indemnity and claims

How a claim is filtered, capped, run, timed and paid, and who ends up paying it

Specific indemnityA promise to pay for a known, identified problem rupee for rupee, regardless of disclosure and usually outside the de minimis and basket.
Also called: Special indemnity, Line-item indemnity, Known-issue indemnity

In plain English

Disclosure protects you from a warranty claim, which is why investors ask for a specific indemnity for known problems found in diligence. It works differently from the general indemnity: it applies even though the matter is disclosed, it usually sits outside the de minimis and basket, and it often has its own cap and time limit. In effect it is a price adjustment for a known risk. Your job is to keep the list short, each item narrowly described and capped at a realistic estimate, with a time limit matched to the risk.

Worked example

Saffron's Schedule 4 has three: the FY 2024-25 TDS short deduction of ₹3.2 lakh, since deposited with interest (cap ₹25 lakh, claims until 31 March 2032); the Section 11 objection to the 'Saffron Flow' trademark, including rebranding cost if registration is refused (cap ₹50 lakh); and a freelance developer's possible claim to 2024 work (cap ₹50 lakh). The last two run to 27 November 2028, and all count towards the overall cap.

What is normal

Two to five specific indemnities at Series A is normal, each capped at a multiple of the estimated exposure and counting towards the overall cap. Tax items survive 6 to 8 years, other items 2 to 3 years.

Watch out for

Uncapped specific indemnities, items described as broadly as 'any tax liability for any period before Closing', and joint and several founder liability for matters that are really company liabilities. Ask that items with a known amount, like the ₹3.2 lakh already deposited, are capped close to the remaining risk.

In India

An indemnity is a contract under Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act 1872. On the TDS item, interest runs under Section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026) and a penalty equal to the tax not deducted can be levied under Section 271C, so the exposure can exceed the ₹3.2 lakh already paid.

Tipping basketA threshold that, once crossed by eligible claims, lets the investor recover the whole amount from the first rupee, not just the excess.
Also called: First-rupee basket, Threshold, Tipping threshold

In plain English

A basket stops the investor claiming until eligible losses add up to a set amount. With a tipping basket, once the total crosses that amount the whole total is claimable, not only the part above it. Together with a de minimis, which removes small individual claims from the count, it decides how much small and medium trouble the investor absorbs. Saffron's SSA has a ₹5 lakh de minimis and a ₹25 lakh tipping basket. The alternative is a deductible basket, where only the excess over the threshold is recovered.

Worked example

Four claims of ₹3,00,000, ₹7,50,000, ₹18,00,000 and ₹4,00,000. The two below the ₹5,00,000 de minimis drop out, leaving ₹25,50,000 of eligible claims. That crosses the ₹25,00,000 basket, so the whole ₹25,50,000 is claimable; under a deductible basket only ₹50,000 would be. Under joint and several liability each founder can be pursued for all ₹25,50,000; if several, ₹12,75,000 each.

What is normal

A de minimis of 0.1 to 0.5 percent of the round (₹2 lakh to ₹10 lakh on ₹20 crore) and a basket of 1 to 2 percent (₹20 lakh to ₹40 lakh) are standard; a tipping basket is more common than a deductible one in Indian venture rounds.

Watch out for

A de minimis that counts a series of related claims together, as Clause 17.2(a) does: claims of ₹3 lakh and ₹4 lakh arising from the same facts become one ₹7 lakh claim that passes the filter. Check whether specific indemnities sit outside the basket (they do in Saffron's SSA) and whether fraud does (it does).

In India

Thresholds are contractual: Indian law has no default de minimis or basket, so without them every proven loss is claimable under Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act 1872. Saffron's basket counts only claims that clear the ₹5 lakh de minimis, which is the usual Indian drafting.

Deductible basketA threshold that works like an insurance excess: once it is crossed, the investor recovers only the amount above it, never the first slice.
Also called: Excess, Deductible, Threshold with deductible

In plain English

With a deductible basket the threshold is never recovered: the investor bears the first ₹25 lakh of eligible losses itself and claims only the excess. It is the founder-friendly version of the basket and works like the excess on a car insurance policy. It is more common in share purchases between buyers and sellers than in venture rounds, where investors usually insist on tipping. A middle path is a tipping basket at a higher threshold, or a smaller deductible inside a tipping basket.

Worked example

Using the indemnity calculator's defaults, eligible claims total ₹25,50,000 against a ₹25,00,000 basket. Under Saffron's tipping basket Marigold recovers ₹25,50,000; under a deductible basket it would recover ₹50,000. If eligible claims later reached ₹60 lakh, the tipping answer would be ₹60 lakh and the deductible answer ₹35 lakh.

What is normal

Deductible baskets of 0.5 to 1 percent of the price appear regularly in share purchases. In Indian Series A rounds they are a founder win, typically traded for a lower threshold, for example a ₹15 lakh deductible instead of a ₹25 lakh tipping basket.

Watch out for

A clause that calls itself a deductible but adds 'provided that once the threshold is exceeded, the Investor may claim the full amount': that is a tipping basket. Read the last words of the basket clause; Saffron's Clause 17.2 ends 'and not only the excess', which makes it tipping.

In India

There is no Indian default; a deductible exists only by contract. In tax terms it changes nothing: whatever amount is paid carries the same treatment as any other indemnity payment, which Saffron's Clause 20.3 treats as an adjustment to the subscription price to the extent the law permits.

Conduct of claimsWho controls the defence of a third-party claim, such as a tax demand or lawsuit, that the founders may pay for under the indemnity.
Also called: Conduct of third party claims, Defence of claims, Claims control

In plain English

When a third party, such as a tax officer, a customer or a former contractor, makes a claim against the company, the founders may end up paying for it under the indemnity. They therefore want to control the defence: choose counsel, decide strategy, and avoid a settlement agreed at their expense. Saffron's SSA gives them that right: the founders may take over a third-party claim within 15 Business Days of notice, at their own cost and in the company's name, keeping the investor informed and not settling on terms that admit fault or restrict the business without consent.

Worked example

If the TDS officer later levies a penalty on Saffron for the FY 2024-25 short deduction, the Schedule 4 indemnity may cover it. Ananya and Vikram can take over the appeal within 15 Business Days of the notice, appoint tax counsel, pay the costs and keep Marigold informed. Nobody can settle behind their backs, and they cannot settle by admitting a wider default without Marigold's consent.

What is normal

Conduct by the indemnifying party, with 10 to 30 days to elect, is standard. Investors keep a consent right over settlements that involve an admission or restrict the business, and often ask for security for costs above a threshold.

