BizExpress

Incubation and accelerator agreement explainer: every clause in plain English (2026)

The first agreement most founders sign is with a programme, not an investor: an accelerator offering a cohort and a cheque for equity, or an incubator passing on a government grant with milestones attached. This page takes both apart clause by clause: the 20-clause accelerator offer Saffron Labs received in March 2023 and declined, and the 18-clause Startup India Seed Fund Scheme incubation agreement it signed in June 2023, with 61 terms in plain English, a 12-row 'what happens when' table and a programme-cost calculator that turns '7 percent for ₹30 lakh' into a valuation. Written by the BizExpress team, who handle grant, GST and company filings for founders, so the utilisation certificate, GST, TDS and Rule 13 points get the same care as the equity.

Free, no sign-upWorks in your browserLaw as at 4 November 2026

In short

What they are

A programme agreement sells you services (mentoring, a cohort, a demo day, a desk) and sometimes money, and takes equity, fees or compliance with a government scheme's rules in return. It is a commercial contract first and an investment document second, so read the services and exit clauses as closely as the equity ones.

The two very different deals

A private accelerator takes equity, usually through an iSAFE with a low valuation cap, and often a further slice 'for the programme' itself. A government incubator passes on a grant or a soft loan under a scheme such as SISFS: milestones, utilisation certificates and reporting, but no equity. Saffron declined the first in April 2023 and signed the second in June 2023.

The four clauses that matter most

What you give up (the iSAFE cap and any programme equity); what you must do (attendance, milestones, reports); what they control (your IP, your logo, publicity, a follow-on right in your seed round); and what happens when you leave or are expelled. Everything else in these agreements is boilerplate you can live with.

What is normal in 2026

Private programmes: ₹10 lakh to ₹75 lakh for 3 to 10 percent, mostly through an iSAFE; programme fees nil to ₹5 lakh plus GST; 3 to 6 month cohorts. SISFS: grants up to ₹20 lakh and debt or convertibles up to ₹50 lakh, released against milestones. Seat licences ₹3,000 to ₹10,000 a month, plus GST except at TBIs recognised by DST's NSTEDB, whose incubation services are exempt. Agreement terms run 3 to 12 months, with extensions for incubation.

What to push back on

Programme equity issued at face value; equity for services with no cash behind it; MFN and follow-on rights that reach into your seed round; publicity rights with no approval step; IP licences wider than your name and logo; expulsion clauses that keep the equity; and grant clawback with interest for an ordinary pivot or an honest miss.

The compliance

SISFS eligibility tests (DPIIT recognition, incorporated within 2 years, Indian promoters at 51 percent, not more than ₹10 lakh of earlier government support); milestone-based disbursement; a Chartered Accountant's utilisation certificate for each tranche; quarterly reports; GST at 18 percent on programme fees and most seat fees (the services of a TBI recognised by DST's NSTEDB are exempt); TDS under Section 194J on fees you pay; and a Rule 13 valuation for any shares a programme receives.

Before the clauses

Four things that make the rest of the document easier to read.

Accelerators sell a programme and buy equity; incubators host you and manage public money

An accelerator is a business. It runs a fixed-length cohort, puts in a small cheque and takes equity, and it makes money when you raise and exit. An incubator, especially a government-supported TBI or an Atal Incubation Centre, is a host: it gives you a desk, mentors and access to schemes, and when it passes on a grant it is administering public money under rules it did not write. Read the first like an investor's term sheet and the second like a grant sanction letter, because that is what each of them is.

'7 percent for ₹30 lakh' is a valuation; work it out before you say yes

Divide the cash by the stake. ₹30 lakh for 7 percent values the company at ₹4.29 crore; add ₹15 lakh of claimed programme value and it is ₹6.43 crore. Then run the stake forward: after a seed round at 15 percent dilution and a Series A at 30 percent, the programme still holds 4.17 percent, worth ₹4.17 crore at a ₹100 crore post-money, 13.9 times its cash. Compare that with what an angel would pay today. Saffron's angels accepted a ₹16 crore cap seven months after the accelerator asked for ₹6 crore.

A grant is not free: milestones, utilisation certificates, audits and clawback

A SISFS grant arrives in tranches, each released only after a Chartered Accountant certifies how the last one was spent. You report quarterly, keep the money on a separate ledger, spend only on the approved heads, open your books to the incubator and to government auditors, and refund with interest if you misuse the money or misstated your eligibility. An honest failure to hit a milestone is not misuse. The real cost is bookkeeping discipline, which you need anyway before a priced round.

Equity for services is hard to issue under Indian company law

A private company cannot simply hand shares to a programme for 'services'. Sweat equity under Section 54 is only for employees and directors. Any other issue to a chosen person is a preferential issue under Section 62(1)(c), which needs a special resolution and a registered valuer's price under Rule 13, so shares at ₹10 face value when the valuer's price is higher are non-compliant. That is why the equity usually hides inside a lower cap on a single iSAFE; the other clean route is shares issued for the programme's services at a registered valuer's price, with the services valued too, while a nominal second iSAFE or warrants still need a price a registered valuer will sign. Each route is a valuation you should compute.

Private accelerator, corporate accelerator, government incubator, university incubator, venture studio

Five kinds of programme sign five kinds of agreement. The ranges are what Indian founders saw in 2025 and 2026; a programme outside them is not wrong, but it owes you an explanation.

Private acceleratorCorporate acceleratorGovernment incubatorUniversity incubatorVenture studio
Cash you receive₹10 lakh to ₹75 lakh, usually through an iSAFEOften nil; sometimes a paid pilot or ₹5 lakh to ₹25 lakhSISFS grant up to ₹20 lakh and debt or convertible up to ₹50 lakh; other schemes varyUsually nil, or a prototyping grant through a scheme such as NIDHI-PRAYAS₹25 lakh to ₹2 crore of build capital, much of it spent by the studio itself
Equity they take3% to 10% including any programme equityNil to 5%; sometimes a right of first offer on a strategic dealNone for a grant; a SISFS convertible debenture may convert laterNil to 5%, or a royalty where institute IP is licensed20% to 60% as a co-founder
Typical instrumentiSAFE (compulsorily convertible preference shares) with a valuation capPilot agreement plus an optional investment letterGrant sanction and incubation agreement; CCDs or a loan for the ₹50 lakh componentIncubation agreement; a licence over institute IP where relevantShareholders' agreement with the studio as a founder shareholder
Fees you payNil to ₹5 lakh plus GST, sometimes deducted from the chequeUsually nilNo fee for scheme services; seat licences of ₹3,000 to ₹10,000 a month are common, with GST unless the incubator is a TBI recognised by DST's NSTEDBSeat and lab fees of ₹1,000 to ₹10,000 a month, often subsidisedNil in cash; the studio recovers its cost through equity
Duration3 to 6 months8 to 16 weeks tied to a pilot12 to 24 months, extendable12 to 36 monthsUntil the seed round, typically 12 to 24 months
What you must doAttend mandatory sessions, both founders full-time, pitch at demo dayDeliver the pilot, protect the corporate's data, present to its business unitHit milestones, file utilisation certificates and quarterly reports, open your booksStay affiliated, acknowledge support, report progressBuild what the studio's thesis says, under the studio's processes
Who owns the IPYou; the programme gets a name and logo licenceYou, but read the pilot agreement for background IP, improvements and dataYou; the scheme and the incubator have no claimUsually you; institute-created IP may be licensed back for a royaltyShared or studio-owned until spin-out; check the assignment
Follow-on and introductionsDemo day, investor network, often a follow-on or pro-rata rightA commercial contract if the pilot works; investment rarelyISMC mentors, scheme networks, State startup cells; no follow-on rightAlumni networks, faculty, campus talentThe studio leads or co-leads the seed round
Best forFirst-time founders who need a network and a first cheque fastB2B startups whose first customer is the corporatePre-revenue, DPIIT-recognised startups building a prototypeDeep-tech and research-led founders who need labsOperators who want a co-founder with capital and will give up control for it

The sample documents, clause by clause

Click a clause. The notes beside it tell you what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, and how to negotiate it. Dotted words open the glossary; terms defined on another explainer open there.

Example only

Accelerator Programme and Investment Agreement offered by Deccan Launchpad Accelerator LLP to Saffron Labs Private Limited

Five weeks after incorporation, Saffron Labs pitched to a Hyderabad accelerator and received this offer on 20 March 2023: a 12-week cohort, ₹30 lakh through an iSAFE at a ₹6 crore pre-money cap, a further 2 percent of the company 'for the programme', and a ₹3 lakh fee plus GST deducted from the cheque. The founders ran the numbers in the programme-cost calculator, compared them with what angels were quoting, and declined in April 2023. The document is reproduced here because it is a fair specimen of a private accelerator offer: every clause below is drafted the way such offers are drafted, and the notes explain what each one would have cost.

Accelerator
Deccan Launchpad Accelerator LLP, Hyderabad, a private programme
Programme
12-week cohort, hybrid (three residential weeks in Hyderabad), Demo Day in June 2023
Investment
₹30 lakh through an iSAFE with a ₹6 crore pre-money valuation cap and no discount
Programme equity
2% of the fully diluted equity shares, issued at face value 'for the programme'
Programme fee
₹3 lakh plus GST (₹3,54,000), deducted from the investment
Rights asked
Follow-on right of up to ₹50 lakh in the seed round, MFN, monthly updates, use of Saffron's name and logo
Saffron's decision
Declined in April 2023; the arithmetic is in the programme-cost calculator
The programme

1. Parties and the Programme

This Accelerator Programme and Investment Agreement (the "Agreement") is offered by Deccan Launchpad Accelerator LLP, a limited liability partnership registered under the Limited Liability Partnership Act 2008 having its office at Hyderabad, Telangana (the "Accelerator"), to Saffron Labs Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act 2013 with CIN U72900KA2023PTC171234 having its registered office at Bengaluru, Karnataka (the "Company"), and to Ananya Rao and Vikram Menon (together the "Promoters"). The Accelerator operates a twelve-week acceleration programme for early-stage technology companies known as the Deccan Launchpad Spring 2023 Cohort (the "Programme"), commencing on 3 April 2023 (the "Programme Commencement Date") and concluding with the Demo Day on 22 June 2023. The Programme shall be delivered in a hybrid format, with Residential Weeks in Hyderabad in weeks 1, 6 and 12 and remote sessions in the remaining weeks. The Accelerator shall designate a Programme Director as the single point of contact for the Company, and the Company shall designate Ananya Rao as its representative. The Programme shall follow the Programme Calendar in Schedule 1, which the Accelerator may amend on 7 days' written notice provided that the number of Mandatory Sessions is not increased.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The opening clause names the three sides of the deal: the accelerator (an LLP in Hyderabad), your company, and the two founders personally. It fixes what the programme is (a named 12-week cohort), when it runs (3 April to 22 June 2023), where (three weeks in Hyderabad, the rest online) and who speaks for each side. It also gives the accelerator the right to move dates around on a week's notice, as long as it does not add compulsory sessions.

What it means for you

Three things to check before you read further. First, the legal person offering the programme must be the same legal person that will hold the iSAFE; many programmes run the cohort through an LLP and invest through a fund or a nominee, and you want to know which entity you are dealing with on each. Second, the founders are parties in their own name, which is why the commitments and warranties later bind you personally and not only the company. Third, an LLP's partners are not personally liable for its obligations, so if the programme is not delivered your remedy is against the LLP alone. Look up the LLP on the MCA portal before you sign.

What is normal

Cohorts run 10 to 16 weeks; 12 is the median for Indian private accelerators. Batch sizes of 8 to 20 companies are usual, and a hybrid format with 2 to 4 residential weeks has been standard since 2022. Naming the founders as parties is normal; a programme that names the founders as guarantors of the company's obligations is not. A 7-day right to change the calendar is common; a right to change the programme's content or its length without consent is not.

How to negotiate it

Ask for three things in this clause. Name the entity that will subscribe to the iSAFE, and confirm it is resident in India so that FEMA does not apply. Limit the founders' status as parties to the commitments in Clause 3 and the warranties in Clause 18, so that you are not personally liable for a company obligation such as the fee. And make any change to the Residential Weeks subject to your consent, because flights and a second city are a real cost for a two-person team.

2. Programme services

During the Programme the Accelerator shall provide to the Company the following services (the "Programme Services"): (a) a structured curriculum of not fewer than 24 workshops on product, sales, finance and fundraising; (b) fortnightly office hours with the Programme Director and access to the Accelerator's mentor network under Clause 5; (c) a dedicated desk for two persons at the Accelerator's Hyderabad premises during the Residential Weeks; (d) the Perks and Credits described in Clause 4; (e) preparation for and participation in the Demo Day; and (f) introductions to investors in the Accelerator's network under Clause 6. The Accelerator shall use its reasonable efforts to deliver the Programme Services in accordance with the Programme Calendar. The Company acknowledges that the Programme Services are advisory and educational in nature, that the Accelerator does not guarantee any outcome, including any investment, revenue, customer or valuation, and that the Accelerator may substitute mentors, speakers and venues at its discretion. The Programme Services shall be deemed fully delivered on the Demo Day.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

This is the list of what you get for the fee and the equity: about two dozen workshops, office hours every two weeks, a desk in Hyderabad during the residential weeks, partner perks, demo day coaching, and introductions. The accelerator promises reasonable efforts, not results, and keeps the right to swap mentors and venues. Whatever happens, the services count as delivered on demo day.

What it means for you

Read this clause as the only enforceable description of the programme, because the brochure and the pitch are not part of the agreement. Count the workshops and the office hours and work out the hourly cost against the ₹3 lakh fee and the equity. The deemed-delivery sentence matters: once demo day passes you cannot claim that half the curriculum was missing. 'Reasonable efforts' is a low standard in Indian contract law, close to not being negligent. The absence of an outcome promise is fair; nobody can promise a round. The absence of any minimum service level is not.

What is normal

Indian private programmes typically list 15 to 30 structured sessions and 1 to 2 hours of office time a week with the programme team. Reasonable or best efforts language is universal. About half of the programmes write a named curriculum into a schedule; the better ones commit to a minimum number of mentor hours (10 to 20 over the cohort) and a named lead mentor. Deemed-delivery clauses appear in most offers but are rarely challenged.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the Programme Calendar to be attached as a schedule with named sessions and a minimum of 20 mentor hours, so that a shortfall is measurable. Ask for a pro-rata refund of the fee if the Accelerator cancels more than 20 percent of the scheduled sessions. Replace deemed delivery on the Demo Day with delivery when the scheduled sessions have been held. And confirm in writing whether the 'dedicated desk' comes with the right to receive mail there, which matters for a company with no office of its own.

3. Founder commitments

Each Promoter undertakes to the Accelerator that during the Programme he or she shall (a) devote his or her full business time to the Company and hold no other employment, directorship or consulting engagement; (b) attend all Mandatory Sessions identified in the Programme Calendar, being not more than 14 sessions, in person or by video as the Calendar specifies; (c) attend not less than 80 percent of all other scheduled sessions; (d) be present in Hyderabad for the whole of each Residential Week, at the Company's cost as to travel and accommodation; (e) submit the weekly progress form by 6 pm every Friday; and (f) not participate in any other accelerator or incubation programme that requires attendance. The Promoters shall procure that at least one Promoter is reachable by the Programme Director on every Business Day. A Promoter who is unable to attend a Mandatory Session shall notify the Programme Director in advance and shall attend the recorded session within 7 days. Failure to attend three Mandatory Sessions, or absence from any Residential Week, shall constitute Non-Participation for the purposes of Clause 17.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Both founders promise to work only on the company, show up to every compulsory session (up to 14 of them), attend four-fifths of everything else, spend three full weeks in Hyderabad at their own expense, file a weekly form, and not join any other programme at the same time. Missing three compulsory sessions or a residential week counts as non-participation, which is the trigger for expulsion later in the agreement.

What it means for you

This is the clause that binds you personally rather than the company. The full-time promise is reasonable in substance and is also what your next investors will ask for, but as drafted it bans any directorship, including a family company or a Section 8 non-profit, and any paid teaching. The three residential weeks are a hidden cost: two founders, flights and 21 nights in Hyderabad would have come to roughly ₹2 lakh to ₹3 lakh for Saffron in 2023, on top of the ₹3 lakh fee. The weekly form and the ban on parallel programmes are standard. The non-participation trigger means that an illness in week 6 could, read literally, cost you the programme.

What is normal

Full-time undertakings from all founders appear in almost every Indian accelerator agreement. Mandatory attendance of 8 to 15 sessions and an 80 to 90 percent threshold for the rest are the usual numbers. Most programmes bear accommodation during residential weeks or provide hostel-type stays; asking the company to pay for both travel and stay is at the stricter end. Exclusivity against other programmes during the cohort is normal; exclusivity for 6 or 12 months after it is not.

How to negotiate it

Carve out existing directorships and unpaid teaching from the full-time undertaking, and list them in a schedule. Ask the Accelerator to provide accommodation in Hyderabad or to cap your cost at a fixed stipend. Make non-participation subject to a written warning and a 7-day cure period, with illness and family emergencies excluded. Finally, limit the ban on other programmes to programmes that require physical attendance, so that an online government scheme such as a SISFS grant application is not a breach.

4. Perks and credits

The Accelerator shall use its reasonable efforts to make available to the Company the partner benefits listed in Schedule 2 (the "Perks and Credits"), including cloud infrastructure credits, software subscriptions, payment-gateway fee waivers and a current account with preferential charges, each provided by the relevant partner (a "Perk Partner") on the Perk Partner's own terms. The Company acknowledges that (a) the Perks and Credits are provided by the Perk Partners and not by the Accelerator; (b) the Accelerator makes no representation as to their availability, value, duration or fitness for the Company's purposes; (c) a Perk Partner may withdraw, vary or decline to extend any Perk or Credit at any time; and (d) the Accelerator shall have no liability for any act or omission of a Perk Partner. The Company shall apply for each Perk directly, shall comply with the Perk Partner's terms, and shall not resell, transfer or share any Credit. Credits not activated within 90 days of the Programme Commencement Date may lapse.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The accelerator will try to get you the partner perks in a schedule: cloud credits, software, payment-gateway fee waivers, a bank account with lower charges. Each comes from the partner on the partner's terms, not from the accelerator, which promises nothing about whether they will arrive, how much they are worth or how long they last. You apply yourself, you cannot share or sell them, and unused credits can lapse after 90 days.

What it means for you

Perks are real but you should value them at what you would otherwise have spent, not at their sticker price. A startup with two developers in 2023 spent perhaps ₹30,000 a month on cloud infrastructure, so credits with a face value of ₹8 lakh over a year were worth a fraction of that to it. Most of the same credits are available directly from the providers to any DPIIT-recognised startup, which is why they should not justify a higher equity ask. Promotional credits are generally treated as discounts rather than income, but if a perk has a cash value and arrives through the Accelerator, ask your tax expert whether Section 28(iv) of the Income-tax Act (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026) treats it as a business receipt.

What is normal

Every private programme in India lists perks, and the claimed face value ranges from ₹5 lakh to over ₹50 lakh. The no-warranty, no-liability language is universal and fair, because the accelerator does not control the partners. A 60 to 120 day activation window is typical. What varies is disclosure: good programmes publish which perks are exclusive to the cohort and which any startup can obtain by applying directly.

How to negotiate it

Do not negotiate the legal terms of this clause; negotiate the valuation. Ask the Accelerator to mark in Schedule 2 which perks are exclusive to its cohort, and discount the rest to zero when you compute the implied valuation. Ask for the activation window to run from the date the Perk Partner approves you, not from the Programme Commencement Date. And confirm that the preferential bank account does not require you to move the Company's main account or to route the iSAFE money through the partner bank.

5. Mentors and entrepreneurs-in-residence

The Accelerator shall give the Company access to its network of mentors and Entrepreneurs-in-Residence (together the "Mentors"), including not fewer than two scheduled sessions with each of two Mentors assigned to the Company. The Company acknowledges that (a) the Mentors are independent persons who are not employees or agents of the Accelerator; (b) a Mentor owes no fiduciary duty to the Company and may be an investor, adviser or director in a company that competes with the Company, provided that the Mentor shall disclose any such interest to the Company before a session; (c) advice given by a Mentor is given in good faith and without warranty, and neither the Mentor nor the Accelerator shall be liable for any action the Company takes in reliance on it; and (d) the Company shall not offer any Mentor remuneration, equity or an advisory role during the Programme without the Accelerator's prior written consent. The Mentors shall be bound by the Accelerator's Code of Conduct, which requires them to keep confidential the information the Company shares in mentor sessions.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

You get the mentor network and at least two sessions with each of two assigned mentors. Mentors are independent, can be invested in your competitors as long as they tell you first, owe you no duty of loyalty, and are not liable for bad advice. You cannot hire a mentor or give one equity during the programme without the accelerator's consent. Mentors must follow the accelerator's code of conduct, which includes keeping your information confidential.

What it means for you

The conflict-of-interest sentence is the one to dwell on. A mentor who sits on the board of a competitor will hear your pricing, your pipeline and your roadmap, and the only protection you have is a disclosure duty and a code of conduct you have never read, enforceable by the accelerator rather than by you. The ban on hiring or granting equity to mentors is designed to stop the mentor pool being poached, but it also stops you building your own advisory board for three months. Four scheduled sessions is a modest commitment; most of the value of mentoring is in the unscheduled conversations, and those depend on the mentor, not on this clause.

What is normal

Indian programmes typically assign 1 to 3 lead mentors per company and promise 4 to 12 scheduled sessions over the cohort. Disclaimers of liability and fiduciary duty are universal. A conflict-disclosure duty appears in roughly half of the agreements seen in 2025 and 2026; a right for the founder to decline a conflicted mentor appears in fewer. Restrictions on hiring mentors during the cohort are common; a cooling-off period of 6 to 12 months after it is unusual and worth resisting.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the Code of Conduct to be attached as a schedule, so that you can see what the mentors have promised. Add a right to decline any Mentor who discloses a competing interest, and a right to receive a replacement. Ask that the restriction on offering a Mentor equity or an advisory role end with the Programme, with the Accelerator's consent not to be unreasonably withheld for a Mentor who has worked with you for more than four sessions. For anything commercially sensitive, sign a direct mutual NDA with the mentor before the session.

6. Demo day and investor introductions

The Accelerator shall organise a Demo Day on or about 22 June 2023 at which the Company shall be given a slot of not less than 5 minutes to present to invited investors, and shall thereafter introduce the Company to not fewer than 10 investors from the Accelerator's network whom the Accelerator considers suitable. The Company acknowledges that (a) an introduction is not an endorsement, recommendation or solicitation by the Accelerator and the Accelerator makes no representation as to any investor's interest or capacity; (b) the Accelerator, its partners and its affiliated funds may invest in the Company alongside or instead of any introduced investor, subject to Clause 10; (c) the Company shall be solely responsible for its presentation and for compliance with applicable law, including the restrictions on public offers under Section 42 of the Companies Act 2013; and (d) no success fee, commission or placement fee shall be payable by the Company to the Accelerator in respect of any investment made by any investor, whether or not introduced by the Accelerator. The Company shall inform the Accelerator within 15 days of any term sheet received from an introduced investor.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

You get a five-minute slot at demo day and at least ten investor introductions afterwards. An introduction is not a recommendation; the accelerator and its funds may themselves invest; you are responsible for what you say on stage and for keeping within the private placement rules; and the accelerator cannot charge a success fee on any money you raise. You must tell the accelerator within 15 days if an introduced investor gives you a term sheet.

What it means for you

The no-success-fee sentence is good for you and worth keeping word for word, because some programmes do charge 1 to 3 percent of a round as a placement fee, and a fee for placing securities raises SEBI registration questions you do not want in your diligence file. The Section 42 reference is a genuine point: a demo day with 50 investors in the room is fine, but a public livestream inviting anyone to invest can turn a private placement into a deemed public offer. The 15-day reporting duty is the hook for the follow-on right and the MFN in Clauses 10 and 11, so it is not administrative; it is how the accelerator learns the price of your next round.

What is normal

A 3 to 7 minute slot and 5 to 15 curated introductions is the standard Indian package. No-endorsement language is universal. About a third of private programmes reserve a right to co-invest at demo day; a right to invest instead of an introduced investor is less common and worth reading twice. Success fees are rare in reputable programmes, partly because a fee for placing securities raises SEBI registration questions; where a fee appears it is usually 1 to 3 percent.

How to negotiate it

Keep the no-success-fee sentence and extend it to the Accelerator's partners and affiliates. Ask for a published investor list before the Demo Day so that you can see who has been invited and note the ones you have already spoken to. Limit the 15-day reporting duty to term sheets from investors the Accelerator actually introduced, and make the information confidential under Clause 14. And add that the Demo Day presentation will be shared only with invitees who have accepted the Accelerator's confidentiality terms, not streamed publicly.

Money and equity

7. Investment through the iSAFE

Subject to the Company's acceptance of this Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions in Schedule 3, the Accelerator shall subscribe, and the Company shall issue and allot by way of private placement under Section 42 of the Companies Act 2013, compulsorily convertible preference shares designated "iSAFE Preference Shares" for an aggregate subscription amount of ₹30,00,000 (the "Investment Amount") on the terms of the iSAFE in Schedule 4. The iSAFE Preference Shares shall carry a non-cumulative preferential dividend of 0.001 percent per annum on their face value, no discount and no voting rights other than those conferred by law, and shall convert as follows: (a) on a Qualified Financing, being an issue of equity securities for new money of not less than ₹2,00,00,000, into the class of shares issued in that financing at the lower of the price paid in that financing and the Cap Price; (b) if no Qualified Financing occurs within 36 months of allotment, into Equity Shares at the Cap Price; and (c) on a Liquidity Event, at the Accelerator's election, into the greater of the Investment Amount and the as-converted value. The "Cap Price" shall be ₹6,00,00,000 divided by the Company's fully diluted share capital immediately before the relevant conversion, excluding the iSAFE Preference Shares and including any option pool created in connection with the financing.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The accelerator subscribes to ₹30 lakh of iSAFE preference shares through a private placement. They carry only a token 0.001 percent dividend, no discount and no votes. They convert into the next priced round's shares at the lower of that round's price and the cap price, where the cap is a ₹6 crore pre-money valuation; if no priced round of at least ₹2 crore happens within 36 months, they convert into equity shares at the cap; on a sale, the accelerator takes the higher of its money back or its converted stake.

What it means for you

The cap is the price. At a ₹6 crore pre-money cap, ₹30 lakh buys about 4.76 percent of the company after conversion, whatever price your seed investors later pay. Seven months after this offer Saffron's angels accepted a ₹16 crore cap, so the accelerator was asking for a stake at well under half the market price. Two drafting points cost money too. The cap divides by a fully diluted capitalisation that includes a pool created 'in connection with the financing', which pushes the pool's dilution onto you alone. And the ₹2 crore threshold for a qualified financing would have missed Saffron's actual ₹1.75 crore seed round in March 2024, leaving the instrument outstanding until the Series A or the 36-month long-stop.

What is normal

Private accelerator cheques in India run from ₹10 lakh to ₹75 lakh, with caps of ₹4 crore to ₹15 crore in 2025 and 2026. A pre-money cap with no discount is the usual accelerator formulation; angels more often get a cap and a 15 to 25 percent discount. Qualified financing thresholds of ₹1 crore to ₹3 crore are standard, as are 24 to 36 month long-stops with conversion at the cap. Including the pool in the cap's denominator is common but negotiable.

How to negotiate it

Negotiate the cap first: at ₹10 crore the same ₹30 lakh buys about 2.9 percent, and that one number is worth more than every other clause on this page. Ask that the fully diluted capitalisation for the Cap Price exclude any pool created for the financing, or that the pool be capped at 10 percent. Lower the qualified financing threshold to ₹1 crore so that a modest seed round converts the instrument and cleans your cap table. And if the seed round pays a higher price than the cap, confirm the conversion is at the cap and not also at a discount.

8. Programme equity

In consideration of the Company's admission to the Programme and the Accelerator's delivery of the Programme Services, the Company shall, within 30 days of the Programme Commencement Date, issue and allot to the Accelerator or its nominee such number of Equity Shares as equals 2 percent of the Fully Diluted Share Capital on the date of allotment (the "Programme Equity"), at a price equal to the face value of ₹10 per Equity Share, which the Accelerator shall pay in cash. The Promoters shall procure that the Board and the shareholders pass all resolutions required for the issue of the Programme Equity, and the Company shall deliver the share certificates and file the return of allotment within the periods prescribed by the Companies Act 2013. The Programme Equity shall rank pari passu with the Equity Shares held by the Promoters, shall not be subject to any vesting, lock-in or forfeiture, and shall be in addition to and not in reduction of the iSAFE Preference Shares under Clause 7. If the Company issues any Equity Shares or securities convertible into Equity Shares before the Qualified Financing, it shall issue such further Equity Shares to the Accelerator, at face value, as are required to maintain the Programme Equity at 2 percent of the Fully Diluted Share Capital.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

On top of the ₹30 lakh iSAFE, the company must issue 2 percent of its shares to the accelerator for ₹10 a share within a month of the programme starting, as payment for the programme itself. The shares carry no vesting or lock-in, rank equally with the founders' shares, and are topped up free of charge if the company issues anything else before the seed round, so the 2 percent never shrinks until then.

What it means for you

This clause is the reason Saffron declined, and it is hard to issue lawfully. Sweat equity under Section 54 and Rule 8 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014 is only for employees and directors; the accelerator is neither. Any other issue to a chosen person is a preferential issue under Section 62(1)(c) with Rule 13: special resolution, a registered valuer's price, allotment at not less than that price. A registered valuer is unlikely to price a company just offered ₹30 lakh at a ₹6 crore cap at ₹10 a share, so face value is likely non-compliant, and the accelerator receiving shares below fair value is taxable under Section 56(2)(x). The top-up is a full ratchet in disguise. And ₹30 lakh for about 7 percent in total is an implied post-money valuation of ₹4.29 crore, not ₹6.3 crore.