Watch out for

Tax and regulatory matters in which the company must be the party and directors face personal exposure: agree who funds any pre-deposit and who signs. Watch for no time limit on the investor's notice, which lets costs build before you can take control, and for settlements by the company without your consent.

In India

Tax appeals are filed in the company's name, and some need a pre-deposit, for example 10 percent of the disputed tax for a first appeal under Section 107(6) of the CGST Act 2017; agree who funds it. Section 125 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 lets the indemnified party recover the costs of suits it defended prudently.

MitigationThe duty of the party claiming a loss to take reasonable steps to reduce it, so that avoidable loss cannot be recovered from you.
Also called: Duty to mitigate, Mitigation of loss

In plain English

If the investor suffers a loss it could reasonably have reduced, it should not recover the part it could have avoided. The law implies this for damages; for indemnities the position is less clear, so the SSA writes it in. Saffron's Clause 19.3 requires the investor to take, and to make the company take, all reasonable steps to mitigate any loss. In practice that means acting promptly on a notice, using insurance and contractual remedies, and not running up costs. It does not require steps that are unreasonable or out of proportion to the loss.

Worked example

Suppose a customer claims ₹30 lakh from Saffron in 2027 for an outage caused by a breach of the IT warranty. Mitigation means Saffron notifies its insurers, contests the inflated part of the claim and fixes the fault quickly. If it rejects a reasonable ₹12 lakh settlement offer and loses ₹30 lakh at trial, the founders can argue that the extra ₹18 lakh was avoidable.

What is normal

An express mitigation clause is standard in Indian SSAs and SPAs; disputes are about its scope, not its existence. Most drafts require 'reasonable steps' and exclude anything that would harm the company's business or key relationships.

Watch out for

Investor drafts sometimes delete mitigation or limit it to steps taken at the indemnifying party's cost. Keep it, and make it bind the company as well as the investor, since most losses arise inside the company. Pair it with the insurance-first rule in Clause 19.5.

In India

Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 states the rule for damages: the means that existed of remedying the inconvenience caused by the breach must be taken into account. Whether that duty applies to an indemnity under Section 124 is less settled, which is why the SSA states it expressly.

No double recoveryA rule that the investor can recover the same loss only once, whatever the number of clauses, documents or insurers it could claim under.
Also called: Double recovery bar, Single recovery

In plain English

One problem can breach several warranties, a covenant, the SHA and a specific indemnity at once. Without a limit, the investor might claim the same loss under each. A no-double-recovery clause says one loss is recovered once, and that anything the company recovers from an insurer or a third party comes off the claim. It also deals with a subtler overlap: a loss suffered by the company and the fall in value of the investor's shares caused by the same event. The investor can claim one or the other, not both.

Worked example

A ₹40 lakh GST demand on Saffron breaches the tax warranty, the compliance warranty and a covenant. Marigold can claim for that loss once, whichever clause it uses. If Saffron later wins ₹10 lakh back on appeal, the claim falls by ₹10 lakh, and Marigold cannot claim both the demand and a fall in the value of its 1,40,000 CCPS caused by the same demand.

What is normal

Present in almost every Indian SSA and SPA, usually with insurance and third-party recoveries deducted net of the costs of recovery. Where the company pays a claim, investors often ask for a gross-up, so that their own 15 to 20 percent share of the company does not bear part of their own claim.

Watch out for

A definition of loss that includes both the company's loss and the investor's 'diminution in value' without a no-double-recovery rule; and a gross-up for company-paid claims that also applies to founder-paid claims, where there is no circularity to correct.

In India

Indian law already resists double compensation: damages under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 compensate actual loss and do not punish. The clause makes the point explicit across the SSA, the SHA and insurance, which a tribunal would otherwise have to work out claim by claim.

Set-off against the second trancheThe investor's right to reduce a later payment, such as the second tranche, by money the company or founders owe it under the indemnity.
Also called: Set-off, Deduction from the tranche, Withholding against claims

In plain English

With a second tranche outstanding, the investor holds money you are counting on. Set-off lets it pay less, by deducting an indemnity claim from the tranche. Founders resist because an unproven claim becomes self-help: the investor decides it is owed, keeps the cash and leaves you to sue. Saffron's version allows none: the investor pays the tranche in full from its own bank account, and a claim agreed in writing or finally determined by an arbitral award or a court is paid back by separate bank transfer on the same day. For a disputed claim the investor must pay the tranche in full and may only ask for a capped escrow until the claim is resolved.

Worked example

If a ₹40 lakh claim is agreed before the ₹6 crore second tranche falls due, Marigold pays the full ₹6 crore for 60,000 CCPS from its own bank account, and the company or the founder concerned pays Marigold ₹40 lakh by separate transfer the same day. If the ₹40 lakh claim is still disputed, Marigold pays the full ₹6 crore but may require ₹40 lakh, its good-faith estimate and below the ₹2 crore ceiling, to sit in a bank escrow, with the escrow agent's costs shared equally.

What is normal

Set-off limited to agreed or finally determined claims is the fair market position; set-off of any amount the investor merely claims is an investor-heavy draft. An escrow for disputed claims, capped at a fixed sum such as Saffron's ₹2 crore, is the usual middle path.

Watch out for

Set-off of 'any amount claimed', set-off against payments other than the tranche, such as dividends or redemption proceeds, and no deadline for the investor to start arbitration on a disputed claim, which lets an escrow sit for years. Saffron's SSA treats a claim as withdrawn unless arbitration starts within 12 months of the notice.

In India

Section 42 and Rule 14 expect subscription money to come from the investor's own bank account through banking channels. A set-off that pays for shares by cancelling a debt sits awkwardly with that, so advisers often settle it as two bank transfers on the same day: the full ₹6 crore into the separate account and the agreed claim paid back separately.

Survival periods (SSA)The SSA's deadlines for notifying warranty claims: 24 months for most warranties, 7 years for tax, and no limit for fundamental warranties.
Also called: Claims periods, Warranty survival in the SSA, Time limits for claims

In plain English

Warranties are given at signing and repeated at Closing, but problems surface years later, so the SSA sets deadlines for notifying a claim. Saffron's follow the market: business warranties 24 months from Closing, tax warranties 7 years after the end of the financial year of Closing, and the fundamental warranties (title and capacity, capitalisation) without limit. A notified claim also lapses unless arbitration starts within 12 months of the notice. The general concept is explained under warranty survival; this entry gives the SSA's own dates.

Worked example

Closing is 27 November 2026, in FY 2026-27. Business warranty claims must be notified by 27 November 2028; tax claims by 31 March 2034, seven years after FY 2026-27 ends; title and capitalisation claims at any time. A claim notified on 1 October 2028 lapses unless Marigold starts arbitration by 1 October 2029.