What is normal

Asking for 1 to 3 percent of 'programme equity' is common among Indian private accelerators; issuing it at face value is also common and is the part that does not survive a diligence review. Programmes that have been through a Series A diligence fold the programme equity into a lower cap on a single iSAFE (a cap of about ₹4 crore gives the same 7 percent), or issue shares for the programme services as consideration other than cash under Section 62(1)(c), with a registered valuer valuing both the shares and the services. A second iSAFE for a nominal amount such as ₹1,000 works only if its conversion price is backed by a registered valuer's report under Rule 13, which a very low cap will rarely survive, and warrants need a special resolution and a valuer's price fixed upfront or at exercise. Vesting or forfeiture of programme equity on expulsion appears in a minority of agreements.

How to negotiate it

Ask the Accelerator to fold the programme equity into a single iSAFE with a lower cap, and then negotiate that cap, so that there is one instrument, one valuer's report and one entry on the cap table. If it insists on shares, ask for a registered valuer's price under Rule 13 and for the valuer to be appointed by the Company. Delete the top-up sentence, or limit it to a broad-based weighted average adjustment that ends at the seed round. And in every case ask for a call option for the Promoters to buy the Programme Equity at the issue price if the Company is expelled or the Programme is not delivered; a purchase by the Company itself would be a buyback under Section 68.

9. Programme fee

The Company shall pay the Accelerator a programme fee of ₹3,00,000 plus goods and services tax at the applicable rate, being ₹3,54,000 in aggregate at the rate of 18 percent (the "Programme Fee"), for the Programme Services. The Programme Fee shall be payable on the Programme Commencement Date and shall be deducted by the Accelerator from the Investment Amount, so that the Accelerator shall remit the Investment Amount net of the Programme Fee to the Company's designated bank account against the allotment of the iSAFE Preference Shares. The Accelerator shall issue a tax invoice for the Programme Fee in compliance with the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 and the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act 2017. The Company shall be entitled to deduct tax at source from the Programme Fee as required by the Income-tax Act and shall furnish the certificate of deduction to the Accelerator within the prescribed time. The Programme Fee is non-refundable in all circumstances, including the Company's early exit from or expulsion from the Programme under Clause 17, and is exclusive of the Company's own travel, accommodation and Demo Day expenses.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

You pay ₹3 lakh plus 18 percent GST, ₹3.54 lakh in all, for the programme. The accelerator takes it out of the ₹30 lakh before wiring the balance, issues a GST invoice, and lets you deduct TDS. The fee is never refundable, even if you leave or are thrown out, and does not cover your travel or demo day costs.

What it means for you

Netting the fee against the subscription money is the first problem. Section 42 requires the whole subscription amount to reach the company's separate bank account through banking channels before allotment; allotment against a net receipt is partly for consideration other than cash. Insist on two transfers: ₹30 lakh in, ₹3.54 lakh out. The second problem is tax. The invoice runs from Telangana to a Karnataka company, so IGST at 18 percent, and the ₹54,000 is input tax credit only if you are GST-registered, which a five-week-old company often is not. Deduct TDS under Section 194J (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026): 10 percent for professional services, 2 percent for technical, above ₹50,000 a year; failing to deduct disallows 30 percent of the expense under Section 40(a)(ia). Net result: ₹30 lakh of equity bought ₹26.46 lakh of working capital.

What is normal

Programme fees run from nil to ₹5 lakh plus GST in India; ₹2 lakh to ₹3.5 lakh is the most common band for a 12-week private cohort, and a few programmes charge nothing but take more equity. Deducting the fee from the cheque is widespread, despite the Section 42 difficulty. Non-refundable fees are the norm; a pro-rata refund if the programme is cancelled or the company is expelled without cause appears in better agreements.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the Investment Amount to be paid in full and the Programme Fee to be invoiced and paid separately, with TDS deducted. Ask for the fee to be refundable pro rata if the Accelerator cancels sessions or expels the Company for anything other than the Non-Participation defined in Clause 3. Confirm whether the fee buys the Residential Week accommodation; if not, ask for it to. And ask the Accelerator to confirm the nature of its services in the invoice, so that the TDS rate is not an argument later.

10. Follow-on right

If the Company proposes to issue equity securities in a priced financing round after the Programme (the "Next Round"), the Company shall give the Accelerator written notice of the proposed terms, including the price per share, the pre-money valuation, the lead investor and the principal terms of the term sheet, not less than 15 Business Days before the Next Round closes (the "Round Notice"). The Accelerator shall have the right, but not the obligation, exercisable by written notice within 10 Business Days of the Round Notice, to subscribe for securities in the Next Round for an amount of up to ₹50,00,000 on the same price and terms as the lead investor in the Next Round (the "Follow-on Right"). The Follow-on Right is in addition to the conversion of the iSAFE Preference Shares under Clause 7 and to any pre-emptive right conferred by the Articles or by law. The Follow-on Right shall lapse if not exercised in respect of the Next Round, and shall terminate on the earlier of the closing of the Next Round and the third anniversary of the Programme Commencement Date. The Company shall procure that the Next Round documentation permits the Accelerator's participation on these terms.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Before your first priced round after the programme, you must send the accelerator the term sheet details 15 business days before closing. It can then put in up to ₹50 lakh on the same price and terms as the lead investor, over and above the converting iSAFE. The right works once, for that round only, and dies after three years if no round happens. You must make sure the round documents let it in.

What it means for you

A right to invest more at the market price sounds harmless; it is a free option on your success. If the round is hot, ₹50 lakh of a ₹1.75 crore seed round is about 29 percent of the allocation, taken from angels or a lead you chose; if the round is weak, the accelerator passes. The second cost is the signalling risk: investors in the new round will ask whether the programme that knows you best is following, and a pass reads as a verdict. The third cost is procedural: 'same terms as the lead' can mean board rights and information rights drafted for a ₹5 crore investor attaching to a ₹50 lakh cheque. The duty to make the round documents accommodate the right gives the accelerator leverage over documents it is not a party to.

What is normal

About half of Indian private accelerators ask for a follow-on or pro-rata right. Fixed amounts of ₹25 lakh to ₹1 crore, or a pro-rata right to maintain percentage, are both seen; a fixed ₹50 lakh in a company offered ₹30 lakh is at the generous end. Notice periods of 10 to 20 business days are standard. Most such rights end at the next round; a right that survives for several rounds is unusual and should be resisted.

How to negotiate it

Convert the fixed ₹50 lakh into a pro-rata right to maintain the Accelerator's as-converted percentage, which in Saffron's case would have been about ₹8 lakh in a ₹1.75 crore round. Make the right exercisable only if the Accelerator agrees to sign the round documents as a minority investor without board, veto or information rights beyond those of other minority holders. Shorten the tail to 24 months. And carve out a round led by a strategic investor who requires that no other party participates, so that the right does not block that deal.

11. Most favoured nation

If, at any time before the conversion of the iSAFE Preference Shares, the Company issues any convertible instrument, iSAFE, convertible note or similar security to any person on terms that are more favourable to the holder than the terms of the iSAFE in Schedule 4, including a lower valuation cap, a discount to the next round price, interest, a shorter long-stop period or a liquidation multiple (the "Better Terms"), the Company shall notify the Accelerator in writing within 10 Business Days of such issue, enclosing the relevant document. The Accelerator shall be entitled, by written notice within 20 Business Days of receiving the Company's notice, to elect that the Better Terms, in whole or in part, shall apply to the iSAFE Preference Shares with effect from the date of issue of the other instrument, and the Company and the Promoters shall take all steps, including the passing of resolutions and the amendment of the Articles, to give effect to that election. This Clause shall not apply to equity securities issued in a Qualified Financing or to options granted under an employee stock option plan.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

If, before the iSAFE converts, the company gives any other note or iSAFE holder better terms (a lower cap, a discount, interest, a shorter long-stop or a preference multiple), the accelerator must be told within 10 business days and can pick those better terms for itself, in whole or in part. Shares issued in the qualified financing and employee options are excluded.

What it means for you

A most favoured nation clause is reasonable as protection against a founder quietly giving a later note-holder a lower cap. The problem is the words 'in whole or in part': the accelerator can cherry-pick the discount from one instrument and the lower cap from another while keeping its own longer long-stop, which gives it a better deal than anyone actually negotiated. For Saffron the clause would have been triggered at once: the October 2023 angel notes carried a 20 percent discount that the accelerator's iSAFE did not. At Saffron's prices the discount added nothing to a ₹6 crore cap, but in a round priced near the cap the accelerator could take it and keep its own cap. When notes stack like this, every instrument's MFN pulls the others downward.

What is normal

MFN clauses appear in most Indian accelerator iSAFEs and in about half of angel notes. Market practice limits the election to the whole set of terms of one other instrument, not a selection from several, and limits the trigger to instruments of the same kind issued before conversion. A 10 to 15 business day notice period is normal. Excluding the qualified financing and ESOPs is standard; some agreements also exclude instruments issued to government schemes and to strategic partners.

How to negotiate it

Replace 'in whole or in part' with 'in whole', so that the Accelerator must take another instrument's terms as a package, including any term that is worse. Limit the Better Terms to a lower valuation cap only, since that is the only term with real economic effect at this stage. Add exceptions for instruments issued to a government scheme, to an incubator under SISFS, and for amounts below ₹25 lakh. And make the MFN fall away if the Accelerator declines to exercise its Follow-on Right under Clause 10.

12. Information rights

From the Programme Commencement Date until the conversion or redemption of the iSAFE Preference Shares, the Company shall deliver to the Accelerator (a) within 10 days after the end of each calendar month, a written update of not more than two pages covering revenue, cash balance, monthly burn, headcount, product milestones and fundraising activity (the "Monthly Update"); (b) within 180 days after the end of each financial year, the Company's audited financial statements; (c) within 15 Business Days of a written request made not more than twice in any financial year, the Company's current capitalisation table on a fully diluted basis; and (d) prompt notice of any event that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company, including any litigation, regulatory notice or resignation of a Promoter. The Accelerator may share the Monthly Update with its partners and mentors on a need-to-know basis and may use aggregated and anonymised data from the Monthly Updates in its reports and marketing. The Accelerator shall have no right to inspect the Company's books or premises or to attend meetings of the Board.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Until the iSAFE converts, you send a two-page update every month (revenue, cash, burn, headcount, product, fundraising), your audited accounts within six months of year end, your cap table on request up to twice a year, and prompt notice of anything materially bad. The accelerator can pass the updates to its partners and mentors and use anonymised data in its marketing. It gets no inspection rights, no board seat and no observer.

What it means for you

This is a mild version of the information rights your Series A investor will later take, and the monthly habit is useful. The two points to notice are the recipients and the duration. 'Partners and mentors on a need-to-know basis' includes the mentor who disclosed a competing interest in Clause 5, so your monthly cash balance and pipeline can reach a competitor's adviser. And the duty runs until conversion, which under the 36-month long-stop could mean three years of monthly reports to a holder of under 5 percent, longer than most angels ask for. The anonymised-data licence is harmless for cohort statistics and is how accelerators publish their 'portfolio raised ₹X crore' figures.

What is normal

Monthly or quarterly updates are standard in accelerator agreements, with 10 to 20 pages of financial information a year. Audited accounts within 180 days is the usual figure, matching the AGM deadline. Cap table on request once or twice a year is normal. Inspection and board rights are rare at this stage and are a red flag for a ₹30 lakh cheque. Most agreements let the accelerator share updates internally; fewer let it share with mentors by name.

How to negotiate it

Limit the recipients of the Monthly Update to the Accelerator's partners and employees, and require any Mentor who receives it to have signed a written confidentiality undertaking in your favour. Switch the Monthly Update to quarterly after the Demo Day. End the information rights at the earlier of conversion and 24 months, or when the Accelerator holds less than 2 percent on an as-converted basis. And confirm that the material-adverse-effect notice is limited to events you would in any case have to disclose to a lender or an investor, not every customer complaint.

Control and brand

13. Intellectual property

All intellectual property rights in the Company's products, software, data, designs, trade marks and business methods, whether existing on the Programme Commencement Date or created during the Programme, including any improvement made as a result of advice received from the Accelerator or any Mentor (the "Company IP"), shall vest in and remain the sole property of the Company. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as an assignment or licence of the Company IP to the Accelerator, and the Accelerator shall acquire no right, title or interest in the Company IP by reason of the Programme Services, the Investment Amount or the Programme Equity. The Company grants the Accelerator a non-exclusive, royalty-free, worldwide licence to use the Company's name, logo and a description of its business of not more than 50 words (the "Marketing Materials") solely to identify the Company as a participant in the Programme and a portfolio company of the Accelerator, in the Accelerator's website, presentations, reports and social media (the "Logo Licence"). The Logo Licence shall survive for so long as the Accelerator holds any security of the Company and for 24 months thereafter, and the Company may require the correction of any inaccurate Marketing Materials on 7 days' notice. All intellectual property in the Programme curriculum and materials shall remain with the Accelerator.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Everything you build stays yours, including improvements that came out of a mentor's advice, and the accelerator gets no share of it through the programme, the cheque or the programme equity. In return you let the accelerator use your name, logo and a 50-word description to show you as a portfolio company, for as long as it holds your securities plus two years. You can make it correct mistakes. The curriculum stays the accelerator's.

What it means for you

This is the right shape of an IP clause, and the words to protect are 'no licence over the product'. Some programmes ask for a licence to use your product internally, or a right of first refusal on licensing it to their corporate partners; neither belongs in a programme agreement. The logo licence is useful to both sides, and its length is the only point to watch: 24 months after the accelerator exits means a programme could still be showing your logo years after you declined to work with it. If your mark is unregistered, file a trade mark application in Class 42 (software as a service) before anyone else starts using the name publicly; a programme's press release is exactly the kind of use a squatter watches for.

What is normal

Company-owns-everything is standard in Indian accelerator agreements and a programme that asks for anything more is outside the market. A name-and-logo licence appears in almost every agreement; the usual duration is the holding period plus 12 to 24 months, or perpetual for the fact of past participation. A correction right on 7 to 15 days' notice is common. Clauses that vest improvements made from mentor advice in the accelerator appear occasionally and should be struck.

How to negotiate it

Limit the Logo Licence to the fact of participation in the Spring 2023 Cohort and the fact of the investment, and give yourself a right to withdraw it on 30 days' notice if the Accelerator is in breach or if you cease to hold any relationship with it. Add that the Accelerator may not imply endorsement of its programme by the Company or quote the Promoters without approval under Clause 15. Ask for a short reciprocal licence to say you were accelerated by the Accelerator, since you will want that on your deck. And add a sentence that mentor advice creates no joint ownership of anything.

14. Confidentiality

Each party (the "Receiving Party") shall keep confidential all non-public information disclosed to it by the other party (the "Disclosing Party") in connection with the Programme or this Agreement, including the Company's financial information, customer lists, product roadmaps and the Monthly Updates, and the Accelerator's curriculum, mentor arrangements and investor lists (the "Confidential Information"), shall use it only for the purposes of the Programme and the Accelerator's investment, and shall disclose it only to its partners, employees, advisers and, in the Accelerator's case, Mentors who need to know it and are bound by obligations of confidentiality no less strict than this Clause. Confidential Information excludes information that is public, independently developed, already known to the Receiving Party or required to be disclosed by law or by a regulator, provided that the Receiving Party gives the Disclosing Party prompt notice where lawful. The Company acknowledges that other members of the Cohort and attendees at the Demo Day are not parties to this Agreement, are bound only by the Accelerator's Code of Conduct, and that the Company is responsible for deciding what it discloses in Cohort sessions and at the Demo Day. This Clause shall survive for 3 years after the end of the Programme.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Each side keeps the other's non-public information secret, uses it only for the programme and the investment, and shares it only with people who need it and are bound to keep it confidential. The usual exclusions apply. Other startups in the cohort and investors at demo day are not bound by this agreement, only by the accelerator's code of conduct, so what you reveal in sessions and on stage is your call. The duty lasts three years.

What it means for you

A cohort is a room full of other founders, some in adjacent markets, plus a rotating cast of mentors and investors. None of them has signed anything with you. The clause tells you this frankly, which is better than a programme that implies the whole room is bound. Assume that anything you say in a group session or at demo day is public: your pricing, your pipeline, your churn. Share your detailed numbers in one-to-one office hours, which this clause does cover, and share your code with nobody. The 'need to know' permission for mentors is the gap discussed in Clause 5, so the mutual NDA approach is the practical fix.

What is normal

Mutual confidentiality with the standard four exclusions and a 2 to 5 year survival period is the Indian norm; 3 years is the median. Almost every agreement states that cohort members are not parties. Few programmes offer a cohort-wide NDA because it is unenforceable in practice. Treating the monthly updates as confidential information is common and worth keeping, because it restricts what Clause 12 lets the accelerator share.

How to negotiate it

Ask the Accelerator to attach the Code of Conduct and to confirm in writing that every Mentor and Entrepreneur-in-Residence has signed a confidentiality undertaking covering cohort companies. Add that the Accelerator may not use the Company's Confidential Information to evaluate or advise any competing company in the Cohort or a later cohort. Extend survival for trade secrets to the period for which they remain secret. Where a specific disclosure matters, use a one-way NDA naming the mentor or investor as the recipient; the NDA Explainer has a form for exactly this.

15. Publicity

The Accelerator may announce the composition of the Cohort, including the Company's name and a description of its business taken from the Marketing Materials, on or after the Programme Commencement Date, and may announce the Investment Amount and the Accelerator's participation in any subsequent financing of the Company after the relevant allotment. Any press release, interview, case study or social media post by the Accelerator that attributes a statement to the Company or a Promoter, or that discloses the Company's revenue, customers, valuation or fundraising beyond the Investment Amount, shall require the Company's prior written approval, which the Company shall give or refuse within 3 Business Days of a request and which shall not be unreasonably withheld for materials consistent with information the Company has itself made public. The Company shall acknowledge its participation in the Programme in the "about" section of its website and in investor materials prepared during the Programme, and may describe itself as a Deccan Launchpad portfolio company. Neither party shall make any public statement concerning a dispute under this Agreement. The Accelerator shall remove the Company from its public cohort and portfolio lists within 30 days of a written request made after the Accelerator ceases to hold any security of the Company.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The accelerator can announce that you are in the cohort and that it invested ₹30 lakh, and later that it joined your next round. Anything that quotes you or reveals your revenue, customers, valuation or fundraising needs your written approval, which you must give or refuse within three business days and cannot refuse unreasonably if the material matches what you have already published. You must mention the programme on your website and in your decks during the cohort. Once the accelerator exits, it must delist you within 30 days of your request.

What it means for you

Publicity is part of what you are paying for, so an outright veto is unrealistic; what you need is control over the facts and the quotes, and this clause gives you that. The real-world risk is timing: an accelerator announcing 'Saffron raises ₹30 lakh' in April makes the ₹30 lakh your public last round when you speak to angels in October, and announcing your 'valuation' from the cap could anchor the next negotiation. The three-day approval window is tight for a two-person team in a residential week, and silence is not deemed consent here, which is good. The obligation to acknowledge the programme in your investor materials is a small concession that some founders later regret when the programme's reputation changes.

What is normal

Cohort and investment announcements without consent are standard; approval rights over quotes and over financial information appear in most Indian agreements since 2023. Approval windows of 2 to 5 business days are typical. About half of the agreements require the startup to acknowledge the programme publicly; the duration ranges from the cohort period to perpetuity. A delisting right on exit appears in a minority of agreements and is worth adding.

How to negotiate it

Add that the Accelerator shall not state or imply any valuation of the Company, including by reference to the Cap Price, and shall announce the Investment Amount only as part of a cohort-level figure unless the Company agrees. Extend the approval window to 5 Business Days and add that the Accelerator will share the draft of any cohort announcement 2 Business Days before release. Limit your duty to acknowledge the Programme to the Programme period plus 12 months. And confirm that the Logo Licence in Clause 13 and this Clause are the only publicity rights, so that nothing in the Perk Partner terms adds to them.

16. Non-disparagement and code of conduct

The Company and the Promoters shall comply with the Accelerator's Code of Conduct in Schedule 5 during the Programme, including its provisions on respectful behaviour, anti-harassment, conflicts of interest and the confidentiality of information shared by other members of the Cohort. The Accelerator shall procure that its employees, Mentors and the other members of the Cohort are bound by the Code of Conduct and shall enforce it fairly, and shall maintain a mechanism for the Company to report a breach to a person other than the Programme Director. Neither party shall, during the Programme and for 24 months thereafter, make any public statement, including on social media, that disparages the other party, its partners, employees or Mentors, or, in the Accelerator's case, the Promoters, provided that nothing in this Clause shall prevent either party from (a) making a truthful statement required by law or to a regulator, court or arbitral tribunal; (b) giving a truthful reference or review in response to a request from a prospective participant in or investor of the other party; or (c) reporting conduct in good faith under the Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013 or any other law. A material breach of the Code of Conduct by a Promoter shall constitute Non-Participation under Clause 17.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

You and the founders follow the accelerator's code of conduct, and the accelerator makes its staff, mentors and the other startups follow it too, with a way to complain to someone other than the programme director. Neither side publicly runs the other down during the programme or for two years after, except for truthful statements to regulators or courts, truthful references to someone asking, and good-faith complaints under the POSH Act. A serious breach of the code by a founder counts as non-participation and can lead to expulsion.

What it means for you

A code of conduct is a good thing in a cohort and the carve-outs here are the ones you need. The issue is asymmetry: a 'material breach' of a document you have not yet seen can end the programme for you, while the accelerator's duty is only to 'enforce it fairly'. The non-disparagement promise is two-way and time-limited, which is better than most, but it covers 'partners and mentors' as well as the accelerator, so a candid review of a mentor on a founder forum could technically be a breach. Honest reviews requested by other founders are expressly allowed, which is the carve-out to keep. Remember that a non-disparagement clause cannot stop you giving evidence or reporting a crime, whatever it says.

What is normal

Codes of conduct have become standard in Indian programmes since 2022, and about two-thirds of agreements attach one. Mutual non-disparagement with a 12 to 36 month tail is common; one-way non-disparagement binding only the founders is still seen and should be rejected. Carve-outs for legal compulsion are universal; carve-outs for references and for POSH complaints appear in the better half. Linking a code breach to expulsion is normal, but 'material' is rarely defined.

How to negotiate it

Get the Code of Conduct attached before you sign, not referred to as a document 'as amended from time to time'. Define a material breach as one that is confirmed in writing after the Company has been heard, and give a 7-day cure period for anything short of harassment. Limit the non-disparagement promise to the Accelerator as an entity, not every Mentor, and to 12 months after the Programme. And add that neither party will use the other's name in connection with a dispute, which protects you more than a general gag protects the Accelerator.

Term and exit

17. Term, early exit and expulsion

This Agreement shall come into force on the Company's acceptance under Clause 20 and the Programme shall run for 12 weeks from the Programme Commencement Date. The Company may withdraw from the Programme at any time on 7 days' written notice to the Accelerator (an "Early Exit"). The Accelerator may remove the Company from the Programme by written notice with immediate effect (an "Expulsion") if (a) Non-Participation occurs under Clause 3 or Clause 16; (b) the Company or a Promoter commits a material breach of this Agreement that is not remedied within 7 days of written notice; or (c) any warranty in Clause 18 proves to have been untrue in a material respect when given. On an Early Exit or an Expulsion: (i) the Programme Services shall cease and the Programme Fee shall not be refunded; (ii) the iSAFE Preference Shares, if allotted, shall remain outstanding on their terms, and if not yet allotted the Accelerator may elect whether to proceed with the subscription; (iii) any Programme Equity already allotted shall be retained by the Accelerator, and any Programme Equity not yet allotted shall cease to be issuable; and (iv) Clauses 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18 and 19 shall survive. An Early Exit or Expulsion shall not of itself entitle either party to damages.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The deal starts when you accept and the programme lasts 12 weeks. You can leave on a week's notice. The accelerator can throw you out immediately for non-participation, for an unremedied serious breach, or for a false warranty. Either way the fee is gone, the iSAFE stays if it has been issued (and the accelerator can choose whether to still invest if it has not), programme equity already issued stays with the accelerator, unissued programme equity lapses, and the money, information, IP and dispute clauses survive.

What it means for you

The asymmetry is the point. If the accelerator expels you in week 3, it keeps the ₹3.54 lakh fee, keeps the iSAFE at the ₹6 crore cap, and keeps the 2 percent if the shares went out in the first 30 days, as Clause 8 requires. It has then paid ₹26.46 lakh for about 7 percent of your company and delivered three weeks of a programme. The 'may elect whether to proceed' wording also lets the accelerator walk away from the cheque if it changes its mind before allotment, while you cannot walk away from the fee. The defined triggers for expulsion are better than 'at the Accelerator's discretion', which some programmes still use, and the cure period is a real protection. A fair version ties the equity to the programme actually delivered.

What is normal

Twelve-week terms with a 7 to 14 day withdrawal right are standard. Expulsion for defined non-participation with a 7 to 15 day cure period is the market; expulsion at discretion is still seen in perhaps a quarter of offers. Keeping the iSAFE after expulsion is universal and defensible, since money changed hands. Keeping programme equity after an early expulsion is common and is the clause founders most often regret. A no-damages sentence is standard.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the Programme Equity to vest weekly over the 12 weeks, so that an Expulsion in week 3 leaves the Accelerator with one quarter of it, or better, for a call option for the Promoters to buy any unvested Programme Equity at the issue price within 60 days. Ask for a pro-rata refund of the Programme Fee on an Expulsion other than for a Code of Conduct breach. Make the Accelerator's commitment to subscribe to the iSAFE binding on acceptance, with the allotment to occur within 15 days, so that the cheque cannot be withdrawn after you have declined other offers. And add that the Logo Licence under Clause 13 ends on an Expulsion.

18. Warranties

The Company and each Promoter warrant to the Accelerator that, on the date of acceptance and on the date of allotment of the iSAFE Preference Shares: (a) the Company is duly incorporated under the Companies Act 2013 and has the power to enter into and perform this Agreement; (b) the capitalisation table in Schedule 6 is complete, the Promoters hold 100 percent of the issued share capital equally, and no person holds any option, warrant, convertible instrument or other right to acquire shares; (c) each Promoter is engaged full-time in the business of the Company and is not bound by any agreement restricting that engagement; (d) the Company has applied for recognition as a startup by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade and knows of no reason why recognition would be refused; (e) the Company owns or validly licenses all intellectual property used in its business and no Promoter or former employer has any claim to it; and (f) no litigation or regulatory proceeding is pending or threatened against the Company or a Promoter. The Accelerator warrants that it has the authority and the funds to perform this Agreement and is a person resident in India under the Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999. The warranties are subject to the matters fairly disclosed in Schedule 6 and shall survive for 24 months.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The company and the founders promise that the company exists and can sign, that the cap table in a schedule is complete with the two founders holding everything equally and nobody else holding rights to shares, that both founders are full-time and free to be, that the company has applied for DPIIT recognition, that it owns its IP with no claim from a former employer, and that there are no disputes. The accelerator promises it has authority and money and is resident in India. The promises are qualified by disclosures in a schedule and last two years.

What it means for you

These are light warranties and appropriately so for a company five weeks old. The ones to take seriously are the IP warranty and the former-employer point: if either founder wrote code for Saffron while still employed elsewhere, or used a previous employer's laptop, say so in the disclosure schedule rather than warrant otherwise. The founders giving the warranties personally means a breach claim can be made against them, although Clause 17 says expulsion alone brings no damages. The accelerator's residency warranty matters to you: it is your assurance that the iSAFE does not trigger FEMA pricing rules, FC-GPR filing or Press Note 3. The 'has applied for' formulation on DPIIT is fair; recognition itself is outside your control.

What is normal

Four to eight company warranties, given by the company and the founders, is the market at this stage. A cap table warranty and a full-time warranty are universal. An IP and former-employer warranty appears in most agreements since 2023. Survival of 12 to 24 months is standard. Accelerators rarely give any warranty beyond authority; a residency warranty is unusual and worth asking for. Disclosure schedules are used in perhaps half of these agreements; the rest rely on 'to the best of the Promoters' knowledge'.

How to negotiate it

Qualify warranties (e) and (f) by the Promoters' knowledge after reasonable enquiry, and attach a disclosure letter that lists any former employment, side projects and open-source components. Cap the Promoters' personal liability for a warranty breach at the Investment Amount actually received, and exclude liability where the Accelerator knew the facts. Keep the Accelerator's residency warranty and add a warranty that it is not acting as a nominee for a non-resident. And ask that the warranties are repeated only at the allotment date, not at every later event the agreement mentions.

19. Governing law and disputes

This Agreement and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with it, including any question regarding its existence, validity or termination, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of India. The parties shall first attempt to resolve any dispute through good-faith discussion between the Programme Director and a Promoter for a period of 15 days from a written notice of dispute. Subject to that, the courts at Hyderabad, Telangana shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, and each party irrevocably submits to that jurisdiction and waives any objection on the ground of venue or inconvenient forum. Nothing in this Clause shall prevent either party from seeking urgent injunctive or other interim relief from any court of competent jurisdiction to protect its Confidential Information or intellectual property. The iSAFE in Schedule 4 contains its own dispute resolution provision providing for arbitration seated in Hyderabad under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, which shall govern disputes concerning the iSAFE Preference Shares.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Indian law governs. Disputes first go to a 15-day conversation between the programme director and a founder. After that, the courts of Hyderabad decide, and you give up the right to argue that Hyderabad is inconvenient. Either side can still rush to any court for an injunction to protect secrets or IP. The iSAFE itself has a separate arbitration clause, also seated in Hyderabad.

What it means for you

For a ₹3.54 lakh fee and a programme dispute, courts are actually the cheaper forum: a civil suit for a small sum in a commercial court costs far less than an arbitration, where a sole arbitrator's model fee under the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration Act is ₹56,250 for a claim of up to ₹5 lakh, before venue and counsel. The problem is geography, not the forum. Litigating in Hyderabad from Bengaluru means local counsel and travel for every hearing, which in practice means you will not sue over the fee. The split between courts for the programme and arbitration for the iSAFE is sensible, though it means a dispute that touches both, such as an expulsion followed by a conversion argument, runs in two places at once.

What is normal

Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts at the accelerator's city is the Indian default for programme agreements, with arbitration reserved for the investment instrument. A 15 to 30 day negotiation step is common. Carve-outs for interim relief appear in nearly every agreement. Seats in the startup's city are rare unless the startup is the larger party. Clauses that pick a neutral city, or that give jurisdiction to the courts at the defendant's location, appear in a small minority.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the courts at Bengaluru, or failing that for non-exclusive jurisdiction so that you can sue where the Company is located. Align the iSAFE arbitration seat with whichever city you agree, so that one tribunal can hear a dispute spanning both documents. Add that the losing party pays the winner's reasonable costs, which deters a programme from leaning on a small company. And add the negotiation step to the iSAFE too, so that a conversion dispute does not go straight to a ₹5 lakh arbitration. The seat question is explained on the Shareholders' Agreement Explainer.

20. Acceptance deadline and miscellaneous

This offer shall remain open for acceptance until 5 pm on 27 March 2023 and shall lapse automatically if the Company and the Promoters have not by then delivered to the Accelerator a countersigned copy of this Agreement together with a certified copy of a Board resolution approving the Agreement and the issue of the iSAFE Preference Shares and the Programme Equity. The Accelerator may extend the deadline in writing but shall not be obliged to do so. This Agreement, with its Schedules, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties in relation to the Programme and supersedes all prior discussions, term sheets, brochures and representations, and no party has relied on any statement not set out in it. No amendment shall be effective unless in writing and signed by all parties. No delay in exercising a right shall operate as a waiver of it. If any provision is held invalid, the remainder shall continue in force. The Company shall not assign this Agreement; the Accelerator may assign its rights under the iSAFE to an affiliated fund on notice. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, including by electronic signature under the Information Technology Act 2000. Notices shall be delivered by email to the addresses in Schedule 7, with a copy by registered post for any notice of breach or termination.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

You have seven days, until 5 pm on 27 March 2023, to sign and return the agreement together with a board resolution approving it and the share issues, or the offer dies. The agreement with its schedules is the whole deal, replacing everything you were told in the pitch or the brochure. Changes need everyone's signature in writing. You cannot assign the agreement; the accelerator can pass the iSAFE to a related fund. E-signatures count. Notices go by email, with registered post for anything serious.

What it means for you

Seven days is the pressure point, and it is deliberate. In that week you need to compute the implied valuation, speak to one or two angels about what they would pay, and have a lawyer read 20 clauses and seven schedules. The entire-agreement sentence is why the brochure's promises of 'guaranteed investor meetings' do not count: if it was promised and matters to you, it goes into Schedule 1. The board resolution the accelerator wants approves the issue of programme equity at face value, which means your own board would be resolving to do something Rule 13 does not allow. The assignment right lets a programme move the iSAFE to a fund it manages; check that the fund is also resident in India, or the FEMA warranty in Clause 18 becomes meaningless.

What is normal

Acceptance windows of 5 to 14 days are standard for cohort offers, driven by batch timing. Entire agreement, no oral modification, waiver, severability and counterparts clauses are boilerplate in every Indian commercial agreement and rarely negotiated. Electronic signature under the Information Technology Act is now universally accepted for agreements of this kind, which are not among the excluded documents in the First Schedule to that Act. A right for the investor to assign to an affiliate is standard; a right to assign to any third party is not.

How to negotiate it

Ask for a 14-day window, and for the Accelerator to confirm the deadline extension in writing before you spend money on counsel. Ask that the Programme Calendar, the Perk list and the Code of Conduct are attached as Schedules before you sign, so that the entire agreement clause works for you. Limit the Accelerator's assignment right to an affiliate that is resident in India and that agrees in writing to be bound by this Agreement. And have the board resolution approve only the iSAFE under Section 42 and Section 62(1)(c), leaving the Programme Equity to be dealt with as Clause 8 is renegotiated.

Example only

Incubation and Seed Fund Agreement between Chamundi Technology Business Incubator, Mysuru and Saffron Labs Private Limited

Two months after declining the accelerator, and two weeks after DPIIT recognition, Saffron applied through the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme portal to Chamundi Technology Business Incubator in Mysuru, a DST-supported technology business incubator approved under the Scheme. The Incubator Seed Management Committee selected Saffron for a ₹20 lakh grant to take its workflow software from prototype to pilot. This is the agreement the parties signed on 12 June 2023: a grant with three milestone instalments, a seat licence for two desks, quarterly reports, Chartered Accountant-certified utilisation certificates and no equity. The Scheme's terms are fixed, so the notes under each clause tell you what to ask the incubator and how to comply, rather than what to negotiate.

Incubator
Chamundi Technology Business Incubator, Mysuru, a DST-supported TBI and an incubator approved under the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme
Startup
Saffron Labs Private Limited, incorporated 14 February 2023, DPIIT-recognised May 2023
Grant
₹20 lakh under SISFS for proof of concept, prototype development and product trials
Disbursement
₹8 lakh on signing, ₹7 lakh on Milestone 1, ₹5 lakh on Milestone 2
Term
12 months from 12 June 2023, extendable by 6 months
Seat licence
₹5,000 a month for two seats; GST nil because Chamundi is a TBI recognised by DST's NSTEDB
Equity
None for the grant; the Scheme's debt or convertible route was not used
Reporting
Quarterly progress reports; utilisation certificate from a chartered accountant for each tranche
Framework

1. Parties and background

This Incubation and Seed Fund Agreement (the "Agreement") is made on 12 June 2023 at Mysuru between Chamundi Technology Business Incubator, a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act 1960 and a technology business incubator supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, at Mysuru (the "Incubator"), and Saffron Labs Private Limited, CIN U72900KA2023PTC171234, having its registered office at Bengaluru, Karnataka (the "Startup"). WHEREAS (A) the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India ("DPIIT") has notified the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme (the "Scheme") and has constituted an Experts Advisory Committee (the "EAC") to select incubators and monitor the Scheme; (B) the EAC has approved the Incubator as an eligible incubator under the Scheme and sanctioned a seed fund corpus to it; (C) the Incubator has constituted an Incubator Seed Management Committee (the "ISMC") in accordance with the Scheme guidelines; (D) the Startup applied to the Incubator through the Scheme portal on 24 May 2023 and the ISMC, at its meeting on 6 June 2023, selected the Startup for seed support by way of a grant of ₹20,00,000 (the "Grant"); and (E) the Scheme requires a legal agreement between the Incubator and the Startup before the release of the first instalment.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The opening clause names the incubator (a registered society in Mysuru supported by DST) and your company, then tells the story in recitals: DPIIT runs the Scheme and set up an Experts Advisory Committee; that committee approved the incubator and gave it a pool of money; the incubator set up its own selection committee (the ISMC); you applied through the Scheme portal in May 2023 and the ISMC picked you on 6 June for a ₹20 lakh grant; and the Scheme requires this written agreement before any money moves.

What it means for you

Three layers of authority sit above your grant, and each can ask you questions: DPIIT and the EAC, the incubator, and the incubator's ISMC. The money is public money passed through the incubator, so the incubator is not your donor; it is an administrator answerable to the EAC for how you spend it. The recitals also fix your eligibility date: the Scheme's tests in Clause 2 are judged at the application date, 24 May 2023, and anything that changes later is dealt with by intimation rather than disqualification. The Scheme expects this agreement to be signed before the first instalment, so a 'sanction letter' alone is not enough to get paid.

What is normal

Under the Scheme guidelines the ISMC decides within 45 days of your application (paragraph 7.2), the incubator must sign a legal agreement with you before the first instalment (paragraph 8.4), and the first grant instalment is due not more than 60 days from your application (paragraph 8.7). Saffron's 13-day selection was quick, and 30 to 45 days is more typical. Agreements are usually signed within 2 to 4 weeks of the ISMC decision. Incubators are societies, trusts, Section 8 companies or statutory bodies; all four forms appear across the roughly 200 incubators approved under SISFS.

How to negotiate it

Ask the incubator for three documents before you sign: the EAC's approval letter or the Scheme portal page confirming the incubator's approved status, the ISMC minutes or the portal notification recording your selection and the sanctioned amount, and a copy of the Scheme guidelines the agreement refers to, so that you know which version applies. Confirm the incubator's PAN and GST registration, because the seat licence invoices in Clause 9 depend on them. And check that the person signing for the society is authorised by its governing body resolution.

2. Eligibility recitals

The Startup represents and warrants to the Incubator that, on the date of its application to the Incubator and on the date of this Agreement: (a) it is recognised as a startup by DPIIT under certificate number DIPP-2023-SL-4471 dated 9 May 2023; (b) it was incorporated on 14 February 2023, being not more than 2 years before the date of application; (c) its business idea has market fit, viable commercialisation and scope for scaling, and it uses technology in its core product; (d) it has not received monetary support of more than ₹10,00,000 under any other Central or State Government scheme, excluding prize money from competitions and grand challenges, subsidised working space, founder monthly allowance, access to labs and access to prototyping facilities, and has received none; (e) shareholding by Indian promoters in the Startup is not less than 51 percent, being 100 percent held by Ananya Rao and Vikram Menon, both citizens and residents of India; (f) it has not previously received a grant under the Scheme from any incubator; and (g) the information in its application on the Scheme portal is true and complete. The Startup shall notify the Incubator within 15 days of any change that would make a representation in this Clause untrue, and acknowledges that the ISMC relied on these representations.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

You confirm, as at your application date and the signing date, that you tick every Scheme box: DPIIT-recognised with the certificate number; incorporated within the last two years; a technology product with a market; not more than ₹10 lakh of earlier government money (excluding prize money, subsidised space, founder allowances, lab and prototyping access), and in your case none; Indian promoters holding at least 51 percent (here 100 percent); never given a SISFS grant before; and a truthful application. You must report within 15 days anything that changes this.

What it means for you

These tests restate paragraph 3.1 of the Scheme guidelines, and they are judged at the application date, so a foreign investor coming in at the seed round does not retroactively disqualify you; it is a change you report under the last sentence. The ₹10 lakh test is the one founders misjudge: a NIDHI-PRAYAS prototyping grant counts, a State policy's reimbursement counts, but a hackathon prize and a subsidised desk do not. The Scheme allows each form of support once, so a second SISFS grant from another incubator later is not available; size this application correctly. A false recital is the fastest route to the clawback in Clause 13, because the ISMC's selection rested on it.

What is normal

The tests are fixed by the Scheme and the same for every incubator, so there is no range to negotiate. What varies is the paperwork: most incubators ask for the DPIIT certificate, the certificate of incorporation, a shareholding pattern certified by a Chartered Accountant or company secretary, and a self-declaration on earlier government support. Some also ask for the last bank statement to verify that no other grant was received. The 15-day notification period is common; 7 to 30 days is the range.

How to negotiate it

Ask the incubator to confirm in writing which earlier benefits count towards the ₹10 lakh test, and disclose every government benefit you have received, including the ones you believe are excluded, so that the judgement is the ISMC's and not yours. Keep the shareholding pattern as at the application date certified and on file, because it proves the 51 percent test at the right date. If you expect a non-resident investor within the year, tell the incubator now and record that it is a post-application change. And check that the DPIIT certificate number and dates in the recital match the certificate exactly.

3. Grant amount and purpose

Subject to the terms of this Agreement and the Scheme guidelines, the Incubator shall provide the Startup seed support by way of a grant of ₹20,00,000 (Rupees twenty lakh only) (the "Grant") for the validation of proof of concept, prototype development and product trials of the Startup's workflow software for mid-market manufacturers, in accordance with the project proposal and the Fund Utilisation Plan approved by the ISMC and annexed as Schedule 1 (the "Approved Project"). The Grant is a grant and not a loan, an investment or consideration for any supply of goods or services by the Startup, and the Incubator shall acquire no shares, convertible securities, royalty, revenue share or other interest in the Startup by reason of the Grant. The Grant shall be used solely for the Approved Project and strictly shall not be used for the creation of any facility, the purchase or construction of land or buildings, the repayment of any loan, the payment of any dividend or distribution, investment in any other entity, or any expense unrelated to the Approved Project. The Startup shall maintain a separate ledger account for the Grant in its books and shall deposit each instalment in the Startup's own bank account in the Startup's name.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The incubator gives you ₹20 lakh as a grant, tied to the project the ISMC approved and the spending plan in a schedule: validating the concept, building the prototype and running product trials for your software. It is not a loan or an investment, the incubator gets no shares, royalty or revenue share, and the money cannot go into buildings, facilities, loan repayments, dividends or investments in other companies. You keep a separate ledger for it and bank it in your own account.

What it means for you

Three things flow from the words 'grant' and 'no interest'. First, nothing dilutes you; this is the sharpest contrast with the accelerator's 7 percent. Second, the money is restricted to the Approved Project, so a pivot moves you out of the permitted uses unless Clause 14 is followed. Third, the tax position: a grant from a government scheme is income under Section 2(24)(xviii) of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026) unless it is applied against the cost of a depreciable asset, so you should expect to show it as income, offset by the project expenses it funds, and plan the timing across financial years with your tax expert. The no-supply sentence supports the GST position that no GST is chargeable on the grant, since there is no consideration for a supply.

What is normal

₹20 lakh is the Scheme's ceiling for the grant component and most SISFS grants are sanctioned at ₹10 lakh to ₹20 lakh. The Scheme guidelines (paragraph 8.1) only prohibit the creation of facilities and spending outside the purpose; the longer list of exclusions here is standard incubator drafting. A separate ledger is required by almost every incubator, and a few require a separate bank account, which the Scheme does not. Grants under the Scheme never carry equity, royalty or revenue share.

How to negotiate it

Ask the incubator to attach the ISMC-approved Fund Utilisation Plan to the agreement exactly as sanctioned, with the heads of expense and amounts, so that the permitted uses are a document and not a memory. Ask whether the incubator wants a separate bank account or only a separate ledger, and if the former, open a current account in the Startup's name before signing so that the first instalment is not delayed. Ask your tax expert to confirm the Section 2(24)(xviii) treatment and whether to recognise the grant as income when received or as the conditions are met under Ind AS 20 or AS 12. And confirm in writing that no part of the grant may be charged as a fee by the incubator.

Money

4. Milestone-based disbursement

The Grant shall be disbursed in three instalments linked to the milestones in Schedule 2 (each a "Milestone"): (a) ₹8,00,000 within 15 days of the execution of this Agreement and the Startup's submission of the documents in Schedule 3 ("Tranche 1"); (b) ₹7,00,000 within 30 days of the ISMC's confirmation that Milestone 1 has been achieved, Milestone 1 being the deployment of a working prototype at one manufacturing plant with a signed pilot letter from the plant's management, together with the submission of the utilisation certificate for Tranche 1 under Clause 6 ("Tranche 2"); and (c) ₹5,00,000 within 30 days of the ISMC's confirmation that Milestone 2 has been achieved, Milestone 2 being pilot or paid agreements with two customers and a documented trial report, together with the utilisation certificate for Tranche 2 ("Tranche 3"). The Startup shall submit a Milestone Completion Report with the proof documents listed in Schedule 2 for each Milestone, and the ISMC shall consider it within 45 days of submission. Where a Milestone is achieved in part, the ISMC may release the relevant Tranche in part or revise the Milestone on the Startup's application. Non-achievement of a Milestone shall not by itself oblige the Startup to refund any Tranche already disbursed.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The ₹20 lakh comes in three pieces: ₹8 lakh within 15 days of signing and handing in the listed documents; ₹7 lakh within 30 days after the ISMC confirms Milestone 1 (a working prototype deployed at one plant with a pilot letter) and you have filed the utilisation certificate for the first tranche; ₹5 lakh after Milestone 2 (two customer agreements and a trial report) and the second certificate. You file a completion report with proof for each milestone, the ISMC decides within 45 days, can pay part or revise the milestone, and an honest miss does not mean paying back what you already received.

What it means for you

Your cash flow is shaped by this clause more than by the headline figure. Tranche 1 of ₹8 lakh is the only money you can count on; ₹12 lakh depends on execution and on the ISMC's meeting cycle, which realistically means 60 to 90 days between hitting a milestone and seeing the money. Plan to fund the gap from your own resources, and do not sign a vendor contract on the strength of Tranche 2. The two gates on each later tranche, the milestone and the utilisation certificate, are independent: a finished prototype does not release money until a Chartered Accountant has certified the spending of the previous tranche. The last sentence is the one to protect; it keeps a missed milestone from becoming a debt.

What is normal

Under the Scheme, the ISMC must decide within 45 days of the application and the grant is disbursed in milestone-based instalments; two to four tranches with 30 to 50 percent upfront is the usual pattern, so 40 percent upfront here is typical. ISMC meetings are quarterly at most incubators. Partial release for partial achievement is common practice but not universal; some incubators treat each milestone as all-or-nothing. A no-refund-for-honest-miss sentence appears in the better agreements; nothing in the Scheme as notified makes an honest miss a refund event.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the Milestones to be written as objective tests with dates and listed proof documents, exactly as in Schedule 2 here, so that 'achieved' is not a matter of opinion. Ask for a fixed ISMC meeting calendar for the year, or a commitment to decide within 45 days, so that you can plan cash. Agree in advance what counts as a 'pilot letter' and whether a letter of intent suffices for Milestone 2. And ask for the no-refund sentence to be kept word for word; it costs the incubator nothing and protects you if the pilot plant changes its mind.

5. Utilisation and permitted expenses

The Startup shall utilise the Grant only for the heads of expenditure in the Fund Utilisation Plan (the "Permitted Expenses"), being: (a) prototype development, including cloud infrastructure, software tools and test devices; (b) product trials, including deployment costs and travel to pilot sites; (c) remuneration of manpower engaged on the Approved Project, including a Promoter's remuneration only to the extent stated in the Fund Utilisation Plan; (d) market entry and customer validation expenses, including pilot support and marketing collateral; and (e) professional fees for the Chartered Accountant's utilisation certificates, intellectual property filings and regulatory compliance related to the Approved Project. The Startup may reallocate up to 10 percent of the Grant between heads without prior approval, with intimation in the next quarterly report, and shall obtain the ISMC's prior written approval for more. All procurement above ₹50,000 shall be supported by at least two quotations or a justification for single-source procurement, and all expenditure shall be supported by invoices in the Startup's name and paid through the Startup's bank account. Interest earned on unutilised Grant funds shall be added to the Grant and utilised or refunded on the same terms. The Grant shall not be used to pay any fee, deposit or charge to the Incubator other than the seat licence fee under Clause 9.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

You may spend the grant only on the heads in the approved plan: building the prototype (cloud, tools, test hardware), running trials (deployment, travel to plants), paying people who work on the project (including a founder, but only at the rate the plan states), market entry costs, and professional fees for the accountant's certificates, IP filings and compliance. You can move up to 10 percent between heads on your own; more needs the ISMC's approval. Purchases over ₹50,000 need two quotes, every expense needs an invoice in the company's name paid from the company's account, interest earned goes back into the grant, and none of it may be paid to the incubator except the seat fee.

What it means for you

The founder-salary question is answered here, and only here: the Scheme guidelines do not list permitted expenses, so what you may pay yourself is whatever the ISMC approved in the Fund Utilisation Plan. If the plan is silent, assume you cannot, and apply for a revision rather than booking it. The two-quotation rule is a procurement norm borrowed from government grant practice; it means your ₹1.2 lakh laptop purchase needs a paper trail that a commercial startup would never keep. The interest sentence is often missed: ₹8 lakh in a current account earns nothing, but if you park it in a sweep deposit, the interest belongs to the project. Every rupee must be traceable from bank statement to invoice to the utilisation certificate.

What is normal

Permitted-expense lists of 4 to 7 heads are standard across SISFS incubators. A 10 to 20 percent free reallocation band is common. Procurement thresholds of ₹25,000 to ₹1 lakh for two or three quotations are usual, mirroring the General Financial Rules practice that government-funded bodies follow. Most incubators allow the cost of people working on the project where the approved plan budgets for it; founder pay is treated differently from one incubator to the next, and some exclude it, so get a monthly figure and the number of months approved in the plan before you sign. Interest-on-unutilised-funds clauses appear in roughly half of the agreements.

How to negotiate it

Before the ISMC meets, put founder remuneration in the Fund Utilisation Plan expressly, with a monthly figure and the number of months, so that it is approved rather than argued about later. Ask for the reallocation band to be 20 percent. Ask for the procurement rule to apply per vendor per quarter rather than per invoice, so that monthly cloud bills are not caught. And set up the bookkeeping on day one: a separate ledger, a tag on every voucher, and a monthly reconciliation that your accountant can certify without a forensic exercise.

6. Utilisation certificates and reporting

The Startup shall submit to the Incubator: (a) for each Tranche, before the release of the next Tranche and in any event within 30 days of the full utilisation of that Tranche, a utilisation certificate in the format in Schedule 4 certified by a practising Chartered Accountant, with a UDIN, stating the amount received, the amount utilised under each head of the Fund Utilisation Plan, the unutilised balance and the interest earned, together with a statement of expenditure and copies of the supporting invoices and bank statements (the "Utilisation Certificate"); (b) within 15 days of the end of each quarter, a progress report in the Scheme's format covering milestones achieved, technical progress, customers and pilots, team changes, funds utilised and funds raised from any other source (the "Quarterly Progress Report"); (c) within 30 days of their adoption, the Startup's audited annual financial statements for each financial year during which any part of the Grant is held or utilised; and (d) within 60 days of the end of the Approved Project, a final report with the audited Utilisation Certificate for the whole Grant. The Incubator shall upload the Startup's progress data to the Scheme portal and the Startup shall provide further information reasonably required for the Incubator's reporting to the EAC within 10 days of a request.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

You owe four kinds of paper. A utilisation certificate for each tranche, signed by a practising Chartered Accountant with a UDIN, showing receipts, spending by head, balance and interest, with the invoices and bank statements attached, before the next tranche and within 30 days of spending the money. A quarterly progress report in the Scheme's format within 15 days of quarter end. Your audited annual accounts within 30 days of adoption. And a final report with an audited certificate for the whole grant within 60 days of the project ending. The incubator uploads your data to the Scheme portal and can ask for more within 10 days.

What it means for you

This is the clause that makes a grant feel like work, and the reason a Chartered Accountant should be lined up before the first tranche lands. A utilisation certificate is a certificate, not an audit report: the accountant verifies the expenditure against the plan and the bank statement and attests the figures, and the UDIN (Unique Document Identification Number) is mandatory for every certificate a practising chartered accountant issues, so the incubator can verify it on the ICAI portal. At the end you file a final report and an audited utilisation certificate, and if the venture has failed, the report records the learnings and the reasons (paragraph 8.8 of the Scheme guidelines). The 'audited' certificate at the end means the final one must be reconciled to your audited accounts. Audited annual statements within 30 days of adoption means your statutory audit timetable (AGM within 6 months of year end) now also drives your grant reporting.

What is normal

A certificate per tranche and a quarterly report are what SISFS incubators expect, because each incubator must itself account to the EAC for the money it passes on. Submission windows of 15 to 30 days are standard. Most incubators prescribe a format, often adapted from the General Financial Rules Form GFR 12-A; some accept the accountant's own format with the required fields. Fees for a utilisation certificate run from ₹5,000 to ₹25,000 per certificate depending on the volume of vouchers, and are a permitted expense under Clause 5.

How to negotiate it

Ask the incubator for its utilisation certificate format and the Scheme's progress report format on the day you sign, and share both with your accountant. Agree the quarter ends in the calendar (June, September, December, March) so that the reports line up with your GST and TDS cycle. Ask whether the incubator wants original invoices or scanned copies, and whether it needs the bank statement for the separate ledger or the whole account. And budget the certificate fee under Clause 5(e), so that paying your accountant from the grant is pre-approved. BizExpress handles this for clients as a package, from the separate ledger to the final audited certificate.

7. Debt and convertible alternative

The parties record that the Scheme permits an incubator to provide seed support of up to ₹50,00,000 for market entry, commercialisation or scaling up through convertible debentures, debt or debt-linked instruments ("Scheme Debt Support"), on the following terms prescribed by the Scheme guidelines: a rate of interest not more than the prevailing repo rate of the Reserve Bank of India; a tenure fixed by the Incubator at the time of sanction, not exceeding 60 months; a moratorium of up to 12 months; and no security, promoter guarantee or third-party guarantee. The Startup has applied for and the ISMC has sanctioned seed support by way of the Grant only, and no Scheme Debt Support is provided under this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement obliges the Incubator to provide, or entitles the Startup to receive, Scheme Debt Support, and any such support shall require a fresh application, a fresh ISMC decision and a separate agreement. The Startup acknowledges that under the Scheme a startup may receive each form of seed support only once, and that the receipt of the Grant exhausts its entitlement to a grant but not its eligibility to apply for Scheme Debt Support.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

This clause records the other half of the Scheme that you did not use: up to ₹50 lakh for market entry or scaling through convertible debentures or a loan, at interest no higher than the RBI's repo rate, for up to five years with a holiday of up to a year, unsecured and without any guarantee. You applied for the grant only, and nothing here promises debt later; that would need a new application, a new ISMC decision and a new agreement. The Scheme allows each form of support once, so this grant uses up your grant but leaves the debt route open.

What it means for you

The Scheme allows a grant and debt support once each, so this grant left the debt route open. A ₹50 lakh unsecured loan at the repo rate (6.5 percent through most of 2023) for five years would have been the cheapest debt Saffron could ever raise. Saffron chose the grant first because at four months old it had no revenue to service even cheap debt, no priced round in sight to convert into, and ₹20 lakh of non-repayable money was worth more than ₹50 lakh of repayable money at that stage. If you are post-revenue with a seed round within 12 months, the arithmetic may run the other way: the debt is larger and, as a CCD, converts at your next round's price. A CCD also brings the debenture formalities covered on the Seed Instruments Explainer.

What is normal

The Scheme's debt parameters are fixed: up to ₹50 lakh, interest capped at the repo rate, tenure up to 60 months, moratorium up to 12 months, unsecured. In practice, most incubators that use the debt route sanction ₹25 lakh to ₹50 lakh as convertible debentures rather than plain loans, because a loan to a pre-revenue company rarely gets repaid on schedule. A startup that has had a grant can still apply once for debt or convertible support to scale.

How to negotiate it

Before applying, ask the incubator whether it will consider a mixed proposal, since some incubators sanction a grant for the prototype stage and record a conditional intention to consider CCDs after a milestone. Ask whether the repo rate is fixed at sanction or floats, because the guidelines only cap it. If you take the CCD route, ask for the conversion to be at a discount to the next round price rather than a fixed price, and read the CCD pricing and debenture terms on the Seed Instruments Explainer first. And ask whether the incubator's corpus could fund a later CCD application, since taking a grant now does not use up your one chance at debt support.

Services and premises

8. Incubation services

During the Incubation Period the Incubator shall provide the Startup the following services without any fee or charge other than the seat licence fee under Clause 9 (the "Incubation Services"): (a) a designated mentor from the Incubator's panel and not fewer than two mentoring sessions each month; (b) access to the Incubator's prototyping laboratory, test equipment and meeting rooms on the Incubator's booking terms; (c) monthly legal, accounting, intellectual property and compliance clinics conducted by the Incubator's empanelled professionals, the first consultation on any matter being free of charge; (d) introductions to the Incubator's industry partners, the Karnataka startup cell and the Startup India Hub network; (e) participation in the Incubator's showcase events and investor connect sessions; and (f) assistance with applications under other Central and State Government schemes for which the Startup is eligible. The Incubator shall provide the Incubation Services with reasonable skill and care and in accordance with the Scheme guidelines, but does not warrant any outcome, including the achievement of any Milestone, the raising of any funds or the award of any other scheme support. The Incubator shall not charge the Startup any fee, in cash or in kind, for its selection, the disbursement of the Grant, incubation or monitoring under the Scheme.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Alongside the money, and at no charge beyond the seat fee, the incubator gives you a named mentor with at least two sessions a month, lab and meeting-room access, monthly legal, accounting, IP and compliance clinics with a free first consultation, introductions to industry partners and government networks, showcase and investor events, and help applying to other schemes. It promises reasonable skill and care, not results. And it confirms it will not charge you anything, in cash or in kind, for selecting, funding, incubating or monitoring you under the Scheme.

What it means for you

The last sentence restates paragraph 8.9 of the Scheme guidelines: the incubator and its staff may not charge applicants or beneficiaries any fee, in cash or in kind, for selection, disbursement, incubation or monitoring, and paragraph 5.12 adds that a selected startup 'shall not be charged any fees'. 'In kind' covers equity, so an incubator that makes 1 or 2 percent 'for incubation' a condition of a SISFS grant is acting against the Scheme, and you can say so. The services themselves are modest and their value depends on the mentor. The clinics are real: a monthly hour with a company secretary or a Chartered Accountant is what most four-month-old companies lack.