What is normal

Business warranties survive 12 to 36 months (24 is typical, long enough for two audits); tax 6 to 8 years; fundamental warranties 5 to 10 years or indefinitely. A deadline of 6 to 12 months after a claim notice to start proceedings is common.

Watch out for

Survival periods that restart at each tranche, or that run from the date the investor discovers a problem rather than from Closing. Ask that fundamental warranties survive a fixed period, such as 7 to 10 years, rather than indefinitely, and that specific indemnities carry their own shorter dates, as Saffron's non-tax items do.

In India

Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 makes void a clause that limits the time to enforce rights through legal proceedings or extinguishes rights when a period expires. Indian drafts therefore frame survival as the window to notify a claim; a short deadline to start proceedings, like Clause 20.2's 12 months, is the part most open to challenge. The Limitation Act 1963 otherwise allows 3 years.

Price adjustment treatmentA clause treating indemnity payments as a reduction of the price paid for the shares, mainly to keep them out of the investor's taxable income.
Also called: Adjustment to the subscription price, Tax treatment of indemnity payments

In plain English

When the company or a founder pays the investor under the indemnity, what is that payment for tax? If it reduces the price paid for the shares, it lowers the investor's cost and is taxed only as a larger gain on sale. If it is compensation, it may be taxed as income when received. The SSA can state what the parties intend but cannot bind the tax officer, hence 'to the extent permitted by law' and no warranty on tax treatment. There is a company law wrinkle: a company payment that hands back part of the premium can look like a return of capital.

Worked example

Suppose Saffron pays Marigold ₹25,50,000 in 2027 under Clause 17. Under Clause 20.3 both sides report it as reducing the price of Marigold's Series A CCPS, so Marigold can argue that its cost for 1,40,000 shares falls from ₹14 crore to ₹13,74,50,000 and that the ₹25,50,000 is taxed later as a larger capital gain on exit, but a tax officer may treat it as income in FY 2027-28. The subscription price itself does not change, because returning share capital or premium needs a reduction of capital under Section 66 of the Companies Act 2013.

What is normal

Price adjustment wording 'to the extent permitted by law', with no tax warranty, is standard in Indian SSAs and SPAs, as is a gross-up limited so that the payer does not cover tax on a loss that would itself have been deductible.

Watch out for

A payment by the company cannot actually cut the subscription price after allotment, because returning share capital or premium needs a reduction of capital under Sections 52 and 66 of the Companies Act 2013, so it is better seen as damages. A payment by a founder avoids that but cannot be a price adjustment at all, since the founder never received the price. A broad gross-up that makes the payer cover the investor's tax on the payment can raise the cost of a claim sharply.

In India

The Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026) has no specific rule on indemnity receipts; treatment turns on the character of the payment, so the clause is a statement of intent, not a guarantee. Share settlement by a founder brings in Sections 50CA and 56(2)(x) if shares move below fair market value.

Warranty and indemnity insurance (W&I)An insurance policy that pays for warranty breaches instead of, or before, the founders; common in M&A, rare in Series A rounds.
Also called: W&I insurance, Representations and warranties insurance, RWI

In plain English

W&I insurance moves warranty risk from the people giving the warranties to an insurer. The policy is usually bought by the investor or buyer and pays for losses from warranty breaches up to a limit, above a retention. It excludes what is already known, such as disclosed matters and diligence findings, so specific indemnities stay with you; it also excludes forward-looking statements and some tax and pricing risks. It allows clean exits for sellers in M&A. In a Series A its cost is usually out of proportion to the round, so founders rely on caps and baskets instead.

Worked example

On Saffron's ₹20 crore round, a policy with a limit of ₹4 crore to ₹6 crore would cost more than the risk justifies, and it would exclude the three Schedule 4 items anyway. In the hypothetical 2029 sale to Kaveri for ₹450 crore, by contrast, a buy-side policy could have reduced the 10 percent escrow the founders had to accept.

What is normal

In India W&I is used mainly in M&A and large secondary deals, with policy limits commonly of 10 to 30 percent of the deal value; it is rare in venture rounds. Where it is used, the sellers' own cap often falls to a nominal amount.

Watch out for

The exclusions are the policy: known matters, specific indemnities, forward-looking warranties, fines and some tax items. If an investor proposes W&I, confirm that the founders' cap falls to a nominal amount and that the insurer waives its subrogation rights against the founders except for fraud.

In India

W&I is general insurance, so the premium carries GST at 18 percent. Subrogation, the insurer's right to step into the insured's claim after paying, arises under general law, so the waiver in favour of the founders must be written into the policy. The SSA's no-double-recovery clause should make clear that insurance proceeds come off any claim against the founders.

Filings and tax

The Companies Act, stamp and FEMA steps that make the shares valid and the money usable

Section 42 (private placement)The Companies Act section governing offers of shares to identified investors: offer letter, separate account, 60-day allotment and Form PAS-3.
Also called: Private placement rules, Section 42 of the Companies Act 2013

In plain English

An issue of shares to an identified outside investor, such as a Series A, is a private placement under Section 42. It runs as a sequence: a special resolution; the investors identified and recorded in Form PAS-5; a Form PAS-4 offer letter to each; the money from the investor's own bank account into a separate account; allotment within 60 days; and Form PAS-3 within 15 days of allotment. Until allotment and PAS-3 the money cannot be used. Offers are limited to 200 persons in a financial year.

Worked example

Saffron's sequence: special resolution at the EGM of 20 October 2026 (MGT-14 by 19 November 2026); Marigold recorded in PAS-5 and sent a PAS-4; the Subscription Account opened; ₹14 crore received on 20 November 2026; allotment on 27 November 2026 against a deadline of 19 January 2027; PAS-3 by 12 December 2026. The second tranche repeats the sequence from a fresh PAS-4.

What is normal

Series A allotments happen within 1 to 10 days of receiving the money, and PAS-3 follows within 2 to 10 days of allotment, certified by a practising professional. A Series A reaches far fewer than the 200-person limit; it matters mainly where many angels invest directly.

Watch out for

Common defects: money received before the PAS-4 offer; money from an account not in the investor's name; use of the money before PAS-3; a fresh offer while an earlier offer's allotment is incomplete; and an allotment to a person not recorded in PAS-5. Each is a contravention that can bring penalties and a refund order.