What is normal

Government-supported incubators offer similar packages: a mentor, lab access, clinics, networks and scheme-application help. Two mentoring sessions a month is above the median; one a month or on request is more common. Free first consultations at clinics are typical, with discounted rates for follow-on work. The no-fee rule under SISFS is absolute and uniform; outside the Scheme, incubators commonly take 2 to 5 percent equity or a small fee for incubation, which is lawful but is a different deal.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the mentor to be named in the agreement or a side letter, with a right to request a change after three months. Ask for the lab booking terms and the list of empanelled professionals, so that you know what the clinics can actually handle. Ask whether the Scheme-application help in item (f) extends to preparing a NIDHI-PRAYAS or State seed fund application, since the ₹10 lakh test in Clause 2 is judged at the SISFS application date and later grants are permitted. And keep the no-fee sentence exactly as drafted; if an incubator proposes to delete it, that is your signal.

9. Seat licence

The Incubator grants the Startup a non-exclusive, revocable licence to use two designated workstations in the Incubator's co-working area at Mysuru, together with shared use of the common areas, internet connectivity and meeting rooms on the Incubator's booking terms (the "Seat Licence"), for a fee of ₹5,000 per month plus goods and services tax at the applicable rate, payable monthly in advance against the Incubator's invoice (the "Seat Fee"). The Seat Licence is a licence to use and not a lease or tenancy, confers no interest in the premises, and shall not be construed as creating any right under any rent control or tenancy law. Access shall be available between 8 am and 10 pm on all days other than public holidays, with extended access on request. The Startup shall not use the Incubator's address as its registered office, or hold out the premises as its place of business for the purposes of the Companies Act 2013, the Goods and Services Tax laws or any other registration, without the Incubator's prior written no-objection certificate, which the Incubator may issue on its standard terms for an additional fee. The Startup shall comply with the Incubator's house rules and shall be liable for damage caused by its personnel. The Incubator may relocate the workstations within the premises on 7 days' notice.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

You get two desks in the incubator's co-working space in Mysuru, with internet, common areas and bookable meeting rooms, for ₹5,000 a month plus any GST that applies, paid monthly in advance against the incubator's invoice. It is a licence to use, not a lease, and gives you no rights as a tenant. Access is 8 am to 10 pm. You cannot use the incubator's address as your registered office or your GST place of business unless the incubator issues a no-objection certificate, which it may charge for. House rules apply, you pay for damage, and the incubator can move your desks on a week's notice.

What it means for you

A licence is the right label and protects both sides: you are not a tenant, so the incubator never needs to evict you. The sentence founders trip over is the registered-office one. Saffron's registered office was in Bengaluru, so this did not arise, but a startup that relocates to the incubator city and wants to shift its registered office needs an NOC from the owner or an authorised occupant, proof of their right to the premises and a utility bill not older than two months, under Rule 25 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules 2014, filed in Form INC-22, and the same NOC for GST registration. Many incubators issue NOCs; some charge ₹5,000 to ₹25,000 a year. Under the SISFS guidelines a startup selected for the Scheme 'shall not be charged any fees', and the incubator may not charge any fee, in cash or in kind, for incubation (paragraphs 5.12 and 8.9), so ask why a seat fee is charged at all. Where an incubator does charge for seats, GST is nil only if it is a Technology Business Incubator recognised by DST's National Science and Technology Entrepreneurship Development Board, or a bio-incubator recognised by BIRAC (entry 48 of Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)); DST funding alone is not enough, so ask for the recognition letter. Chamundi has that recognition, so the 'applicable rate' here is nil, and ₹60,000 a year is below the Section 194-I TDS threshold.

What is normal

Seat licences at government-supported incubators run from ₹3,000 to ₹10,000 a month per seat, with two-seat or team packages often discounted; ₹2,500 a seat here is below that band. GST at 18 percent applies to most incubators' licence fees, but not to a TBI recognised by NSTEDB or a BIRAC bio-incubator, whose services are exempt. 'Licence not lease' language is universal. Registered-office NOC policies vary: about half of the incubators permit it for incubatees, usually against a fee and a condition that the company shifts its office out within 30 to 90 days of exit.

How to negotiate it

If you will need the incubator's address for your registered office or GST registration, ask for the NOC terms and fee to be written into the agreement now, including the exit condition and how long you have to shift the office when incubation ends. Ask for 24-hour access for product trial periods. Confirm whether the Seat Fee is fixed for the Incubation Period and any extension. And ask the incubator whether its services are exempt as a TBI recognised by DST's NSTEDB or taxable at 18 percent, because the Seat Fee is the only payment you make to it and any input credit depends on a valid tax invoice.

10. Term and extension

This Agreement shall come into force on 12 June 2023 and the Startup shall be incubated for a period of 12 months ending on 11 June 2024 (the "Incubation Period"), unless terminated earlier under Clause 17. The Startup may apply in writing, not less than 60 days before the end of the Incubation Period, for an extension of up to 6 months, stating the reasons and the revised plan for the Approved Project, and the Incubator may grant the extension, with or without conditions, on the recommendation of the ISMC. No extension shall increase the Grant. On the completion of the Approved Project and the submission of the final report and the audited Utilisation Certificate under Clause 6, the Incubator shall issue a certificate of graduation recording the Startup's participation, the Grant received and the Milestones achieved, and shall record the Startup as a graduated startup on the Scheme portal. The Seat Licence may be continued after the Incubation Period on the Incubator's standard terms by a separate agreement. The obligations in Clauses 6, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 16 shall survive the Incubation Period to the extent they relate to the Grant.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

The incubation runs 12 months from 12 June 2023. You can ask, at least two months before the end, for up to six more months with a revised plan, and the incubator can agree on the ISMC's recommendation, but no extension means more money. When the project is done and the final report and audited certificate are in, the incubator issues a graduation certificate and marks you as graduated on the Scheme portal. You can keep the desks on new terms. Reporting, IP, audit, clawback, confidentiality and publicity duties outlive the term where they relate to the grant.

What it means for you

Twelve months is tight for three milestones and three certificates, so the extension clause matters: Saffron hit Milestone 2 in January 2024 and graduated in June 2024, but a pilot plant that delays by a quarter can push you past the end date with money unspent. Apply for the extension by the 60-day deadline (12 April 2024 here) even if you think you will make it, because an application costs nothing and a lapsed term complicates the final certificate. Graduation is not a formality: the graduation certificate and the Scheme portal entry are what later investors and scheme applications accept as proof that the grant was properly closed. The survival sentence means audit rights over the grant money continue after you leave.

What is normal

SISFS incubation agreements run 12 to 24 months; 12 months with a 6-month extension is the most common structure. Extension applications 30 to 90 days before the end are usual. Extensions do not increase the grant under the Scheme. Most incubators issue a graduation or completion certificate; the Scheme portal records project completion. Survival of audit and clawback rights for 3 to 5 years after the project is common in government grant practice and should be expected.

How to negotiate it

Ask the incubator to confirm the extension criteria in writing, so that a milestone delayed by a customer and not by you is a routine extension. Ask that the graduation certificate be issued within 30 days of the final certificate, and that it lists the Milestones achieved in words you can quote to investors. Ask for the Seat Licence continuation terms now, so that leaving the Scheme does not mean leaving the desk the same week. And ask which clauses survive and for how long, with an outside date of 5 years from the final Utilisation Certificate.

Control and compliance

11. Intellectual property

All intellectual property created by the Startup in the course of the Approved Project, including software, inventions, designs, data and know-how, and all intellectual property owned by the Startup before this Agreement (together the "Startup IP"), shall vest in and remain the sole property of the Startup. Neither the Incubator, DPIIT nor the EAC shall acquire any right, title, licence or interest in the Startup IP by reason of the Grant, the Incubation Services or the use of the Incubator's facilities, and the Incubator shall not require any assignment, licence or option over the Startup IP as a condition of any Tranche or service. Where the Startup uses the Incubator's laboratory or equipment, the Startup shall own the results of its own work, and any intellectual property of the Incubator or a third party embedded in that equipment or software shall remain with its owner. The Startup shall acknowledge the support of the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme and the Incubator in any publication, paper, patent application or public presentation that describes work funded by the Grant, in the form set out in Schedule 5, and shall inform the Incubator of any patent or design application filed in respect of the Approved Project within 30 days of filing.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Everything you create under the project, and everything you owned before, stays yours. Neither the incubator nor DPIIT nor its committee gets any right, licence or option in your IP because of the grant, the services or the lab, and the incubator cannot make an assignment or licence a condition of a tranche. If you use the incubator's lab, your results are yours and its embedded software stays theirs. You must credit the Scheme and the incubator in publications, papers, patents and presentations about grant-funded work, in a set form, and tell the incubator about patent or design filings within 30 days.

What it means for you

This is as clean as an IP clause gets, and it is what the Scheme intends: a grant for proof of concept comes with no claim over the concept. The acknowledgement duty is the only obligation and it is harmless; 'supported by the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme' on a slide is a credential, not a cost. The sentence about the incubator's embedded IP is practical rather than legal: if your prototype runs on a licensed tool in the incubator lab, you need your own licence before you ship it to a customer. The 30-day patent notification helps the incubator's own reporting; it does not give it any say over the application. Contrast this with university incubators, where institute IP policies can give the institution a share of inventions made with its facilities.

What is normal

Startup-owns-everything is the standard in SISFS agreements and in DST-supported TBIs generally. Acknowledgement clauses are universal in government-funded research and grant agreements. About a third of incubators ask for notification of IP filings; a few ask for a copy of the filing receipt. University-affiliated incubators sometimes claim a royalty or a licence over IP developed using faculty time or institute labs, typically 1 to 5 percent of revenue or a non-exclusive research licence; a Scheme grant does not create that claim, but an institute's IP policy may.

How to negotiate it

Ask for Schedule 5 (the form of acknowledgement) to be short and to allow a logo-free text credit, so that it fits in a pitch deck footer. If the incubator is attached to a university or research institute, ask for a written confirmation that the institute's IP policy does not apply to work you do with your own team on your own equipment, even on its premises. Ask for the patent notification to be confidential under Clause 15. And if any incubator staff or mentor contributes to your code or design, have them sign an IP assignment in your favour, because the agreement protects you only against the incubator's institutional claim, not against an individual's.

12. Monitoring, audit and site visits

The Startup acknowledges that the Grant is public money and agrees to the following monitoring: (a) the ISMC shall review the Startup's progress at each quarterly meeting on the basis of the Quarterly Progress Report and may require the Promoters to present in person or by video; (b) the Incubator's officers may visit the Startup's premises and the pilot sites on 5 Business Days' notice during business hours to verify progress and assets acquired from the Grant; (c) the Startup shall keep its books of account, vouchers, bank statements and records relating to the Grant for not less than 8 years after the end of the Approved Project and shall make them available for inspection by the Incubator, DPIIT, the EAC, any agency appointed by them and the Comptroller and Auditor General of India or its nominee; (d) the Incubator may require a special audit of the Grant by a Chartered Accountant appointed by the Incubator at the Incubator's cost, and the Startup shall cooperate fully; and (e) the Startup's statutory auditors shall be informed of the Grant and its conditions and shall disclose the Grant appropriately in the financial statements. The Startup's own Chartered Accountant who certifies the Utilisation Certificates shall not be the Chartered Accountant appointed by the Incubator for any special audit.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Because the grant is public money, you accept monitoring: quarterly ISMC reviews where the founders may have to present; site visits to your office and pilot plants on five business days' notice; keeping all grant records for eight years and opening them to the incubator, DPIIT, its committee, their agencies and the Comptroller and Auditor General; a special audit by a chartered accountant the incubator appoints and pays for, if it wants one; and telling your own auditors about the grant so it is disclosed in your accounts. The accountant who certifies your utilisation certificates cannot be the one the incubator appoints to audit you.

What it means for you

The CAG sentence surprises founders, but it follows from the money's source: government grants flow through the Scheme to the incubator to you, and the auditor of the Union can follow public money to its final use. In practice CAG audits of individual startups are rare; the realistic monitoring is the ISMC's quarterly review and the incubator's own accountant. The eight-year retention period matches the Companies Act requirement for books of account under Section 128(5), so it costs you nothing extra if your records are already in order. The independence sentence is good practice: your certifying accountant attests your figures, and a different accountant checks them if the incubator has doubts. Tell your statutory auditors at the planning stage; a grant has disclosure consequences under AS 12 or Ind AS 20 and in the notes to the accounts.

What is normal

Quarterly ISMC reviews are the Scheme's rhythm. Site visit notice periods of 3 to 7 business days are common. Retention periods of 5 to 8 years appear across government grant agreements; 8 years aligns with Section 128(5). CAG access clauses are standard in agreements that pass on Central Government funds, and most SISFS agreements carry one. Special audit rights at the incubator's cost appear in roughly half of the agreements; a few put the cost on the startup if misuse is found.

How to negotiate it

Ask for site visits to pilot sites to be coordinated with your customer, because a surprise visit to a manufacturing plant by an incubator officer is a relationship problem; 10 business days' notice and your presence is a reasonable ask. Ask that any special audit be limited to the Grant ledger and not the Startup's whole business, and that its findings be shared with you before they go to the ISMC. Ask that documents inspected be treated as confidential under Clause 15. And ask that the ISMC presentation requirement be satisfied by one founder, so that both are not pulled out of a sales week.

13. Clawback, refund and blacklisting

If the Incubator, on the recommendation of the ISMC and after written notice stating the grounds and not less than 30 days to respond and remedy where possible, determines that (a) any representation in Clause 2 was untrue when made; (b) the Startup has utilised any part of the Grant for a purpose other than the Permitted Expenses, or has diverted Grant funds to a Promoter, a related party or another entity; (c) the Startup has submitted a false or misleading Utilisation Certificate, Progress Report or Milestone Completion Report; or (d) the Startup has received funding for the same expenses from another Government scheme without disclosure (each a "Misuse Event"), the Startup shall within 60 days refund the amount of the Grant affected by the Misuse Event with interest at 12 percent per annum from the date of disbursement, and the Incubator may terminate this Agreement and withhold any undisbursed Tranche. The Incubator may report a Misuse Event to DPIIT, and the Startup and its Promoters may be debarred from the Scheme and the Incubator's programmes. The failure of the Approved Project, the non-achievement of a Milestone or a change of direction notified under Clause 14, in each case in good faith, shall not be a Misuse Event and shall not require the refund of any amount properly utilised.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

If, after notice and 30 days to respond, the ISMC finds that you lied in the eligibility recitals, spent grant money outside the permitted heads or diverted it to a founder or a related party, filed a false certificate or report, or took money from another scheme for the same expenses without telling them, you refund the affected amount within 60 days with 12 percent interest from the day you received it, lose the undisbursed tranches, and may be reported to DPIIT and barred from the Scheme and the incubator. Failing in good faith, missing a milestone, or pivoting with proper notice is not misuse and never requires a refund of money properly spent.

What it means for you

This clause separates misuse from failure, which is the single most important thing a grant agreement can do. Seed funding expects some projects to fail, and the last sentence here says so: an honest failure costs a report, not a refund. The four Misuse Events are all things within your control. The one that catches honest founders is diversion to a promoter: paying yourself a salary not in the Fund Utilisation Plan, or reimbursing a founder's personal laptop, is 'diversion' on this wording even if the amount is small. The 12 percent interest is a penalty rate and the refund is of the 'amount affected', so a ₹40,000 mistake is a ₹40,000 refund with interest, not a ₹20 lakh one. Debarment is the real deterrent: it follows the founders, not just the company.

What is normal

Clawback for misuse, false information and diversion is standard in SISFS agreements; the Scheme guidelines set no rate, so the interest is whatever the agreement says, and you should check both the rate and the date from which it runs. Notice and response periods of 15 to 30 days are usual. Refund of the whole grant rather than the affected amount appears in stricter agreements and is worth resisting. A clear exclusion for honest failure appears in better agreements; where it is missing, the Scheme guidelines still imply it, but you want it in writing. Blacklisting language is common, but the Scheme guidelines contain no rule on debarring startups or founders; any bar is the incubator's contractual sanction, limited to the Scheme and its own programmes, though DPIIT and other schemes make their own decisions about whom they fund.

How to negotiate it

Keep the last sentence and, if the incubator's draft lacks it, ask for it in these words. Ask for the refund to be of the amount affected, not the whole Grant, and for interest to run from the date of the Misuse Event rather than the date of disbursement where the misuse is a later spending decision. Ask for a right to be heard by the ISMC in person before a determination. And ask that debarment of the Promoters personally require a DPIIT decision, not the incubator's alone. The spirit of the clause is fair; the mechanics are what you tune.

14. Change of control, pivot and founder changes

The Startup shall give the Incubator written intimation, 15 days before the event where practicable and in any event within 7 days after it, of: (a) any issue or transfer of shares or convertible securities that changes the Promoters' shareholding or gives any other person 10 percent or more of the share capital on a fully diluted basis; (b) any investment by a person resident outside India; (c) a Promoter resigning, being removed, becoming incapacitated or ceasing to work substantially full-time for the Startup; (d) any merger, amalgamation, sale of the business or change in the Startup's registered office; and (e) any proposal to change the Approved Project, including a change in the target customer, the core product or the technology (a "Pivot"). A Pivot shall require the prior written consent of the Incubator on the recommendation of the ISMC, which may revise the Milestones and the Fund Utilisation Plan, and shall not be unreasonably withheld where the revised project remains within the Scheme's objectives. Where a Promoter leaves, the Startup shall within 30 days submit a plan for the continuation of the Approved Project, and the Incubator may suspend disbursement of any undisbursed Tranche until the ISMC has approved the plan. Nothing in this Clause gives the Incubator any right to approve or veto any investment in the Startup.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

You must tell the incubator, ideally 15 days before and at the latest 7 days after: any share issue or transfer that changes the founders' holdings or puts an outsider at 10 percent or more; any foreign investment; a founder leaving or going part-time; a merger, business sale or change of registered office; and any plan to pivot. A pivot needs the incubator's written consent on the ISMC's recommendation, which cannot be unreasonably refused if the new project still fits the Scheme, and the milestones and spending plan get revised. If a founder leaves, you file a continuation plan within 30 days and tranches may pause until the ISMC approves it. The incubator gets no veto over your fundraising.

What it means for you

This is an intimation clause, not a control clause, and the last sentence makes that explicit: your angel round in October 2023 and your seed round in March 2024 needed a letter to the incubator, not its permission. The pivot consent is the only real control and it is tied to the money's purpose, which is fair; if Saffron had switched from manufacturers to hospitals mid-project, the approved milestones would have become meaningless and the ISMC needed to reset them. The founder-departure mechanism is sensible: the ISMC selected a team, and a one-founder company is a different risk. The 51 percent Indian-promoter test applies only at application, so a foreign investor later is reportable but not disqualifying; the Scheme guidelines are explicit on timing.

What is normal

Intimation duties for share issues, foreign investment, founder changes and office moves are standard in SISFS agreements; notice periods of 7 to 30 days are typical. Pivot consent tied to the Approved Project appears in most agreements, with reasonableness language in the better half. Suspension of disbursement on a founder's departure is common. A small number of incubators ask for consent rights over fundraising, which exceeds anything the Scheme requires; founders should refuse it. Thresholds for reporting a new shareholder range from 5 to 25 percent.

How to negotiate it

Ask for a definition of Pivot that excludes ordinary product iteration, so that adding a module or changing a pricing model is not a consent event. Ask that the ISMC decide a Pivot request within 30 days and that silence after 45 days counts as consent. Ask for the intimation threshold on new shareholders to be 10 percent as here or higher, and for the duty to be satisfied by a copy of the Form PAS-3 or SH-4. And where a founder leaves, ask that disbursement resume automatically when the ISMC approves the plan, without a fresh application. For the shareholder-level rules on a founder leaving, the bad leaver notes on the Shareholders' Agreement Explainer apply to your own documents, not to this one.

Other

15. Confidentiality and data

Each party shall keep confidential the non-public information of the other party received in connection with this Agreement, including the Startup's technical information, source code, customer and pilot details, financial statements and Utilisation Certificates, and the Incubator's selection criteria, ISMC deliberations and information concerning other incubated startups (the "Confidential Information"), shall use it only for the purposes of this Agreement and the Scheme, and shall disclose it only to its officers, employees, ISMC members, professional advisers and auditors who need to know it and are bound by confidentiality obligations. The Startup consents to the Incubator uploading the Startup's application, progress data, funds utilisation and Milestone status to the Scheme portal maintained by DPIIT and the Startup India Hub, and to their use by DPIIT and the EAC for monitoring, evaluation and aggregated reporting on the Scheme. The Incubator shall not share the Startup's Confidential Information with any corporate partner, investor or other incubated startup without the Startup's prior written consent. The usual exclusions for public, independently developed, previously known and legally compelled disclosures apply. Each party shall comply with applicable law on personal data, including the Information Technology Act 2000 and the rules made under it, in respect of personal data it receives from the other. This Clause shall survive for 5 years after the end of the Incubation Period.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Both sides keep each other's non-public information secret and share it only with people who need it and are bound to confidentiality, including the incubator's committee members, advisers and auditors. You agree that your application, progress, spending and milestone data go onto the Scheme portal for DPIIT and its committee to monitor and to use in aggregate. The incubator cannot pass your information to a corporate partner, an investor or another startup without your written consent. The usual exclusions apply, both sides comply with the data protection law for personal data, and the duty lasts five years after incubation ends.

What it means for you

The portal consent is the part you cannot refuse: the Scheme runs on a dashboard, and your quarterly numbers become DPIIT's monitoring data. That is disclosure to government, not to the public, and this agreement says what is uploaded. The corporate-partner sentence is the one to insist on, because incubators run showcase days and corporate challenges, and your pilot data is exactly what a partner's business unit would like to see. ISMC members include a venture capital or angel network representative and industry experts, so people who invest in your sector will see your progress reports; their confidentiality undertaking to the incubator is your only protection. Signed before the DPDP Act 2023 existed, the data sentence cites the IT Act; sign today and name the DPDP Act and its 2025 Rules, since pilot data may hold employee personal data.

What is normal

Mutual confidentiality with portal consent is standard in SISFS agreements. Survival periods of 3 to 5 years are typical. A specific restriction on sharing with corporate partners appears in roughly a third of agreements and is worth adding. Most agreements require ISMC members to sign confidentiality and conflict-of-interest declarations, as the Scheme's model ISMC composition implies. DPDP Act references have appeared in incubation agreements since 2024 and are now common.

How to negotiate it

Ask for a list of exactly what is uploaded to the Scheme portal, so that you can prepare your reports knowing which fields leave the room. Ask the incubator to confirm that every ISMC member has signed a confidentiality and conflict declaration and that a member with a conflicting interest in your sector will recuse from your review. Ask that source code be excluded from anything the incubator may receive or inspect, since the Utilisation Certificate never needs it. And for a pilot with a corporate partner introduced by the incubator, sign a direct mutual NDA with the partner; the NDA Explainer has the clauses.

16. Publicity and branding

The Startup shall acknowledge the support received under the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme and from the Incubator on its website and in its investor and marketing materials during the Incubation Period, using the Scheme's logo and the Incubator's logo in accordance with the brand guidelines in Schedule 5, and shall not use either logo to suggest endorsement of its products by DPIIT, the Government of India or the Incubator. The Incubator may list the Startup's name, logo and a one-line description as an incubated startup on its website, in its reports to the EAC and DPIIT and in promotional materials, and DPIIT and the Startup India Hub may feature the Startup as a beneficiary of the Scheme. Any case study, press release or public statement by the Incubator that quotes the Startup or a Promoter, or discloses the Startup's revenue, customers or fundraising, shall require the Startup's prior written approval, not to be unreasonably withheld. The Startup shall participate in not more than two showcase or outreach events each year on reasonable notice. The Incubator shall not, by reason of this Agreement or the Grant, be entitled to any equity, royalty, revenue share, board seat or observer right in the Startup, and shall not describe the Startup as a portfolio company or investee.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

You credit the Scheme and the incubator on your website and in your decks during incubation, using their logos within brand guidelines, without implying that government or the incubator endorses your product. The incubator can list you as an incubated startup, and DPIIT can feature you as a beneficiary. Anything that quotes you or reveals your revenue, customers or fundraising needs your approval, which you cannot unreasonably refuse. You attend up to two showcase events a year. The incubator gets no equity, royalty, revenue share, board seat or observer right, and may not call you a portfolio company or an investee.

What it means for you

Compare this with the accelerator's publicity clause and the difference is the last sentence. A government incubator administering a grant is not your investor and should not present itself as one; founders have found themselves listed as 'portfolio companies' of incubators that hold nothing, which confuses later investors doing diligence. The acknowledgement duty is a Scheme expectation and is also useful to you: 'SISFS-supported' on your deck tells an angel that a committee of experts has already looked at you. The approval right over quotes and figures is standard and sufficient. The no-endorsement sentence protects you too: using the Government of India emblem or implying government approval of a product is restricted under the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act 1950.

What is normal

Acknowledgement of Scheme support is required by most SISFS incubators and expected by the Scheme. Incubators listing incubatees is universal. Approval rights over quotes and financial figures appear in about two-thirds of agreements. A limit on mandatory events (1 to 4 a year) appears in roughly half. An explicit no-equity, no-portfolio-company sentence is less common and worth asking for; the Scheme prohibits fees in cash or kind, which covers equity, but the labelling point is separate.

How to negotiate it

Keep the final sentence; it is the clearest statement in the agreement of what the incubator is not. Ask for the brand guidelines in Schedule 5 to permit a text-only acknowledgement, because many pitch deck templates have no room for two logos. Ask for the approval window for case studies to be 5 business days with silence meaning no approval, not deemed approval. And ask that your duty to acknowledge the Scheme end with the Incubation Period, with a right to continue voluntarily, since a 2029 acquirer's communications team will not want a 2023 incubator logo on your materials.

17. Termination and exit from incubation

Either party may terminate this Agreement by not less than 30 days' written notice to the other. The Incubator may also terminate immediately on a Misuse Event under Clause 13, or if the Startup is wound up, becomes insolvent or ceases business. On termination for any reason: (a) the Incubator's obligation to disburse any undisbursed Tranche shall cease; (b) the Startup shall, within 30 days, refund the unutilised balance of the Grant together with any interest earned on it, except to the extent the ISMC approves its application to Permitted Expenses contracted before the notice of termination; (c) the Startup shall submit a final report and an audited Utilisation Certificate for the Grant received, within 60 days of termination; (d) the Seat Licence shall end and the Startup shall vacate the workstations within 7 days; (e) any no-objection certificate for the registered office shall be withdrawn and the Startup shall shift its registered office within 60 days; and (f) Clauses 6, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 16 shall survive to the extent they relate to the Grant received. Amounts properly utilised on Permitted Expenses before the notice of termination shall not be refundable save on a Misuse Event. Termination shall not affect the Startup's graduation status if the Approved Project has been completed.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Either side can end the agreement on 30 days' notice; the incubator can end it at once for misuse or if you go bust or stop trading. On any termination, no more tranches are paid; you refund the unspent balance and its interest within 30 days unless the ISMC lets you apply it to expenses you had already contracted; you file a final report and audited certificate within 60 days; you clear your desks within a week; any registered-office NOC is withdrawn and you move the office within 60 days; and reporting, IP, audit, clawback, confidentiality and publicity duties survive. Money properly spent is not refundable unless there was misuse.

What it means for you

A 30-day mutual exit is generous for a grant and reflects the Scheme's logic: the money follows the project, so if you stop, the unspent money goes back and the spent money stays spent. The two practical traps are the registered office and the committed expenses. If you shifted your registered office to the incubator, a 60-day clock to find a new address and file Form INC-22 starts the day you leave; plan for it. The committed-expenses carve-out matters because a terminated project often has a vendor contract mid-flight, and without ISMC approval you would be funding the balance yourself. Refunding 'unutilised balance together with interest' means your separate ledger must show interest allocation, which a current account will not; keep it simple and keep the money in a non-interest account unless the sums justify the bookkeeping.

What is normal

Termination on 30 to 60 days' notice by either side is the standard SISFS structure. Refund of the unutilised balance within 30 to 60 days is universal. Vacating periods of 7 to 15 days are typical. Final report windows of 30 to 90 days appear across agreements. The committed-expenses carve-out appears in perhaps a third of agreements and is worth asking for. The sentence protecting properly utilised amounts is present in better agreements and matches the clawback clause's logic.

How to negotiate it

Ask for the committed-expenses carve-out to be automatic for contracts disclosed in the last Quarterly Progress Report, so that you are not waiting on an ISMC meeting to pay a vendor. Ask for the registered-office shift period to be 90 days and the vacating period 15 days. Ask that termination by the Incubator for convenience (not for misuse) require the ISMC's recommendation and a stated reason. And ask that the final audited certificate window run from the later of termination and the receipt of the last vendor invoice, since you cannot certify spending that has not yet been billed.

18. Governing law, grievances and miscellaneous

This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of India. Any grievance of the Startup concerning the Incubator's conduct of the Scheme, including a delay in disbursement or a Milestone or Misuse Event determination, shall first be raised in writing with the Incubator's Chief Executive Officer, who shall respond within 15 days; if unresolved, the Startup may escalate to DPIIT's grievance cell for the Scheme, and the parties shall abide by the directions of DPIIT or the EAC on matters within the Scheme's purview. Subject to that, any dispute arising out of this Agreement shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts at Mysuru, Karnataka. This Agreement, its Schedules and the Scheme guidelines as in force from time to time constitute the entire agreement between the parties; in a conflict, the Scheme guidelines prevail. No amendment shall be effective unless in writing and signed by both parties; changes to the Milestones or the Fund Utilisation Plan shall be recorded in an ISMC-approved addendum. Neither party may assign this Agreement. Notices shall be given by email to the addresses in Schedule 6, with a copy by registered post for notices under Clauses 13 and 17. This Agreement is executed in two stamped counterparts under the Karnataka Stamp Act 1957, one for each party.