In India

Section 42 of the Companies Act 2013 works with Rule 14 of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014. Section 42(9) penalises a late PAS-3, and Section 42(10) penalises an issue in contravention. Spend the money before allotment and PAS-3 and the company, its promoters and its directors risk a penalty under Section 42(10) of up to the amount raised or ₹2 crore, whichever is lower, with a refund order; Registrars have used Section 42(10) for exactly this breach, and for a startup or small company Section 446B halves the penalty, with a maximum of ₹2 lakh for the company and ₹1 lakh for each officer in default. An offer to more than 200 persons is treated as a public offer.

Section 62(1)(c) (preferential issue)The Companies Act route for issuing new shares to chosen persons rather than to all existing shareholders: special resolution and a valuer's price.
Also called: Preferential allotment, Preferential issue, Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act 2013

In plain English

Section 62 says new shares should first be offered to existing shareholders in proportion to their holdings, as a rights issue. Clause (c) is the exception that lets a company issue shares to anyone else, such as a new investor, if the shareholders pass a special resolution and the price is determined by a registered valuer's report. For an unlisted company the details are in Rule 13: what the explanatory statement must disclose, and that allotment must be completed within 12 months of the resolution. A Series A uses Section 62(1)(c) and Section 42 together.

Worked example

Saffron's EGM on 20 October 2026 passed a special resolution under Sections 42 and 62(1)(c) for 2,00,000 Series A CCPS at ₹1,000 to Marigold, with an explanatory statement giving the price, the valuation basis, the allottee and the shareholding before and after. The resolution supports allotments up to 19 October 2027; a second tranche allotted later needs a fresh resolution.

What is normal

One special resolution for the whole round, naming both tranches, is normal; existing holders also waive pre-emption under the Articles and the earlier SHA, as Saffron's founders and angels did. An EGM at shorter notice than 21 clear days, with the consents Section 101 requires, is usual for a closely held company.

Watch out for

Rule 13 counts 12 months from the resolution, not from Closing: a second tranche allotted after that needs a fresh special resolution, valuation and offer. Check that the explanatory statement names the investor, the class, the number and the price exactly, because an allotment outside what the resolution approved is invalid to that extent.

In India

Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act 2013 is read with Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014 for unlisted companies; listed companies follow the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations 2018 instead. The special resolution is filed in Form MGT-14 within 30 days, and an issue for cash to identified persons must also follow Section 42.

Rule 13 (preferential issue rules)The rule for preferential issues by unlisted companies: special resolution, prescribed disclosures, a registered valuer's report and allotment within 12 months.
Also called: Rule 13 valuation, Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014

In plain English

Rule 13 fills in Section 62(1)(c) for unlisted companies. It requires a special resolution with an explanatory statement disclosing the objects, the number and class of shares, the price and how it was arrived at, the proposed allottees and their holdings after the issue, and the time for allotment. The price must be determined on a registered valuer's report, and allotment must be completed within 12 months of the resolution. For convertible instruments such as CCPS, the conversion price is either fixed up front on the valuation at the offer or set near conversion on a fresh valuation.

Worked example

Saffron's registered valuer's report justifies ₹1,000 per Series A CCPS and is summarised in the explanatory statement for the EGM of 20 October 2026, with the conversion ratio of one equity share per CCPS fixed up front. The first tranche is allotted on 27 November 2026, well inside the 12-month window. The report is Condition (h) and a Closing deliverable.

What is normal

A report takes about a week and must be in hand before the EGM notice goes out, because the explanatory statement must include it; the discounted cash flow method or the price of a recent arm's length round are the usual bases. One special resolution and its report cover the round if every allotment completes within 12 months.

Watch out for

Rule 13 sets no shelf life for a valuation report and no fixed 60-day rule; its only 60-day figure is for a conversion price set at a later date. If the round is tranched beyond 12 months from the resolution, budget for a fresh resolution and report. Angel tax is gone, but the Rule 13 report is still mandatory.

In India

Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014 applies to unlisted companies, and the valuer must be registered under Section 247 of the Companies Act 2013 and the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules 2017. If the investor were non-resident, a valuation under the FEMA (Non-debt Instruments) Rules 2019 would also be needed.

Form PAS-4 (private placement offer letter)The serially numbered offer-cum-application letter a company must send each identified investor before it may accept any subscription money.
Also called: Private placement offer letter, PAS-4, Offer cum application letter

In plain English

PAS-4 is the formal offer under Section 42. It goes only to persons the board has identified and recorded in Form PAS-5, the company's record of private placement offers. It is addressed to the named investor, serially numbered, and carries the prescribed disclosures: the company, its business and financial position, the terms of the offer, the price and its basis, the purpose, the shareholding before and after, and a directors' declaration. The investor applies on it with the money. It cannot be renounced in favour of anyone else, and it must come before the money.

Worked example

Before Marigold wires ₹14 crore on 20 November 2026, Saffron records Marigold in PAS-5 and sends it a PAS-4 for 1,40,000 Series A CCPS at ₹1,000. For the second tranche Clause 11.4(c) requires a fresh PAS-4 for 60,000 CCPS before the ₹6 crore is paid. Copies of the PAS-4 and PAS-5 are Closing deliverables and are attached to the PAS-3 filing.

What is normal

One PAS-4 per investor per tranche, sent 1 to 4 weeks before the money, is normal. It is prepared by the company secretary from the explanatory statement and the SSA, and goes out within 30 days of recording the investor in PAS-5.

Watch out for

Money received before the PAS-4 is issued; a PAS-4 addressed to an entity other than the one that pays, for example the manager instead of the fund; and a PAS-4 whose terms differ from the SSA or the special resolution. Each undermines the allotment and the Section 42 compliance the investor's counsel will be asked to confirm.

In India

Rule 14 of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014 prescribes the form and requires it to be sent within 30 days of recording the investor's name in Form PAS-5, and only after the special resolution has been filed in Form MGT-14 (Rule 14(8)). The offer carries no right of renunciation, and payment must come from the investor's own bank account.

Form PAS-3 (return of allotment)The return of allotment filed with the Registrar within 15 days of a private placement allotment; until then the company cannot use the money.
Also called: Return of allotment, PAS-3, Allotment return

In plain English

PAS-3 tells the Registrar of Companies that shares have been allotted: to whom, how many, of what class, at what price and for what consideration. It is filed on the MCA portal within 15 days of allotment, with the list of allottees, the board resolution, the special resolution details, the valuation report and the PAS-4 and PAS-5, and is certified by a practising professional. For a private placement it is also the gate to the money: Section 42 bars using the subscription money until allotment and PAS-3 are complete. File it in two days, not fifteen.