Click for the notes: what it says, what it means for you, what is normal, how to negotiate it

What it says

Indian law applies. If you have a complaint about how the incubator is running the Scheme (a late tranche, a milestone call, a misuse finding), you write to its CEO, who has 15 days; after that you can escalate to DPIIT's grievance cell for the Scheme, and both sides follow what DPIIT or its committee decides. Otherwise disputes go to the courts of Mysuru. The agreement, its schedules and the current Scheme guidelines are the whole deal, and the guidelines win if they conflict. Changes need signatures, and milestone or spending-plan changes need an ISMC-approved addendum. No assignment. Notices by email, with registered post for clawback and termination notices. Two stamped originals.

What it means for you

The grievance ladder is more useful than the court clause. A ₹7 lakh tranche that is 60 days late is not a court case; it is a letter to the CEO and then an escalation to DPIIT's grievance cell, where the incubator's standing with the EAC is at stake. The guidelines-prevail sentence cuts both ways: the incubator cannot write terms stricter than the Scheme (such as a fee or equity), and a guideline revision can change your deal without a signature. Stamp duty is nominal but real: an agreement of this kind attracts State duty (in Karnataka, ₹200 under Article 5(j) of the Schedule to the Karnataka Stamp Act for an agreement not otherwise provided for; confirm the current figure), and an unstamped agreement is inadmissible until duty and penalty are paid.

What is normal

A two-step grievance route (incubator, then Scheme) appears in most SISFS agreements and reflects the grievance cell the Scheme guidelines set up at DPIIT (paragraph 8.10). Courts at the incubator's city are standard; arbitration is rare in grant agreements because the sums and the public-money context do not suit it. A guidelines-prevail clause is common. Stamping on ₹100 to ₹500 State stamp paper is universal practice for incubation agreements. Addenda for milestone changes approved by the ISMC are the standard way of recording revisions.

How to negotiate it

Ask the incubator to confirm how to reach DPIIT's grievance cell for the Scheme and the timelines it follows, so that the escalation is a real step and not a form. Ask that the guidelines-prevail sentence be limited to the guidelines as in force on the date of the agreement, with later changes applying only if DPIIT makes them retrospective. Ask for a 30-day negotiation step before any court filing. And ask the incubator to confirm the stamp duty it has paid and to give you one stamped original, so that your copy is admissible. The jurisdiction clause notes on the NDA Explainer cover the courts-versus-arbitration choice in more detail.

What the fine print does when...

The same event lands very differently under the two agreements on this page. Each row is drawn from the sample clauses; click through to the clause for the full text.

EventPrivate accelerator agreementSISFS incubation agreement
You miss a milestoneNothing contractual: the iSAFE has no milestones. The risk is reputational and shows up at demo day and in the Accelerator's follow-on decision.The next tranche is not released until the milestone is met or the ISMC re-approves a revised plan. No refund for an honest miss; the final report must explain the shortfall.
You raise a seed round during the programmeThe iSAFE converts at the ₹6 crore cap if the round is a qualified financing; the MFN and the ₹50 lakh follow-on right switch on; the Accelerator receives the round documents.Allowed. Give the Incubator 15 days' prior intimation and keep grant money separate from round money on the ledger; the 51 percent test was met at application, so new investors do not disqualify you.
You pivotAllowed. The Accelerator holds an instrument, not a veto; it may ask for an update under the information clause.A pivot outside the approved plan needs the Incubator's written consent; the ISMC may reset the milestones. A silent pivot is a diversion of the grant.
A founder leavesA breach of the full-time commitment and the warranty; the Accelerator may expel the Company, but the iSAFE survives.Intimate within 7 days and propose a replacement plan within 30 days; disbursement may pause while the ISMC reviews the team.
You want to leave the programme earlyGive 7 days' notice. The fee is not refunded, the iSAFE stays, and unissued programme equity lapses.Give 30 days' notice. Return the unspent grant with interest earned and file a final utilisation certificate within 60 days.
They want to publicise youThe Accelerator may announce the cohort and the investment; quotes about you need your approval within 3 business days.The Incubator may list you as an incubatee and the Scheme may feature you; you must acknowledge Scheme support in your own materials.
You receive another government grantNo effect; the Accelerator is a private party.Disclose it. The ₹10 lakh prior-support test applies at application, but undisclosed public funding of the same expenses is double-funding and a clawback trigger.
You use the money for salariesYour choice; the iSAFE money is unrestricted working capital once PAS-3 is filed.Project manpower on the approved plan is permitted; founder remuneration is only allowed if the Fund Utilisation Plan names it. Keep payroll proof for the utilisation certificate.
You want the programme's equity cancelledOnce issued, shares cannot simply be cancelled: it takes a buyback under Section 68 or a capital reduction under Section 66. Negotiate a call option for the founders at the issue price before signing instead; below fair value, Sections 50CA and 56(2)(x) apply to that transfer.Not applicable: there is no equity. A SISFS convertible debenture, if used, converts or is repaid on its own terms.
You are not DPIIT-recognisedThe warranty is drafted as 'has applied'; recognition is not a condition of the offer.You are ineligible. Recognition is a condition of selection; a false recital is grounds for refund with interest and blacklisting.
A corporate partner wants your dataNothing in the agreement forces disclosure; mentors and partners are bound only by the Accelerator's code of conduct, so sign a direct NDA.Your data goes only to the Incubator and the Scheme portal; any sharing with a corporate partner needs your written consent.
The programme ends and you have unspent moneyIt is your capital; no return, no report.Return the unspent balance and the interest it earned with the final report and audited certificate, or seek the ISMC's approval to re-purpose it within the project.

Calculators

Change any figure and the result updates. Every formula is shown.

Programme cost calculator

Turn an accelerator's ask into a valuation and a future rupee cost. Enter the cash offered, the programme's claimed in-kind value, the total equity asked (including any programme equity), the dilution you expect at the seed round and at the Series A, and a Series A post-money. The engine shows the implied valuation on the cash alone and on cash plus in-kind, the programme's stake after both rounds, what that stake is worth, and how many times the cash it represents.

Worked example. Saffron's March 2023 offer, with the defaults loaded: ₹30 lakh of cash, ₹15 lakh of claimed in-kind programme value, 7 percent of equity asked (the iSAFE at a ₹6 crore cap converts to about 4.76 percent at the cap, and the 2 percent programme equity takes the total to roughly 7 percent), 15 percent dilution at the seed round, 30 percent at the Series A including the pool, and a ₹100 crore Series A post-money. Results: implied valuation on the cash alone ₹4.29 crore (₹30 lakh divided by 7 percent); on cash plus in-kind ₹6.43 crore (₹45 lakh divided by 7 percent); the programme's stake after the seed and the Series A is 4.17 percent (7 percent times 0.85 times 0.70); worth ₹4.17 crore at the ₹100 crore post-money; which is 13.9 times the ₹30 lakh of cash. Saffron's angels paid at a ₹16 crore cap seven months later, so the accelerator's price was less than 40 percent of what the market offered.
The engine ignores the iSAFE cap mechanics and treats the whole stake as issued at the start; use the Seed Instruments Explainer's note-stacking calculator for the iSAFE arithmetic, including stacking with other notes. Cash divided by stake is strictly a post-money figure; purists would call ₹4.29 crore the post-money and ₹3.99 crore the pre-money, and at these sizes the difference is the ₹30 lakh itself. The in-kind value is the programme's own claim: test it against what the same mentoring, credits and introductions would cost you in cash.

Every term, in plain English

61 terms in 5 groups. Each one has the plain meaning, a worked example where numbers help, what is normal, what to watch for, and the India-specific rule.

Start here

The kinds of programme and the one document each of them signs with you

AcceleratorA fixed-length, cohort-based programme that invests a small amount for equity and ends with a demo day.
Also called: Startup accelerator, Cohort programme

In plain English

An accelerator takes a batch of early-stage companies through a structured programme of 3 to 6 months: workshops, mentors, office hours and a final pitch event. It usually puts in money, in India most often through an iSAFE, and takes equity in return. It is a business: its returns come from the equity it holds when you raise and exit, so its incentives are aligned with your growth but also with taking as much equity as early as possible. Read its agreement as an investor's document with a services contract attached.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad Accelerator LLP offered Saffron Labs a 12-week programme, ₹30 lakh through an iSAFE at a ₹6 crore cap, and asked for 2 percent more as programme equity. The implied valuation on the cash was ₹4.29 crore; Saffron's angels paid at a ₹16 crore cap seven months later.

What is normal

Indian private accelerators invest ₹10 lakh to ₹75 lakh for 3 to 10 percent, run 10 to 16 week cohorts of 8 to 20 companies, and charge nil to ₹5 lakh plus GST in fees.

Watch out for

Programme equity on top of the cheque, follow-on and MFN rights that reach into your seed round, and expulsion clauses that keep the equity whatever the programme delivered.

In India

Most Indian accelerators are LLPs or private companies; their investing arm is sometimes a SEBI-registered AIF. The iSAFE they use is a compulsorily convertible preference share issued by private placement under Section 42 of the Companies Act 2013.

IncubatorAn organisation that hosts early-stage companies with space, mentors and access to schemes, usually for a longer period and often without equity.
Also called: Business incubator, Incubation centre

In plain English

An incubator is a host rather than an investor. It gives you a desk or a lab, a mentor, clinics with professionals, and introductions, typically for 12 to 36 months. Many Indian incubators are supported by government (DST, MeitY, NITI Aayog's Atal Innovation Mission) or by a university, and they are the channel through which schemes such as the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme reach startups. A government-supported incubator administering a grant is bound by the scheme's rules, which it did not write and cannot waive.

Worked example

Chamundi Technology Business Incubator in Mysuru, a DST-supported TBI approved under SISFS, incubated Saffron Labs for 12 months from June 2023: a ₹20 lakh grant in three tranches, two seats at ₹5,000 a month, mentoring and clinics, and no equity.

What is normal

Government-supported incubators charge ₹3,000 to ₹10,000 a month per seat and take no equity for scheme grants; private and university incubators that take equity for incubation typically take 2 to 5 percent.

Watch out for

An incubator that makes equity or a fee a condition of a SISFS grant is acting against the Scheme, which bars fees in cash or kind. A university incubator may apply the institute's IP policy to work done on campus.

In India

The live directory at /startup-incubators/ lists 3,691 incubators and accelerators across 34 States and Union Territories with scheme tags. Approximately 200 incubators are approved under SISFS; DST's NIDHI programme and AIM's Atal Incubation Centres are the other large networks.

Technology Business Incubator (TBI)An incubator supported by the Department of Science and Technology under its NIDHI programme, usually hosted by an academic or research institution.
Also called: TBI, NIDHI-TBI, DST-supported incubator

In plain English

A Technology Business Incubator is the Department of Science and Technology's model of an incubator: a not-for-profit entity, often a society or a Section 8 company hosted by an engineering college, a university or a research institute, that receives DST support to incubate technology startups. TBIs are the backbone of the government incubation network and are the most common type of incubator approved under SISFS, because they already have the governance, the physical space and the committees the Scheme requires.

Worked example

Chamundi TBI in Mysuru is a DST-supported TBI registered as a society. Its approval under SISFS let it run an Incubator Seed Management Committee and sanction Saffron's ₹20 lakh grant; its DST support funds the lab, the seats and the mentoring that came with it.

What is normal

A TBI typically hosts 20 to 60 startups at a time, charges ₹2,000 to ₹8,000 a month per seat, and offers 12 to 36 month incubation terms with scheme grants routed through it.

Watch out for

The TBI is one legal entity and its host institution is another; check which one signs your agreement, holds the SISFS corpus and owns the premises, and whether the host's IP policy reaches you.

In India

DST runs TBIs under the National Initiative for Developing and Harnessing Innovations (NIDHI). NIDHI-PRAYAS and the NIDHI Seed Support Programme are delivered through TBIs and PRAYAS centres. Details are on nidhi.dst.gov.in.

Atal Incubation Centre (AIC)An incubator established with grant support from NITI Aayog's Atal Innovation Mission.
Also called: AIC, AIM incubator

In plain English

Atal Incubation Centres are incubators set up under the Atal Innovation Mission, NITI Aayog's flagship innovation programme. AIM provides grant-in-aid to the incubator (up to ₹10 crore per centre, subject to the guidelines) to build and run the facility; the startup's relationship is with the AIC itself, under the AIC's own incubation agreement. Many AICs are also approved under SISFS, so an AIC may offer you both incubation and a Scheme grant. AICs are hosted by universities, corporate foundations, State bodies and private trusts, so their agreements vary more than TBIs' do.

Worked example

A founder choosing between a TBI and an AIC in the same city should compare the incubation agreements, not the labels: both can route a SISFS grant, but an AIC hosted by a corporate foundation may ask for a corporate showcase or a right of first refusal on a pilot that a DST TBI would not.

What is normal

AIC incubation terms run 12 to 24 months, seat fees ₹3,000 to ₹10,000 a month, and most AICs take no equity for scheme grants; some take 1 to 3 percent for their own incubation programmes.

Watch out for

An AIC's own equity-based programme and a SISFS grant through the same AIC are two different deals; keep them in separate documents and never let equity become a condition of the grant.

In India

Atal Innovation Mission, NITI Aayog (aim.gov.in). AIM also runs Atal Tinkering Labs in schools and the Atal Community Innovation Centres. AIC grants are to the incubator, not to startups.

Corporate acceleratorA programme run by a large company to source startups for pilots and partnerships, usually with little or no equity and a commercial contract as the prize.
Also called: Corporate innovation programme, Open innovation challenge

In plain English

A corporate accelerator is a large company's way of meeting startups that could become its vendors, partners or acquisitions. The programme runs 8 to 16 weeks around a pilot with one of the corporate's business units, with mentoring from its managers. Cash is rare; the real prize is a paid pilot or a commercial contract. The paperwork to read is the pilot agreement, not the programme agreement: background IP, improvements, data, exclusivity and a right of first refusal on a strategic deal are where corporates ask for more than they give.

Worked example

Saffron's pilot with Tungabhadra Forge Industries in January 2026 ran under a mutual NDA and a pilot agreement, not a corporate accelerator; had it come through a corporate programme, the programme's standard terms might have given the corporate a right to match any acquisition offer, which is exactly the clause to delete.

What is normal

Equity nil to 5 percent; cash nil or a paid pilot of ₹5 lakh to ₹25 lakh; duration 8 to 16 weeks; a pilot agreement and sometimes an optional investment letter.

Watch out for

Exclusivity (you cannot sell to the corporate's competitors), rights of first refusal on acquisition or licensing, and data clauses that let the corporate keep what it learns in the pilot.

In India

Corporate pilots with listed companies may involve unpublished price sensitive information on the corporate's side; its NDA will reference SEBI's insider trading regulations. GST applies to paid pilots as a supply of service.

Venture studioAn organisation that co-founds companies, supplying the idea, the build team and the first capital in exchange for a large founder-sized stake.
Also called: Startup studio, Venture builder, Company builder

In plain English

A venture studio does not accept you into a programme; it starts a company with you. It typically brings the thesis, a shared engineering and design team, legal and finance support, and ₹25 lakh to ₹2 crore of build capital, much of which it spends itself, and takes 20 to 60 percent as a co-founder. The document is a shareholders' agreement, not an incubation agreement, and the questions are a co-founder's questions: who controls the board, who owns the IP before spin-out, what happens to the studio's stake at the seed round, and what the studio's team is obliged to deliver.

Worked example

A founder offered 35 percent of a new company by a studio that supplies the first ₹60 lakh and a shared team should model the seed round: with the studio at 65 percent before the round, most seed investors will ask for the studio to come down to 20 to 30 percent and for the founder to be refreshed, which is a negotiation to have before signing, not after.

What is normal

Studio stakes of 20 to 60 percent, build capital of ₹25 lakh to ₹2 crore, a shareholders' agreement with vesting on both sides, and the studio leading or co-leading the seed round.

Watch out for

Studio stakes that do not vest or reduce when the studio's team moves on; IP assigned to the studio rather than the company; and investor pushback at the seed round against a cap table where a non-operating shareholder holds the majority.

In India

A studio's stake above 50 percent makes the company its subsidiary under Section 2(87) of the Companies Act 2013, with consolidation and related party consequences; losses may also be restricted under Section 79 of the Income-tax Act when the studio later sells down below 51 percent.

University incubatorAn incubator run by an academic institution, offering labs, faculty and students, sometimes with the institute's IP policy attached.
Also called: Academic incubator, Institute incubator, Campus incubator

In plain English

Universities and engineering institutes host many of India's TBIs and AICs. They offer what a private programme cannot: laboratories, test equipment, faculty expertise and a stream of student talent, for low seat fees and long terms. The point to check is the institute's intellectual property policy. Most institutes own inventions made by their faculty and students, and some extend that to work done using their facilities; an incubatee that uses a faculty member's time or an institute lab may find the institute claiming a royalty or a licence. A SISFS grant through a university incubator does not create that claim, but the institute's policy might.

Worked example

A deep-tech startup incubated at an institute whose IP policy claims a 2 percent royalty on products developed with institute facilities should get a written carve-out before using the lab, or budget the royalty. For Saffron, incubated at a DST TBI with no institute policy reaching it, the agreement's IP clause settled the question.

What is normal

Seat and lab fees of ₹1,000 to ₹10,000 a month, often subsidised; incubation terms of 12 to 36 months; equity nil to 5 percent or a royalty of 1 to 5 percent where institute IP is licensed.

Watch out for

The institute's IP policy, affiliation requirements (a faculty mentor or an alumnus founder), and a requirement to stay 'affiliated' for reporting after you leave.

In India

Institutes of national importance publish their IP policies; the Protection and Utilisation of Public Funded Intellectual Property Bill lapsed, so each institute's policy, not a statute, governs. DST and MeitY grants to institute incubators carry acknowledgement and reporting duties that flow down to incubatees.

Incubation agreementThe contract between an incubator and a startup covering services, premises, any scheme grant and its conditions, IP, reporting and exit.
Also called: Incubation and seed fund agreement, Incubatee agreement, Programme agreement

In plain English

An incubation agreement sets out what the incubator gives (space, services, sometimes a grant or scheme funding), what you owe (fees, reports, milestones, acknowledgement) and what happens when the relationship ends. Where a government grant is involved, the Scheme's guidelines sit above the agreement and the incubator is expected to sign a legal agreement with you before releasing any money. The agreement is a services contract and a grant sanction in one document, and the grant conditions are the part that will follow you for years.

Worked example

Saffron's agreement with Chamundi TBI, dated 12 June 2023, ran to 18 clauses: eligibility recitals, a ₹20 lakh grant in three tranches, utilisation certificates, two seats at ₹5,000 a month, IP ownership, monitoring, clawback for misuse only, and a 30-day mutual exit.

What is normal

12 to 24 month terms, 15 to 25 clauses, a schedule with the fund utilisation plan and milestones, a utilisation certificate from a chartered accountant per tranche, and courts at the incubator's city.

Watch out for

Equity or fees hidden in a Scheme agreement, clawback that does not distinguish misuse from honest failure, pivot consent drafted so widely it catches ordinary iteration, and a registered-office NOC with no exit terms.

In India

Stamped on State stamp paper (nominal duty); governed by Indian law; a grant under a Central scheme brings CAG audit access and Section 2(24)(xviii) income-tax treatment of the grant. GST is not chargeable on the grant, and the seat fee is taxable unless the incubator is a TBI or bio-incubator whose services are exempt.

Grant versus equityThe core choice between non-dilutive money with conditions and dilutive money with freedom.
Also called: Non-dilutive versus dilutive funding, Grant or investment

In plain English

A grant costs you compliance: milestones, restricted spending, certificates, audits and a refund if you misuse it. Equity costs you ownership: a slice of every future exit, and a shareholder with rights. At the prototype stage the grant usually wins, because ₹20 lakh of grant is ₹20 lakh of value kept, while ₹30 lakh of accelerator money for 7 percent may be worth ₹4 crore to the programme at a Series A. Later, equity wins when you need more money than any scheme offers and the speed and network of an investor matter more than the dilution.

Worked example

Saffron compared ₹30 lakh for roughly 7 percent (worth ₹4.17 crore to the programme at the ₹100 crore Series A post-money) with a ₹20 lakh grant that cost three utilisation certificates, four quarterly reports and a separate ledger. It took the grant, then raised ₹1 crore from angels at a ₹16 crore cap in October 2023.

What is normal

Pre-revenue startups in India commonly stack a SISFS grant (up to ₹20 lakh), a NIDHI-PRAYAS or State grant (subject to the ₹10 lakh prior-support test at the SISFS application date), and then an angel round of ₹50 lakh to ₹2 crore.

Watch out for

Treating a grant as free money and skipping the bookkeeping; or taking equity money at a low cap because it arrived first. Sequence matters: the SISFS ₹10 lakh test looks backwards from the application date.

In India

Grants are income under Section 2(24)(xviii) of the Income-tax Act unless applied to a depreciable asset's cost; equity raised is capital and not income. Section 56(2)(viib) no longer applies to shares issued from 1 April 2024, so a high-valuation angel round carries no angel tax risk.

Programmes and what they take

The equity, fees, rights and commitments inside a private accelerator offer

CohortThe batch of companies that go through an accelerator programme together over the same dates.
Also called: Batch, Class

In plain English

Accelerators admit companies in batches so that the curriculum, the mentors and the demo day can be shared. Your cohort is the 8 to 20 companies that start and finish with you. It is a source of peer learning and introductions, and also a room full of people who are not bound by your agreement: other founders, visiting mentors and investors hear what you say in sessions and owe you nothing beyond the programme's code of conduct. The cohort's name and dates are fixed in the agreement because the programme's obligations are tied to them.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad's Spring 2023 Cohort ran from 3 April to 22 June 2023 with three residential weeks in Hyderabad. Saffron would have been one of about 12 companies; two others were workflow or ERP tools for manufacturers, which is a conflict a founder should ask about before accepting.

What is normal

8 to 20 companies per cohort, 10 to 16 weeks, two cohorts a year. Sector-focused programmes run smaller cohorts of 5 to 10.

Watch out for

Direct competitors in the same cohort, and confidentiality clauses that tell you frankly that cohort members are not bound; treat group sessions as public.

In India

No statute governs cohorts; the relevant rule is Section 42's private placement limit of 200 persons a year, which a demo day with a large audience does not breach as long as the offer of securities is made only to identified investors.

Demo dayThe pitch event at the end of an accelerator cohort where each company presents to invited investors.
Also called: Pitch day, Showcase, Graduation day

In plain English

Demo day is the accelerator's product: a room of investors, a stage and five minutes per company. It matters commercially because it compresses months of introductions into a day, and legally because it is a public-facing event at which you are describing an investment opportunity. Keep the pitch about the business and leave the terms to private conversations afterwards, keep the audience to identified invitees rather than a public livestream, and remember that a programme's 'introductions' are not endorsements and carry no obligation on the investor.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad's offer promised a 5-minute slot on 22 June 2023 and at least 10 introductions afterwards, with no success fee on any round raised. Saffron's angels came through a founder network instead, which is the more common route in India.

What is normal

3 to 7 minute slots, 30 to 150 investors in the room, 5 to 15 curated introductions, and no success fee. Follow-on conversions from demo day to a term sheet are typically 10 to 30 percent of a cohort.

Watch out for

Public livestreams of investment pitches, success fees (which raise SEBI registration questions for an unregistered intermediary), and reporting duties on term sheets that feed a follow-on right or an MFN.

In India

A private placement under Section 42 must be to identified persons through a PAS-4 offer letter, not a public advertisement; a demo day pitch is pre-offer marketing, but a general public call to invest can be a deemed public offer. A placement fee can raise SEBI registration questions for whoever charges it.

Entrepreneur-in-residence (EIR)An experienced founder or operator attached to a programme to mentor cohort companies, usually part-time and without duties to you.
Also called: EIR, Resident mentor, Mentor-in-residence

In plain English

An entrepreneur-in-residence is a programme's senior mentor: someone who has built and often sold a company and now spends part of their time with the cohort. The value is real and so is the exposure: an EIR is typically paid by the programme, may be an investor in or adviser to companies that compete with you, and owes you no fiduciary duty. Programme agreements say this plainly and also restrict you from hiring or granting equity to an EIR during the programme. Disclosure of conflicts before a session is the protection to insist on.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad's clause gave Saffron two assigned mentors with at least two sessions each, allowed mentors to be invested in competitors subject to disclosure, and barred Saffron from offering any mentor equity during the 12 weeks without consent.

What is normal

1 to 3 assigned mentors per company, 4 to 12 scheduled sessions per cohort, conflict disclosure in about half of agreements, and a restriction on hiring mentors during the cohort in most.

Watch out for

A conflicted EIR hearing your pipeline and pricing with no NDA; cooling-off periods of 6 to 12 months after the programme on hiring mentors; and advisory equity asks from EIRs after the programme at 1 to 2 percent, which is high for a part-time adviser.

In India

An EIR who later becomes an adviser with equity is not an employee, so any shares must be a preferential issue under Section 62(1)(c) at a registered valuer's price; options under an ESOP cannot be granted to a non-employee adviser under Rule 12.

Perks and creditsPartner benefits (cloud credits, software, banking, payment gateways) a programme arranges, provided by the partners on their own terms.
Also called: Partner perks, Cloud credits, In-kind benefits

In plain English

Programmes list perks because the face value is large and the cost to the programme is nil: a cloud provider gives credits to attract future paying customers, a software vendor gives a year free. The programme makes no promise about availability, value or duration, you apply directly, and unused credits lapse. Value them at what you would actually have spent, and remember that most of the same credits are available to any DPIIT-recognised startup directly from the providers, so they should not justify a higher equity ask.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad put the in-kind value of its programme, mostly perks, at about ₹15 lakh. Saffron's actual cloud spend in 2023 was under ₹30,000 a month, and the same provider offered DPIIT-recognised startups a comparable credit programme directly, so the founders valued the perks at roughly ₹2 lakh when computing the implied valuation.

What is normal

Claimed face values of ₹5 lakh to ₹50 lakh or more; realistic value to a two-founder startup ₹1 lakh to ₹5 lakh; activation windows of 60 to 120 days.

Watch out for

Perks that require moving your main bank account or routing the investment through a partner bank, and 'in-kind value' used in the programme's own arithmetic to justify equity.

In India

Promotional credits are generally discounts rather than income, but a perk with a cash value that arrives through the programme may be a business receipt under Section 28(iv) of the Income-tax Act; ask your tax expert. GST input credit is unaffected by a vendor's promotional discount shown on the invoice.

Mandatory sessionsThe compulsory workshops and check-ins in a programme calendar whose non-attendance can trigger expulsion.
Also called: Compulsory sessions, Core curriculum, Attendance requirement

In plain English

Accelerators split their calendar into sessions you must attend and sessions you should. The mandatory list is the enforceable one: missing a set number (three in Saffron's offer) is 'non-participation', the defined trigger for expulsion. Residential weeks usually count as mandatory in full. The clause is reasonable in principle, because a cohort only works if people turn up, but as drafted it rarely allows for illness, a family emergency or a customer deployment that clashes with a workshop. Ask for the list, a cap on the number, a recorded-session alternative and a cure period.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad required attendance at up to 14 mandatory sessions, 80 percent of the rest and all three residential weeks in Hyderabad at Saffron's cost; three missed mandatory sessions or any missed residential week was non-participation under Clause 17.

What is normal

8 to 15 mandatory sessions over a 12-week cohort, an 80 to 90 percent threshold for other sessions, and 2 to 4 residential weeks in hybrid programmes.

Watch out for

Non-participation defined without a warning or cure step, residential weeks at your cost, and a ban on parallel programmes wide enough to catch a government scheme application.

In India

No statutory angle, but founders who are also directors of other companies should carve those directorships out of a full-time undertaking; a director's statutory duties under Section 166 of the Companies Act 2013 cannot be suspended by a programme contract.

Residential weeksThe weeks of a hybrid programme that founders must spend in person at the accelerator's city.
Also called: In-person weeks, On-site weeks, Immersion weeks

In plain English

Since 2022 most Indian accelerators run hybrid cohorts: online sessions most weeks and two to four weeks on site. Residential weeks are where the networking happens and where the cost hides. Two founders, flights and three weeks of accommodation in another city add up, and the agreement usually makes it your expense and makes absence from any part of a residential week a non-participation event. Ask who pays for accommodation, whether one founder can attend some weeks, and how illness is handled.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad's three residential weeks in Hyderabad (weeks 1, 6 and 12) would have cost Saffron roughly ₹2 lakh to ₹3 lakh in travel and stay for two founders, on top of the ₹3.54 lakh programme fee, so the real cash cost of the programme approached ₹6 lakh against ₹26.46 lakh of net investment.

What is normal

2 to 4 residential weeks per cohort; about half of programmes provide or subsidise accommodation; the rest leave it to the startup.

Watch out for

Both founders required for every residential week, no illness carve-out, and relocation clauses that quietly expect you to be in the accelerator's city for the whole cohort.

In India

Travel and stay for founders on company business are deductible business expenses; keep them in the company's books, not the founders' personal accounts, and apply TDS on hotel bills only where Section 194-I thresholds are crossed, which they rarely are for short stays.

Programme equityA slice of the company an accelerator asks for in exchange for the programme itself, separate from any cash it invests.
Also called: Equity for programme, Services equity, Acceleration fee in shares

In plain English

Many Indian accelerators ask for 1 to 3 percent of the company 'for the programme', on top of whatever their cheque buys. The ask is usually drafted as shares issued at face value within a few weeks of joining. The economic point is that it is a price increase: ₹30 lakh for 4.76 percent through an iSAFE becomes ₹30 lakh for about 7 percent in total, and the post-money valuation falls from ₹6.3 crore to ₹4.29 crore. The legal point is that issuing shares at face value to a non-employee for services is not something a private company can do under Rule 13 without a valuer's price. Programmes that know this fold the equity into a lower cap on a single iSAFE, or take shares for their services at a registered valuer's price; warrants need the same valuer-backed price.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad asked Saffron for 2 percent of fully diluted equity shares at ₹10 face value within 30 days, with a free top-up until the seed round. At the ₹100 crore Series A post-money, 2 percent that had been diluted to about 1.19 percent would have been worth ₹1.19 crore for a programme fee of ₹3 lakh.

What is normal

1 to 3 percent is the usual ask; roughly a third of Indian private accelerators have dropped programme equity in favour of a single lower-cap iSAFE since 2023.

Watch out for

Issue at face value, no vesting over the programme, top-up rights that act as a full ratchet, and retention of the equity on expulsion in week three.

In India

Shares to a non-employee for services are not sweat equity (Section 54, Rule 8 are for employees and directors). A preferential issue under Section 62(1)(c) with Rule 13 needs a special resolution and a registered valuer's price; the recipient of shares below fair value is taxable under Section 56(2)(x). Warrants to a non-employee need a special resolution and a valuer's price fixed upfront or at exercise.

Equity for services (how programmes structure it)The lawful routes by which a programme can take equity for services in India: a lower cap on a single iSAFE, shares issued for the services, or a nominal iSAFE or warrants, each needing a valuation.
Also called: Services for shares, Advisory equity structure, Non-cash consideration

In plain English

Indian company law has no simple route for a private company to hand shares to an outsider for services. Sweat equity is for employees and directors. A preferential issue needs a registered valuer's price and consideration at that price, in cash or in kind; where the consideration is services, the valuer must value the services too and the board must disclose it. So programmes use two clean routes and one awkward one: a lower valuation cap on the single iSAFE, so the equity sits in the conversion arithmetic; shares issued for the programme's services as consideration other than cash, with the services valued; or a nominal second iSAFE or warrants, which still need a conversion or exercise price a registered valuer will sign. All three can be lawful if priced under Rule 13; each is a valuation to compute before agreeing.

Worked example

To give Deccan Launchpad the same 7 percent lawfully, the ₹30 lakh iSAFE could have carried a ₹4 crore cap (₹30 lakh divided by ₹4.3 crore of post-money is about 7 percent). Same economics, one instrument, one valuer's report, and no face-value issue for your board to resolve.

What is normal

Lower-cap iSAFEs are now the most common structure; nominal second iSAFEs appear in perhaps a fifth of offers; warrants are rare for programmes but common for advisers.

Watch out for

Any draft that still asks your board to resolve to issue shares at face value; valuer's reports commissioned by the programme rather than the company; and warrant terms that let the programme exercise years later at ₹10 after your value has multiplied.

In India

Section 62(1)(c) and Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014 require a registered valuer's report and allotment within 12 months of the special resolution; Rule 13 also requires a valuer's report on any consideration other than cash and a justification in the explanatory statement. The valuer is registered under Section 247 with IBBI.

Implied valuationThe company value an equity ask implies: cash divided by the percentage taken, with or without the programme's claimed in-kind value.
Also called: Implied post-money, Effective valuation, Price of the programme

In plain English

Every 'X lakh for Y percent' is a valuation, and a programme's deck will not state it. Divide the cash by the stake. If the programme claims its services are worth more, add that claimed value to the cash and divide again; the second number is the valuation the programme is asking you to believe, and the first is the one your cap table will show. Then compare both with what angels in your market would pay today. If the programme's number is below half the angel number, the programme is expensive and the services must justify the gap.

Worked example

₹30 lakh for 7 percent: ₹30 lakh divided by 0.07 is ₹4.29 crore. Adding ₹15 lakh of claimed perks and mentoring: ₹45 lakh divided by 0.07 is ₹6.43 crore. Saffron's angels paid at a ₹16 crore cap seven months later, so the programme's price was less than 40 percent of market even on its own generous arithmetic. The programme-cost calculator on this page does this sum.

What is normal

Implied valuations of ₹3 crore to ₹10 crore for Indian private accelerators in 2025 and 2026; angel caps for comparable companies of ₹8 crore to ₹25 crore.

Watch out for

Cash divided by stake is strictly a post-money figure, so the pre-money is lower still; and the stake usually grows through MFN and top-up clauses, so compute the maximum stake, not the headline.

In India

No statutory meaning; but if a programme receives shares at an implied valuation far below a registered valuer's fair value, Section 56(2)(x) taxes the programme on the difference above ₹50,000 and Rule 13 compliance is in question. Section 56(2)(viib) no longer applies to the company for shares issued from 1 April 2024.

Programme feeA cash fee an accelerator charges for the cohort, often deducted from the investment, attracting GST and TDS.
Also called: Acceleration fee, Cohort fee, Participation fee

In plain English

Some programmes charge a fee alongside the equity; some take more equity and charge nothing. A fee is a service invoice, so it attracts GST at 18 percent and you must deduct TDS when paying it. The usual drafting deducts the fee from the cheque, which creates a Section 42 problem because the whole subscription amount must reach the company before allotment. Fees are nearly always non-refundable, even on expulsion. Budget the fee, the GST (which you can recover only if GST-registered), the TDS mechanics and your own travel before you decide whether the programme is cheap.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad's fee was ₹3 lakh plus 18 percent IGST, ₹3.54 lakh, deducted from the ₹30 lakh iSAFE. Saffron, unregistered for GST at five weeks old, could not have recovered the ₹54,000. The net working capital from the deal would have been ₹26.46 lakh, for about 7 percent of the company.

What is normal

Nil to ₹5 lakh plus GST; ₹2 lakh to ₹3.5 lakh is the median for a 12-week private cohort; about a third of programmes charge nothing in cash.

Watch out for

Deduction from the subscription money, non-refundability on expulsion without cause, and invoices that do not state the nature of the service (which decides the TDS rate).

In India

GST at 18 percent as a supply of service; IGST if the programme is in another State. TDS under Section 194J at 10 percent for professional services or 2 percent for technical services above the ₹50,000 annual threshold, and disallowance of 30 percent of the expense under Section 40(a)(ia) if not deducted. Section 42 requires the full subscription amount through banking channels before allotment.

Follow-on rightA programme's right, not obligation, to invest a stated amount in your next priced round on the lead investor's terms.
Also called: Participation right, Right to invest in the next round, Pro-rata right (fixed amount)

In plain English

A follow-on right lets the accelerator put more money into your next round at whatever price the lead negotiates. It is a free option: exercised when the round is strong, declined when it is weak. A fixed amount can take a large share of a small round from the investors you chose; 'same terms as the lead' can import rights designed for a much bigger cheque; and the right requires you to send round details early, which also feeds any MFN clause. A pro-rata right to maintain percentage is the fairer version, and the right should die with the next round.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad asked for up to ₹50 lakh in Saffron's next priced round. Saffron's actual seed round in March 2024 was ₹1.75 crore of new money, so the right would have been about 29 percent of the round; a pro-rata right on the accelerator's roughly 4.76 percent would have been about ₹8 lakh.

What is normal

About half of Indian private accelerators ask for one; fixed amounts of ₹25 lakh to ₹1 crore or pro-rata to maintain percentage; 10 to 20 business days' notice; nearly always limited to the next round.

Watch out for

Fixed amounts large relative to your expected round, rights that survive several rounds, 'same terms as the lead' without a carve-out for board and veto rights, and the signalling effect if the programme passes.

In India

A follow-on investor in a priced round subscribes under Section 42 and Section 62(1)(c) like everyone else; the right itself is a contractual pre-emption that the Articles need not mirror. If the programme's investing entity is non-resident, FEMA pricing applies to its subscription.

Signalling riskThe damage done to a round when an insider with a right to invest chooses not to.
Also called: Negative signal, Insider pass

In plain English

New investors read the behaviour of existing ones. If a programme or an early investor that has a right to invest in your round, and knows you better than anyone, decides not to use it, the new investors will ask why, and no answer sounds good. A follow-on right therefore carries a hidden cost: it makes the programme's decision visible. Programmes that invest in many companies cannot follow all of them, so a pass is often about their fund, not about you; but you will spend the round explaining that. Keeping follow-on rights small or pro-rata reduces the signal, because a small cheque's absence is less noticeable.

Worked example

Had Saffron taken the accelerator deal and the accelerator then declined its ₹50 lakh follow-on in the March 2024 seed round, the angels' counsel would have asked for the reason in diligence; a declined right of that size would have cost Saffron at least a conversation and possibly a lower price.

What is normal

Programmes with follow-on rights exercise them in perhaps 20 to 40 percent of portfolio companies; the rest are passes that founders must explain.

Watch out for

Large fixed follow-on rights, programmes known never to follow on, and information clauses that make the programme's view of you visible to the next round's investors.

In India

No legal dimension; a diligence point. Where a programme's investing entity is a SEBI-registered AIF, its decision to follow on is also constrained by its fund's concentration limits under the AIF Regulations, which is a legitimate reason to give new investors.

Success feeA percentage of money raised charged by an intermediary for introducing investors; legally sensitive for unregistered intermediaries and rare in reputable programmes.
Also called: Placement fee, Fundraising commission, Finder's fee

In plain English

A success fee is a cut of your round paid to whoever introduced the investor. Reputable accelerators do not charge one, and a good agreement says so expressly, because their return comes from equity. Where a programme or an 'investment banker' asks for 2 to 5 percent of the round, two problems arise: the fee is paid out of money that was meant to be equity capital, and charging for arranging an issue of securities can be a regulated activity needing SEBI registration. Investors in the round will also ask whether their money is going to the company or to a middleman.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad's offer stated that no success fee, commission or placement fee would be payable on any investment, whether or not introduced by the accelerator. That sentence is worth keeping word for word and extending to the accelerator's affiliates.

What is normal

Nil in reputable programmes; 1 to 3 percent where charged by boutique advisers, 2 to 5 percent by some unregistered introducers.

Watch out for

Fees described as 'advisory' or 'documentation' fees that are in substance a percentage of the raise, and clauses that make the fee payable on rounds the programme did not introduce.

In India

Arranging an issue of securities for a fee can be merchant banking under the SEBI (Merchant Bankers) Regulations, but whether a placement agent for an unlisted company's private placement needs that registration is not settled. The Companies Act also limits what you can pay: Section 40(6) allows commission for procuring subscriptions only on prescribed conditions, and Rule 13 of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014 requires your articles to authorise it and caps it at 5 percent of the share price. Those conditions are written mainly for public issues, but the cautious course in a private round is to follow them. The fee is also a service attracting GST, and TDS under Section 194H or 194J of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026).

Code of conductThe programme's behavioural rules that bind cohort members, mentors and staff, and that you are usually asked to accept by reference.
Also called: Cohort rules, Community guidelines, House rules

In plain English

A code of conduct is the only document that binds the people in the room who are not parties to your agreement: other founders, mentors and visiting investors. It typically covers respectful behaviour, harassment, conflicts of interest and confidentiality of what other companies share. It is enforced by the programme, not by you, so it protects you only as far as the programme is willing to act. The trap is agreeing to a code 'as amended from time to time' and making a 'material breach' of it a ground for expulsion; get the document attached and the breach defined.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad's Clause 16 made a material breach of its Schedule 5 code by a founder a non-participation event leading to expulsion, while the accelerator's own duty was only to 'enforce it fairly' against mentors and other cohort members.

What is normal

Attached as a schedule in about two-thirds of Indian programme agreements; a breach-reporting route to someone other than the programme director in the better half.

Watch out for

Codes incorporated by reference, undefined 'material breach', and reliance on the code instead of an NDA for anything commercially sensitive you share with a mentor.

In India

A programme with 10 or more employees must have an Internal Committee under the Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act 2013; a code cannot stop a founder or employee from making a POSH complaint, giving evidence, or reporting a crime, whatever its non-disparagement wording.

Government schemes

SISFS and the other Central and State schemes an incubator can route to you

Startup India Seed Fund Scheme (SISFS)DPIIT's scheme giving DPIIT-recognised startups up to ₹20 lakh as a grant and up to ₹50 lakh as debt or convertibles, routed through approved incubators.
Also called: SISFS, Seed Fund Scheme, Startup India seed fund

In plain English

SISFS is the Central Government's seed money for very early startups. DPIIT allocates a corpus to incubators approved by an Experts Advisory Committee; each incubator's own Incubator Seed Management Committee selects startups and sanctions support. Two instruments: a grant of up to ₹20 lakh for proof of concept, prototype development or product trials, paid in milestone-based instalments; and up to ₹50 lakh for market entry, commercialisation or scaling through convertible debentures, debt or debt-linked instruments, at interest not above the repo rate, for up to 60 months with a moratorium of up to 12 months, unsecured. Each form of support is available once. Incubators may not charge any fee, in cash or kind.

Worked example

Saffron Labs received a ₹20 lakh SISFS grant from Chamundi TBI in June 2023, in tranches of ₹8 lakh, ₹7 lakh and ₹5 lakh against two milestones, with a Chartered Accountant's utilisation certificate for each tranche and no equity.

What is normal

Grants of ₹10 lakh to ₹20 lakh in 2 to 4 tranches; debt or CCD support of ₹25 lakh to ₹50 lakh; selection within 45 days of application under the Scheme.

Watch out for

The once-each rule (one grant, one debt or convertible), the ₹10 lakh prior-support test, the 2-year incorporation test at the application date, and incubators that attach equity or fees. The Scheme's June 2026 playbook stated that the last date for startups to apply was 31 May 2026 with disbursals ongoing; check the portal for the current window.

In India

Administered by DPIIT, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, through seedfund.startupindia.gov.in. Eligibility: DPIIT recognition; incorporated not more than 2 years before application; technology in the core product, service or business model; not more than ₹10 lakh of monetary support under any other Central or State scheme (excluding prize money, subsidised space, founder allowance, lab and prototyping access); Indian promoters holding at least 51 percent at application; no earlier SISFS support of the same kind.

Experts Advisory Committee (EAC)The DPIIT-constituted committee that approves incubators under SISFS, allocates the seed fund to them and monitors the Scheme.
Also called: EAC, SISFS Experts Advisory Committee

In plain English

The EAC sits at the top of the Scheme. It selects which incubators receive a seed fund corpus, decides how much each gets, reviews their progress at least quarterly, and can stop further funding to an incubator that performs poorly or misuses funds. It does not select startups; that is the incubator's ISMC. For you, the EAC matters in two ways: your incubator's approval by the EAC is what makes the grant available at all, and the EAC's directions on matters within the Scheme bind both you and the incubator through the agreement.

Worked example

Chamundi TBI's agreement with Saffron recited the EAC's approval of the incubator and gave the EAC and DPIIT the right to inspect Saffron's grant records; the grievance clause required both parties to follow any EAC direction on a Scheme matter.

What is normal

The EAC meets at least quarterly under the guidelines; incubator sanctions have typically been ₹1 crore to ₹5 crore per incubator. An incubator receives up to ₹5 crore in milestone-based instalments plus a 5 percent management fee (paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2), may give not more than 20 percent of that grant as grants to startups, so most of the pot is meant for debt or convertible support (paragraph 8.2), and gets no further drawdown if it has used less than half its commitment within two years (paragraph 5.7).

Watch out for

An incubator whose EAC approval has lapsed or whose drawdown has been stopped cannot pay your later tranches; ask for the approval status before you sign.

In India

Constituted by DPIIT under paragraph 4 of the Scheme guidelines: an eminent chairperson, DPIIT officials, representatives of DBT, DST, MeitY, ICAR and NITI Aayog, and at least three expert members. Incubators receive their commitment of up to ₹5 crore in milestone-based instalments (paragraph 5.1).

Incubator Seed Management Committee (ISMC)The committee each SISFS incubator forms to evaluate applications, select startups, sanction support and review milestones.
Also called: ISMC, Seed management committee

In plain English

The ISMC is the body that actually decides your grant. Under the guidelines it includes the incubator's nominee as chair, a representative of the State Government's startup nodal team, a venture capital or angel network representative, an industry domain expert, an academic domain expert and two successful entrepreneurs, with the composition approved by the EAC. It scores applications on need, feasibility, impact, novelty, team, fund utilisation plan and presentation, must select within 45 days of application, and later confirms milestone achievement, approves revisions to the plan and recommends clawback. It meets quarterly at most incubators, which sets the rhythm of your tranches.

Worked example

Chamundi TBI's ISMC selected Saffron on 6 June 2023, 13 days after the application, and later confirmed Milestone 1 in September 2023 and Milestone 2 in January 2024, each time releasing the next tranche within 30 days of confirmation.

What is normal

Quarterly meetings; 30 to 45 days from application to decision; milestone confirmations at the next meeting after a completion report, so 30 to 90 days between achievement and money.

Watch out for

ISMC members from your own sector seeing your progress reports without a confidentiality undertaking, and milestone decisions deferred a quarter because a meeting was missed.

In India

Composition and role are set by paragraphs 7.1 and 7.2 of the Scheme guidelines; the EAC approves the composition. Members should sign confidentiality and conflict declarations; ask your incubator to confirm they have.

SISFS debt and convertible supportThe Scheme's ₹50 lakh component: convertible debentures, debt or debt-linked instruments at interest not above the repo rate, up to 60 months, unsecured.
Also called: SISFS investment component, Seed fund CCD, Seed fund loan

In plain English

Beyond the grant, an incubator can provide up to ₹50 lakh for market entry, commercialisation or scaling. The guidelines fix the terms: interest not more than the prevailing repo rate, a tenure fixed by the incubator at sanction and not more than 60 months, a moratorium of up to 12 months, no security and no promoter or third-party guarantee. Incubators prefer convertible debentures to plain loans because a pre-revenue borrower rarely repays on schedule; a CCD converts to equity at your next round, so it is dilutive in the end. Each form is available once, so a grant for the prototype does not rule out debt later.

Worked example

Saffron took the ₹20 lakh grant and not the debt. A startup with early revenue might instead have taken ₹50 lakh of CCDs at a 6.5 percent coupon (the repo rate through most of 2023), converting at a discount to its seed round price, and used it as a bridge to that round.

What is normal

₹25 lakh to ₹50 lakh sanctioned where used; CCDs more common than loans; conversion at a 10 to 25 percent discount to the next priced round or at a cap; open to a startup that has already had a SISFS grant.

Watch out for

Whether the incubator's corpus has debt money left; whether the repo rate is fixed at sanction or floats; CCD conversion terms that are fixed-price rather than discount-based; and the Companies Act debenture formalities a CCD brings.

In India

A CCD is a debenture under Section 71 of the Companies Act 2013, issued by private placement; compulsorily convertible, it is treated as equity under FEMA. Interest on a CCD is interest on securities, so TDS falls under Section 193; Section 194A applies only to interest on a plain loan. The Seed Instruments Explainer covers debenture mechanics, the debenture trustee question and conversion pricing.

Two-year incorporation testA SISFS applicant must have been incorporated not more than 2 years before the date of its application to the incubator.
Also called: Age test, Incorporation window

In plain English

SISFS is for very early companies, so the guidelines require that the startup was incorporated not more than two years before it applies. The date that counts is the application date to the incubator through the Scheme portal, not the ISMC decision or the agreement date. A company incorporated on 14 February 2023 can therefore apply until 13 February 2025. A startup that converted from an LLP or a partnership should check which incorporation date DPIIT recognises, because the recognition certificate and the Scheme portal use the same date.

Worked example

Saffron, incorporated 14 February 2023, applied on 24 May 2023 at three months old; its recital in Clause 2 of the agreement warranted the incorporation date and the two-year test at the application date.

What is normal

Most SISFS beneficiaries are 6 to 20 months old at application; applying in the first six months is common for founders coming out of a pre-incubation or NIDHI-PRAYAS programme.

Watch out for

Applying in month 23 and being selected in month 25 is fine, since the test is at application; missing the window because the incubator's call for applications opens late is the real risk.

In India

Paragraph 3.1 of the Scheme guidelines. DPIIT recognition itself is available to entities up to 10 years from incorporation (20 for deep-tech) with turnover under ₹200 crore (₹300 crore for deep-tech), so recognition does not imply SISFS eligibility.

51 percent Indian promoter testIndian promoters must hold at least 51 percent of a SISFS applicant at the time of its application to the incubator.
Also called: Indian ownership test, Promoter shareholding test

In plain English

The guidelines require that shareholding by Indian promoters is at least 51 percent at the time of application, as defined under the Companies Act 2013 and SEBI's ICDR Regulations. 'Promoters' here means the founders who control the company, and 'Indian' is usually read as resident Indian citizens. The test is at the application date, so a non-resident investor coming in after you apply is a change to report, not a disqualification; a non-resident co-founder holding 50 percent on the application date is a disqualification. Most incubators ask for a shareholding pattern certified by a chartered accountant or company secretary as at the application date.

Worked example

Saffron's two founders held 100 percent at application in May 2023, so the test was met with room to spare; the agreement required intimation of any later foreign investment but gave the incubator no veto over it.

What is normal

Founders at 60 to 100 percent at the SISFS stage; the test only bites where a non-resident co-founder or an early foreign investor holds a large stake before application.

Watch out for

An NRI co-founder's shares counting as non-Indian for this test even where FEMA treats the investment on a non-repatriation basis; confirm the incubator's reading before applying.

In India

Paragraph 3.1 of the Scheme guidelines; 'promoter' as defined in Section 2(69) of the Companies Act 2013 and Regulation 2(1)(oo) of the SEBI (ICDR) Regulations 2018. A foreign investor after application is reported under FEMA (Form FC-GPR within 30 days of allotment) and intimated to the incubator.

₹10 lakh prior-support testA SISFS applicant must not have received more than ₹10 lakh of monetary support under any other Central or State Government scheme.
Also called: Prior government support test, Other scheme cap

In plain English

The Scheme is meant for startups that have not already been funded by government, so an applicant that has received more than ₹10 lakh of monetary support under any other Central or State scheme is ineligible. The guidelines exclude prize money from competitions and grand challenges, subsidised working space, a founder's monthly allowance, access to labs and access to prototyping facilities, which do not count. A NIDHI-PRAYAS prototyping grant, a State seed fund grant or a MeitY TIDE grant does count. The test is at the application date, so grants received after you apply are intimated, not disqualifying, though funding the same expense twice is always misuse.

Worked example

Saffron had received nothing from any scheme before May 2023, so the recital was simple. A founder who had taken a ₹10 lakh NIDHI-PRAYAS grant and a ₹5 lakh State grant before applying would fail the test; one who had won ₹5 lakh in a hackathon and used a subsidised desk would pass.

What is normal

Most SISFS applicants have received nil to ₹5 lakh of prior scheme money; founders sequence SISFS first and other grants after the application date for this reason.

Watch out for

Reimbursement-type State benefits (patent cost reimbursement, marketing assistance) that count as monetary support; and the temptation to leave a small grant off the self-declaration, which is a false recital and a clawback trigger.

In India

Paragraph 3.1 of the Scheme guidelines. Disclose every government benefit in the application and let the ISMC apply the exclusions; the agreement's eligibility recital is a warranty and misstatement leads to refund with interest and debarment.

NIDHI-PRAYASDST's prototyping grant for innovators and early startups, delivered through PRAYAS centres hosted by TBIs.
Also called: PRAYAS, Promoting and Accelerating Young and Aspiring technology entrepreneurS, NIDHI-PRAYAS 2.0

In plain English

NIDHI-PRAYAS is the Department of Science and Technology's grant for turning an idea into a working prototype. It is delivered through PRAYAS centres, which are TBIs selected by DST, and is available to individual innovators as well as DPIIT-recognised startups. The current version, NIDHI-PRAYAS 2.0, provides up to ₹20 lakh per innovator or startup at a PRAYAS centre, and up to ₹40 lakh at an Advanced PRAYAS centre, as per DPIIT's June 2026 schemes playbook. A PRAYAS grant counts as monetary support for the SISFS ₹10 lakh test, so founders who want both usually apply to SISFS first.

Worked example

A hardware founder who takes a ₹15 lakh PRAYAS grant to build a prototype and then applies to SISFS would fail the ₹10 lakh prior-support test; the same founder who applies to SISFS first and takes PRAYAS afterwards passes, and simply reports the later grant to the incubator.

What is normal

Prototyping grants of ₹5 lakh to ₹20 lakh over 12 to 18 months, with the PRAYAS centre providing lab access and a mentor; the grant is to the innovator or startup, not for equity.

Watch out for

Treating PRAYAS and SISFS as stackable in either order; the sequence decides eligibility. Also the eligibility limits (startup not more than 5 years old, turnover not above ₹1 crore) stated in the playbook.

In India

Department of Science and Technology under the NIDHI programme (nidhi.dst.gov.in). Amounts and eligibility as published in DPIIT's Startup Schemes Playbook, June 2026; confirm on the DST page before relying on them.

NIDHI Seed Support Programme (SSP)DST's seed support for startups incubated at TBIs, administered by the TBI's Seed Support Management Committee.
Also called: NIDHI-SSP, NIDHI Seed Support System, DST seed support

In plain English

The NIDHI Seed Support Programme gives DST-supported TBIs a corpus to provide seed support to their incubatees, as equity, debt or a mix, decided by the TBI's own Seed Support Management Committee. Unlike SISFS, the support can be equity-linked, so the TBI may become a small shareholder. DPIIT's June 2026 playbook summarises it as up to ₹1 crore per startup, subject to TBI guidelines. It is a separate scheme from SISFS with separate committees, and a startup can be a beneficiary of both, subject to the SISFS ₹10 lakh test at the SISFS application date.

Worked example

A TBI that is both DST-supported and SISFS-approved could offer a startup a SISFS grant for the prototype and, a year later, NIDHI-SSP equity-linked support for scaling; the two agreements would be separate, with the SSP one carrying real equity terms to negotiate.

What is normal

SSP support of ₹25 lakh to ₹1 crore where used, often as equity at a negotiated valuation or as a soft loan; tenure and terms set by each TBI's guidelines.

Watch out for

Equity terms in an SSP agreement are negotiable and should be benchmarked like an angel deal; a TBI holding equity also becomes a party to your shareholders' agreement at the next round.

In India

Department of Science and Technology, NIDHI programme (nidhi.dst.gov.in). Any equity issued to a TBI is a preferential issue under Section 62(1)(c) at a registered valuer's price; a TBI that is a society may hold shares in a company.

MeitY TIDE 2.0The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology's incubation scheme providing grants to technology startups through TIDE centres.
Also called: TIDE 2.0, Technology Incubation and Development of Entrepreneurs

In plain English

TIDE 2.0 is MeitY's scheme for incubating startups that use emerging technologies (IoT, AI, blockchain, robotics and similar) in domains of national importance. MeitY funds TIDE centres hosted by academic and research institutions, and the centres provide grants and incubation to startups. DPIIT's June 2026 playbook describes proof-of-concept grants of up to ₹7 lakh, with larger support varying by centre and component. A TIDE grant counts as monetary support for the SISFS ₹10 lakh test, so sequence it after a SISFS application if you want both.

Worked example

A startup building an IoT monitoring product for factories could take a TIDE 2.0 proof-of-concept grant from a TIDE centre at an engineering institute, then apply to SISFS at a different incubator; disclosure of the TIDE grant is mandatory and, if it exceeded ₹10 lakh, disqualifying.

What is normal

Proof-of-concept grants of ₹4 lakh to ₹7 lakh; later-stage support at the centre's discretion; incubation of 12 to 24 months at the TIDE centre.

Watch out for

Technology-domain eligibility (the scheme is for emerging-technology startups, not all software), and reporting obligations to the centre and MeitY that resemble SISFS's.

In India

Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (meity.gov.in). Amounts as stated in DPIIT's Startup Schemes Playbook, June 2026; confirm with the TIDE centre.

Startup India Hub and the Scheme portalDPIIT's Startup India platform through which recognition, SISFS applications and progress reporting run.
Also called: Startup India portal, SISFS portal, seedfund.startupindia.gov.in

In plain English

Startup India is DPIIT's programme and its online hub is where everything happens: you obtain DPIIT recognition (the prerequisite for SISFS, Section 80-IAC benefits and more), apply to up to three incubators under SISFS, and are tracked after selection. Incubators upload your progress data, milestone status and fund utilisation to the Scheme portal in real time, where the EAC reviews it quarterly. Grievances go to a grievance cell the Scheme guidelines set up at DPIIT; check the portal or DPIIT for how to reach it. Treat the portal as a reporting counterparty: what goes there is seen by government, and the agreement should list what is uploaded.

Worked example

Saffron obtained DPIIT recognition in May 2023 through the hub, applied to Chamundi TBI through the SISFS portal on 24 May 2023, and its quarterly reports were uploaded by the incubator for the 12 months of incubation.

What is normal

DPIIT recognition is typically granted within 2 to 10 working days of a complete application; SISFS applications may be made to up to three incubators at a time.

Watch out for

Data you report to the incubator goes to the portal; keep source code and customer identities out of progress reports unless the format requires them.

In India

DPIIT, Ministry of Commerce and Industry (startupindia.gov.in and seedfund.startupindia.gov.in). DPIIT recognition is now governed by notification G.S.R. 108(E), which revised the 2019 definition: an entity up to 10 years from incorporation (20 for deep-tech) with turnover under ₹200 crore (₹300 crore for deep-tech), working on innovation or scalable business models. The Startup India Eligibility tool on this site tests the criteria.