Worked example

Saffron allots 1,40,000 Series A CCPS on 27 November 2026, so PAS-3 is due by 12 December 2026. Filed on 30 November 2026, it makes the ₹14 crore usable three days after Closing instead of fifteen. A second PAS-3 follows within 15 days of the second tranche allotment. Missing the date is also a breach of Clause 12, subject to a 15 Business Day cure.

What is normal

Filed within 2 to 10 days of allotment in well-run rounds; government fees are a few hundred rupees for a company of Saffron's size, plus the professional's certification. The SSA usually makes PAS-3 a condition subsequent with a short cure period.

Watch out for

Spending before PAS-3 is filed, even on payroll, breaches Section 42. Check the allottee's PAN and email, the class of shares and the premium figure against the PAS-4, the resolution and the board allotment; a mismatch invites a resubmission notice and pushes back the day you can spend.

In India

Section 42(8) of the Companies Act 2013 and Rule 14 of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014 require it within 15 days. A late filing attracts additional fees and, under Section 42(9), a penalty of ₹1,000 a day up to ₹25 lakh on the company, its promoters and directors. The money stays frozen until it is filed. Other allotments, such as the later conversion of these CCPS into equity shares or an ESOP exercise, have 30 days under Section 39(4) and Rule 12 of the same Rules.

Register of membersThe company's statutory register of shareholders; entry in it makes the investor a member, and for demat shares the depository's record stands in for it.
Also called: Members' register, Register in Form MGT-1, Share register

In plain English

A person becomes a member of a company when its name is entered in the register of members. The register records each holder's name, address, class and number of shares, amount paid and date of entry, with a separate part for each class. For shares held in demat form, the depository's register of beneficial owners is treated as the company's register, and the company updates its own records from the depository's. At Closing the register entry is part of the sequence the investor checks: an extract showing it as holder is a Closing deliverable.

Worked example

At Saffron's Closing board meeting on 27 November 2026 the board allots 1,40,000 Series A CCPS and approves Marigold's entry in the register of members as their holder, at ₹1,000 each fully paid. The certified extract goes to Marigold as item (h) of Schedule 2, and the depository's records take over once the CCPS are credited to Marigold's demat account.

What is normal

Well-run companies make entries on the day the board approves an allotment or transfer, and in any case within the 7 days the rules allow. A separate folio for each class (equity, Seed CCPS, Series A CCPS) keeps the register clean, and investors check it in diligence against MCA filings and the cap table.

Watch out for

Mismatches between the register, the cap table, MCA filings and depository records are among the commonest diligence findings and make the capitalisation warranty untrue. Check too that past transfers were stamped and approved by the board; an unregistered transfer leaves the seller as the legal member.

In India

Section 88 of the Companies Act 2013 requires the register, kept in Form MGT-1 under the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules 2014 with entries within 7 days of the board's approval. For demat shares the depository's register of beneficial owners is deemed to be the register of members. Membership starts on entry under Section 2(55), and Section 59 lets the Tribunal rectify the register.

Demat creditThe electronic credit of newly allotted shares to the investor's demat account through the depository, completing a dematerialised issue.
Also called: Credit to the demat account, Corporate action for allotment, Demat allotment

In plain English

When shares are issued in dematerialised form, the investor receives no certificate; the shares are credited to its demat account. The company's registrar and share transfer agent sets up the new class with its own ISIN, executes a corporate action with the depository after the board allots, and the depository collects the stamp duty on the issue. The investor's demat statement is the evidence. Obtaining an ISIN for a new class such as Series A CCPS takes time, so start before Closing. Saffron's SSA allows 2 months for the credit, though the law expects the depository to be told at once.

Worked example

Saffron allots 1,40,000 Series A CCPS on 27 November 2026. Its registrar files the corporate action, the depository collects ₹7,000 of stamp duty (0.005 percent of ₹14 crore) and credits the shares to Marigold's demat account. Clause 12.1(c) requires the credit, with the depository statement as evidence, by 27 January 2027.

What is normal

A credit within 1 to 3 weeks of allotment is normal when the ISIN for the new class was obtained during the CP period; without it, the 2-month deadline can be tight. The second tranche uses the same ISIN, since it is the same class.

Watch out for

No ISIN for the new class, a demat account opened in a name that differs from the allottee's, or a subscriber whose existing shares are still in physical form, which Rule 9B would block if the company were not a small company. Chase the registrar in writing: the deadline is yours under the SSA, not theirs.

In India

Rule 9B of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014, in force since October 2023, requires private companies other than small companies to issue securities only in demat form. Saffron, with paid-up capital under ₹1 crore and modest turnover, is a small company, so Rule 9B does not apply to it today; the demat issue rests on Clause 12.1(c) of the SSA and on SEBI's requirement that AIFs hold their investments in demat form. Recheck the position at each 31 March, because a company that outgrows the small company limits has 18 months to comply. The proviso to Section 56(4) of the Companies Act 2013 requires the depository to be told of the allotment immediately; certificates, where issued, are due within 2 months.

Stamp duty on the issue of sharesStamp duty of 0.005 percent of the issue price on newly issued shares, collected through the depository when the shares are issued in demat form.
Also called: Issue stamp duty, Stamp duty on allotment

In plain English

Two different stamp duties apply to a Series A. The SSA and the SHA, as agreements, carry a State stamp duty, a few hundred rupees in most States, although in Maharashtra a stamp officer could charge 0.2 percent of the amount agreed on an SSA. The issue of the shares carries a separate duty of 0.005 percent of the issue price under the Indian Stamp Act 1899 as amended from 1 July 2020. For shares issued in demat form the depository collects it at the corporate action and passes it to the State. The company, as issuer, pays. The amount is small, but an unpaid duty holds up the demat credit.

Worked example

Saffron's first tranche is ₹14 crore, so the duty on the issue is ₹7,000 (0.005 percent); the second tranche of ₹6 crore adds ₹3,000, ₹10,000 in all on ₹20 crore. Clause 23.6 puts it on the Company, together with the stamp duty on the SSA and the SHA and the fees of the Registrar and the depository.

What is normal

The duty is ₹500 per ₹1 crore issued, so ₹1,000 to ₹25,000 for rounds of ₹2 crore to ₹50 crore. The company bears it in almost every SSA, as the issuer's own obligation.

Watch out for

Do not confuse it with the 0.015 percent duty on a transfer of shares, which applies to a founder secondary; the depository collects it from the seller, though the buyer often bears it by agreement. And do not let the investor's draft make the company pay duty on the investor's later transfers; that cost belongs to the parties to the transfer.

In India

Part AA of the Indian Stamp Act 1899, inserted with effect from 1 July 2020, routes duty on demat issues through the depository, and the Schedule rate for an issue of securities is 0.005 percent. Duty on the SSA itself falls under the State's stamp law, here the Karnataka Stamp Act 1957, and is nominal.