Fund of Funds for Startups (FFS)The ₹10,000 crore Central corpus, operated by SIDBI, that invests in SEBI-registered AIFs which in turn invest in startups.
Also called: FFS, Startup India Fund of Funds, SIDBI Fund of Funds, FoF 2.0

In plain English

The Fund of Funds does not invest in startups directly. The Government committed ₹10,000 crore to it, SIDBI manages it, and it commits capital to SEBI-registered Alternative Investment Funds (venture funds), which must invest at least twice the FFS contribution in startups. A second ₹10,000 crore Fund of Funds 2.0 was announced in the Union Budget 2025-26 with priority for deep-tech and manufacturing. For a founder, the relevance is indirect: a fund 'backed by FFS' is a domestic rupee fund with government money in its limited partner base, which brings some reporting expectations and a preference for DPIIT-recognised startups, but no scheme-style conditions on you.

Worked example

Marigold Capital Partners Fund II, Saffron's Series A investor, is a domestic Category II AIF; had FFS been among its limited partners, Saffron's DPIIT recognition would have helped Marigold meet its FFS startup-investment commitment, but Saffron's agreement with Marigold would have been unaffected.

What is normal

FFS commitments to AIFs of ₹25 crore to ₹250 crore; AIFs then invest ₹2 crore to ₹50 crore per startup; well over 100 AIFs have FFS backing.

Watch out for

An AIF with FFS money is still a private investor with the full Series A term sheet; 'government-backed' does not mean softer terms.

In India

Operated by SIDBI under DPIIT's Startup India action plan (sidbi.in, startupindia.gov.in). AIFs are registered under the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations 2012. Fund of Funds 2.0 was announced in the Union Budget 2025-26; see DPIIT's June 2026 schemes playbook for its current status.

Credit Guarantee Scheme for Startups (CGSS)DPIIT's scheme guaranteeing loans by banks, NBFCs and AIFs to DPIIT-recognised startups, so that they can borrow without collateral.
Also called: CGSS, Startup credit guarantee

In plain English

CGSS lets a lender give a DPIIT-recognised startup a loan without collateral because a government-backed trust guarantees part of the exposure. It is a lending scheme, not a grant: you borrow from a member bank, NBFC or AIF at the lender's rate, and the guarantee makes the lender willing. DPIIT's June 2026 playbook puts the maximum guarantee at ₹20 crore per eligible borrower, or the actual outstanding, whichever is less. For a company past the prototype stage with revenue, it is the route to venture debt or working capital without pledging founder assets.

Worked example

At Series A, Saffron's board considered a ₹3 crore working capital line from an NBFC under CGSS to fund receivables from manufacturing customers without a founder guarantee; the SHA's reserved matters required Investor Majority consent for borrowing above ₹2 crore.

What is normal

Loans of ₹50 lakh to ₹10 crore under CGSS at rates of 11 to 16 percent from NBFCs; guarantee cover and fees per the scheme's current operating guidelines.

Watch out for

The guarantee protects the lender, not you; the company still owes the money, and covenants, charges over receivables and events of default apply as in any loan.

In India

Notified by DPIIT in October 2022 and operated through the National Credit Guarantee Trustee Company (startupindia.gov.in). Borrowing above thresholds typically needs board and, under your SHA, investor consent; a charge over assets must be registered in Form CHG-1 within 30 days.

State startup policiesEach State's own startup policy, with seed grants, reimbursements and incubator support that count towards the SISFS ₹10 lakh test.
Also called: State seed fund, State startup scheme, Elevate (Karnataka)

In plain English

Most States run a startup policy with its own benefits: seed grants, patent and marketing reimbursements, subsidised incubation, and sometimes a State fund of funds. Karnataka's Elevate programme and the Startup Karnataka seed fund are the examples for Saffron's State; other States have equivalents administered by their startup cells or nodal agencies. The benefits are real but modest, usually ₹5 lakh to ₹50 lakh, and a State grant counts as monetary support for the SISFS ₹10 lakh test, so timing matters. State benefits usually require the company to be registered in and to operate from the State.

Worked example

Saffron, a Karnataka company incubated at a Karnataka TBI, could have applied to Elevate after its SISFS application; a ₹20 lakh Elevate grant before the SISFS application would have made it ineligible for SISFS.

What is normal

State seed grants of ₹5 lakh to ₹50 lakh; reimbursements of patent, trademark and marketing costs of ₹1 lakh to ₹10 lakh; State incubator seat subsidies.

Watch out for

Residency and employment conditions (a share of employees from the State), reporting to the State nodal agency, and the SISFS sequencing problem. Do not rely on scheme amounts you have not confirmed on the State's own portal.

In India

Each State's startup policy is a State executive scheme, not a statute; Karnataka's is administered through the Department of Electronics, IT, Biotechnology and Science and Technology and its startup cell. State benefits are monetary support for the SISFS test unless they fall within the guidelines' exclusions.

Incubator managerThe incubator's chief executive or programme head who runs incubation day to day, convenes the ISMC and is your first point of contact.
Also called: Incubator CEO, Programme manager, Nodal officer

In plain English

Behind every incubation agreement is a person who decides how it works in practice: the incubator's chief executive or manager. In a SISFS incubator this person usually processes applications, convenes the Incubator Seed Management Committee, assigns your mentor, books lab time, chases your reports and uploads data to the Scheme portal. The manager does not approve tranches alone; the committee does. But a good manager gets your milestone report onto the next committee agenda, and a slow one can cost you a quarter.

Worked example

At Chamundi TBI the chief executive's office received Saffron's application of 24 May 2023 and put it before the ISMC, which selected Saffron on 6 June 2023. Under the agreement the CEO is also the first stop for any grievance, with 15 days to reply before the Startup can escalate through the Scheme.

What is normal

One manager or CEO with a small team looking after 20 to 60 startups; committee meetings at least quarterly; replies to routine requests within 7 to 15 days; a named contact in the notices schedule.

Watch out for

Promises made in emails or meetings that are not in the agreement, such as a faster tranche, an extra seat or a waived report: the entire-agreement clause wipes them out. Get any concession recorded in an ISMC-approved addendum, which is how Saffron's agreement requires changes to be made.

In India

Under SISFS the decisions on selection, tranches and misuse belong to the incubator's ISMC, not to the manager; in DST's TBI model the chief executive reports to a governing body. Put the manager's designation and email in the notices schedule so that a request to them counts as notice.

Money, milestones and compliance

Tranches, certificates, permitted expenses, tax and clawback

Milestone-based disbursementPaying a grant in instalments, each released only after the previous milestone is verified and the money already received is accounted for.
Also called: Tranche-wise release, Milestone-linked instalments

In plain English

Scheme money does not arrive in one cheque. The incubator releases the grant in tranches, and each later tranche is tied to a milestone written into the agreement: a working prototype, a signed pilot, a trial report. Before the next tranche moves, the ISMC checks the proof you submit and the utilisation certificate for the money already spent. The design protects public money, but it also sets your runway: if a milestone slips by three months, so does your next instalment.

Worked example

Saffron's ₹20 lakh came as ₹8 lakh within 15 days of signing, ₹7 lakh after Milestone 1 (a working prototype at one plant with a signed pilot letter) and ₹5 lakh after Milestone 2 (pilot or paid agreements with two customers and a trial report). The ISMC had 45 days to consider each completion report, and each tranche followed within 30 days of its confirmation.

What is normal

Two to four tranches over 12 to 24 months; 30 to 50 percent released on signing; later tranches within 30 to 60 days of the committee confirming the milestone; part-release or a revised milestone where the target is mostly met. Saffron's 40, 35 and 25 percent split is typical.

Watch out for

Milestones that depend on someone else's decision, such as a customer's purchase order or a government approval; vague milestones like 'market traction'; no deadline for the committee to decide; and no right to a part-release when a milestone is mostly met. Ask for objective, dated milestones you control.

In India

The SISFS guidelines require grants to be released in milestone-based instalments. The milestones and the Fund Utilisation Plan are approved by the incubator's ISMC with your selection, so changing either later needs an ISMC-approved addendum, not an email from the incubator's staff.

Permitted expensesThe heads of spending a grant may fund under the approved Fund Utilisation Plan; spending outside them is misuse.
Also called: Eligible expenditure, Fund Utilisation Plan heads

In plain English

A grant agreement lists what the money may buy, usually by reference to a Fund Utilisation Plan approved with your application. Under SISFS the grant is for proof of concept, prototype development and product trials, so the usual heads are cloud and tools, test devices, trial deployments, travel to pilot sites and the people working on the project. Land, buildings, loan repayments, dividends and anything unrelated to the approved project are out. Spending outside the list is the usual route to a clawback.

Worked example

Saffron's plan had five heads: prototype development, product trials, project manpower (a founder's pay only as the plan stated), market entry and validation, and professional fees for the accountant's certificates and IP filings. It could move up to 10 percent of the grant, ₹2 lakh, between heads with intimation in the next quarterly report; anything more needed the ISMC's prior written approval.

What is normal

Five to eight heads mapped to the project; 10 to 20 percent of the grant movable between heads without prior approval; equipment allowed where it is used in the project; founder pay allowed only where the approved plan names it and caps it.

Watch out for

Founder salaries are the classic trap. The Scheme guidelines say nothing about salaries: they confine the grant to proof of concept, prototype development and product trials and bar spending on facilities (paragraph 8.1), so whether project staff, or a founder, can be paid from the grant depends on the Fund Utilisation Plan your incubator's ISMC approves. Paying yourself without a line in that plan is diversion. Also watch GST on inputs (if you claim the credit, the grant has not borne it) and bills dated before the agreement, which most incubators will not accept.

In India

The SISFS guidelines confine the grant to validation of proof of concept, prototype development or product trials, and bar Scheme funds from creating facilities or buildings. The treatment of founders' own salaries is a point to confirm with your incubator, so get the answer into the approved plan before you sign.

Procurement normsThe rules for buying with grant money: quotations above a threshold, invoices in the company's name and payment through its bank account.
Also called: Purchase rules, Quotation requirement

In plain English

Because a grant is public money, the agreement imports a light version of government purchasing discipline. Above a value threshold you collect competing quotations or record why one supplier was the only sensible choice. Every bill is in the company's name, paid from the company's bank account and kept for inspection. Purchases from a founder's relative or another business you control need disclosure and an arm's-length price. These are the things your certifying accountant tests before signing the utilisation certificate.

Worked example

Saffron's agreement required at least two quotations for any purchase above ₹50,000. For ₹1,80,000 of rugged tablets for the plant pilot it filed three quotes with the invoice; for the renewal of its existing cloud plan it recorded a single-source justification instead. Both passed when its accountant certified the Tranche 2 spending.

What is normal

Two or three quotations for purchases above ₹25,000 to ₹1 lakh; single-source purchases allowed with a written reason; no splitting of orders; payments by bank transfer, not cash; related-party purchases disclosed and priced at arm's length.

Watch out for

Splitting one order into several bills to stay under the threshold; buying from a founder's other business without disclosure; and paying vendors in cash or from a founder's personal card. Each is a finding your certifying accountant must report, and diversion to a related party is a misuse event.

In India

No statute fixes procurement rules for a private company spending a grant; they come from the agreement and the incubator's own policy, which often borrows from the General Financial Rules 2017. Cash expenditure above ₹10,000 a day to one person is also disallowed for income tax under Section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026).

Utilisation certificate (UC)A Chartered Accountant's certificate of how much grant was received, spent under each approved head and left unspent, needed before each next tranche.
Also called: UC, Fund utilisation certificate

In plain English

The utilisation certificate is the document that unlocks your next tranche. A practising Chartered Accountant examines your grant ledger, invoices and bank statements, and certifies the amount received, the amount spent under each head of the approved plan, the interest earned and the balance in hand, with a statement of expenditure and copies of the bills. The incubator relies on it for its own reporting to the Scheme, so errors travel upwards. A false certificate is a misuse event for you and a disciplinary matter for the accountant.

Worked example

For Tranche 1, Saffron's accountant certified ₹8,00,000 received; ₹7,62,400 spent (prototype ₹3,10,000, trials ₹1,45,000, project manpower ₹2,60,000, professional fees ₹47,400); ₹2,180 of interest earned; and ₹39,780 in hand, with a UDIN. The ISMC released Tranche 2 against it after confirming Milestone 1.

What is normal

One certificate per tranche before the next is released, and a final audited certificate for the whole grant within 30 to 60 days of the project's end; fees of ₹5,000 to ₹25,000 per certificate for a startup grant, payable from the grant where the plan allows.

Watch out for

A certifying accountant who is related to a founder or also keeps your books, which weakens the independence the incubator relies on; expenses booked under the wrong head; GST shown as spent when you claimed the input tax credit; and certificates without a UDIN, which an incubator can reject.

In India

ICAI requires a UDIN (Unique Document Identification Number) on every certificate a practising chartered accountant signs, so the incubator can verify it online, and its Guidance Note on Reports or Certificates for Special Purposes governs the wording. Saffron's agreement also bars the certifying accountant from conducting any special audit the incubator orders.

Grant certificate formatsThe prescribed layouts for an accountant's grant certificates, which fix what must be certified, how expenditure is shown and what is annexed.
Also called: UC format, Schedule 4 format, GFR 12-A format

In plain English

A grant agreement does not leave the wording of the certificate to your accountant. It annexes a format that fixes what must be certified: amounts received, spending per head, interest, balance, assets bought and a statement that the money was used for the approved purpose. Your accountant certifies against that format after examining the records and may qualify any line the evidence does not support. Get the format on the day you sign, not when the tranche is due, so the books are kept to match it from the first rupee.

Worked example

Saffron's Schedule 4 format asked for the amount received, spending under each Fund Utilisation Plan head, interest earned and the unspent balance, with a statement of expenditure, invoices and bank statements annexed. Its accountant mapped the grant ledger to those lines from the first month, so each certificate took two days to prepare, not two weeks.

What is normal

A one or two page certificate with a head-wise statement of expenditure, a list of assets bought from the grant and a UDIN; the final certificate reconciled to the audited accounts; a special audit, if ordered, on the incubator's own terms of reference and at its cost.

Watch out for

Formats that ask the accountant to certify outcomes, such as 'the milestone was achieved', rather than money: an accountant can certify what the books and documents show, not that a prototype works. Also watch a format that changes mid-project; ask for the version in force at signing to apply.

In India

ICAI's Guidance Note on Reports or Certificates for Special Purposes governs how a practising chartered accountant words and qualifies a certificate. For Central grants-in-aid the General Financial Rules 2017 prescribe Form GFR 12-A, which many incubators adapt; SISFS incubators use the Scheme's format or their own.

Progress reportThe periodic report, usually quarterly, a funded startup sends its incubator on milestones, spending, team, customers and money raised elsewhere.
Also called: Quarterly Progress Report, Monitoring report

In plain English

The progress report is how the incubator, and through it the Scheme, watches the grant between tranches. In the Scheme's format you report milestones achieved, technical progress, customers and pilots, team changes, money spent and any money raised from elsewhere. It is not a pitch: the ISMC compares each report with the last one, with the utilisation certificate and with what it sees on site visits. A late report is the easiest compliance failure to avoid, and it can hold up the next tranche.

Worked example

Saffron filed four quarterly reports over its 12-month incubation, each within 15 days of the quarter's end. The report covering October 2023 disclosed the angels' ₹1 crore through an iSAFE and a convertible note, and the one covering March 2024 disclosed the ₹1.75 crore of new seed money, because the format asks for funds raised from any other source.

What is normal

Quarterly reports due 10 to 30 days after each quarter ends, in the scheme's template; a separate milestone completion report with proof for each tranche; audited annual accounts within 30 to 60 days of adoption; a final report within 60 days of the project's end.

Watch out for

Reports that tell a different story from the utilisation certificate or the pitch deck; silence about a pivot, a founder's exit or new funding, each of which also needs a separate intimation; and survival clauses that keep reporting alive after graduation without an end date.

In India

The incubator uploads your progress data to the SISFS portal on the Startup India Hub, where DPIIT and the Experts Advisory Committee use it to monitor the Scheme. Keep each report consistent with your audited accounts and MCA filings, which the ISMC can check.

Grant clawbackThe incubator's right to recover grant money, usually with interest, when it was misused, obtained on false information or double-funded.
Also called: Refund clause, Recovery of grant

In plain English

A clawback clause turns a grant back into a debt if you break its conditions. The fair version is narrow: it bites on spending outside the approved heads, false eligibility statements, false certificates or reports, diversion to founders or related parties, and undisclosed double funding of the same costs, after notice and a chance to respond. It does not bite because the product failed, a milestone was missed or you changed direction in good faith. Unspent money at the end is returned under the exit clause, not clawed back as a penalty.

Worked example

Had Saffron spent ₹3 lakh of Tranche 1 on a founder's personal laptop and travel, the incubator could demand ₹3 lakh plus interest at 12 percent a year from disbursement: ₹3,24,000 eight months later, payable within 60 days, with possible debarment. An honest pilot failure would have cost nothing.

What is normal

Recovery limited to the amount affected; interest at the rate the agreement states, from the date of misuse rather than disbursement where you can get it; 15 to 30 days' notice to respond; 60 to 90 days to pay; and an express carve-out for honest failure and for money properly spent.

Watch out for

Recovery of the whole grant for any breach, including a late report; interest from the date of disbursement rather than the date of misuse; founders made personally liable for the company's refund; and no right to be heard by the committee before the decision.

In India

There is no statutory clawback for SISFS grants: the right is contractual, so its scope is whatever the agreement says. Nothing in the Scheme as notified makes an honest failure a refund event, and the incubator, as custodian of public money, may report misuse to DPIIT.

Blacklisting (debarment)Barring a startup, and sometimes its founders, from a scheme and an incubator's programmes after misuse of public money, on top of any refund.
Also called: Debarment, Exclusion from the Scheme

In plain English

Blacklisting is the reputational sanction that sits beside a clawback. The incubator reports the misuse to the scheme's administrator, and the startup, sometimes with its founders personally, is barred from further support under that scheme and the incubator's programmes. Because each form of SISFS support is available only once, the practical sting is wider: other incubators, State programmes and government buyers ask about past debarment, and a founder named in one carries it into the next company. It should follow only proven misuse, after a hearing.

Worked example

In Saffron's agreement, a misuse event let the incubator report to DPIIT, and the startup and its founders 'may be debarred from the Scheme and the Incubator's programmes'. If Ananya Rao later started a second company, she would have to disclose a debarment wherever a grant or tender application asks about it, and many government applications do.

What is normal

Debarment only for proven misuse, false information or diversion; written notice and 15 to 30 days to respond; a stated period rather than an indefinite bar; and founders named only where they were personally involved.

Watch out for

Founders named personally for a company breach they had no part in; debarment from 'all government schemes', which an incubator cannot impose and should not claim to; no end date; and no review by the scheme authority. Ask for the bar to be limited to the Scheme and the incubator's own programmes.

In India

A startup grant agreement's debarment is contractual: it binds only the parties and the programmes it names, though a ministry may separately decide whom it funds. Disclose any past debarment in full; concealing it is itself a false representation and a refund ground under most eligibility recitals.

GST on grantsWhether a grant attracts GST; usually not, because money given with nothing supplied in return is not consideration for a supply.
Also called: GST on subsidies, Grant as consideration

In plain English

GST is charged on a supply of goods or services made for consideration. A grant passed on by a government-supported incubator to help you build your own product buys nothing from you: the incubator gets no service, no licence and no equity. On that analysis the grant is outside GST and no invoice is raised for it. The answer changes if the 'grant' is really payment for something, such as a pilot delivered to the funder, exclusive rights, or a report the funder will use commercially.

Worked example

Saffron received its ₹20 lakh with no invoice and no GST, because the agreement records that the grant is not consideration for any supply. The ₹5,000 monthly seat fee was different in kind, a supply of a service, but it carried no GST either, because a TBI recognised by DST's NSTEDB supplies its services at a nil rate.

What is normal

No GST on scheme grants with no deliverable to the funder; the grant recorded in the books with a note citing the no-consideration clause; 18 percent GST as usual on taxable seat and programme fees and on what you sell, subject to the exemption for an incubatee's own services (entry 44 of Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)), which covers sales up to ₹50 lakh of turnover in a financial year, and only if you work from the premises of a TBI recognised by DST's NSTEDB under an incubation agreement, your turnover was not above ₹50 lakh in the previous financial year, and three years have not passed since you signed.

Watch out for

Grants tied to deliverables for the funder, such as a report, a licence or a pilot for its benefit, can look like consideration. And if you claim input tax credit on purchases funded by the grant, show them net of the credit in the utilisation certificate, or the same tax is funded twice.

In India

Section 7 of the CGST Act 2017 taxes supplies made for consideration. A SISFS grant is Central money passed on by the incubator and buys nothing from you, so it falls outside GST; Section 2(31), which excludes subsidies given by the Central or a State Government from 'consideration', supports the same answer but is not the main ground. No circular names the Scheme, so confirm the position for your facts.

Income tax on grantsWhether a grant is taxable: the Income-tax Act treats most government grants as income, except the part that reduces the cost of an asset.
Also called: Tax on subsidies, Capital versus revenue receipt

In plain English

Founders once argued that a grant to set up a business was a capital receipt and outside tax. Since AY 2016-17 the Act includes in income any subsidy, grant or cash incentive from the Central or a State Government or any authority, body or agency, except an amount that reduces the cost of an asset. So grant money spent on salaries, cloud and trials is usually income of the year it is received; the part spent on equipment reduces the equipment's cost, and so its depreciation, instead.

Worked example

Saffron's three tranches, ₹20 lakh in all, arrived in FY 2023-24. Suppose ₹2.4 lakh bought test devices: that cuts the devices' cost and depreciation, and the other ₹17.6 lakh is income of FY 2023-24. If the company had a tax loss of ₹50 lakh before the grant, the loss to carry forward falls to ₹32.4 lakh and no tax is payable.

What is normal

The common treatment: grant income in the year of receipt, the capital portion deducted from asset cost, and disclosure under AS 12 or Ind AS 20 in the accounts. For a loss-making startup the effect is a smaller carried-forward loss, not a tax bill; for a profitable one, budget tax on the grant.

Watch out for

Crediting the grant to a capital reserve in the books does not take it out of taxable income. Watch the year too: a grant is income of the year it is received if not taxed earlier, so a March receipt is taxed that year even if it is spent in April.

In India

Section 2(24)(xviii) of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026) taxes grants from government or 'any authority or body or agency', which is read to cover a SISFS grant passed on by an incubator; Section 145B(3) taxes it in the year of receipt; Explanation 10 to Section 43(1) handles the asset portion.

GST on seat and programme feesThe 18 percent GST on programme fees and most seat licence fees, usually recoverable as input tax credit; a recognised TBI's services are exempt.
Also called: GST on co-working fees, GST on incubation charges

In plain English

A seat licence and an accelerator's programme are services, so the provider charges GST at 18 percent on its invoice, unless it is a TBI recognised by DST's NSTEDB or a BIRAC bio-incubator, whose services are exempt. If your company is registered for GST and uses the seat or the programme for its business, that tax is input tax credit, which reduces the GST you pay on your own sales. If you are not yet registered, or have no taxable sales, the 18 percent is a straight cost. Where the provider sits decides the invoice: CGST and SGST within your State, IGST across States.

Worked example

Saffron's two seats cost ₹5,000 a month with no GST, because Chamundi, a TBI recognised by DST's NSTEDB, supplies at a nil rate; a taxable incubator in Karnataka would have added CGST ₹450 and SGST ₹450. The accelerator's ₹3 lakh fee would have carried ₹54,000 of IGST, because Deccan Launchpad is in Telangana, recoverable only if Saffron was registered.

What is normal

GST at 18 percent on seat fees, programme fees and paid clinics, except at recognised TBIs and bio-incubators, whose services are exempt; seat fees of ₹3,000 to ₹10,000 a month per seat before GST at government-supported incubators; programme fees from nil to ₹5 lakh plus GST at private accelerators.

Watch out for

Invoices addressed to a founder rather than the company, or without your GSTIN, which block the credit; a fee deducted from your investment, where you still need a proper tax invoice to claim credit; and GST-inclusive quotes that hide the tax in the headline fee.

In India

For a seat licence the place of supply is where the premises are, under Section 12(3) of the IGST Act 2017, so an incubator in your State charges CGST and SGST. For a programme fee to a registered business it is generally where the business is registered (Section 12(2)), so a provider in another State charges IGST. Entry 48 of Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) exempts services of TBIs recognised by DST's NSTEDB and of BIRAC bio-incubators. The exemption for an incubatee's own services (entry 44) covers sales up to ₹50 lakh of turnover in a financial year, and only if you work from the premises of such a recognised TBI under an incubation agreement, your turnover was not above ₹50 lakh in the previous financial year, and three years have not passed since you signed.

TDS on programme feesThe income tax your company must deduct at source from a fee it pays a programme, deposit with the government and certify to the programme.
Also called: TDS on incubation fees, Withholding on programme fees

In plain English

When your company pays a programme a fee above the annual threshold, it must deduct tax at source, deposit it by the 7th of the next month, file a quarterly TDS statement and issue a certificate. Mentoring and workshop fees usually fall under Section 194J of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026); event or production work under Section 194C; a seat fee, as payment for the use of premises and furniture, under Section 194I. Tax is deducted on the fee before separately shown GST.

Worked example

On Deccan Launchpad's ₹3,00,000 fee, Saffron would have deducted ₹6,000 at 2 percent if the fee were technical services, or ₹30,000 at 10 percent if professional, on the fee before the ₹54,000 GST, even though the fee was taken by set-off from the investment. Its own ₹5,000 monthly seat fee was below the rent threshold, so no TDS applied.

What is normal

Section 194J at 2 percent for technical services or 10 percent for professional services once fees to one payee exceed ₹50,000 in a financial year; Section 194C at 2 percent to a company or LLP above ₹30,000 a payment or ₹1 lakh a year; Section 194I on rent above ₹50,000 a month.

Watch out for

A fee 'deducted from the investment' still needs TDS: it is paid by set-off, and the obligation remains. Missing it costs interest of 1 to 1.5 percent a month and the disallowance of 30 percent of the fee under Section 40(a)(ia). Also watch a bundled fee described as professional mentoring but deducted at the 2 percent technical rate.

In India

CBDT Circular 23 of 2017 excludes GST shown separately from the TDS base. Whether mentoring and workshops are 'technical' (2 percent) or 'professional' (10 percent) services is a judgement on the invoice and the facts; deducting at 10 percent is the safer course when in doubt, since the programme can claim the excess back.

Control, brand and exit

IP, publicity, conduct, premises and how each agreement ends

IP in incubationWho owns what you build during a programme: the startup should own all of it, with the programme keeping only its own materials.
Also called: Startup IP, IP ownership clause

In plain English

Programmes rarely try to own your product outright; the risks are subtler. An accelerator may ask for a licence over 'Company materials', which should mean your name and logo, not your code. A university or research incubator may apply the institute's IP policy to work done in its labs or with its staff and students. Mentors may contribute ideas without any assignment. The clean position: the company owns everything it creates before and during the programme, and the programme keeps only its curriculum and equipment.

Worked example

Both of Saffron's documents vested all IP in Saffron. The accelerator kept its curriculum and asked only for a logo licence; Chamundi TBI disclaimed any claim, even to work done on its lab equipment, and asked only for an acknowledgement of Scheme support in publications and notice of any patent or design filed within 30 days.

What is normal

All IP stays with the startup; any programme licence limited to name, logo and a description of 30 to 50 words; acknowledgement of support in papers and patent filings; university incubators sharing only jointly developed IP, with a licence back on agreed terms.

Watch out for

Licences over 'materials' or 'deliverables' wide enough to reach your code; programmes claiming improvements a mentor suggested; university policies that give the institute a share of IP created by faculty or students on your team; and code or a trade mark still held by a founder personally.

In India

Copyright in code a founder wrote before the company existed stays with the founder until assigned in writing under Section 19 of the Copyright Act 1957; trade marks are assigned under the Trade Marks Act 1999. Assign both to the company before the programme starts, or 'the company owns its IP' protects little.

Logo licencePermission for a programme to use your company's name and logo to show you as a participant or portfolio company, and nothing more.
Also called: Name and logo licence, Marketing licence

In plain English

Every programme wants to show its cohort on its website and in its decks; that is fair and usually free advertising for you. The logo licence is the clause that allows it. A good one is non-exclusive and royalty-free, covers your name, logo and a short approved description, is limited to identifying you as a participant or portfolio company, and ends a stated time after the relationship does. It should not cover product screenshots or customer names, or let the programme imply that you endorse it.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad's draft licensed Saffron's name, logo and a description of up to 50 words for as long as the accelerator held any Saffron security and 24 months after, with corrections on 7 days' notice. Under the SISFS agreement the flow ran the other way: Saffron had to display the Scheme's and the incubator's logos under Schedule 5's brand guidelines.

What is normal

Non-exclusive and royalty-free; name, logo and 30 to 50 words of description; corrections within 7 days; removal within 30 days of a request once the relationship ends, or 12 to 24 months after the programme's exit at the latest.

Watch out for

Perpetual or irrevocable licences; a licence over 'Company materials' rather than name and logo; no duty to update an old logo or remove you; and use that suggests the programme endorses or controls you. A licence that lasts while the accelerator holds any security can run for a decade if it never sells.

In India

Your logo is protected as a trade mark under the Trade Marks Act 1999 and as an artistic work under the Copyright Act 1957; the licence is what makes the programme's use lawful. Register the mark early: licensing an unregistered mark works by contract, but it is harder to enforce against anyone else.

Publicity rightsWhat each side may announce about the other, from the cohort and the investment to quotes and numbers, and whose approval each needs.
Also called: Announcement clause, Press and publicity

In plain English

The publicity clause decides who may say what, and when. A programme will want to announce the cohort and its investment, list you as a portfolio company and use your story in case studies. You want three things: no quote or number about you published without your written approval, a short deadline for that approval so it is not a bottleneck, and removal from lists once the relationship ends. Under a grant, publicity also runs the other way: you must acknowledge the scheme's support in your own materials.

Worked example

The accelerator could announce the cohort and the ₹30 lakh, but any quote, revenue figure, customer name or valuation needed Saffron's approval, given or refused within 3 business days. Under the SISFS agreement Saffron acknowledged the Scheme on its website, approved any case study quoting it, and attended up to two showcase events a year.

What is normal

Announcement of participation and the investment without approval; prior written approval for quotes, financials and customer names within 3 to 5 business days; removal from portfolio lists within 30 days of exit; acknowledgement of scheme support during the grant period; up to two showcase events a year.

Watch out for

Disclosure of your valuation or round size before you are ready; customer names in a programme's marketing, which may breach your customer NDAs; deemed approval if you do not reply within a day; and showcase or demo obligations with no annual cap.

In India

There is no statute on programme publicity; it is pure contract. Two outside rules matter: your customer NDAs, which usually forbid naming the customer without consent, and, for SISFS, the Scheme's right to feature beneficiaries on the Startup India Hub, which your incubator cannot waive.

Non-disparagementA promise not to make public statements that run down the other party, usually mutual and for a fixed period after the programme.
Also called: No-disparagement clause, Mutual non-disparagement

In plain English

A non-disparagement clause stops either side from publicly running down the other: no angry posts, no interviews attacking the programme, no programme staff criticising you to investors. It is reasonable if it is mutual, time-limited and protects the truth where it matters: statements required by law or to a regulator, frank answers to a prospective founder or investor who asks, and reports of harassment. A one-way clause that silences only the founder, with no end date, is a reputational shield for the programme and should be resisted.

Worked example

Deccan Launchpad's draft was mutual, ran for the programme plus 24 months, and allowed truthful statements to regulators and courts, truthful references when a prospective participant or investor asked, and good-faith reports under the POSH Act 2013. A public post in month 6 calling the mentors useless would have breached it; a frank reply to a founder who asked would not.

What is normal

Mutual; for the programme plus 12 to 24 months; carve-outs for legal and regulatory statements, truthful references on request and harassment reports; remedies limited to an injunction and proven damages, never forfeiture of shares or refund of the investment.

Watch out for

One-way clauses; no end date; no carve-out for harassment complaints; clauses that bind your employees personally, which you cannot deliver; and links to expulsion or equity forfeiture, which turn a frank review into a financial penalty.

In India

Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 is generally not engaged, since the clause restrains speech rather than trade. But a promise that tried to stop a complaint under the POSH Act 2013 or a disclosure required by law would likely be void to that extent under Section 23 as opposed to public policy.

Cohort expulsionAn accelerator's right to remove a company from the programme for non-participation or breach, and what then happens to the money and equity.
Also called: Expulsion, Removal from the programme, Non-Participation

In plain English

Programmes reserve the right to expel a company that stops turning up, breaks the code of conduct or misstated its warranties. The trigger matters less than the consequences. On expulsion the services stop and the fee is rarely refunded; the real questions are what happens to the investment and to any equity the programme holds or is still to receive. A fair clause lets the programme keep its iSAFE, which it paid for, but cancels unissued programme equity and gives you a call option at face value over programme equity already issued.

Worked example

Under Deccan Launchpad's draft, missing three of up to 14 mandatory sessions, or any residential week, was Non-Participation and allowed immediate expulsion. The ₹3 lakh fee stayed with the accelerator, the iSAFE stayed outstanding, programme equity already allotted (2 percent) was kept, and only unallotted programme equity lapsed. Expelled in week 8, Saffron would have kept a 2 percent shareholder for 7 weeks of services.

What is normal

Expulsion only after written notice and 7 to 14 days to remedy, except for fraud or harassment; the iSAFE survives; programme equity earned over the programme or callable at face value on expulsion; and a pro-rata refund of the fee for weeks not delivered.

Watch out for

Expulsion at the programme's sole discretion; vague triggers such as 'conduct prejudicial to the programme'; no cure period for a missed session; and the accelerator keeping programme equity after expelling you in week 2. Equity that cannot be taken back is the reason the fix must be in the document.

In India

Shares once allotted cannot be cancelled by a contract clause alone: taking them back needs a buyback under Section 68 or a capital reduction under Section 66 of the Companies Act 2013, or a call option the holder agreed to in advance and that is reflected in the Articles.

Seat licencePermission to use a desk or workstation in an incubator's premises for a monthly fee, without any lease, tenancy or interest in the property.
Also called: Workstation licence, Desk licence, Co-working seat

In plain English

An incubator does not rent you an office; it licenses you a seat. The difference is legal and practical: a licence lets you use named desks and common areas under the incubator's house rules, can be moved or ended on short notice, and gives you no tenancy rights. You pay a monthly fee plus GST for a fixed number of seats, with access hours and booking rules for meeting rooms and labs. It is not proof of an address for registrations unless the incubator separately issues a no-objection certificate.

Worked example

Saffron licensed two workstations in Chamundi TBI's co-working area in Mysuru for ₹5,000 a month, payable monthly in advance, with access from 8 am to 10 pm and relocation within the premises on 7 days' notice. Over the 12 months it paid ₹60,000, with no GST, since Chamundi's services as a TBI recognised by DST's NSTEDB are exempt.

What is normal

₹3,000 to ₹10,000 a month per seat at government-supported incubators, plus 18 percent GST unless the incubator's services are exempt; deposits of nil to two months' fee; relocation on 7 days' notice and termination on 30 days'; access of 12 to 14 hours a day, with extended access on request.

Watch out for

Fee increases without a cap; deposits with no refund date; the licence ending with the incubation and leaving your registered office or GST address stranded; and liability for damage by any visitor rather than only your own people.

In India

Section 52 of the Indian Easements Act 1882 defines a licence as a right to do something on another's property that creates no interest in it, so rent control and tenancy protections do not apply. The fee attracts GST at 18 percent unless the incubator is a recognised TBI or bio-incubator, and, above the rent threshold, TDS under Section 194I of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026).

Seat licence versus registered officeWhy a desk at an incubator is not automatically a lawful registered office or GST place of business, and what turns it into one.
Also called: Using the incubator's address

In plain English

Founders often assume that once they have a seat, the incubator's address can go on the company's MCA record, GST certificate and letterhead. It cannot, without more. A registered office must be a place where the company receives and acknowledges communications, backed by proof of the right to use it and an authorisation from the owner or an authorised occupant; a GST principal place of business needs similar proof. A seat licence gives a right to use a desk, often forbids using the address for registrations, and ends with the incubation.

Worked example

Saffron kept its registered office in Bengaluru and used Chamundi TBI only as a working seat in Mysuru. Moving the registered office to the TBI would have needed the TBI's no-objection certificate, a special resolution (Mysuru is outside Bengaluru's local limits), Form INC-22 within 30 days, and a second move within 60 days of leaving.

What is normal

Most incubated startups keep the registered office at a founder's or rented address and use the seat for work. Where an incubator allows its address, it issues a no-objection certificate for the incubation term, sometimes for a fee, and requires a move within 30 to 90 days of exit.

Watch out for

Putting the incubator's address on MCA or GST records without its consent; an NOC that lapses when incubation ends, forcing a rushed INC-22 and GST amendment; and statutory notices going to an address you no longer use.

In India

The MCA accepts an address the company does not own only with an authorisation from the owner or authorised occupant, proof of their right to the premises and a utility bill not older than two months, under Rule 25 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules 2014; GST registration needs similar consent for the principal place of business. A seat licence by itself satisfies neither.

NOC for registered officeThe written no-objection of the premises owner or an authorised occupant to your company using the address as its registered office, needed for MCA and GST records.
Also called: No-objection certificate, Owner's NOC, Consent letter

In plain English

If your registered office is in premises your company does not own, the MCA needs the written consent of the owner or an authorised occupant, the no-objection certificate, along with proof of the address such as a recent utility bill. At an incubator the NOC is a separate permission from the seat licence: the incubator may refuse it, charge for it, limit it to the incubation term and withdraw it when you leave. Read its conditions with the termination clause, because the day the incubation ends may be the day your registered office loses its basis.

Worked example

Chamundi TBI would issue an NOC 'on its standard terms for an additional fee', and its agreement required any NOC to be withdrawn on termination and the registered office moved within 60 days. A startup using the TBI's address would budget for a board resolution, a special resolution if leaving Mysuru, Form INC-22 and a GST amendment at exit.

What is normal

An NOC on the letterhead of the owner or authorised occupant, with a utility bill not older than two months; validity tied to the incubation term; a fee of nil to a few thousand rupees; 30 to 90 days to move after it is withdrawn.

Watch out for

Withdrawal on short notice; an NOC signed by an incubator that neither owns the premises nor can show its own occupancy authority from the owner, such as the host university's allotment letter; and no duty on the incubator to forward statutory notices that arrive after you leave.

In India

Section 12 of the Companies Act 2013 requires a company to keep a registered office and to notify any change in Form INC-22 within 30 days. Moving outside the local limits of a city or town also needs a special resolution under Section 12(5), filed in Form MGT-14 within 30 days.

Incubation extensionA longer incubation period granted on application, usually up to 6 months, to finish the approved project; it adds time, not money.
Also called: Extension of incubation, Term extension

In plain English

Projects slip. Most incubation agreements let you apply, before the term ends, for an extension so that you can reach the last milestone and keep your seat. The extension is discretionary: the incubator decides on the committee's recommendation, may attach conditions and does not increase the grant. Apply early with a clear reason, a revised plan and evidence of progress. An extension also keeps your reporting duties, your seat fee and the incubator's monitoring running for the extra months.

Worked example

Saffron's term ran 12 months to 11 June 2024. To extend, it would have had to apply by 12 April 2024, 60 days before the end, for up to 6 more months, with reasons and a revised plan, and the grant would have stayed at ₹20 lakh. It did not need one: Milestone 2 was met in January 2024.

What is normal

One extension of 3 to 6 months on written application 30 to 60 days before the term ends; no increase in the grant; seat fees and reporting continue; a second extension only in exceptional cases.

Watch out for

Missing the application window, which turns a routine request into a favour; conditions attached to the extension, such as a higher seat fee or new milestones; and undrawn tranches that lapse at the original end date whatever the extension says.

In India

Your grant comes from the incubator's own Scheme corpus, which it must account for to DPIIT on its own timetable, so extending your project does not guarantee that an undrawn tranche stays available. Ask the incubator to confirm in writing how long it does before you rely on the extension.

GraduationThe formal end of incubation once the project is complete and the final reports are accepted, recorded in a certificate and on the scheme portal.
Also called: Graduation certificate, Exit from incubation

In plain English

Graduation is the good way out of an incubator. Once the approved project is done and your final report and audited utilisation certificate are accepted, the incubator issues a certificate recording your participation, the support received and the milestones achieved, and marks you as graduated on the scheme portal. Investors, State schemes and government buyers may ask for it later. Graduation does not end everything: duties tied to the grant, such as keeping records, allowing audits and confidentiality, survive.

Worked example

In June 2024, at the end of its 12-month term, Saffron filed its final report and the audited utilisation certificate for the full ₹20 lakh, and Chamundi TBI issued its graduation certificate and recorded Saffron as graduated on the Scheme portal. Its grant records must still be kept until 2032, 8 years after the project ended.

What is normal

Graduation 12 to 24 months after entry, on completion of the project and acceptance of the final report within 30 to 60 days of the project's end; the seat may continue on commercial terms under a separate agreement.

Watch out for

Graduation made conditional on things outside the grant, such as a fee, an equity stake or a success payment; no deadline for the incubator to issue the certificate; and survival clauses that keep reporting alive for years with no end date.

In India

The incubator records each startup's status on the SISFS portal, which DPIIT and the Experts Advisory Committee use to monitor the Scheme. A graduation certificate is not a statutory document, but it is the cleanest evidence of grant compliance in later due diligence, so keep it with the utilisation certificates.

Grievance mechanismThe route for complaints about how an incubator runs a scheme: first to the incubator, then to the scheme's own grievance process, for SISFS a grievance cell at DPIIT.
Also called: Grievance redressal, Scheme grievance process

In plain English

When a tranche is delayed, a milestone is unfairly rejected or a clawback is threatened, a lawsuit is the wrong first tool. Scheme agreements set out a grievance ladder: a written complaint to the incubator's chief executive with a reply deadline, then escalation through the scheme's own grievance process, whose directions on scheme matters both parties agree to follow. Courts remain available for contractual disputes. Use the ladder in writing, keep dates, and cite the clause you rely on.

Worked example

Had the ISMC sat on Saffron's Milestone 1 report beyond the 45 days the agreement allowed, Saffron would have written to Chamundi TBI's CEO, who had 15 days to reply, and then escalated to DPIIT's grievance cell for the Scheme, citing the dates, the milestone evidence and the clause.

What is normal

A written complaint to the incubator with a reply within 15 to 30 days; escalation to the scheme's grievance process; the scheme authority's directions binding on scheme matters; courts or arbitration only for contractual disputes.

Watch out for

Clauses that make the incubator's decision 'final and binding' with no escalation; no reply deadline; and 'scheme matters' defined so widely that ordinary contract disputes, such as a seat-fee dispute, go to DPIIT rather than a court.

In India

The Scheme guidelines provide for a grievance cell at DPIIT to deal with applicants' issues such as delayed evaluation of applications and delayed disbursements by incubators (paragraph 8.10); check the Scheme portal or DPIIT for how to reach it today. Complaints about a Central department's handling of a scheme can also go to CPGRAMS, the Government of India's public grievance portal, which does not take up matters pending in court. Neither replaces your contractual remedies: the agreement's courts clause, Mysuru in Saffron's case, still governs other disputes.

Before you sign

Fifteen checks, eight for a private accelerator offer and seven for a SISFS incubation agreement, each with the reason it matters.

  1. Work out the implied valuation: the cash divided by the total percentage asked, with and without the programme's claimed in-kind value, and compare it with angel offers.
    ₹30 lakh for 7 percent implies about ₹4.29 crore, or ₹6.43 crore counting ₹15 lakh of in-kind value; Saffron's angels paid at a ₹16 crore cap seven months later.
  2. Fold any programme equity into the iSAFE cap, a nominal-amount iSAFE or warrants priced by a registered valuer, or drop it.
    Equity at face value for services is not sweat equity when the holder is not an employee or director, and it falls below the Rule 13 valuer's price for a preferential issue.
  3. Write down the cap convention: pre-money or post-money, and whether the option pool and other notes sit inside the capitalisation the cap divides.
    The offer's cap price counted any new pool in the denominator, so the pool would have come out of the founders' share; the stacking arithmetic shows the cost.
  4. Limit the follow-on right to a fixed amount in the next priced round only, and make the MFN end at that round or if the follow-on is declined.
    Open-ended MFN and follow-on rights reach into your seed round, and a declined follow-on is a signal every new investor will ask about.
  5. Confine the programme's IP rights to a licence of your name, logo and a short description, ending a fixed period after its exit.
    A licence over 'Company materials' can reach your code, and a licence that lasts while the accelerator holds any security can run for a decade.
  6. Require your prior written approval, within a short deadline, for any quote, revenue figure, customer name or valuation the programme publishes.
    Customer names are often confidential under your NDAs, and a leaked valuation can anchor your next round before you have priced it.
  7. Make sure expulsion or early exit cancels unissued programme equity and gives you a call at face value over any already allotted.
    Allotted shares cannot be cancelled by contract alone; without a call option, taking them back needs a buyback under Section 68 or a capital reduction under Section 66.
  8. Budget every fee with 18 percent GST and the TDS you must deduct, including a fee taken by set-off from the investment.
    A ₹3 lakh fee is ₹3,54,000 with GST, and missed TDS costs interest and a 30 percent disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026).
  9. Document each SISFS test as at the application date: DPIIT recognition, incorporation within 2 years, Indian promoters at 51 percent or more, other scheme support of ₹10 lakh or less, no earlier SISFS grant.
    Each test is a recital you warrant; a false one is a misuse event, with refund at interest and possible debarment, so keep the evidence in the grant file.
  10. Make every milestone objective, dated and within your control, with the proof documents listed and a deadline for the ISMC to decide.
    Your next tranche, and so your runway, waits on the committee confirming the milestone; Saffron's agreement gave the ISMC 45 days to consider each report.
  11. Read the Fund Utilisation Plan head by head, including whether founder salaries are fundable and how much you may move between heads.
    Spending outside the approved heads is the usual route to a clawback; Saffron could move 10 percent of the grant between heads with intimation, and more only with approval.
  12. Line up a practising Chartered Accountant for the utilisation certificates before the first tranche, and give them the incubator's format.
    Every later tranche is released only against a utilisation certificate from a chartered accountant with a UDIN, and books kept to the format from day one save weeks at each tranche.
  13. Diarise the reporting calendar: quarterly progress reports within 15 days of each quarter, a certificate per tranche, audited accounts and the final report.
    A late report is the easiest compliance failure to avoid, and it can hold up the next tranche while the committee waits.
  14. Do not treat the seat licence as proof of a registered office or GST address; get a separate NOC if you need one, and plan the move at exit.
    A licence to use a desk is not the authorisation to use the address that the MCA and GST officers need, and an NOC is usually withdrawn when incubation ends, starting a 30-day INC-22 clock.
  15. Confirm the clawback clause excludes honest failure and good-faith pivots, limits recovery to the amount affected and gives you a hearing first.
    Nothing in the Scheme as notified makes an honest failure a refund event, so your agreement should say so in terms, as Saffron's did.

From the offer to graduation

Ten steps from the accelerator pitch Saffron declined to its SISFS graduation, with who acts at each step and the document or filing involved.

WhenWhat happensWhoForm or document
February to March 2023Weeks after incorporation on 14 February 2023, the founders apply and pitch to Deccan Launchpad's Spring 2023 cohort, and start shortlisting government-supported incubators in parallel.Founders; the Accelerator's selection panelOnline application and pitch deck; no filing
20 to 27 March 2023The offer arrives: a 12-week cohort, ₹30 lakh through an iSAFE at a ₹6 crore cap, 2 percent programme equity at face value and a ₹3 lakh fee plus GST, open for 7 days. The programme-cost calculator shows 7 percent for ₹30 lakh implies about ₹4.29 crore.Founders and the Company's counselOffer letter and draft agreement; acceptance needed a board resolution
April 2023Saffron confirms its decline in writing. Nothing was signed, so no iSAFE, programme equity, fee or follow-on right ever arises and nothing is filed with the MCA.FoundersEmail confirming the decline; no MCA, GST or TDS filing
9 May 2023DPIIT recognises Saffron as a startup by a certificate dated 9 May 2023, which is the first eligibility test for SISFS.Founders, through the Startup India portalDPIIT recognition application and certificate of recognition
24 May to 6 June 2023Saffron applies to Chamundi TBI through the SISFS portal on 24 May 2023. The ISMC evaluates the application and the pitch and, at its meeting on 6 June 2023, selects Saffron for a ₹20 lakh grant.Founders; Chamundi TBI's ISMCSISFS application on seedfund.startupindia.gov.in; ISMC selection decision
12 June 2023The incubation agreement is signed in two stamped counterparts. Tranche 1 of ₹8 lakh arrives within 15 days in Saffron's own bank account and is booked to a separate grant ledger; two seats start at ₹5,000 a month.Both parties; Saffron's accountant sets up the grant ledgerAgreement stamped under the Karnataka Stamp Act 1957; Schedule 3 documents
September 2023Milestone 1: a working prototype deployed at one plant with a signed pilot letter. Saffron files the Milestone Completion Report and the utilisation certificate from its chartered accountant for Tranche 1, and the ISMC confirms the milestone and releases Tranche 2 of ₹7 lakh.Founders; the certifying accountant; the ISMCMilestone Completion Report; utilisation certificate with UDIN; quarterly progress report
October 2023Ritika Iyer invests ₹60 lakh through an iSAFE and Arjun Nair ₹40 lakh through a convertible note, both at a ₹16 crore cap. Saffron intimates the Incubator under the change clause and reports the ₹1 crore in its next progress report.Founders, the angels and your company secretaryPAS-4, PAS-5 and PAS-3 for the iSAFE; the note under the deposit rules' startup exemption
January 2024Milestone 2: pilot or paid agreements with two customers and a documented trial report. With the Tranche 2 utilisation certificate filed, the ISMC confirms the milestone and releases the final ₹5 lakh.Founders; the certifying accountant; the ISMCMilestone Completion Report; utilisation certificate for Tranche 2
June 2024Incubation ends on 11 June 2024. Saffron files the final report and the audited utilisation certificate for the full ₹20 lakh, returning any unspent balance with its interest; Chamundi TBI issues the graduation certificate and marks Saffron graduated on the Scheme portal.Founders; the certifying accountant; Chamundi TBIFinal report; audited utilisation certificate with UDIN; graduation certificate

How this page was put together

The BizExpress team, who handle Startup India recognition, grant compliance and filings for founders, wrote this page. Every India-specific statement was checked against the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme guidelines, DPIIT's startup notification of 4 February 2026, the Companies Act 2013, the General Financial Rules 2017, the GST law and the income tax law as they stood on 4 November 2026, and an expert reviewed each point the law turns on before publication.

The sample documents are composites: the clauses are typical of Indian startups in 2026, but Saffron Labs, its founders, its investors and every other company, fund, incubator, adviser and person in the samples are invented, as are the figures. Any resemblance to a real business is unintended. The calculators simplify on purpose.

The page is reviewed after each Union Budget and whenever a rule it relies on changes; the date of the last review sits at the top. It is general information for founders reading these documents, not advice on any particular deal.

Questions founders ask about incubators and accelerators

What is an incubation agreement?

An incubation agreement is the contract between a startup and an incubator: the incubator provides space, mentoring, services and sometimes funding, and the startup accepts its rules, reporting and any fee or equity. An accelerator agreement is the same idea for a fixed cohort, usually with a cheque and a demo day in return for equity. In India, an incubator that passes on Startup India Seed Fund Scheme money must follow the Scheme: grants of up to ₹20 lakh released against milestones, no fee in cash or in kind for selection, disbursement, incubation or monitoring, and a utilisation certificate for each tranche.

Is 7 percent for ₹30 lakh a good deal from an accelerator?

Work it out as a valuation first. ₹30 lakh for 7 percent implies a company value of about ₹4.29 crore, or ₹6.43 crore if you also count ₹15 lakh of claimed in-kind value. If the programme's 7 percent passes through a seed round and a Series A at 15 and 30 percent dilution, it becomes 4.17 percent, worth ₹4.17 crore at a ₹100 crore post-money: 13.9 times the cash. That can still be worth paying if the programme reliably gets you a seed round you would not otherwise raise. Compare it with what angels are quoting; Saffron's angels paid at a ₹16 crore cap seven months later.

Can a company give shares to an accelerator in exchange for the programme?

A company cannot easily give shares to an accelerator in exchange for the programme. Sweat equity under Section 54 of the Companies Act 2013 is only for employees and directors, so it does not fit a programme. A preferential issue under Section 62(1)(c) needs a special resolution and a registered valuer's price under Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014, and the shares must be paid for in cash or in kind at that price; equity at ₹10 face value 'for the programme' does neither. Lawful routes exist: a lower cap on a single iSAFE that prices the programme in, or shares issued for the programme services at a registered valuer's price with the services valued too; a nominal iSAFE or warrants need the same valuer-backed price.

What does the iSAFE cap mean in an accelerator deal?

The cap is the highest valuation at which the accelerator's money converts into shares. With ₹30 lakh at a ₹6 crore pre-money cap, the accelerator gets about 5 percent at conversion, or more if your seed round is priced below the cap. A cap is a ceiling, not a valuation, but a low cap is a low valuation in disguise. Check three conventions in writing: whether the cap is pre-money or post-money, whether the option pool and other notes sit inside the capitalisation it divides, and what happens at the long-stop date. The Seed Instruments Explainer works through the stacking.

What does the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme give, and who qualifies?

SISFS, run by DPIIT through approved incubators, offers up to ₹20 lakh as a grant for proof of concept, prototype development or product trials, and up to ₹50 lakh as debt or convertible instruments for market entry, commercialisation or scaling, at interest not above the repo rate. To qualify you need DPIIT recognition, incorporation not more than 2 years before you apply, a technology-based product or process with market fit, Indian promoters holding at least 51 percent, and not more than ₹10 lakh of monetary support under other Central or State schemes. Each form of support is available once. DPIIT's June 2026 playbook gave 31 May 2026 as the last date to apply; check the portal for a new window.

Is a SISFS grant taxable?

For income tax, a SISFS grant is usually taxable. Section 2(24)(xviii) of the Income-tax Act 1961 (renumbered under the Income-tax Act 2025 from 1 April 2026) treats grants from government or any authority, body or agency as income, except the part that reduces the cost of an asset, and Section 145B(3) taxes it in the year of receipt. For most startups the grant reduces a tax loss rather than creating a bill. For GST, usually no. GST applies to a supply made for consideration, and a SISFS grant buys nothing from you: neither the incubator nor DPIIT receives a service, licence or equity in return, and the progress reports you file are conditions of the grant, not something they buy, so there is no supply and your agreement should say so. Do not rely only on the CGST Act's exclusion of government subsidies, because it speaks of a subsidy given by the Central or a State Government and your money comes from the incubator. If a grant comes with a deliverable for the funder, such as a pilot, a licence or a report it will use, it can be treated as payment for a service, so take advice from a tax expert before you sign. Confirm both points for your facts with your tax expert.

Do incubators take equity?

Government-supported incubators administering SISFS do not: the Scheme gives grants and debt, and the incubator may not charge you any fee, in cash or in kind, for selection, disbursement, incubation or monitoring (paragraph 8.9 of the guidelines). Many still charge seat fees, usually ₹3,000 to ₹10,000 a month, plus GST unless the incubator is a TBI recognised by DST's NSTEDB, but a startup selected under the Scheme 'shall not be charged any fees' (paragraph 5.12), so ask why a seat fee is charged at all. Some incubators run their own equity programmes alongside, typically taking 2 to 5 percent for incubation; keep those in a separate document and never let equity become a condition of the grant. Private accelerators, by contrast, almost always take equity, often through an iSAFE plus a slice for the programme itself.

What is a utilisation certificate, and who signs it?

A utilisation certificate is a practising Chartered Accountant's certificate of how much grant you received, how much you spent under each head of the approved plan, the interest earned and the balance in hand, with a statement of expenditure and the bills behind it. It must carry a UDIN, which the incubator can verify with ICAI. Under SISFS you need one for each tranche before the next is released, and an audited one for the whole grant at the end. Line up the accountant before the first tranche lands, and keep the grant ledger in the incubator's format from day one.

What happens if we miss a milestone?

Under a fair SISFS agreement, nothing punitive. The next tranche waits until the milestone is met, or until the ISMC releases it in part or approves a revised milestone on your application. You do not refund money properly spent: an honest failure to achieve a milestone, or a good-faith change of direction notified in advance, is not misuse. What does trigger a refund with interest is spending outside the permitted heads, false reports or certificates, or diversion to founders. Under a private accelerator agreement there is usually no milestone at all; the cost of a slow start is reputational.

Can we take two government grants?

Yes, with care about order and overlap. The SISFS eligibility test looks back from your application date: if you have already received more than ₹10 lakh of monetary support under another Central or State scheme, you are out. Prize money, subsidised working space, a founder monthly allowance and lab access do not count. After the SISFS grant, other schemes may still fund you, but never the same expenses twice, and you must disclose every other grant in your progress reports. Undisclosed double funding is a misuse event, and each form of SISFS support is available only once.

Can the incubator's address be our registered office?

Only if the incubator agrees in writing. The MCA accepts an address the company does not own only with proof that you may use it, under Rule 25 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules 2014: a no-objection letter from the owner or an authorised occupant (an incubator housed in a university building can sign if it shows its own allotment or occupancy authority), or a notarised lease or rent agreement in the company's name with a rent receipt not older than one month, together with a utility bill for the premises not older than two months. A GST principal place of business needs similar consent. A seat licence is a licence to use a desk, not that consent, and many agreements forbid using the address for registrations. If the incubator does issue an NOC, expect it to end with the incubation: you will then need Form INC-22 within 30 days, and a special resolution if you move out of the city.

What should we check before demo day?

Before demo day, check four things that the accelerator agreement decides. First, the round mechanics: whether your iSAFE converts at the demo-day round and what the MFN and follow-on rights then require. Second, publicity: the deck the programme circulates should contain only numbers you have approved. Third, confidentiality: investors at a demo day sign nothing, so present nothing you would not publish. Fourth, the signalling risk: if the accelerator has a follow-on right, know before you pitch whether it intends to use it, because new investors will ask. Then tidy the basics: cap table, DPIIT certificate and the filings for any instrument already issued.

How do we find an approved incubator?

Start with the startup incubators directory on this site, which lists 3,691 incubators and accelerators across 34 States and Union Territories, with scheme tags and links to apply. Browse by State and look for the scheme tags: SISFS-approved, DST TBIs, Atal Incubation Centres, MeitY TIDE 2.0 centres. Then confirm the incubator's SISFS status and open calls on the Scheme portal at seedfund.startupindia.gov.in, because approvals and corpus availability change. Shortlist two or three in your sector, read their incubation agreement before applying, and run the Startup India Eligibility tool to confirm you meet the recognition tests first.

Want an expert to read your incubation or accelerator agreement with you?

An expert will reach out within 2 working hours. Mon to Sat, 10am to 7pm IST. Bring the clause that worries you and we pick it up from there.