FLA returnThe annual return on foreign liabilities and assets that an Indian company with foreign investment files with the RBI by 15 July each year.
Also called: Annual Return on Foreign Liabilities and Assets, FLA, FLAIR filing

In plain English

Once a company has foreign direct investment, it reports its foreign liabilities and assets to the Reserve Bank of India every year through the FLA return, due by 15 July on the RBI's online portal. It applies to companies that received foreign investment, or made an overseas investment, in the previous year or earlier. Saffron does not file one: Marigold is a domestic fund and the angels are resident. It would matter if a non-resident investor came in, and it then becomes a standing annual compliance alongside Form FC-GPR for each allotment.

Worked example

Had Marigold been a foreign fund, Saffron would have filed Form FC-GPR within 30 days of the 27 November 2026 allotment, by 27 December 2026, and the FLA return for FY 2026-27 by 15 July 2027, then every year while the investment remains. As Marigold is resident, neither applies.

What is normal

Every Indian company with foreign investment files it each year by 15 July, on unaudited figures if the audit is not finished, with a revised return later. There is no fee. Missed returns are a common FEMA lapse found in diligence.

Watch out for

A past transfer of shares to a non-resident, or a foreign angel in an early round, can make the company a filer even if the new investor is domestic; check every holder's residency in diligence. Missed returns are a FEMA lapse that a foreign investor will want regularised before it closes.

In India

The return is required by the RBI's Master Direction on Reporting under FEMA and filed on the RBI's FLAIR portal. It sits alongside Form FC-GPR within 30 days of each allotment to a non-resident and the pricing rules of the FEMA (Non-debt Instruments) Rules 2019. None of this applies to Saffron's Series A because Marigold is resident and its sponsor and manager are Indian-owned and controlled.

Additional fees (late ROC filing)The extra fee for a late MCA filing: ₹100 a day for annual returns and accounts, multiples of the normal fee for most other forms.
Also called: Late fee, Additional fee, ROC late filing fee

In plain English

Most Companies Act filings have deadlines, and the MCA portal accepts late filings on payment of an additional fee. For the annual return and the financial statements the fee is ₹100 for each day of delay, with no ceiling. For most other forms, including PAS-3, MGT-14 and DIR-12, it is a multiple of the normal fee that rises with the delay, from 2 to 12 times. Paying it puts the form on record, but it is without prejudice to any penalty for the default, and investors read a pattern of late filings as a governance signal.

Worked example

Saffron's annual return for FY 2023-24 was filed 41 days late, so the additional fee was ₹4,100 at ₹100 a day. The delay is disclosed against the compliance warranty and visible in the public records searched on 20 October 2026, so it cannot found a warranty claim, but it still shapes Marigold's view of how the company is run.

What is normal

Short delays of days or weeks are common in early-stage companies and usually end with the additional fee alone; adjudication of penalties for small delays is rare but possible. Investors expect the last three years' filings to be complete, with any delays disclosed.

Watch out for

Believing the fee settles everything: it does not cure penalties, and some forms, such as a charge filing beyond the permitted time, need condonation rather than just a fee. A late DIR-12 or MGT-14 after Closing also counts as a missed condition subsequent under the SSA.

In India

Additional fees are prescribed by the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules 2014, and Section 403 of the Companies Act 2013 makes late filing without prejudice to other liability. Section 92(5) penalises a late annual return with ₹10,000 plus ₹100 a day, up to ₹2 lakh for the company and ₹50,000 for each officer in default; Section 446B halves penalties for startups and small companies.

Before you sign: 15 checks for the SSA and the disclosure letter

Run through these with your company secretary and counsel in the week before signing. Each one is a point where Indian Series A rounds lose time, money or bargaining power.

  1. The disclosure letter is complete, including the awkward items: emailed equity promises, late filings, consultants who work like employees, missing IP assignments.
    Anything left out can become a warranty claim against you personally; anything fairly disclosed cannot. The embarrassing items are the ones that most need to be in the letter.
  2. Every condition precedent in Schedule 1 has a named owner, a target date and an agreed piece of evidence that will show it is done.
    The CP satisfaction notice needs evidence for every item. Conditions with no owner slip, and a shared tracker avoids a scramble in the week before Closing.
  3. The long-stop date leaves room for slippage: Saffron's is 31 January 2027, about nine weeks after the target Closing of 27 November 2026.
    If a condition is still open at the long-stop, either side can walk away. A long-stop set too tight hands the investor a free exit when one consent or filing runs late.
  4. Any 'satisfactory due diligence' condition ends with a closing memo or written sign-off by a stated date, not the investor's open-ended discretion.
    An open-ended diligence condition is an option to walk away for any reason until Closing. A closing memo turns it into a list of specific items you can clear and prove.
  5. The second tranche is fully written: the fixed ₹1,000 price, the auditors' certificate of the ₹6 crore ARR Milestone, the 30-day funding window and the near-miss rule.
    ₹6 crore depends on these words. If the price, the certificate or the near-miss treatment is left to later agreement, the second tranche becomes a fresh negotiation.
  6. Founder liability is several where you can get it, and in any case capped per founder, with an election to settle a claim in shares rather than cash.
    Under joint and several liability either founder can be pursued for the whole claim. A per-founder cap and share settlement keep one claim away from your personal assets.
  7. Set-off against the second tranche is removed, and any claim that is agreed or finally determined by the arbitrator is paid by a separate bank transfer on the same day.
    Otherwise the investor can hold back part of the ₹6 crore just by alleging a breach, and you must win an arbitration to get your own round money.
  8. Reimbursement of the investor's costs on a failed deal applies only to a failure caused by the company or the founders, is capped at ₹20 lakh at most, and there is no break fee.
    If the investor walks away for its own reasons, you should not pay its lawyers. A cap keeps the downside known if the deal fails for a reason within your control.
  9. A separate bank account for the subscription money is open in the company's name with a scheduled bank, and its details are in the PAS-4 offer letter.
    Section 42 requires the money to arrive through banking channels into a separate account. Bank onboarding can take one to two weeks, so do not leave it for Closing week.
  10. The PAS-4 offer letter and the PAS-5 record of the private placement are drafted, with the board resolution approving the offer ready to pass.
    Money can be accepted only against a valid offer to an identified investor. A defective PAS-4 can taint the allotment and the PAS-3 that follows it.
  11. The Rule 13 valuation report from a registered valuer is in hand before the EGM notice goes out, because the explanatory statement for the special resolution must include it and state the relevant date of the price.
    Rule 13 bars an issue below the price the report supports. A second tranche allotted within 12 months of the resolution can rest on the same report at the fixed ₹1,000; a fresh special resolution after that needs a fresh report.
  12. The restated Articles are in agreed form, annexed to the SSA, and carry every investor right that the SHA gives.
    Rights that sit only in the SHA may not bind the company or other shareholders, the point of the Rangaraj line of cases. Agreeing the text at signing avoids a second negotiation.
  13. The investor entity is checked: Marigold Capital Partners Fund II's SEBI registration as a Category II AIF and the authority of the person signing for its investment manager.
    You are issuing shares to the fund, not to the partner you negotiated with. The wrong entity or a signatory without authority can unwind the allotment and its filings.
  14. The stamp duty budget is known: the State duty on the SSA itself, a few hundred rupees in Karnataka but possibly 0.2 percent of the amount agreed in Maharashtra, and 0.005 percent on the issue of demat shares, ₹10,000 on ₹20 crore.
    An unstamped agreement cannot be relied on in evidence until the duty and any penalty are paid. The issue duty is collected through the depository when the shares are credited.
  15. The e-signature method is agreed for every signatory: Aadhaar e-sign or a digital signature certificate, with the e-stamp bought before the first signature.
    Section 5 of the Information Technology Act 2000 recognises electronic signatures, but it does not remove stamp duty, and the stamping must be in place before execution.

From signing to filings: the Saffron Labs Series A

Saffron's dates are shown. Each legal deadline runs from the event that triggers it (money received, allotment, resolution, appointment), so move them with your own dates; the closing deadlines calculator does this for you.

WhenWhat happensWhoForm or document
15 September 2026Term sheet accepted. The 45-day exclusivity runs to 30 October 2026, and the investor's counsel sends the diligence request list.Founders and MarigoldNo filing. Only exclusivity, confidentiality and costs bind
Mid-September to late October 2026 (4 to 6 weeks)Legal, financial and tax diligence on the data room; drafting of the SSA, SHA, restated Articles and disclosure letter. Findings become disclosures, conditions precedent or specific indemnities.Investor's counsel and advisers, company secretary, foundersPublic records searches on 20 October 2026; data room index frozen on 24 October 2026
9 and 20 October 2026The board adopts the ESOP (9 October). The EGM passes the special resolutions for the Series A issue under Sections 42 and 62(1)(c), the ESOP and the restated Articles (20 October).Board and shareholdersForm MGT-14 within 30 days of each special resolution: by 19 November 2026, and before the PAS-4 goes out
30 October 2026SSA signed and the disclosure letter delivered with the frozen data room copy. The warranties speak from today and are repeated at Closing.Company, both founders, MarigoldSSA stamped in Karnataka before execution; e-signatures valid under Section 5 of the Information Technology Act 2000
30 October to 20 November 2026Conditions precedent period: diligence items closed, Rule 13 valuation report (obtained before the EGM notice) delivered, insurance proposals, separate bank account opened, PAS-4 offer issued to Marigold. The company serves the CP satisfaction notice with evidence.Founders and company secretaryPAS-4 offer letter and PAS-5 record; board resolution approving the offer
20 November 2026Marigold pays ₹14 crore into the separate bank account. The 60-day allotment clock under Section 42 starts, and the money cannot be used yet.MarigoldAllot by 19 January 2027, or refund within 15 days after that, else 12 percent interest
27 November 2026Closing: the board allots 1,40,000 Series A CCPS, enters Marigold in the register of members, appoints Rohan Kapoor as Investor Director and instructs the demat credit. The SHA is signed and the closing deliverables are exchanged.Board, company secretary, MarigoldBoard resolution for allotment; register of members in Form MGT-1
By 12 December 2026The return of allotment is filed within 15 days of allotment. Only after this filing can the company use the ₹14 crore.Company secretaryForm PAS-3 with the list of allottees, board resolution and valuation report
By 27 December 2026Rohan Kapoor's appointment as Investor Director is filed, with MGT-14 for any special resolution passed at Closing, such as restated Articles adopted then. The ₹5 crore D&O policy and the key person policies are due under the conditions subsequent.Company secretary and finance headForm DIR-12 within 30 days of appointment; Form MGT-14 within 30 days of the resolution
By 27 January 2027The Series A CCPS are credited to Marigold's demat account within 2 months of allotment, and the stamp duty on the issue (0.005 percent, ₹7,000 on ₹14 crore) is collected through the depository.Company secretary and registrar and transfer agentCorporate action through the depository; Section 56(4); Rule 9B does not apply while Saffron is a small company
By 25 February 2027The remaining condition subsequent falls due 90 days after Closing: the Schedule 7 policies (anti-bribery, related party transactions, whistle-blower and POSH) adopted by the Board. A missed item has a 15 business day cure period.Board and company secretaryBoard resolution adopting the policies, with copies to Marigold; no ROC filing
By 27 November 2027, then 30 daysThe auditors certify ₹6 crore of annual recurring revenue (the Milestone). Marigold funds the second tranche of ₹6 crore for 60,000 CCPS at ₹1,000 within 30 days of the certificate.Auditors, board, MarigoldPAS-4, PAS-5; fresh special resolution and new Rule 13 valuation if allotted after 19 October 2027; PAS-3 in 15 days

How this page was put together

The BizExpress team, who prepare the filings that close founders' funding rounds, wrote this page. Every India-specific statement was checked against the Companies Act 2013 and its rules on private placements and allotments, the Indian Stamp Act and the State stamp laws, the FEMA Non-Debt Instruments Rules and the income tax law as they stood on 4 November 2026, and an expert reviewed each point the law turns on before publication.

The sample documents are composites: the clauses are typical of Indian startups in 2026, but Saffron Labs, its founders, its investors and every other company, fund, incubator, adviser and person in the samples are invented, as are the figures. Any resemblance to a real business is unintended. The calculators simplify on purpose.

The page is reviewed after each Union Budget and whenever a rule it relies on changes; the date of the last review sits at the top. It is general information for founders reading these documents, not advice on any particular deal.

Questions founders ask about share subscription agreements

What is a share subscription agreement?

A share subscription agreement (SSA) is the contract in which an investor agrees to buy new shares from a company, and the company agrees to issue them, at an agreed price and on agreed conditions. It sets the conditions to be met before the money comes in, the warranties the company and the founders give, the indemnity if a warranty turns out wrong, and the steps at closing. In India the issue itself follows Sections 42 and 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act 2013, and the shareholders' agreement governs the relationship after closing.

Can the investor walk away after signing the SSA, and what if a condition is not met by the long-stop?

Only on the grounds the SSA lists. Between signing on 30 October 2026 and Closing, Marigold can terminate if a condition precedent is not satisfied or waived by the long-stop date of 31 January 2027, if a warranty or pre-closing covenant is materially breached, or if a supplementary disclosure shows a material adverse change, a fundamental warranty breach or a likely loss above ₹1 crore. If a condition is slipping, agree a written extension of the long-stop before it passes; neither side has to agree one. After termination only the surviving clauses continue, and the company pays Marigold's costs only if the failure was caused by the company or the founders.

Can we spend the Series A money before Form PAS-3 is filed?

No, the Series A money cannot be spent before Form PAS-3 is filed. Under Section 42 of the Companies Act 2013 the money sits in a separate bank account and cannot be used until the shares are allotted and the return of allotment in Form PAS-3 is filed, within 15 days of allotment. For Saffron, the ₹14 crore received on 20 November 2026 is untouchable until allotment on 27 November 2026 and the PAS-3, due by 12 December 2026; filing it the same week is better. If shares are not allotted within 60 days of receipt, the money must be refunded within the next 15 days, failing which it carries interest at 12 percent a year from the end of the 60th day (Section 42(6)). Money that is neither allotted nor refunded in time is also treated as a deposit under the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 2014, though money from a SEBI-registered AIF such as Marigold arguably falls within a separate exclusion in those rules; the interest applies either way.

What is the difference between an SSA and an SSHA?

The SSA is the purchase: subscription, conditions precedent, warranties, indemnity and Closing. Once the shares are issued its work is largely done, apart from claims. The shareholders' agreement is the rulebook for life after the money: board seats, reserved matters, transfers and exits. An SSHA puts both in one document, which is common in seed and smaller rounds that sign and close on the same day. At Series A, with a gap between signing and Closing, two documents are cleaner: the SSA can end without disturbing the SHA, and a later investor signs only a deed of adherence to the SHA.

Who pays the stamp duty on an SSA, and how much is it?

Two stamp duties apply to a share subscription: one on the agreement and one on the issue of the shares. The agreement itself attracts State stamp duty, paid before or at signing: in Karnataka a fixed duty of a few hundred rupees under Article 5(j) of the Karnataka Stamp Act 1957; in Maharashtra at least ₹500 under Article 5(h)(B) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act 1958, and because Article 5(h)(A)(iv) charges 0.2 percent of the amount agreed on agreements creating rights worth more than ₹10 lakh, a stamp officer could charge ₹4 lakh on a ₹20 crore SSA, so take advice if the SSA is signed or received there. Saffron's SSA puts the duty on the company. The issue of the shares attracts stamp duty of 0.005 percent of the issue price, including premium, collected through the depository when demat shares are credited: ₹7,000 on the ₹14 crore first tranche and ₹3,000 on the ₹6 crore second tranche, ₹10,000 in all. An unstamped agreement cannot be relied on in evidence until the duty and any penalty are paid, so stamp it first, especially if you sign electronically.

What is a disclosure letter, and why does it protect founders?

It is a letter from the company and the founders to the investor, delivered at signing, listing the exceptions to the warranties. The warranty says no one has been promised shares; the letter says 'except the advisor's email of July 2024, now released'. A matter fairly disclosed in the letter cannot found a warranty claim, so every awkward fact you put in it is a claim you take off the table. Saffron's letter has general disclosures (the data room, public records and accounts) and specific ones against numbered warranties. Disclosure does not switch off a specific indemnity, which is why three diligence findings stay covered by Clause 18.

How long do the warranties last, and what is a bring-down?

The warranties are given at signing and repeated at Closing. That repetition is the bring-down: it makes them speak as at 27 November 2026, not just 30 October. After Closing, claims can be made for 24 months on business warranties, 7 years on tax and with no contractual time limit on fundamental warranties such as title and capitalisation. A claim must be notified within 60 days of the investor becoming aware of it, with reasonable detail. Between signing and Closing you must tell the investor of any new breach within 3 business days, and you can deliver a supplementary disclosure letter, but it protects you only against the Closing-day warranties.

What happens if the second tranche never arrives?

If the second tranche never arrives, what happens depends on why. If the Milestone, ₹6 crore of annual recurring revenue certified by the auditors within 12 months of Closing, is missed, Marigold need not invest; it may waive the Milestone or apply the near-miss rule in the SSA, at the fixed price of ₹1,000 per share. If the Milestone is met and Marigold does not pay within 30 days of the certificate, it is in breach and the company can claim in arbitration. If the allotment would fall after 19 October 2027, Rule 13 also requires a fresh special resolution and valuation report first. Either way, plan your runway on the ₹14 crore alone, and have any claim that is agreed or finally determined paid by a separate bank transfer on the same day rather than set off against the tranche.

Are e-signatures valid for a share subscription agreement?

Yes, e-signatures are valid for a share subscription agreement. Section 5 of the Information Technology Act 2000 gives electronic signatures legal recognition, and both Aadhaar-based e-sign and a digital signature certificate qualify. Agree the method in the counterparts clause, check that every signatory, including the investor's authorised signatory, uses a recognised method, and keep the audit trail. Signing electronically does not remove stamp duty: buy the e-stamp for the State before the first signature and attach it to the signed document. The MCA forms that follow, such as PAS-3, MGT-14 and DIR-12, are signed separately with a director's digital signature certificate.

Do the angel investors from the seed round sign the SSA?

They need not be parties, because Ritika Iyer and Arjun Nair are not subscribing and give no warranties, though some SSAs add existing investors to record their waivers. What matters is their consent. The Seed Shareholders' Agreement of 12 March 2024 typically gives them pre-emptive and consent rights over a new issue, especially one ranking ahead of their Seed CCPS, so a written waiver from both is needed before Closing; Saffron's SSA records in Clause 3.5 that both have given it. They do sign the new Shareholders' Agreement at Closing, because it replaces the seed agreement and binds every shareholder.

What changes if the investor is a foreign fund?

Marigold is a domestic rupee fund, so FEMA does not apply to this round. If the investor were non-resident, the price would have to be at least fair value under the FEMA pricing guidelines; the company would file Form FC-GPR within 30 days of allotment and the annual FLA return by 15 July; no assured return could be promised; and an investor from a country sharing a land border with India would need government approval under Press Note 3 of 2020. A Rule 13 valuation is still needed. Angel tax under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026) does not apply to shares issued from 1 April 2024.

Want an expert to read your SSA with you?

An expert will reach out within 2 working hours. Mon to Sat, 10am to 7pm IST. Bring the clause that worries you and we pick it up from there.